scholarly journals DNA Repair Biosensor-Identified DNA Damage Activities of Endophyte Extracts from Garcinia cowa

Biomolecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1680
Author(s):  
Tassanee Lerksuthirat ◽  
Rakkreat Wikiniyadhanee ◽  
Sermsiri Chitphuk ◽  
Wasana Stitchantrakul ◽  
Somponnat Sampattavanich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Fluorescent Proteins ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Focus Formation ◽  
Dna Damage And Repair ◽  
Biological Compounds ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Garcinia Cowa

Recent developments in chemotherapy focus on target-specific mechanisms, which occur only in cancer cells and minimize the effects on normal cells. DNA damage and repair pathways are a promising target in the treatment of cancer. In order to identify novel compounds targeting DNA repair pathways, two key proteins, 53BP1 and RAD54L, were tagged with fluorescent proteins as indicators for two major double strand break (DSB) repair pathways: non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). The engineered biosensor cells exhibited the same DNA repair properties as the wild type. The biosensor cells were further used to investigate the DNA repair activities of natural biological compounds. An extract from Phyllosticta sp., the endophyte isolated from the medicinal plant Garcinia cowa Roxb. ex Choisy, was tested. The results showed that the crude extract induced DSB, as demonstrated by the increase in the DNA DSB marker γH2AX. The damaged DNA appeared to be repaired through NHEJ, as the 53BP1 focus formation in the treated fraction was higher than in the control group. In conclusion, DNA repair-based biosensors are useful for the preliminary screening of crude extracts and biological compounds for the identification of potential targeted therapeutic drugs.

scholarly journals Mutational signatures are jointly shaped by DNA damage and repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadezda V. Volkova ◽  
Bettina Meier ◽  
Víctor González-Huici ◽  
Simone Bertolini ◽  
Santiago Gonzalez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Mutational Signatures ◽  
Dna Damage And Repair ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Dna Repair Deficiency ◽  
Dna Alterations ◽  
Repair Pathways

AbstractCells possess an armamentarium of DNA repair pathways to counter DNA damage and prevent mutation. Here we use C. elegans whole genome sequencing to systematically quantify the contributions of these factors to mutational signatures. We analyse 2,717 genomes from wild-type and 53 DNA repair defective backgrounds, exposed to 11 genotoxins, including UV-B and ionizing radiation, alkylating compounds, aristolochic acid, aflatoxin B1, and cisplatin. Combined genotoxic exposure and DNA repair deficiency alters mutation rates or signatures in 41% of experiments, revealing how different DNA alterations induced by the same genotoxin are mended by separate repair pathways. Error-prone translesion synthesis causes the majority of genotoxin-induced base substitutions, but averts larger deletions. Nucleotide excision repair prevents up to 99% of point mutations, almost uniformly across the mutation spectrum. Our data show that mutational signatures are joint products of DNA damage and repair and suggest that multiple factors underlie signatures observed in cancer genomes.

scholarly journals PDTM-41. INHIBITION OF DNA DOUBLE STRAND BREAK REPAIR PATHWAYS AS A PROMISING THERAPEUTIC TARGET IN DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMAS (DIPGs)

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi196-vi196
Author(s):  
Sharmistha Pal ◽  
Jie Bian ◽  
Brendan Price ◽  
Dipanjan Chowdhury ◽  
Daphne Haas-Kogan
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Gliomas ◽  
Pathway Inhibition

Abstract New approaches to the treatment of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs) are desperately needed. DNA damage response is essential for cells to maintain genome integrity as DNA is damaged by both endogenous and exogenous stressors. Many cancer cells exhibit hyper-dependency on specific DNA repair pathways due to either defects in DNA repair mechanisms and/or high levels of endogenous stress leading to accumulation of DNA damage lesions. Identification of DIPG-specific DNA repair deficiencies and resultant dependencies may establish novel therapeutic strategies for DIPGs. METHODS To identify pathways critical for DIPG cell survival, genome wide CRISPR-Cas9 screen was performed on patient derived DIPG cell lines followed by gene set enrichment analyses. To monitor the effects of pathway inhibition on survival, apoptosis, DNA damage and repair, assays were performed to measure cell proliferation, cleaved-caspase3, gamma-H2AX and reporter based-DNA repair efficiency. RESULTS Our unbiased CRISPR approach to uncover vulnerabilities in DIPGs identified DNA double strand break (DSBs) repair pathways as essential for DIPG cell proliferation and survival. Further studies revealed high basal DSBs in DIPG cells compared to neural stem cells and primary astrocytes that suggest dependence of DIPG cell survival on specific DSB repair pathways. We confirmed the intrinsic reliance of DIPG cells on the specific DSB repair pathway of mutagenic end-joining, and defined a key role for DNA repair in suppressing endogenous DNA damage-induced apoptotic cell death. CONCLUSION DIPG cells have high endogenous DNA damage levels and escape catastrophic genomic instability and cell death by engaging DNA repair pathways, in particular the mutagenic end-joining DNA repair pathway. Inhibition of this specific DNA repair pathway represents a promising new avenue for the treatment of DIPGs.

