scholarly journals Biochar-Ca and Biochar-Al/-Fe-Mediated Phosphate Exchange Capacity are Main Drivers of the Different Biochar Effects on Plants in Acidic and Alkaline Soils

Agronomy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Baigorri ◽  
Sara San Francisco ◽  
Óscar Urrutia ◽  
José María García-Mina
Keyword(s):  
Fertilizer Application ◽  
Exchange Capacity ◽  
Chemical Mechanism ◽  
Alkaline Soil ◽  
Alkaline Soils ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Acidic Soils ◽  
High Doses ◽  
Phosphate Exchange ◽  
Partial Desorption

Because of the low consistency of the results obtained in the field, the use of biochar as a soil amendment is controversial. Thus, in general, in acidic soils, results are positive, while in alkaline soils, they are non-significant or even negative. The results regarding biochar action in acidic soils have been related to a lime-like effect due to its alkaline pH and the high doses normally used. However, the causes of biochar effects in alkaline soils remain unknown. Our objective was to explore the chemical mechanism of biochar interaction in acidic and alkaline soils. We used well-characterized biochar as a component of two complex N and PK granulated fertilizers at two different doses (1% and 5%). These fertilizers were applied to wheat cultivated in pots containing an alkaline soil and grown for 60 days. No effect was shown for the N-biochar fertilizer application. However, the PK-biochar fertilizer application caused a decrease in crop yield. In addition, the adsorption isotherms of Al, Fe, Mo, Mn, and Phosphate (Pi) in biochar were also studied. The results showed that Fe and Al were rapidly adsorbed in biochar, while Pi was only adsorbed on the Fe-, Al-biochar complex. Desorption experiments showed that P and Fe/Al were not desorbed from the P-Fe/Al-biochar complex by water or the Olsen reagent, while partial desorption was observed when HCl 0.1 M was used. This blockage of Fe/Al and P through Fe/Al bridges in biochar could partially explain the negative effects in alkaline soils. After these studies, soil solution sorption experiments were carried out in both acidic and alkaline soils and were complemented with a greenhouse trial using tomato plants. The results showed that biochar enhanced foliar Ca and N content, as well as growth in acidic soil only, and the possible mechanism of the failure in alkaline soils.

The chemical interaction of biochar with iron and phosphate might explain the effects of biochar in alkaline and calcareous soils

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Baigorri ◽  
Óscar Urrutia ◽  
Sara San Francisco ◽  
José María García-Mina
Keyword(s):  
Chemical Interaction ◽  
Calcareous Soils ◽  
Fertilizer Application ◽  
Alkaline Soils ◽  
Alkaline Ph ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Acidic Soils ◽  
High Doses ◽  
Partial Desorption ◽  
Different Doses

<p>Due to the low consistency of the results obtained in field, the use of biochar as soil amendment is controversial. Thus, in general in acidic soils results are positive while in alkaline soils they are non-significant or even negative. The results regarding biochar action in acidic soils have been related to a lime-like effect due to its alkaline pH and the high doses normally used. However, the causes of biochar effects in alkaline soils remain unknown. We have used a well characterized biochar as a component of two complex N and PK granulated fertilizers at two different doses (1 and 5%). These fertilizers have been applied to wheat cultivated in pots containing an alkaline and calcareous soil and grown for 60 days. No effect was shown for the N-biochar fertilizer application. However, the PK-biochar fertilizer application caused a decrease in crop yield. Complementary, the absorption isotherms of Iron (Fe), Molybdenum (Mo), Manganese (Mn) and Phosphate (Pi) in biochar were also studied. The results showed that Fe was rapidly adsorbed in biochar, while Pi was only absorbed on the Fe-Biochar complex. Desorption experiments showed that P and Fe were no desorbed from the P-Fe-biochar complex by water or the Olsen reactant, while a partial desorption was observed when HCl 0.1 M was used. This blockage of Fe and P through Fe bridges in biochar could partially explain the negative effects in alkaline soils.</p>

scholarly journals Effects of corn straw biochar application on soybean growth and alkaline soil properties

