Rehabilitation Programs for Bedridden Patients with Prolonged Immobility: A Scoping Review Protocol

Bedridden patients usually stay in bed for long periods, presenting several motor problems caused by immobility, such as reductions in muscle mass, bone mineral density and physical impairment, resulting in a long recovery process. Thus, identifying physical rehabilitation programs for bedridden patients with prolonged immobility is a matter of urgent research for a solution that will help health professionals and stakeholders to develop more adjusted programs and identify possible gaps. To date, no previous scoping reviews addressing this purpose have been found. This scoping review will be guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology, will focus on physical rehabilitation programs for bedridden patients with prolonged immobility and aims to map the programs, the devices used, and the parameters assessed. A relevant set of electronic databases and grey literature will be searched. Data extraction will be conducted using a tool developed by the research team that will address the review objectives and questions. Data synthesis will be presented in tabular form and a narrative summary aligned with the review’s objective. This scoping review will contribute to the improvement of clinical practice, identifying key challenges that might justify the need to develop new programs suitable in clinical and organizational contexts.

Download Full-text

Using social marketing for the promotion of cognitive health: a scoping review protocol

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049947 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (10) ◽

pp. e049947

Author(s):

Mathilde Barbier ◽

Caroline Schulte ◽

Anna Kornadt ◽

Carine Federspiel ◽

Jean-Paul Steinmetz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Social Marketing ◽

Scoping Review ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Scientific Journal ◽

Grey Literature ◽

Marketing Strategies ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Cognitive Health ◽

The Social ◽

Scoping Reviews

IntroductionThe use of social marketing strategies to induce the promotion of cognitive health has received little attention in research. The objective of this scoping review is twofold: (i) to identify the social marketing strategies that have been used in recent years to initiate and maintain health-promoting behaviour; (ii) to advance research in this area to inform policy and practice on how to best make use of these strategies to promote cognitive health.Methods and analysisWe will use the five-stage methodological framework of Arksey and O’Malley. Articles in English published since 2010 will be searched in electronic databases (the Cochrane Library, DoPHER, the International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, PsycInfo, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus). Quantitative and qualitative study designs as well as reviews will be considered. We will include those articles that report the design, implementation, outcomes and evaluation of programmes and interventions concerning social marketing and/or health promotion and/or promotion of cognitive health. Grey literature will not be searched. Two independent reviewers will assess in detail the abstracts and full text of selected citations against the inclusion criteria. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flowchart for Scoping Reviews will be used to illustrate the process of article selection. We will use a data extraction form, present the results through narrative synthesis and discuss them in relation to the scoping review research questions.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required for conducting this scoping review. The results of the review will be the first step to advance a conceptual framework, which contributes to the development of interventions targeting the promotion of cognitive health. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. They will also be disseminated to key stakeholders in the field of the promotion of cognitive health.

Download Full-text

Postgraduate education in healthy and active ageing: learning needs, curriculum and expected outcomes: a scoping review protocol

HRB Open Research ◽

10.12688/hrbopenres.13444.1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 4 ◽

pp. 120

Author(s):

Daisy Wiggin ◽

Benjamin Penič ◽

Outi Sulopuisto ◽

Annalisa Setti ◽

Jana Mali ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Scoping Review ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Grey Literature ◽

