scholarly journals Nationwide Population-Based Epidemiological Study for Outcomes of Adjunctive Steroid Therapy in Pediatric Patients with Bacterial Meningitis in Taiwan

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 6386
Author(s):  
Dong-Yi Hsieh ◽  
Yun-Ru Lai ◽  
Chia-Yi Lien ◽  
Wen-Neng Chang ◽  
Chih-Cheng Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Meningitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Steroid Therapy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Acute Bacterial Meningitis ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Steroid Group ◽  
Empirical Antibiotics

Although corticosteroids can serve as an effective anti-inflammatory adjuvant therapy, the role of adjunctive steroid therapy in pediatric bacterial meningitis in Taiwan remains under-investigated. Cases of acute bacterial meningitis, aged between 1 month and 20 years, were divided into a steroid group (empirical antibiotics with adjunctive steroid therapy) and a non-steroid group (empirical antibiotics only). Data were identified from the annual hospitalization discharge claims of the National Health Insurance Research Database using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Of the 8083 episodes enrolled in this study, 26% (2122/8083) and 74% (5961/8083) were divided into the steroid and non-steroid groups, respectively. The fatality rates were 7.9% in the steroid group and 1.7% in the non-steroid group during hospitalization (p < 0.0001). In the steroid and non-steroid groups, the median length of hospital stay was 13 and 6 days, respectively (p < 0.0001). Medical costs (median (interquartile range)) of hospitalization were 77,941 (26,647–237,540) and 26,653 (14,287–53,421) New Taiwan dollars in the steroid and non-steroid groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). The steroid group had a more fulminant course at baseline, a higher fatality rate, length of hospital stay, and medical cost of hospitalization. Therefore, the beneficial effects of the adjunctive use of corticosteroids in pediatric bacterial meningitis are inconclusive, and additional prospective multicenter investigations are required to clarify this issue.

scholarly journals 1464. Adjuvant Systemic Steroid Therapy and Length of Hospital Stay in Pneumonia Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Community Hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S733-S734
Author(s):  
Rattanaporn Mahatanan
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Steroid Therapy ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Systemic Steroid ◽  
Inpatient Mortality ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Class Iv

Abstract Background Pneumonia is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide resulting in a substantial healthcare expenditure. Antimicrobial agents are the main treatment. Recent studies showed the benefits of steroid therapy as an adjuvant therapy for patients with pneumonia; however, the overall evidence is still controversial. Methods Electronic medical records of hospitalized patients (age &gt;18) at a community hospital in a rural Maine with the discharge diagnosis of pneumonia in 2015 and 2016 were reviewed. Demographics, comorbidities, physical examination, initial laboratory, and Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) were collected for each patient. The exposure was a systemic steroid administered by either oral or intravenous. The outcomes included length of hospital stay (LOS), inpatient mortality, and transfer to tertiary care center. Competing-risks regression was utilized to examine the association between steroid and LOS. Multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for propensity score was used for other outcomes. Results A total of 414 patients were included. 277(63%) patients received systemic steroids. Overall, steroid use was significantly associated with shorter LOS (HR 1.26, 95%CI 1.03-1.54, p=0.02) and decrease inpatient mortality (OR 0.11, 95%CI 0.03-0.45, p&lt; 0.01). In subgroup analysis, steroid associated with shorter LOS only in patients with PSI class IV (HR 1.38, 95%CI 1.02-1.89, p=0.04) and PSI class V (HR 2.04, 95%CI 1.11-3.74, p=0.02). There was an association of steroid and shorter LOS in subgroup of COPD patients (HR 1.42, 95%CI 1.02-1.97, p=0.03). Table 1: The baseline characteristics of hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of pneumonia who received steroid vs non-steroid Figure 1: Subgroup analysis the effect of steroid and lenght of hospital stay (LOS) Conclusion Our study concluded that adjuvant steroid therapy associated with a decrease in length of hospital stay and improved inpatient mortality in hospitalized pneumonia patients. Steroid was most beneficial to those with severe pneumonia (PSI class IV-V) and COPD patients. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Association Between Chinese Herbal Medicine Therapy and the Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease in Gout Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan-Zhuan Xiao ◽  
Zhi-Zhong Ye ◽  
Yuan-Tong Liang ◽  
Xin-Peng Chen ◽  
Yu-Hsun Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Herbal Medicine ◽  
Chinese Herbal Medicine ◽  
Conditional Logistic Regression ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Chinese Herbal ◽  
Incidence Of Ckd

Background: Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) has been nationally and globally used in treating gout for over a millennium. The potential relationship between the incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in gout patients and CHM therapy is unclear. Thus, this study aimed to provide some evidence regarding the relationship between CHM therapy and the occurrence of CKD in gout patients.Methods: We used data from the National Health Insurance Research database (NHIRD) in Taiwan. In this population-based nested case-control study, all participants were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9). Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of the risk of CKD in gout patients treated with CHM therapy.Results: Data on 1718 gout patients with CKD and 1:1 matched 1718 gout patients without CKD were collected for analysis. The results showed that CHM therapy in gout patients did not increase the risk of developing CKD (adjusted OR = 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86–1.18; p &gt; 0.05). Moreover, CHM therapy in gout patients for &gt;365 days did not increase the incidence of CKD (adjusted OR = 1.30; 95% CI: 0.90–1.88; p = 0.162).Conclusion: Traditional CHM therapy does not increase the incidence of CKD in gout patients.