scholarly journals PHF2 regulates homology-directed DNA repair by controlling the resection of DNA double strand breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (9) ◽  
pp. 4915-4927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio Alonso-de Vega ◽  
Maria Cristina Paz-Cabrera ◽  
Magdalena B Rother ◽  
Wouter W Wiegant ◽  
Cintia Checa-Rodríguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Double Strand Break Repair ◽  
Focus Formation ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Break Repair

Abstract Post-translational histone modifications and chromatin remodelling play a critical role controlling the integrity of the genome. Here, we identify histone lysine demethylase PHF2 as a novel regulator of the DNA damage response by regulating DNA damage-induced focus formation of 53BP1 and BRCA1, critical factors in the pathway choice for DNA double strand break repair. PHF2 knockdown leads to impaired BRCA1 focus formation and delays the resolution of 53BP1 foci. Moreover, irradiation-induced RPA phosphorylation and focus formation, as well as localization of CtIP, required for DNA end resection, to sites of DNA lesions are affected by depletion of PHF2. These results are indicative of a defective resection of double strand breaks and thereby an impaired homologous recombination upon PHF2 depletion. In accordance with these data, Rad51 focus formation and homology-directed double strand break repair is inhibited in cells depleted for PHF2. Importantly, we demonstrate that PHF2 knockdown decreases CtIP and BRCA1 protein and mRNA levels, an effect that is dependent on the demethylase activity of PHF2. Furthermore, PHF2-depleted cells display genome instability and are mildly sensitive to the inhibition of PARP. Together these results demonstrate that PHF2 promotes DNA repair by homologous recombination by controlling CtIP-dependent resection of double strand breaks.

scholarly journals Bilirubin-Induced Oxidative Stress Leads to DNA Damage in the Cerebellum of Hyperbilirubinemic Neonatal Mice and Activates DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Pathways in Human Cells

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vipin Rawat ◽  
Giulia Bortolussi ◽  
Silvia Gazzin ◽  
Claudio Tiribelli ◽  
Andrés F. Muro
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Adaptive Responses ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Bilirubin Toxicity ◽  
The Brain

Unconjugated bilirubin is considered a potent antioxidant when present at moderate levels. However, at high concentrations, it produces severe neurological damage and death associated with kernicterus due to oxidative stress and other mechanisms. While it is widely recognized that oxidative stress by different toxic insults results in severe damage to cellular macromolecules, especially to DNA, no data are available either on DNA damage in the brain triggered by hyperbilirubinemia during the neonatal period or on the activation of DNA repair mechanisms. Here, using a mouse model of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, we demonstrated that DNA damage occurs in vivo in the cerebellum, the brain region most affected by bilirubin toxicity. We studied the mechanisms associated with potential toxic action of bilirubin on DNA in in vitro models, which showed significant increases in DNA damage when neuronal and nonneuronal cells were treated with 140 nM of free bilirubin (Bf), as determined by γH2AX Western blot and immunofluorescence analyses. Cotreatment of cells with N-acetyl-cysteine, a potent oxidative-stress inhibitor, prevented DNA damage by bilirubin, supporting the concept that DNA damage was caused by bilirubin-induced oxidative stress. Bilirubin treatment also activated the main DNA repair pathways through homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), which may be adaptive responses to repair bilirubin-induced DNA damage. Since DNA damage may be another important factor contributing to neuronal death and bilirubin encephalopathy, these results contribute to the understanding of the mechanisms associated with bilirubin toxicity and may be of relevance in neonates affected with severe hyperbilirubinemia.

scholarly journals PHF2 regulates homology-directed DNA repair by controlling the resection of DNA double strand breaks