BioResources ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1463-1481
Author(s):  
Defu Liu ◽  
Zhenyue Feng ◽  
Hongde Zhu ◽  
Lihe Yu ◽  
Kejun Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ph Value ◽  
Chemical Properties ◽  
Exchange Capacity ◽  
Organic Carbon Content ◽  
Alkaline Soil ◽  
Alkaline Soils ◽  
Corn Straw ◽  
Loading Level ◽  
Physico Chemical ◽  
The Impact

Pot experiments were conducted to investigate the impact of biochar loading level on soybean growth and physico-chemical properties of alkaline soil. Biochar derived from corn straw was mixed with alkaline soil at 0%, 2.5%, 5%, and 10% loading levels and exposed to the natural elements. Soybean was used as the test crop. The results indicated that a single application of biochar positively and significantly improved soybean productivity and quality attributes of the tested alkaline soil. Soybean yield peaked at 5% loading level, but it declined at 10% loading. Applications of biochar at 5% and 10% loading significantly increased total soil porosity by 4.14% and 5.09%, and decreased the soil pH value by 0.07 and 0.24 units, respectively. Biochar addition significantly increased water holding capacity, total organic carbon content, total nitrogen, Olsen-P, available potassium, and cation exchange capacity. The results indicated that applications of corn straw biochar to alkaline soil improved soybean growth and promoted the physico-chemical properties of alkaline soil. However, the negative effects of increased C:N ratios and soil exchange sodium percentages at higher biochar loading levels should be taken into account when applying biochar as amendments to alkaline soils.

Alkaline soil pH affects bulk soil, rhizosphere and root endosphere microbiomes of plants growing in a Sandhills ecosystem

2021 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Dantas Lopes ◽  
Jingjie Hao ◽  
Daniel P Schachtman
Keyword(s):  
Microbial Communities ◽  
Plant Species ◽  
Soil Ph ◽  
Soil Microbial Communities ◽  
Bulk Soil ◽  
Strong Impact ◽  
Alkaline Soil ◽  
Alkaline Soils ◽  
Soil Microbial ◽  
Soil Rhizosphere

ABSTRACT Soil pH is a major factor shaping bulk soil microbial communities. However, it is unclear whether the belowground microbial habitats shaped by plants (e.g. rhizosphere and root endosphere) are also affected by soil pH. We investigated this question by comparing the microbial communities associated with plants growing in neutral and strongly alkaline soils in the Sandhills, which is the largest sand dune complex in the northern hemisphere. Bulk soil, rhizosphere and root endosphere DNA were extracted from multiple plant species and analyzed using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Results showed that rhizosphere, root endosphere and bulk soil microbiomes were different in the contrasting soil pH ranges. The strongest impact of plant species on the belowground microbiomes was in alkaline soils, suggesting a greater selective effect under alkali stress. Evaluation of soil chemical components showed that in addition to soil pH, cation exchange capacity also had a strong impact on shaping bulk soil microbial communities. This study extends our knowledge regarding the importance of pH to microbial ecology showing that root endosphere and rhizosphere microbial communities were also influenced by this soil component, and highlights the important role that plants play particularly in shaping the belowground microbiomes in alkaline soils.

scholarly journals Archaeal Communities in a Heterogeneous Hypersaline-Alkaline Soil

Archaea ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yendi E. Navarro-Noya ◽  
César Valenzuela-Encinas ◽  
Alonso Sandoval-Yuriar ◽  
Norma G. Jiménez-Bueno ◽  
Rodolfo Marsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Species Richness ◽  
Alpha Diversity ◽  
Methanogenic Archaea ◽  
Archaeal Community ◽  
Soil Samples ◽  
Alkaline Soil ◽  
Alkaline Soils ◽  
Phylogenetic Information ◽  
Archaeal Communities ◽  
Saline Alkaline Soils

