scholarly journals Material Anisotropy in Additively Manufactured Polymers and Polymer Composites: A Review

Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 3368
Author(s):  
Nima Zohdi ◽  
Richard (Chunhui) Yang
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Complex Geometry ◽  
Research Work ◽  
High Strength ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Material Anisotropy ◽  
Removal Technology ◽  
Subtractive Manufacturing ◽  
Potential Methods ◽  
Manufacturing Technologies

Additive manufacturing (AM) is a sustainable and innovative manufacturing technology to fabricate products with specific properties and complex shapes for additive manufacturable materials including polymers, steels, titanium, copper, ceramics, composites, etc. This technology can well facilitate consumer needs on products with complex geometry and shape, high strength and lightweight. It is sustainable with having a layer-by-layer manufacturing process contrary to the traditional material removal technology—subtractive manufacturing. However, there are still challenges on the AM technologies, which created barriers for their further applications in engineering fields. For example, materials properties including mechanical, electrical, and thermal properties of the additively manufactured products are greatly affected by using different ways of AM methods and it was found as the material anisotropy phenomenon. In this study, a detailed literature review is conducted to investigate research work conducted on the material anisotropy phenomenon of additively manufactured materials. Based on research findings on material anisotropy phenomenon reported in the literature, this review paper aims to understand the nature of this phenomenon, address main factors and parameters influencing its severity on thermal, electrical and mechanical properties of 3D printed parts, and also, explore potential methods to minimise or mitigate this unwanted anisotropy. The outcomes of this study would be able to shed a light on improving additive manufacturing technologies and material properties of additively manufactured materials.

scholarly journals A STRUCTURED APPROACH TO REDUCE DESIGN ITERATIONS IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 231-240
Author(s):  
Laura Wirths ◽  
Matthias Bleckmann ◽  
Kristin Paetzold
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Spare Parts ◽  
Design Guidelines ◽  
Final Part ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Powder Bed ◽  
Batch Sizes ◽  
Manufacturing Technologies ◽  
Structured Approach ◽  
Design Freedom

AbstractAdditive Manufacturing technologies are based on a layer-by-layer build-up. This offers the possibility to design complex geometries or to integrate functionalities in the part. Nevertheless, limitations given by the manufacturing process apply to the geometric design freedom. These limitations are often unknown due to a lack of knowledge of the cause-effect relationships of the process. Currently, this leads to many iterations until the final part fulfils its functionality. Particularly for small batch sizes, producing the part at the first attempt is very important. In this study, a structured approach to reduce the design iterations is presented. Therefore, the cause-effect relationships are systematically established and analysed in detail. Based on this knowledge, design guidelines can be derived. These guidelines consider process limitations and help to reduce the iterations for the final part production. In order to illustrate the approach, the spare parts production via laser powder bed fusion is used as an example.

scholarly journals Effects of Positioning Conditions on Material Properties In Powder bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mevlüt Yunus Kayacan ◽  
Nihat Yılmaz
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Material Properties ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Powder Bed Fusion ◽  
Laser Powder Bed Fusion ◽  
Cooling Rates ◽  
Powder Bed ◽  
Manufacturing Technologies ◽  
Average Size ◽  
Hardness Values

Abstract Among additive manufacturing technologies, Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) is considered the most widespread layer-by-layer process. Although the L-PBF, which is also called as SLM method, has many advantages, several challenging problems must be overcome, including part positioning issues. In this study, the effect of part positioning on the microstructure of the part in the L-PBF method was investigated. Five Ti6Al4V samples were printed in different positions on the building platform and investigated with the aid of temperature, porosity, microstructure and hardness evaluations. In this study, martensitic needles were detected within the microstructure of Ti6Al4V samples. Furthermore, some twins were noticed on primary martensitic lines and the agglomeration of β precipitates was observed in vanadium rich areas. The positioning conditions of samples were revealed to have a strong effect on temperature gradients and on the average size of martensitic lines. Besides, different hardness values were attained depending on sample positioning conditions. As a major result, cooling rates were found related to positions of samples and the location of point on the samples. Higher cooling rates and repetitive cooling cycles resulted in microstructures becoming finer and harder.