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio Alonso-de Vega ◽  
M. Cristina Paz-Cabrera ◽  
Wouter W. Wiegant ◽  
Cintia Checa-Rodríguez ◽  
Pablo Huertas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Double Strand Break Repair ◽  
Focus Formation ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Knock Down

ABSTRACTPost-translational histone modifications and chromatin remodelling play a critical role in the mechanisms controlling the integrity of the genome. Here we identify histone lysine demethylase PHF2 as a novel regulator of the DNA damage response by regulating the balance between DNA damage-induced focus formation by 53BP1 and BRCA1, critical factors in the pathway choice for DNA double strand break repair. PHF2 knock down leads to impaired BRCA1 focus formation and delays the resolution of 53BP1 foci. Moreover, irradiation-induced RPA phosphorylation and focus formation, as well as localization of CtIP, required for DNA end resection, to sites of DNA lesions are affected by depletion of PHF2. These results are indicative of a defective resection of double strand breaks and thereby an impaired homologous recombination upon PHF2 depletion. In accordance with these data, Rad51 focus formation and homology-directed double strand break repair is inhibited in cells depleted for PHF2. Importantly, we demonstrate that PHF2 knock down decreases CtIP and BRCA1 protein and mRNA levels and cells depleted of PHF2 display genome instability and are sensitive to the inhibition of PARP. Together these results demonstrate that PHF2 promotes DNA repair by homologous recombination by controlling CtIP-dependent resection of double strand breaks.

scholarly journals Systematic analysis of mutational spectra associated with DNA repair deficiency in C. elegans

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Meier ◽  
NV Volkova ◽  
Y Hong ◽  
S Bertolini ◽  
V González-Huici ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Structural Variants ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Mutational Spectra ◽  
Base Substitutions ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Complex Structural

AbstractGenome integrity is particularly important in germ cells to faithfully preserve genetic information across generations. As yet little is known about the contribution of various DNA repair pathways to prevent mutagenesis. Using the C. elegans model we analyse mutational spectra that arise in wild-type and 61 DNA repair and DNA damage response mutants cultivated over multiple generations. Overall, 44% of lines show >2-fold increased mutagenesis with a broad spectrum of mutational outcomes including changes in single or multiple types of base substitutions induced by defects in base excision or nucleotide excision repair, or elevated levels of 50-400 bp deletions in translesion polymerase mutants rev-3(pol ζ) and polh-1(pol η). Mutational signatures associated with defective homologous recombination fall into two classes: 1) mutants lacking brc-1/BRCA1 or rad-51/RAD51 paralogs show elevated base substitutions, indels and structural variants, while 2) deficiency for MUS-81/MUS81 and SLX-1/SLX1 nucleases, and HIM-6/BLM, HELQ-1/HELQ and RTEL-1/RTEL1 helicases primarily cause structural variants. Genome-wide investigation of mutagenesis patterns identified elevated rates of tandem duplications often associated with inverted repeats in helq-1 mutants, and a unique pattern of ‘translocation’ events involving homeologous sequences in rip-1 paralog mutants. atm-1/ATM DNA damage checkpoint mutants harboured complex structural variants enriched in subtelomeric regions, and chromosome end-to-end fusions. Finally, while inactivation of the p53-like gene cep-1 did not affect mutagenesis, combined brc-1 cep-1 deficiency displayed increased, locally clustered mutagenesis. In summary, we provide a global view of how DNA repair pathways prevent germ cell mutagenesis.

scholarly journals DDX11 loss causes replication stress and pharmacologically exploitable DNA repair defects

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (17) ◽  
pp. e2024258118
Author(s):  
Nanda Kumar Jegadesan ◽  
Dana Branzei
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Focus Formation ◽  
Chemotherapy Drug

DDX11 encodes an iron–sulfur cluster DNA helicase required for development, mutated, and overexpressed in cancers. Here, we show that loss of DDX11 causes replication stress and sensitizes cancer cells to DNA damaging agents, including poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and platinum drugs. We find that DDX11 helicase activity prevents chemotherapy drug hypersensitivity and accumulation of DNA damage. Mechanistically, DDX11 acts downstream of 53BP1 to mediate homology-directed repair and RAD51 focus formation in manners nonredundant with BRCA1 and BRCA2. As a result, DDX11 down-regulation aggravates the chemotherapeutic sensitivity of BRCA1/2-mutated cancers and resensitizes chemotherapy drug–resistant BRCA1/2-mutated cancer cells that regained homologous recombination proficiency. The results further indicate that DDX11 facilitates recombination repair by assisting double strand break resection and the loading of both RPA and RAD51 on single-stranded DNA substrates. We propose DDX11 as a potential target in cancers by creating pharmacologically exploitable DNA repair vulnerabilities.