In this study the archaeal communities in extreme saline-alkaline soils of the former lake Texcoco, Mexico, with electrolytic conductivities (EC) ranging from 0.7 to 157.2 dS/m and pH from 8.5 to 10.5 were explored. Archaeal communities in the 0.7 dS/m pH 8.5 soil had the lowest alpha diversity values and were dominated by a limited number of phylotypes belonging to the mesophilic CandidatusNitrososphaera. Diversity and species richness were higher in the soils with EC between 9.0 and 157.2 dS/m. The majority of OTUs detected in the hypersaline soil were members of the Halobacteriaceae family. Novel phylogenetic branches in the Halobacteriales class were detected in the soil, and more abundantly in soil with the higher pH (10.5), indicating that unknown and uncharacterized Archaea can be found in this soil. Thirteen different genera of the Halobacteriaceae family were identified and were distributed differently between the soils.Halobiforma,Halostagnicola,Haloterrigena, andNatronomonaswere found in all soil samples. Methanogenic archaea were found only in soil with pH between 10.0 and 10.3. Retrieved methanogenic archaea belonged to the Methanosarcinales and Methanomicrobiales orders. The comparison of the archaeal community structures considering phylogenetic information (UniFrac distances) clearly clustered the communities by pH.

scholarly journals Effect of Oxytetracycline and Chlortetracycline on Bacterial Community Growth in Agricultural Soils

Agronomy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanesa Santás-Miguel ◽  
Manuel Arias-Estévez ◽  
Montserrat Díaz-Raviña ◽  
María José Fernández-Sanjurjo ◽  
Esperanza Álvarez-Rodríguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Organic Carbon ◽  
Bacterial Community ◽  
Total Organic Carbon ◽  
Agricultural Soils ◽  
Exchange Capacity ◽  
Soil Parameters ◽  
Leucine Incorporation ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Input Variables ◽  
Community Growth

Toxicity on soil bacterial community growth caused by the antibiotics oxytetracycline (OTC) and chlortetracycline (CTC) was studied in 22 agricultural soils after 1, 8 and 42 incubation days. The leucine incorporation method was used with this aim, estimating the concentration of each antibiotic which caused an inhibition of 50% in bacterial community growth (log IC50). For OTC, the mean log IC50 was 2.70, 2.81, 2.84 for each of the three incubation times, while the values were 2.05, 2.22 and 2.47 for CTC, meaning that the magnitude of OTC toxicity was similar over time, whereas it decreased significantly for CTC with incubation time. In addition, results showed that the toxicity on bacterial community growth due to CTC is significantly higher than when due to OTC. Moreover, the toxicity on bacterial community growth due to both antibiotics is dependent on soil properties. Specifically, an increase in soil pH and silt content resulted in higher toxicity of both antibiotics, while increases in total organic carbon and clay contents caused decreases in OTC and CTC toxicities. The results also show that OTC toxicity can be well predicted by means of specific equations, using the values of pH measured in KCl and those of effective cation exchange capacity as input variables. CTC toxicity may be predicted (but with low precision) using pH measured in KCl and total organic carbon. These equations may help to predict the negative effects caused by OTC and CTC on soil bacteria using easily measurable soil parameters.

Preferential nitrate immobilization in alkaline soils

Soil Research ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 737 ◽  
Author(s):  
IJ Rochester ◽  
GA Constable ◽  
DA Macleod
Keyword(s):  
Acid Soil ◽  
Nitrification Inhibitor ◽  
Biological Significance ◽  
Nitrate Assimilation ◽  
Acid Soils ◽  
Ammonium Assimilation ◽  
Potassium Nitrate ◽  
Alkaline Soil ◽  
Alkaline Soils ◽  
Nitrate Immobilization

The literature pertaining to N immobilization indicates that ammonium is immobilized in preference to nitrate. Our previous research in an alkaline clay soil has indicated substantial immobilization of nitrate. To verify the preference for immobilization of nitrate or ammonium by the microbial biomass in this and other soil types, the immobilization of ammonium and nitrate from applications of ammonium sulfate and potassium nitrate following the addition of cotton crop stubble was monitored in six soils. The preference for ammonium or nitrate immobilization was highly correlated with each soil's pH, C/N ratio and its nitrification capacity. Nitrate was immobilized in preference to ammonium in neutral and alkaline soils; ammonium was preferentially immobilized in acid soils. No assimilation of nitrate (or nitrification) occurred in the most acid soil. Similarly, little assimilation of ammonium occurred in the most alkaline soil. Two physiological pathways, the nitrate assimilation pathway and the ammonium assimilation pathway, appear to operate concurrently; the dominance of one pathway over the other is indicated by soil pH. The addition of a nitrification inhibitor to an alkaline soil enhanced the immobilization of ammonium. Recovery of 15N confirmed that N was not denitrified, but was biologically immobilized. The immobilization of 1 5 ~ and the apparent immobilization of N were similar in magnitude. The identification of preferential nitrate immobilization has profound biological significance for the cycling of N in alkaline soils.