scholarly journals Association between neuraxial anaesthesia or general anaesthesia for lower limb revascularisation surgery in adults and clinical outcomes: population based comparative effectiveness study

BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m4104
Author(s):  
Derek J Roberts ◽  
Sudhir K Nagpal ◽  
Dalibor Kubelik ◽  
Timothy Brandys ◽  
Henry T Stelfox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Instrumental Variable ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Neuraxial Anaesthesia ◽  
Renal Complications ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness Study

Abstract Objective To examine the associations between neuraxial anaesthesia or general anaesthesia and clinical outcomes, length of hospital stay, and readmission in adults undergoing lower limb revascularisation surgery. Design Comparative effectiveness study using linked, validated, population based databases. Setting Ontario, Canada, 1 April 2002 to 31 March 2015. Participants 20 988 patients Ontario residents aged 18 years or older who underwent their first lower limb revascularisation surgery in hospitals performing 50 or more of these surgeries annually. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was 30 day all cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital cardiopulmonary and renal complications, length of hospital stay, and 30 day readmissions. Multivariable, mixed effects regression models, adjusting for patient, procedural, and hospital characteristics, were used to estimate associations between anaesthetic technique and outcomes. Robustness of analyses were evaluated by conducting instrumental variable, propensity score matched, and survival sensitivity analyses. Results Of 20 988 patients who underwent lower limb revascularisation surgery, 6453 (30.7%) received neuraxial anaesthesia and 14 535 (69.3%) received general anaesthesia. The percentage of neuraxial anaesthesia use ranged from 0.6% to 90.6% across included hospitals. Furthermore, use of neuraxial anaesthesia declined by 17% over the study period. Death within 30 days occurred in 204 (3.2%) patients who received neuraxial anaesthesia and 646 (4.4%) patients who received general anaesthesia. After multivariable, multilevel adjustment, use of neuraxial anaesthesia compared with use of general anaesthesia was associated with decreased 30 day mortality (absolute risk reduction 0.72%, 95% confidence interval 0.65% to 0.79%; odds ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.83; number needed to treat to prevent one death=139). A similar direction and magnitude of association was found in instrumental variable, propensity score matched, and survival analyses. Use of neuraxial anaesthesia compared with use of general anaesthesia was also associated with decreased in-hospital cardiopulmonary and renal complications (odds ratio 0.73, 0.63 to 0.85) and a reduced length of hospital stay (−0.5 days, −0.3 to−0.6 days). Conclusions Use of neuraxial anaesthesia compared with general anaesthesia for lower limb revascularisation surgery was associated with decreased 30 day mortality and hospital length of stay. These findings might have been related to reduced cardiopulmonary and renal complications after neuraxial anaesthesia and support the increased use of neuraxial anaesthesia in patients undergoing these surgeries until the results of a large, confirmatory randomised trial become available.

scholarly journals Severity of hyperoxia as a risk factor in patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-158
Author(s):  
Gabrielius Jakutis ◽  
Ieva Norkienė ◽  
Donata Ringaitienė ◽  
Tomas Jovaiša
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Bypass ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Elective Cardiac Surgery ◽  
The Impact

Background. Hyperoxia has long been perceived as a desirable or at least an inevitable part of cardiopulmonary bypass. Recent evidence suggest that it might have multiple detrimental effects on patient homeostasis. The aim of the study was to identify the determinants of supra-physiological values of partial oxygen pressure during on-pump cardiac surgery and to assess the impact of hyperoxia on clinical outcomes. Materials and methods. Retrospective data analysis of the institutional research database was performed to evaluate the effects of hyperoxia in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, 246 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients were divided in three groups: mild hyperoxia (MHO, PaO2 100–199 mmHg), moderate hyperoxia (MdHO, PaO2 200–299 mmHg), and severe hyperoxia (SHO, PaO2 >300 mmHg). Postoperative complications and outcomes were defined according to standardised criteria of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Results. The extent of hyperoxia was more immense in patients with a lower body mass index (p = 0.001) and of female sex (p = 0.005). A significant link between severe hyperoxia and a higher incidence of infectious complications (p – 0.044), an increased length of hospital stay (p – 0.044) and extended duration of mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001) was confirmed. Conclusions. Severe hyperoxia is associated with an increased incidence of postoperative infectious complications, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and increased hospital stay.

scholarly journals Progress of Diabetic Severity and Risk of Dementia

2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (8) ◽  
pp. 2899-2908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Che Chiu ◽  
Wen-Chao Ho ◽  
Ding-Lieh Liao ◽  
Meng-Hung Lin ◽  
Chih-Chiang Chiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Severity Index ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Population Based ◽  
International Classification ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
New Onset