Postgraduate Education ◽

European Population ◽

Educational Process ◽

Active Ageing ◽

Learning Needs ◽

Or Education ◽

Scoping Reviews

Background: As the European population ages, it becomes increasingly important to promote and facilitate healthy and active ageing and age-friendly societies. Professionals across a range of disciplines and sectors need knowledge and skills to support both. Objective: This scoping review aims to identify and map the literature on learning needs, learning outcomes and respective curricula in healthy and active ageing and age-friendly society concepts. Inclusion criteria: Studies focused on the teaching/learning process in healthy and active ageing and/or age-friendly society, of any design type, are eligible. Included studies may focus on undergraduate, postgraduate or continuing education and on any aspect of the educational process, such as needs analysis, content delivery, learner satisfaction/acceptability, or education outcome. Methods: This review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for conducting scoping reviews. Four electronic databases, PubMed, EBSCO (Academic Search Complete), Scopus and Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), will be searched, limited to studies published from 1st January 2000. Text language will be limited to English, German, Greek, Portuguese, Finnish, and Slovenian. Google Scholar and Research Gate will be searched for grey literature, limited to the first 50 results of each. Title and abstract screening, followed by full-text screening will be undertaken independently by at least two reviewers. The JBI extraction tool will be adapted for data extraction. Quality assessment will be conducted using a tool developed by Hawker and colleagues. A narrative synthesis will outline the data in relation to the aims and objectives outlined.

Download Full-text

Virtual reality in medical students’ education: a scoping review protocol

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046986 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (5) ◽

pp. e046986

Author(s):

Jiang Haowen ◽

Sunitha Vimalesvaran ◽

Bhone Myint Kyaw ◽

Lorainne Tudor Car

Keyword(s):

Medical Education ◽

Virtual Reality ◽

Scoping Review ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Grey Literature ◽

Real Life ◽

Future Research ◽

Review Author ◽

Reference List ◽

Scoping Reviews

BackgroundVirtual reality (VR) is a technology that produces a virtual manifestation of the real world. In recent years, VR has been increasingly used as a tool in medical education. The use of VR in medical education has large potential, as it allows for distance learning and training which may be challenging to deliver in real life. VR encompasses different tools and applications. There is a need to explore how VR has been employed in medical education to date.ObjectiveThe objective of this scoping review is to conceptualise the VR tools available and the applications of VR in undergraduate medical education as reported in the literature. This scoping review will identify any gaps in this field and provide suggestions for future research.Methods and analysisThe relevant studies will be examined using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework for scoping studies. A comprehensive search from a total of six electronic databases and grey literature sources will be performed. The reference list of included studies will be screened for additional studies. The screening and data extraction will be done in parallel and independently by two review authors. Any discrepancies will be resolved through consensus or discussion with a third review author. A data extraction form has been developed using key themes from the research questions. The extracted data will be qualitatively analysed and presented in a diagrammatic or tabular form, alongside a narrative summary, in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: extension for Scoping Reviews reporting guidelines.Ethics and disseminationAll data will be collected from published and grey literature. Ethics approval is therefore not a requirement. We will present our findings at relevant conferences and submit them for publications in peer-reviewed journals.

Download Full-text

Burnout and compassion fatigue among organ and tissue donation coordinators: a scoping review

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040783 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (12) ◽

pp. e040783

Author(s):

Vanessa Silva e Silva ◽

Laura Hornby ◽

Joan Almost ◽

Ken Lotherington ◽

Amber Appleby ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Protective Factors ◽

Coping Strategies ◽

Compassion Fatigue ◽

Scoping Review ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Research Question ◽

Grey Literature ◽

Tissue Donation ◽

Organ And Tissue Donation ◽

Scoping Reviews

ObjectivesTo collate and synthesise available literature on burnout and compassion fatigue (CF) among organ and tissue donation coordinators (OTDCs) and to respond to the research question: what is known about burnout and CF among OTDCs worldwide?DesignScoping review using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews.Data sourcesMedline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS, PTSpubs and grey literature (ResearchGate, OpenGrey, Organ Donation Organization (ODO) websites, open access theses and dissertations) up to April 2020.Study selectionStudies reporting aspects of burnout and CF among OTDCs, including risk and protective factors.Data extractionTwo reviewers independently screened the studies for eligibility and extracted data from chosen sources using a data extraction tool developed for this study; NVIVO was used to perform a qualitative directed content analysis.ResultsThe searches yielded 741 potentially relevant records, of which 29 met the inclusion criteria. The majority of articles were from the USA (n=7, 24%), Canada (n=6, 21%) and Brazil (n=6, 21%), published between 2013 and 2020 (n=13, 45%) in transplant journals (n=11, 38%) and used a qualitative design approach (n=12, 41%). In the thematic analysis, we classified the articles into five categories: (1) burnout characteristics, (2) CF characteristics, (3) coping strategies, (4) protective factors and (5) ambivalence.ConclusionWe identified aspects of burnout and CF among OTDCs, including defining characteristics, demographic predispositions, protective factors, coping strategies, precursors, consequences and personal ambivalences. Researchers described burnout and CF characteristics but did not use consistent terms when referring to CF and burnout, which may have hindered the identification of all relevant sources. This gap should be addressed by the application of consistent terminology, systematic approaches and appropriate research methods that combine quantitative and qualitative investigation to examine the underlying reasons for the development of burnout and CF among OTDCs.

