scholarly journals Predictors of Mortality in Hemodialyzed Patients after SARS-CoV-2 Infection

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 285
Author(s):  
Leszek Tylicki ◽  
Ewelina Puchalska-Reglińska ◽  
Piotr Tylicki ◽  
Aleksander Och ◽  
Karolina Polewska ◽  
...  

Introduction: The determinants of COVID-19 mortality are well-characterized in the general population. Less numerous and inconsistent data are among the maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients, who are the population most at risk of an unfavorable prognosis. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study we included all adult HD patients from the Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland, with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection hospitalized between 6 October 2020 and 28 February 2021, both those who survived, and also those who died. Demographic, clinical, treatment, and laboratory data on admission, were extracted from the electronic medical records of the dedicated hospital and patients’ dialysis unit, and compared between survivors and non-survivors. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods to explore the risk factors associated with 3-month all-cause mortality. Results: The 133 patients (53.38% males) aged 73.0 (67–79) years, with a median duration of hemodialysis of 42.0 (17–86) months, were included in this study. At diagnosis, the majority were considered to have a mild course (34 of 133 patients were asymptomatic, another 63 subjects presented mild symptoms), while 36 (27.07%) patients had low blood oxygen saturation and required oxygen supplementation. Three-month mortality was 39.08% including an in-hospital case fatality rate of 33.08%. Multivariable logistic regression showed that the frailty clinical index of 4 or greater (OR 8.36, 95%CI 1.81–38.6; p < 0.01), D-Dimer of 1500 ng/mL or greater (6.00, 1.94–18.53; p < 0.01), and CRP of >118 mg/L at admission (3.77 1.09–13.01; p = 0.04) were found to be predictive of mortality. Conclusion: Very high 3-month all-cause mortality in hospitalized HD patients was determined mainly by frailty. High CRP and D-dimer levels upon admission further confer mortality risk.

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S161-S162
Author(s):  
Amr Ramahi ◽  
Kok Hoe Chan ◽  
Laxminarayan Prabhakar ◽  
Iyad Farouji ◽  
Divya Thimmareddygari ◽  
...  

Abstract Background A few COVID-19 related retrospective studies have established that older age, elevated neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and decreased lymphocyte-CRP ratio (LCR) were associated with worse outcome. Herein, we aim to identify new prognostic markers associated with mortality. Methods We conducted a retrospective hospital cohort study on patients ≥ 18 years old with confirmed COVID-19, who were admitted to our hospital between 03/15/2020 and 05/25/2020. Study individuals were recruited if they had a complete CBC profile and inflammatory markers such as CRP, ferritin, D-dimer and LDH, as well as a well-defined clinical outcomes (discharged alive or expired). Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were reviewed and retrieved. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression methods were employed to identify prognostic markers associated with mortality. Results Out of the 344 confirmed COVID-19 hospitalized patients during the study period, 31 who did not have a complete blood profile were excluded; 303 patients were included in the study, 89 (29%) expired, and 214 (71%) were discharged alive. Demographic analysis was tabulated in Table 1. The univariate analysis showed a significant association of death with absolute neutrophil count (ANC, p=0.022), NLR (p=002), neutrophil-monocyte ratio (NMR, p=&lt; 0.0001), LCR (p=0.007), lymphocyte-LDH ratio (LLR, p=&lt; 0.0001), lymphocyte-D-dimer ratio (LDR, p=&lt; 0.0001), lymphocyte-ferritin ratio (LFR, p=&lt; 0.0001), and platelets (p=0.037) with mortality. With multivariable logistic regression analysis, the only values that had an odds of survival were high LDR (odds ratio [OR] 1.763; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20–2.69), and a high LFR (OR 1.136, CI 1.01–1.34). We further build up a model which can predict &gt;85% mortality in our cohorts with the utilization of D-dimer (&gt;500 ng/ml), Ferritin (&gt;200 ng/ml), LDR (&lt; 1.6), LFR (&lt; 4) and ANC (&gt;2.5). This new model has a ROC of 0.68 (p&lt; 0.0001). Conclusion This retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 suggests LDR and LFR as potential independent prognostic indicators. A new model with combination of D-dimer, Ferritin, LDR, LFR and ANC, was able to predict &gt;85% mortality in our cohort with ROC of 0.68, it will need to be validated in a prospective cohort study. Disclosures Jihad Slim, MD, Abbvie (Speaker’s Bureau)Gilead (Speaker’s Bureau)Jansen (Speaker’s Bureau)Merck (Speaker’s Bureau)ViiV (Speaker’s Bureau)