Context: Diabetes is a risk factor for dementia, but the effects of diabetic severity on dementia are unclear. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the severity and progress of diabetes and the risk of dementia. Design and Setting: We conducted a 12-year population-based cohort study of new-onset diabetic patients from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The diabetic severity was evaluated by the adapted Diabetes Complications Severity Index (aDCSI) from the prediabetic period to the end of follow-up. Cox proportional hazard regressions were used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) of the scores and change in the aDCSI. Participants: Participants were 431,178 new-onset diabetic patients who were older than 50 years and had to receive antidiabetic medications. Main Outcome: Dementia cases were identified by International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, code (International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, codes 290.0, 290.1, 290.2, 290.3, 290.4, 294.1, 331.0), and the date of the initial dementia diagnosis was used as the index date. Results: The scores and change in the aDCSI were associated with the risk of dementia when adjusting for patient factors, comorbidity, antidiabetic drugs, and drug adherence. At the end of the follow-up, the risks for dementia were 1.04, 1.40, 1.54, and 1.70 (P &lt; .001 for trend) in patients with an aDCSI score of 1, 2, 3, and greater than 3, respectively. Compared with the mildly progressive patients, the adjusted HRs increased as the aDCSI increased (2 y HRs: 1.30, 1.53, and 1.97; final HRs: 2.38, 6.95, and 24.0 with the change in the aDCSI score per year: 0.51–1.00, 1.01–2.00, and &gt; 2.00 vs &lt; 0.50 with P &lt; .001 for trend). Conclusions: The diabetic severity and progression reflected the risk of dementia, and the early change in the aDCSI could predict the risk of dementia in new-onset diabetic patients.

scholarly journals Statin Use and COVID-19 Infectivity and Severity in South Korea: Two Population-Based Nationwide Cohort Studies (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Won Lee ◽  
So Young Kim ◽  
Sung Yong Moon ◽  
In Kyung Yoo ◽  
Eun-Gyong Yoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Adjusted Relative Risk ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Independent Population ◽  
Statin Use

BACKGROUND Basic studies suggest that statins as add-on therapy may benefit patients with COVID-19; however, real-world evidence of such a beneficial association is lacking. OBJECTIVE We investigated differences in SARS-CoV-2 test positivity and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 (composite endpoint: admission to intensive care unit, invasive ventilation, or death) between statin users and nonusers. METHODS Two independent population-based cohorts were analyzed, and we investigated the differences in SARS-CoV-2 test positivity and severe clinical outcomes of COVID-19, such as admission to the intensive care unit, invasive ventilation, or death, between statin users and nonusers. One group comprised an unmatched cohort of 214,207 patients who underwent SARS-CoV-2 testing from the Global Research Collaboration Project (GRCP)-COVID cohort, and the other group comprised an unmatched cohort of 74,866 patients who underwent SARS-CoV-2 testing from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS)-COVID cohort. RESULTS The GRCP-COVID cohort with propensity score matching had 29,701 statin users and 29,701 matched nonusers. The SARS-CoV-2 test positivity rate was not associated with statin use (statin users, 2.82% [837/29,701]; nonusers, 2.65% [787/29,701]; adjusted relative risk [aRR] 0.97; 95% CI 0.88-1.07). Among patients with confirmed COVID-19 in the GRCP-COVID cohort, 804 were statin users and 1573 were matched nonusers. Statin users were associated with a decreased likelihood of severe clinical outcomes (statin users, 3.98% [32/804]; nonusers, 5.40% [85/1573]; aRR 0.62; 95% CI 0.41-0.91) and length of hospital stay (statin users, 23.8 days; nonusers, 26.3 days; adjusted mean difference –2.87; 95% CI –5.68 to –0.93) than nonusers. The results of the NHIS-COVID cohort were similar to the primary results of the GRCP-COVID cohort. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that prior statin use is related to a decreased risk of worsening clinical outcomes of COVID-19 and length of hospital stay but not to that of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

scholarly journals Comparison of clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgery for left-sided colon cancer: a nationwide population-based study

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Min Huang ◽  
Yuan-Wen Lee ◽  
Yan-Jiun Huang ◽  
Po-Li Wei
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Research Database

AbstractThe role of laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer has been supported by the results of randomized controlled trials. However, its benefits and disadvantages in the real world setting should be further assessed with population-based studies.The hospitalization data of patients undergoing open or laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer were sourced from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Patient and hospital characteristics and perioperative outcomes including length of hospital stay, operation time, opioid use, blood transfusion, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and use of mechanical ventilation were compared. The overall survival was also assessed. Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery had shorter hospital stay (p < 0.0001) and less demand for opioid analgesia (p = 0.0005). Further logistic regression revealed that patients undergoing open surgery were 1.70, 2.89, and 3.00 times more likely to have blood transfusion, to be admitted to ICU, and to use mechanical ventilation than patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Operations performed in medical centers were also associated with less adverse events. The overall survival was comparable between the 2 groups.With adequate hospital quality and volume, laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer was associated with improved perioperative outcomes. The long-term survival was not compromised.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document