Download Full-text

Health and Support Service Needs of Individuals With Disability From Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds: A Scoping Review Protocol

10.21203/rs.3.rs-35393/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Jacqueline Nhu Quynh Pho ◽

Aidan Christopher Tan ◽

Katrina Chaudhary ◽

Sonia Hines ◽

Caroline Ellison ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Scoping Review ◽

Support Services ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Grey Literature ◽

Linguistically Diverse ◽

Support Service ◽

Culturally And Linguistically Diverse ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Service Needs ◽

Scoping Reviews

Abstract Background: All individuals should have the right to engage meaningfully in occupations that meet their aspirations and life goals as well as promote their health and wellbeing. For individuals with disability, meaningful engagement in occupations is supported by timely, effective and adaptive health and support services. However, research has revealed multiple barriers preventing utilisation of these services by individuals with disability from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds. This review aims to identify gaps and solutions in health and support services of individuals with disability from CALD backgrounds to meaningfully engage in occupations.Methods: A scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews and follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review guidelines. A detailed search strategy will be used to search CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsychInfo, JBI and Cochrane Library, as well as grey literature in Trove, Mednar and OpenGrey. Studies will be screened for eligibility against specific inclusion and exclusion criteria for relevant studies. Data will be extracted using the JBI data extraction instrument and presented in a diagrammatic or tabular form accompanied with a narrative summary.Discussion: The scoping review will present the health and support service needs of individuals with disability from CALD backgrounds and will extend the current reviews as it focuses the engagement in meaningful occupation. Findings from this review have the potential to inform local policy discussions and practice-based disability care.

Download Full-text

Education and training to support physiotherapists working in dementia care: a scoping review protocol

HRB Open Research ◽

10.12688/hrbopenres.13219.2 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 4 ◽

pp. 27

Author(s):

Trish O'Sullivan ◽

Tony Foley ◽

Joseph G. McVeigh ◽

Suzanne Timmons

Keyword(s):

Scoping Review ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Grey Literature ◽

Education And Training ◽

Dementia Care ◽

Multidisciplinary Teams ◽

Publication Date ◽

Scoping Reviews ◽

Data Extraction Tool ◽

And Training

Background: The care of people with dementia is of global concern. Physiotherapeutic intervention can be of benefit to patients with dementia. Physiotherapists can play a role in assessment, falls prevention, pain management and gait re-education. Dementia care forms a significant part of the workload of a physiotherapist. However, there is a paucity of evidence on what constitutes effective education and training for physiotherapists working in dementia care. Objective: This scoping review aims to explore and map the evidence on education and training for physiotherapists working in dementia care. Inclusion criteria: Studies that explore dementia training and/or education for physiotherapists or for multidisciplinary teams, in which physiotherapists have been included. Studies that explore student physiotherapy training will also be considered. Qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods studies, case studies and observational studies will be included. Methods: This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. Databases to be searched as part of this review include: Medline, SocINDEX, CINAHL and, PsycINFO, with no limitation on publication date. Google Scholar and Open-Grey will be searched for grey literature, limited to the first 100 searches. Titles and abstracts will be screened for inclusion and identified full texts reviewed independently by two reviewers. Data will be extracted using a draft data extraction tool based on the JBI data extraction tool. A chronological narrative synthesis of the data will outline how the results relate to the aims and objective of this scoping review.