scholarly journals ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING - APPLICATION OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE AVIATION INDUSTRY

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-86
Author(s):  
Dipesh Dhital ◽  
Yvonne Ziegler
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
3D Printing ◽  
Computer Aided Design ◽  
Free Form ◽  
Aviation Industry ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Printing Technology ◽  
3D Printing Technology ◽  
Subtractive Manufacturing ◽  
Aided Design

Additive Manufacturing also known as 3D Printing is a process whereby a real object of virtually any shape can be created layer by layer from a Computer Aided Design (CAD) model. As opposed to the conventional Subtractive Manufacturing that uses cutting, drilling, milling, welding etc., 3D printing is a free-form fabrication process and does not require any of these processes. The 3D printed parts are lighter, require short lead times, less material and reduce environmental footprint of the manufacturing process; and is thus beneficial to the aerospace industry that pursues improvement in aircraft efficiency, fuel saving and reduction in air pollution. Additionally, 3D printing technology allows for creating geometries that would be impossible to make using moulds and the Subtractive Manufacturing of drilling/milling. 3D printing technology also has the potential to re-localize manufacturing as it allows for the production of products at the particular location, as and when required; and eliminates the need for shipping and warehousing of final products.

Additive Manufacturing of Nickel-Based Super Alloys for Aero Engine Applications

2020 ◽  
pp. 48-70
Author(s):  
Raja A. ◽  
Mythreyi O. V. ◽  
Jayaganthan R.
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Complex Geometry ◽  
Source Parameters ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Powder Bed ◽  
Complex Design ◽  
Direct Energy ◽  
Second Phases ◽  
Metal Addition

Ni based super alloys are widely used in engine turbines because of their proven performance at high temperatures. Manufacturing these parts by additive manufacturing (AM) methods provides researchers a lot of creative space for complex design to improve efficiency. Powder bed fusion (PBF) and direct energy deposition (DED) are the two most widely-used metal AM methods. Both methods are influenced by the source, parameters, design, and raw material. Selective laser melting is one of the laser-based PBF techniques to create small layer thickness and complex geometry with greater accuracy and properties. The layer-by-layer metal addition generates epitaxial growth and solidification in the built direction. There are different second phases in the Ni-based superalloys. This chapter details the micro-segregation of these particles and its influence on the microstructure, and mechanical properties are dependent on the process influencing parameters, the thermal kinetics during the process, and the post-processing treatments.

scholarly journals Analysis and characterization of additive manufacturing processes

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 167-180
Author(s):  
Andra TOFAN-NEGRU ◽  
Cristian BARBU ◽  
Amado STEFAN ◽  
Ioana-Carmen BOGLIS
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Complex Geometry ◽  
Cutting Tools ◽  
Manufacturing Processes ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Finishing Processes ◽  
Short Time ◽  
Physical Phenomena ◽  
Am Processes

Recently, additive manufacturing (AM) processes have expanded rapidly in various fields of the industry because they offer design freedom, involve layer-by-layer construction from a computerized 3D model (minimizing material consumption), and allow the manufacture of parts with complex geometry (thus offering the possibility of producing custom parts). Also, they provide the advantage of a short time to make the final parts, do not involve the need for auxiliary resources (cutting tools, lighting fixtures or coolants) and have a low impact on the environment. However, the aspects that make these technologies not yet widely used in industry are poor surface quality of parts, uncertainty about the mechanical properties of products and low productivity. Research on the physical phenomena associated with additive manufacturing processes is necessary for proper control of the phenomena of melting, solidification, vaporization and heat transfer. This paper addresses the relevant additive manufacturing processes and their applications and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of AM processes compared to conventional production processes. For the aerospace industry, these technologies offer possibilities for manufacturing lighter structures to reduce weight, but improvements in precision must be sought to eliminate the need for finishing processes.