scholarly journals Influence of long-term mineral fertilization on metal contents and properties of soil samples taken from different locations in Hesse, Germany

SOIL ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Czarnecki ◽  
R.-A. Düring
Keyword(s):  
Cation Exchange ◽  
Cation Exchange Capacity ◽  
Agricultural Soils ◽  
Mineral Fertilizer ◽  
Fertilizer Application ◽  
Exchange Capacity ◽  
Soil Samples ◽  
Residual Effects ◽  
Metal Contents

Abstract. Essential and non-essential metals occur in soils as a result of weathering, industrial processes, fertilization, and atmospheric deposition. Badly adapted cultivation of agricultural soils (declining pH value, application of unsuitable fertilizers) can enhance the mobility of metals and thereby increase their concentrations in agricultural products. As the enrichment of metals in soils occurs over long time periods, monitoring of the long-term impact of fertilization is necessary to assess metal accumulation in agricultural soils. The main objective of this study was to test the effects of different mineral fertilizer variations on soil properties (pH, Corg, and cation exchange capacity (CEC)) and pseudo-total and mobile metal contents of soils after 14 years of fertilizer application and to determine residual effects of the fertilization 8 years after cessation of fertilizer treatment. Soil samples were taken from a field experiment which was carried out at four different locations (210, 260, 360, and 620 m above sea level) in Hesse, Germany. During the study, a significant decrease in soil pH and an evident increase in soil carbon content and cation exchange capacity with fertilization were determined. The CEC of the soils was closely related to their organic C contents. Moreover, pseudo- and mobile metal (Cd, Cu, Mn, Pb, Zn) contents in the soils increased due to application of 14 years of mineral fertilizer treatments (N, P, NP, and NPK) when compared to control plots. Eight years after termination of the fertilization in the soil samples taken from soil profiles of the fertilized plots (NPK) for monitoring the residual effects of the fertilizer application, a decrease of 82.6, 54.2, 48.5, 74.4, and 56.9% in pseudo-total Cd, Cu, Mn, Pb, and Zn contents, respectively, was determined.

scholarly journals Soil aggregates indirectly influence litter carbon storage and release through soil pH in the highly alkaline soils of north China

PeerJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e7949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Yang ◽  
Jingjing Li ◽  
Yingjun Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Mass Loss ◽  
Soil Ph ◽  
North China ◽  
Soil Aggregates ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Plant Litter ◽  
Leymus Chinensis ◽  
Alkaline Soil ◽  
Alkaline Soils ◽  
Size Classes

Background Soil aggregate-size classes, structural units of soil, are the important factors regulating soil organic carbon (SOC) turnover. However, the processes of litter C mineralization and storage in different aggregates-size classes are poorly understood, especially in the highly alkaline soils of north China. Here, we ask how four different aggregate sizes influence rates of C release (Cr) and SOC storage (Cs) in response to three types of plant litter added to an un-grazed natural grassland. Methods Highly alkaline soil samples were separated into four dry aggregate classes of different sizes (2–4, 1–2, 0.25–1, and <0.25 mm). Three types of dry dead plant litter (leaf, stem, and all standing dead aboveground litter) of Leymus chinensis were added to each of the four aggregate class samples. Litter mass loss rate, Cr, and Cs were measured periodically during the 56-day incubation. Results The results showed that the mass loss in 1–2 mm aggregates was significantly greater than that in other size classes of soil aggregates on both day 28 and day 56. Macro-aggregates (1–2 mm) had the highest Cr of all treatments, whereas 0.25–1 mm aggregates had the lowest. In addition, a significant negative relationship was found between Cs/Cr and soil pH. After incubation for 28 and 56 days, the Cs was also highest in the 1–2 mm aggregates, which implied that the macro-aggregates had not only a higher CO2 release capacity, but also a greater litter C storage capacity than the micro-aggregates in the highly alkaline soils of north China.