Author(s):  
Rahul S Dalal ◽  
Cheikh Njie ◽  
Jenna Marcus ◽  
Sanchit Gupta ◽  
Jessica R Allegretti

Abstract Background Many patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) who lose response to the standard ustekinumab dose interval of every 8 weeks (q8w) undergo dose intensification to q4w or q6w. However, baseline factors that predict success or failure after dose intensification are unknown. We sought to identify predictors of failure of ustekinumab after dose intensification for patients with CD. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of adult CD patients undergoing ustekinumab dose intensification at a tertiary referral center between January 1, 2016, and January 31, 2019. Electronic health records were reviewed to obtain patient demographics, CD history, and laboratory data. The primary outcome was failure to achieve corticosteroid-free remission (Harvey-Bradshaw Index &lt;5) within 12 months after intensification. The secondary outcome assessed was time to new biologic therapy after dose intensification. We used multivariable logistic regression and Cox regression to identify predictors of these outcomes. Results We included 123 patients who underwent ustekinumab dose intensification to q4w (n = 64), q5w (n = 1), q6w (n = 55), or q7w (n = 3). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that perianal disease, Harvey-Bradshaw Index, and opioid use at time of intensification were associated with failure to achieve remission. Cox regression demonstrated that perianal disease and corticosteroid use at time of intensification were associated with shorter time to a new biologic. Conclusion Perianal disease, Harvey-Bradshaw Index, current opioid use, and current corticosteroid use are associated with ustekinumab failure after dose intensification in CD. Larger, prospective studies are needed to corroborate these findings and guide therapeutic strategies for patients who lose response to standard ustekinumab dosing.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yili Zhang ◽  
Juan Wang ◽  
Nannan Tan ◽  
KangJia Du ◽  
Kuo Gao ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose. Diabetes is common in COVID-19 patients and associated with unfavorable outcomes. We aimed to describe the characteristics and identify the risk factors for COVID-19 patients complicated with diabetes. Methods. In this multicenter retrospective study, patients with COVID-19 in China were included and classified into two groups according to whether they were complicated with diabetes or not. Demographic symptoms and laboratory data were extracted from medical records. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods were used to explore the risk factors. Results. 538 COVID-19 patients were finally included in this study, of whom 492 were nondiabetes and 46 were diabetes. The median age was 47 years (IQR 35.0-56.0). And the elderly patients with diabetes were more likely to have dry cough, and the alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, Ca, and mean hemoglobin recovery rate were higher than the other groups. Furthermore, we also found the liver and kidney function of male patients was worse than that of female patients, while female cases should be paid more attention to the occurrence of bleeding and electrolyte disorders. Moreover, advance age, blood glucose, gender, prothrombin time, and total cholesterol could be considered as risk factors for COVID-19 patients with diabetes through the multivariable logistic regression model in our study. Conclusion. The potential risk factors found in our study showed a major piece of the complex puzzle linking diabetes and COVID-19 infection. Meanwhile, focusing on gender and age factors in COVID-19 patients with or without diabetes, specific clinical characteristics, and risk factors should be paid more attention by clinicians to figure out a targeted intervention to improve clinical efficacy worldwide.


Author(s):  
Robert A Fletcher ◽  
Thomas Matcham ◽  
Marta Tibúrcio ◽  
Arseni Anisimovich ◽  
Stojan Jovanović ◽  
...  