Download Full-text

The Use of Global Rating Scales and Checklists in Clinical Simulation-Based Assessments: A Protocol for a Scoping Review

10.21203/rs.3.rs-1134609/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Karien Henrico ◽

Andrew Makkink

Keyword(s):

Scoping Review ◽

Rating Scales ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Grey Literature ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Future Research ◽

Global Rating ◽

Clinical Simulation ◽

Scoping Reviews ◽

Simulation Based

Abstract Background Assessment in health sciences education remains a hotly debated topic, with measures of competency and how to determine them in simulation-based assessments enjoying much of the focus. Global rating scales (GRS) and checklists enjoy widespread use within simulation-based education but there is a question regarding how the two strategies are used within clinical simulation assessment. The aim of this proposed scoping review is therefore to explore, map and summarise the nature, range and extent of published literature available relating to the use of GRS and checklists in clinical simulation-based assessment. Methods We will follow the methodological frameworks and updates described by Arksey and O’Malley, Levac, Colquhoun and O'Brien, and Peters, Marnie and Tricco et al and will report using the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews. We will search PubMed, CINAHL, ERIC, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EBSCO, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, the DOAJ, and several sources of grey literature. We developed a search strategy in collaboration with an experienced research librarian and include an example of a full electronic search in this article. We will screen all titles and abstracts and relevant full-text articles and extract the relevant data using the data extraction form. Quantitative data will be presented as will a narrative account of all included studies. We will import the narrative into Atlas.ti and use thematic analysis to identify themes and map the data. We will be including all identified sources published in English after 1 January 2010 that relate to the use of GRS and/or checklists in clinical simulation-based assessments. Discussion The overview of literature produced will help to identify knowledge gaps and inform future research in the use of GRS and checklists in clinical simulation-based assessments. This information will be valuable and useful for all stakeholders that are interested in clinical simulation-based assessments. Scoping review protocol registration: Open Science Framework (OSF) submitted on 26 November 2021 and available at https://osf.io/7yfbq.

Download Full-text

Protocol for a scoping review exploring the use of patient-reported outcomes in adult social care

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045206 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (4) ◽

pp. e045206

Author(s):

Sarah E Hughes ◽

Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi ◽

Daniel S Lasserson ◽

Philip Collis ◽

Samantha Cruz Rivera ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Scoping Review ◽

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Clinical Decision Making ◽

Social Care ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Grey Literature ◽

Secondary Data ◽

Ethical Review ◽

Scoping Reviews ◽

Patient Reported

IntroductionPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) are measures of a person’s own views of their health, functioning and quality of life. They are typically assessed using validated, self-completed questionnaires known as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs are used in healthcare settings to support care planning, clinical decision-making, patient–practitioner communication and quality improvement. PROMs have a potential role in the delivery of social care where people often have multiple and complex long-term health conditions. However, the use of PROMs in this context is currently unclear. The objective of this scoping review is to explore the evidence relating to the use of PROMs in adult social care.Methods and analysesThe electronic databases Medline (Ovid), PsychInfo (Ovid), ASSIA (ProQuest), Social Care Online (SCIE), Web of Science and EMBASE (Ovid) were searched on 29 September 2020 to identify eligible studies and other publically available documents published since 2010. A grey literature search and hand searching of citations and reference lists of the included studies will also be undertaken. No restrictions on study design or language of publication will be applied. Screening and data extraction will be completed independently by two reviewers. Quality appraisal of the included documents will use the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and AACODS (Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significance) checklists. A customised data charting table will be used for data extraction, with analysis of qualitative data using the framework method. The review findings will be presented as tables and in a narrative summary.Ethics and disseminationEthical review is not required as scoping reviews are a form of secondary data analysis that synthesise data from publically available sources. Review findings will be shared with service users and other relevant stakeholders and disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. This protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework (www.osf.io).