Exchangeable Ions

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garrison Sposito
Keyword(s):  
Soil Analysis ◽  
Metal Cations ◽  
Alkaline Soils ◽  
Charge Balance ◽  
Surface Excess ◽  
Acidic Soils ◽  
Soil Humus ◽  
Proton Charge ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Particulate Soil

In Section 3.4, the cation exchange capacity, or CEC, of particulate soil humus is defined as the maximum number of moles of proton charge per kilogram that can be desorbed by a metal cation under prescribed conditions. Thus, CEC for particulate humus is equal to the maximum absolute value of the negative net proton charge. Operationally, this maximum value is measured typically as the surface excess of Ba2+ adsorbed by humus at pH 8.2 (Eq. 3.5). Extending this concept to soils, one can define the CEC as the maximum number of moles of readily exchangeablemetal cation charge per unit mass of dry soil that can be extracted under prescribed conditions. In this more general context, CEC refers to metal cations that adsorb on soil particles in either outer sphere surface complexes or the diffuse ion swarm (Fig. 7.2). In alkaline soils, the common readily exchangeable cations are Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, and K+, whereas in acidic soils, this group expands to include Al3+, and its complexes AlOH2+, Al(OH)2+, and AlSO+4. Following the operational paradigm for soil humus, one concludes that the measurement of soil CEC involves not only the desorption of protons, but also the replacement of the population of readily exchangeable adsorbed metal cations at a selected pH value (usually pH 7–8) by a chosen cation. Laboratory procedures for measuring CEC are described in Methods of Soil Analysis, listed in For Further Reading at the end of this chapter. In alkaline soils, the replacing cation chosen is often Na+ or Ca2+, whereas in acidic soils and for soil humus, the replacing cation of choice is Ba2+. These cations, in turn, are typically displaced from soil particle surfaces by Mg2+ to measure the surface excess. A conceptual definition of CEC can be developed in terms of the surface charge balance concepts introduced in Chapter 7. Consider first a soil in which a net positive surface excess of anions does not occur, such as the Mollisol example discussed in Section 8.1. In this case, the only adsorbed ions are Ca2+ and Cl-. The CEC of this soil may be defined by a special case of the charge-balance condition in Eq. 7.3a: ∆qex (max) ≡ CEC

Lime chlorosis and other factors affecting the distribution of Eucalyptus on coastal sands in Southern Australia

1967 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 95 ◽  
Author(s):  
RF Parsons ◽  
RL Specht
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Growth Rates ◽  
The Other ◽  
Alkaline Soils ◽  
Acidic Soils ◽  
Calcareous Sand ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Physiological Tolerance ◽  
Calcareous Sands ◽  
Beach Sands

In southern Australia, deep calcareous and deep siliceous sands each carry a distinctive assemblage of eucalypts. Three of these species with contrasting edaphic ranges were investigated: Eucalyptus baxteri, which is widespread on acidic soils and is never found on highly alkaline soils like the calcareous sands; E. incrassata, which is widespread on acidic and neutral soils, occurs occasionally on some highly alkaline soils, but is also absent from calcareous beach sands; and E. diversifolia, which is found on both acidic and highly alkaline soils and is widespread on calcareous beach sands. All three species occur on siliceous sands, with E. baxteri in wetter areas than the other two species. Comparative pot experiments in which typical calcareous and siliceous sands were used showed that: (1) E. baxteri is stunted by severe lime chlorosis when grown on calcareous sand, while the other two species are not affected. (2) E. baxteri markedly outyields the other two species on siliceous sands. It is suggested that E. baxteri is absent from calcareous sands because it is physiologically intolerant of highly alkaline soils, and that E. baxteri replaces the other two species on the wetter siliceous sands because its faster growth rate enables it to outcompete them when rainfall is adequate. However, the slower growth rates of E. diversifolia and E. incrassata will be accompanied by slower rates of water use and this may give them an advantage over E. baxteri on drier siliceous sands. The wide edaphic range of E. diversifolia is considered to be the outcome of the wide physiological tolerance of individual plants rather than of intraspecific differentiation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document