Background: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak presents a significant threat to global health. A better understanding of patient clinical profiles is essential to drive efficient and timely health service strategies. In this study, we aimed to identify risk factors for a higher susceptibility to symptomatic presentation with COVID-19 and a transition to severe disease. Methods: We analysed data on 2756 patients admitted to Chelsea & Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust between 1st January and 23rd April 2020. We compared differences in characteristics between patients designated positive for COVID-19 and patients designated negative on hospitalisation and derived a multivariable logistic regression model to identify risk factors for predicting risk of symptomatic COVID-19. For patients with COVID-19, we used univariable and multivariable logistic regression to identify risk factors associated with progression to severe disease defined by: 1) admission to the hospital AICU, 2) the need for mechanical ventilation, 3) in-hospital mortality, and 4) at least one measurement of elevated D-dimer (equal or superior to 1,000 ug/L) indicative of increased risk of venous thromboembolism. Results: The patient population consisted of 1148 COVID-19 positive and 1608 COVID-19 negative patients. Age, sex, self-reported ethnicity, C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, respiratory rate, body temperature, and systolic blood pressure formed the most parsimonious model for predicting risk of symptomatic COVID-19 at hospital admission. Among 1148 patients with COVID-19, 116 (10.1%) were admitted to the AICU, 71 (6.2%) required mechanical ventilation, 368 (32.1%) had at least one record of D-dimer levels ≥1,000 μg/L, and 118 patients died. In the multivariable logistic regression, age (OR = 0.953 per 1 year, 95% CI: 0.937-0.968) C-reactive protein (OR = 1.004 per 1 mg/L, 95% CI: 1.002-1.007), and white blood cell counts (OR = 1.059 per 109/L, 95% CI: 1.010-1.111) were found to be associated with admission to the AICU. Age (OR = 0.973 per 1 year, 95% CI: 0.955-0.990), C-reactive protein (OR = 1.003 per 1 mg/L, 95% CI: 1.000-1.006) and sodium (OR = 0.915 per 1 mmol/L, 0.868-0.962) were associated with mechanical ventilation. Age (OR = 1.023 per 1 year, 95% CI: 1.004-1.043), CRP (OR = 1.004 per 1 mg/L, 95% CI: 1.002-1.006), and body temperature (OR = 0.723 per 1oC, 95% CI: 0.541-0.958) were associated with elevated D-dimer. For mortality, we observed associations with age (OR = 1.060 per 1 year, 95% CI: 1.040-1.082), female sex (OR = 0.442, 95% CI: 0.442, 95% CI: 0.245-0.777), Asian ethnic background (OR = 2.237 vs White ethnic background, 95% CI: 1.111-4.510), C-reactive protein (OR = 1.004 per 1 mg/L, 95% CI: 1.001-1.006), sodium (OR = 1.038 per 1 mmol/L, 95% CI: 1.001-1.006), and respiratory rate (OR = 1.054 per 1 breath/min, 95% CI: 1.024-1.087). Conclusion: Our analysis suggests there are several demographic, clinical and laboratory findings associated with a symptomatic presentation of COVID-19. Moreover, significant associations between patient deterioration were found with age, sex and specific blood markers, chiefly C-reactive protein, and could help early identification of patients at risk of poorer prognosis. Further work is required to clarify the extent to which our observations are relevant beyond current settings.


2020 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-016342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moustafa Aly ◽  
Ramez N Abdalla ◽  
Ayush Batra ◽  
Ali Shaibani ◽  
Michael C Hurley ◽  
...  

BackgroundAdmission neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is significantly correlated to clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We investigated follow-up NLR and temporal changes in NLR after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) with respect to successful revascularization, clinical outcomes, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality.MethodsRetrospective analysis of EVT for anterior circulation emergent LVO was performed with both admission (NLR1) and 3–7 day follow-up NLR (NLR2) laboratory data. Patient demographics, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) presentations, reperfusion efficacy (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score), sICH, and clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale (mRS)) at 90 days were studied. Univariate analyses correlated NLR1, NLR2, and temporal change in NLR (NLR2-NLR1) with successful reperfusion (mTICI ≥2b), favorable outcomes (mRS ≤2), sICH, and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression model evaluated the independent effects of NLR2 on favorable outcomes.Results142 AIS patients with median NIHSS 17 underwent EVT within 24 hours, and met NLR laboratory inclusion criteria. Lower follow-up NLR2 and less temporal change in NLR over 3–7 days, but not admission NLR1, inversely correlated with successful reperfusion (p<0.05) and favorable clinical outcomes (p<0.001). Higher follow-up NLR2 and greater temporal change in NLR was significantly associated with sICH and mortality (p≤0.05). In multivariable logistic regression, lower follow-up NLR2 remained a predictor of favorable outcomes (OR 0.785, p=0.001), independent of age or successful reperfusion.ConclusionsFollow-up NLR is a readily available and modifiable biomarker that correlates with the degree of reperfusion after mechanical stroke thrombectomy. Lower follow-up NLR2 at 3–7 days is associated with successful reperfusion and an independent predictor of favorable clinical outcomes, with reduced risk for sICH and mortality.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S334-S334
Author(s):  
Mina Phlamon ◽  
Sarah Petite ◽  
Kelli Cole