Download Full-text

Electronic patient-generated health data to facilitate prevention and health promotion: a scoping review protocol

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021245 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 8 (8) ◽

pp. e021245 ◽

Cited By ~ 16

Author(s):

Vasileios Nittas ◽

Margot Mütsch ◽

Frederic Ehrler ◽

Milo Alan Puhan

Keyword(s):

Health Promotion ◽

Scoping Review ◽

Digital Health ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Grey Literature ◽

Health Data ◽

Final Decision ◽

Patient Centeredness ◽

Scoping Reviews ◽

Prevention And Health Promotion

IntroductionRapidly expanding digital innovations transform the perception, reception and provision of health services. Simultaneously, health system challenges underline the need for patient-centred, empowering and citizen-engaging care, which facilitates a focus on prevention and health promotion. Through enhanced patient-engagement, patient-provider interactions and reduced information gaps, electronic patient-generated health data (PGHD) may facilitate both patient-centeredness and preventive scare. Despite that, comprehensive knowledge syntheses on their utilisation for prevention and health promotion purposes are lacking. The review described in this protocol aims to fill that gap.Methods and analysisOur methodology is guided by Arksey and O’ Malley’s methodological framework for scoping reviews, as well as its advanced version by Levac, Colquhoun and O’Brien. Seven electronic databases will be systematically searched using predefined keywords. Key electronic journals will be hand searched, while reference lists of included documents and grey literature sources will be screened thoroughly. Two independent reviewers will complete study selection and data extraction. One of the team’s senior research members will act as a third reviewer and make the final decision on disputed documents. We will include literature with a focus on electronic PGHD and linked to prevention and health promotion. Literature on prevention that is driven by existing discomfort or disability goes beyond the review’s scope and will be excluded. Analysis will be narrative and guided by Shapiroet al’s adapted framework on PGHD flow.Ethics and disseminationThe scoping review described in this protocol aims to establish a baseline understanding of electronic PGHD generation, collection, communication, sharing, interpretation, utilisation, context and impact for preventive purposes. The chosen methodology is based on the use of publicly available information and does not require ethical approval. Review findings will be disseminated in digital health conferences and symposia. Results will be published and additionally shared with relevant local and national authorities.

Download Full-text

Shared decision-making in advanced kidney disease: a scoping review protocol

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034142 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (2) ◽

pp. e034142

Author(s):

Noel Engels ◽

Gretchen de Graav ◽

Paul van der Nat ◽

Marinus van den Dorpel ◽

Willem Jan Bos ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Decision Making ◽

Kidney Disease ◽

Shared Decision Making ◽

Scoping Review ◽

Treatment Modality ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Grey Literature ◽

Shared Decision ◽

Research Knowledge ◽

Scoping Reviews

IntroductionPatients with advanced kidney disease (AKD) have to make difficult treatment modality decisions as their disease progresses towards end-stage kidney disease. International guidelines in nephrology suggest shared decision-making (SDM) to help patients make timely treatment modality decisions that align with their values and preferences. However, systematic reviews or scoping reviews on these SDM interventions and on their reported use or outcomes are lacking. This limits the adoption of SDM in clinical practice and hampers further research and development on the subject. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of these SDM interventions by means of a scoping review of the literature. Scoping reviews can provide a broad overview of a topic, identify gaps in the research knowledge base and report on the types of evidence that address and inform practices. This paper presents our study protocol.Methods and analysisThe proposed scoping review will be performed in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute’s (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. It will cover both qualitative and quantitative scientific literature, as well as the grey literature on SDM interventions for treatment modality decisions in AKD. Only literature written in English will be considered for inclusion. Two independent reviewers will participate in an iterative process of screening the literature, paper selection and data extraction. Disagreements between the reviewers will be resolved by discussion until consensus is reached or after consultation with the research team when needed. Results will be reported with descriptive statistics and diagrammatic or tabular displayed information, accompanied by narrative summaries as explained in the JBI guidelines.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval for the conduct of this study is not required. We will analyse previously collected data for the proposed scoping review. Our results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated through conferences and/or seminars.

Download Full-text