Motor Coordination in Space: An Analysis of the Effects of Microgravity on XRCCI DNA Repair Protein Function

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishruth Nagam
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Protein Function ◽  
Motor Coordination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Single Strand Break ◽  
Single Strand Break Repair ◽  
Repair Protein ◽  
Mature Neurons ◽  
Microgravity Conditions

Abstract While in space, astronauts have been known to face exposure to stressors that may increase susceptibility to DNA damage. If DNA repair proteins are defective or nonexistent, DNA mutations may accumulate, causing increasingly abnormal function as one ages [1]. The DNA single-strand break repair protein XRCC1 is important for cerebellar neurogenesis and interneuron development [2]. According to previous studies, a deficiency of XRCC1 can lead to an increase in DNA damage, in mature neurons, and ataxia (a progressive loss of motor coordination) [2]. I propose to address how XRCC1’s efficiency can change in microgravity conditions. This experiment’s relevance is underscored by the importance of motor coordination and physical fitness for astronauts; determining the potential effects of microgravity on XRCC1 is crucial for future space exploration.

Variability in DNA repair and individual susceptibility to genotoxins

1995 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 1848-1853 ◽  
Author(s):  
S A Kyrtopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Protective Role ◽  
Interindividual Variation ◽  
Human Populations ◽  
Cytostatic Drugs ◽  
Dna Damage And Repair ◽  
Cellular Protection ◽  
Methylated Dna ◽  
Methylating Agents

Abstract DNA repair is an important mechanism of cellular protection from the effects of genotoxic chemicals. Although extensive evidence from studies in experimental systems indicates that variation in DNA repair can significantly influence susceptibility to genotoxins, corresponding studies in human populations are so far limited, mainly because of methodological difficulties. One system, using observations of the accumulation and repair of DNA damage in cancer patients treated with alkylating cytostatic drugs, has provided useful information for assessing the effects of interindividual variation in DNA repair activity on the induction of genotoxic effects in humans. The most detailed studies of this kind have been carried out on patients with cancer (i.e., Hodgkin disease, malignant melanoma) treated with the methylating cytostatic drugs procarbazine or dacarbazine; these studies have provided detailed information on dose-response relationships. They have also demonstrated the protective role of the repair enzyme O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase against the accumulation of the premutagenic methylated DNA lesion O6-methylguanine in patients' DNA. Given the strong evidence that exposure of the general population to environmental methylating agents may be extensive, as indicated by the frequent discovery of methylated DNA adducts in human DNA, data on DNA damage and repair in alkylating drug-treated patients and their modulation by host factors may prove useful in efforts to assess the possible carcinogenic risks posed by exposure to environmental methylating agents.

scholarly journals The Radiobiological Effects of Proton Beam Therapy: Impact on DNA Damage and Repair

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eirini Terpsi Vitti ◽  
Jason L Parsons
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Proton Beam ◽  
Bragg Peak ◽  
Proton Beam Therapy ◽  
High Energy ◽  
High Let ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Radiobiological Effects ◽  
Photon Radiotherapy

Proton beam therapy (PBT) offers significant benefit over conventional (photon) radiotherapy for the treatment of a number of different human cancers, largely due to the physical characteristics. In particular, the low entrance dose and maximum energy deposition in depth at a well-defined region, the Bragg peak, can spare irradiation of proximal healthy tissues and organs at risk when compared to conventional radiotherapy using high-energy photons. However, there are still biological uncertainties reflected in the relative biological effectiveness that varies along the track of the proton beam as a consequence of the increases in linear energy transfer (LET). Furthermore, the spectrum of DNA damage induced by protons, particularly the generation of complex DNA damage (CDD) at high-LET regions of the distal edge of the Bragg peak, and the specific DNA repair pathways dependent on their repair are not entirely understood. This knowledge is essential in understanding the biological impact of protons on tumor cells, and ultimately in devising optimal therapeutic strategies employing PBT for greater clinical impact and patient benefit. Here, we provide an up-to-date review on the radiobiological effects of PBT versus photon radiotherapy in cells, particularly in the context of DNA damage. We also review the DNA repair pathways that are essential in the cellular response to PBT, with a specific focus on the signaling and processing of CDD induced by high-LET protons.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document