Abstract Background When managing complicated intra-abdominal infections (IAIs), the current Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines recommend an antimicrobial treatment duration of 4–7 days. Although recent evidence supports this shorter course of therapy, antimicrobials are still often administered for 10–14 days due to concern for subsequent complications. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of short-course (SC) vs. prolonged-course (PC) antimicrobial therapy in the management of IAI at our institution. Methods IRB-approved, single-center, retrospective cohort including all patients at the University of Toledo Medical Center who were admitted between January 1, 2012–June 30, 2017 with an IAI, received antimicrobials for ≥48 hours, and had at least one sign of IAI. Patients with concomitant infections at sites other than the abdomen, primary peritonitis or pancreatitis, immunocompromising conditions, or bacteremia were excluded. Primary outcome of clinical cure was compared between SC (≤7 days of antimicrobial treatment) and PC (&gt;7 days) groups. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, 28-day all-cause mortality, and 30-day readmission. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess for factors associated with clinical cure. Results One hundred seventy-five patients were included, 73 SC and 102 PC. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Rate of clinical cure for SC vs. PC was 74.0% vs. 67.6% (P = 0.367). Secondary outcomes including hospital LOS (5.5 days vs. 5.8 days, P = 0.372), ICU LOS (3.0 days vs. 5.0 days, P = 0.117), 28-day all-cause mortality (4.1% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.651), and 30-day readmission (19.2% vs. 20.6%, P = 0.818) were also not significantly different. After multivariable logistic regression, the only variable independently associated with clinical cure was diverticulitis (adjusted odds ratio 0.337, 95% CI 0.133 – 0.853). Conclusion In patients with IAI, there was no significant difference observed in rates of clinical cure between SC and PC antimicrobial therapy. These results further support the IDSA recommendations for a shorter duration of therapy for patients with IAI. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Wang ◽  
Yang Li ◽  
HaiBo Wu ◽  
Hua Chen ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Blood pressure (BP) is a known prognostic marker for mortality in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). However, definition of the BP and its optimal values vary essentially among different MHD populations. Our purpose was to clarify these important clinical parameters in a Chinese MHD cohort. Accordingly, we reviewed the available records of patients on regular MHD during the past 10 years and made a comparison between the deceased (n=81) and survival ones (n=131). Multiple logistic regression and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis were used to examine the effect of BP on mortality and long-term survival, respectively. The all-cause mortality in our patients was 38.2%, in which 49.4% was from cardio-cerebrovascular deaths. Using the multiple logistic regression, we found that the sitting (the same definition hereafter) pre-dialysis systolic BP (SBP) was significantly associated with both the all-cause mortality and cardio-cerebrovascular deaths exclusively in patients of 60–80 years. Moreover, a pre-dialysis SBP of 140–160 mmHg in these patients had the minimum all-cause mortality (23.5%) against that conferred by either a lower (42.1%) or higher SBP value (61.5%). This observation was further confirmed by the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. As fresh gain to the practice of hemodialysis, our report revealed that BP worked in a time-dependent way among a Chinese MHD cohort and highlighted a U-shaped association between the pre-dialysis SBP and all-cause mortality. These findings may hence help to obtain optimal BP control for better survival and lend some prognostic insight into mortality in these MHD patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Briasoulis ◽  
I Doulamis ◽  
P Kampaktsis ◽  
P Alvarez

Abstract Introduction Approximately 50% of heart transplant (HT) programs currently employ a strategy of induction therapy (IT) with either interleukin-2 receptor antagonists (IL2RA) or polyclonal anti-thymocyte antibodies (ATG) during the early postoperative period. However, the overall utility of such therapy is uncertain and data comparing induction protocols are limited. Methods Adult HT recipients were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry between 1990 and 2020. Patients were grouped according to administration of induction in the post-operative period after HT. Accounting for re-transplantation, Fine and Gray's test compared cumulative incidences of all-cause mortality between groups. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using the competing risk model. The risk of treated rejection and hospitalization for infection or rejection was analyzed with multivariable logistic regression. Results A total of 63,849 HT recipients were included in the study and among those 59% did not receive induction, 16.6% received ATG, 19.1% IL2RA, 0.7% alemtuzumab, and 4.6% OKT3. Since 2000 IL2RA is the most frequently used form of induction therapy whereas OK3 is not used in the past decade. In multivariable logistic regression models, use of ATG is associated with lower risk of treated rejection at one year after HT (relative risk ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.47–0.63, p&lt;0.001) compared with no induction whereas IL2RA had similar risk of treated rejection. Similarly, the risk of rejection requiring hospitalization was significantly lower with ATG than no induction. No significant differences in rates of infection requiring hospitalization were noted between groups. Moreover, no differences in rates of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease and any malignancy were noted between those receiving induction versus no induction. Adjusted all-cause mortality was significantly lower among those treated with ATG than patients that did not receive induction therapy (sub-hazard ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.63–0.82, p&lt;0.001) (Figure). Conclusion Induction therapy with IL2RA is the most used approach. ATG is associated with lower risk of treated rejection and all-cause mortality than no induction and IL2RA. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.


Author(s):  
Aryo Wibisono ◽  
R. Amilia Destryana

This study aims to determine the index of public satisfaction in public health center services in Sumenep Regency and the relationship between the services to the public satisfaction. The analysis measured the index of public satisfaction and logistic regression methods to determine the effect of the relationship on total satisfaction in the health services of Public Health Center. The results of the study are the alignment between interests and patient satisfaction is still not aligned, there are still differences between interests and satisfaction, the pattern of the result is the relationship between the assurance dimension to the service satisfaction of the public health center, and the results of the index of public satisfaction  values show that the results of the community assess the public health center performance is very good by getting an A grade. Keywords: public service, logistic regretion, index of public satisfaction


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 191.1-192
Author(s):  
S. Amikishiyev ◽  
M. G. Gunver ◽  
M. Bektas ◽  
S. Aghamuradov ◽  
B. Ince ◽  
...  

Background:COVID-19 runs a severe disease associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome in a subset of patients, and a hyperinflammatory response developing in the second week contributes to the worse outcome. Inflammatory features are mostly compatible with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) observed in other viral infections despite resulting in milder changes. Early detection and treatment of MAS may be associated with a better outcome. However, available criteria for MAS associated with other causes have not been helpful.Objectives:To identify distinct features of MAS associated with COVID-19 using a large database enabling to assess of dynamic changes.Methods:PCR-confirmed hospitalized COVID-19 patients followed between March and September 2020 constituted the discovery set. Patients considered to have findings of MAS by experienced physicians and given anakinra or tocilizumab were classified as the MAS group and the remaining patients as the non-MAS group. The MAS group was then re-grouped as the cases with exact-MAS and borderline-MAS cases by the study group. Clinical and laboratory data including the Ct values of the PCR test were obtained from the database, and dynamic changes were evaluated especially for the first 14 days of the hospitalization. The second set of 162 patients followed between September-December 2020 were used as the replication group to test the preliminary criteria. In the second set, hospitalization rules were changed, and all patients required oxygen support and received dexamethasone 6mg/day or equivalent glucocorticoids. Daily changes were calculated for the laboratory items in MAS, borderline, and non-MAS groups to see the days differentiating the groups, and ROC curves and lower and upper limits (10-90%) of the selected parameters were calculated to determine the cutoff values.Results:A total of 769 PCR-confirmed hospitalized patients were analysed, and 77 of them were classified as MAS and 83 as borderline MAS patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the baseline viral loads of MAS patients compared to the non-MAS group according to the Ct values. Daily dynamic changes in the MAS group differed from the non-MAS group especially around the 6th day of hospitalization, and more than a twofold increase in ferritin and a 1.5-fold increase in D-dimer levels compared to the baseline values help to define the MAS group. Twelve items selected for the criteria are given in Table 1 below. The total score of 45 provided 79.6% sensitivity for the MAS (including borderline cases) and 81.3% specificity around days 5 and 6 in the discovery set, and a score of 60 increased the specificity to 94.9% despite a decrease in sensitivity to 40.8%. The same set provided a similar sensitivity (80.3%) in the replication, but a lower specificity (47.4-66% on days 6 to 9) due to a group of control patients with findings of MAS possibly masked by glucocorticoids.Table 1.Preliminary Criteria for Macrophage Activation Syndrome Associated with Coronavirus Disease-191.Fever (>37.0 °C)2.Ferritin concentration > 550 ng/mL3.More than 2 times increase of ferritin concentration within 7 days of disease onset4.Neutrophil count > 6000 cell/mm35.Lymphopenia < 1000 cell/mm36.Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio > 67.D-dimer concentration > 1000 ng/ml8.More than 50% increase of D-dimer concentration within 7 days of disease onset9.CRP concetration > 50 mg/L10.LDH concentration > 300 U/L11.ALT or AST concentration > 50 U/L12.Procalcitonin concentration < 1.21 point for each positive item assessed on Days 5-7Score calculation: Total points / 12 x 100Possible MAS ≥45 and Definite MAS ≥60Conclusion:This study defined a set of preliminary criteria using the most relevant items of MAS according to the dynamic changes in the parameters in a group of COVID-19 patients. A score of 45 would be helpful to define a possible MAS group with reasonable sensitivity and specificity to start necessary treatments as early as possible.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document