scholarly journals A 3D weaving infill pattern for fused filament fabrication

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Yao ◽  
Cheng Ding ◽  
Mohamed Aburaia ◽  
Maximilian Lackner ◽  
Lanlan He
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Fused Filament Fabrication ◽  
Repetitive Structure ◽  
Mechanical Linkage ◽  
Manufacturing Technologies ◽  
Dimensional Object ◽  
Anisotropy Of Mechanical Properties ◽  
3D Weaving

Abstract The Fused Filament Fabrication process is the most used additive manufacturing process due to its simplicity and low operating costs. In this process, a thermoplastic filament is led through an extruder, melted, and applied to a building platform by the axial movements of an automated Cartesian system in such a way that a three-dimensional object is created layer by layer. Compared to other additive manufacturing technologies, the components produced have mechanical limitations and are often not suitable for functional applications. To reduce the anisotropy of mechanical strength in fused filament fabrication (FFF), this paper proposes a 3D weaving deposit path planning method that utilizes a 5-layer repetitive structure to achieve interlocking and embedding between neighbor slicing planes to improve the mechanical linkage within the layers. The developed algorithm extends the weaving path as an infill pattern to fill different structures and makes this process feasible on a standard three-axis 3D printer. Compared with 3D weaving printed parts by layer-to-layer deposit, the anisotropy of mechanical properties inside layers is significantly reduced to 10.21% and 0.98%.

scholarly journals Tension testing of additively manufactured specimens of 17-4 PH processed by Bound Metal Deposition

2021 ◽  
Vol 1201 (1) ◽  
pp. 012037
Author(s):  
F Bjørheim ◽  
I M La Torraca Lopez
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Computer Aided Design ◽  
Industrial Sector ◽  
Metal Deposition ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
High Momentum ◽  
Subtractive Manufacturing ◽  
Tension Testing ◽  
Thermal Histories ◽  
Aided Design

Abstract In contrast to the traditional ways of subtractive manufacturing, additive manufacturing (AM), also known as 3D printing, adapts computer-aided design to iteratively build the component or part layer by layer. The technology has recently gained a high momentum, both within academia, but also within the industrial sector. However, it is common that parts produced by AM will have more defects than parts produced by traditional methods. The objective of this paper is to investigate a new method of additive manufacturing, namely the bound metal deposition method (BMD). This method seemed promising from the perspective that the metal is not iteratively being melted, similar to such as welding. In fact, the part is first printed, then washed, for then to be sintered. Consequently, avoiding the complex thermal histories/cycles. It was found that the material will exhibit anisotropic behaviour, and have a mesh of crack like defects, related to the printing orientation.

scholarly journals Sensor-Based Additive Manufacturing Technologies

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 3513-3521
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Wearable Sensors ◽  
Sensor Technology ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Environmental Sensors ◽  
Direct Energy Deposition ◽  
Powder Bed ◽  
Direct Energy ◽  
Building Components ◽  
Manufacturing Technologies

Additive manufacturing is the term that uses the CAD data to build components layer by layer; it is also termed layered manufacturing or 3D printing. The major advantage of additive manufacturing is the capability of building components without the use of molds or tools. Five major categories of AM processes include Powder Bed Fusion (PBF), Direct Energy Deposition (DED), Material Jetting (MJ), Binder Jetting (BJ), and Sheet Lamination (SL). The sensor may be defined as a device that responds to a physical stimulus and transmits a resulting impulse. Sensor technology has been widely adopted in advanced manufacturing, aerospace, biomedical and robotic applications. Commonly used sensors are temperature sensors, strain sensors, biosensors, environmental sensors, and wearable sensors, etc. Additive manufacturing technologies can fabricate sensors and microfluidic devices with less labor. This paper focuses on various sensors developed by additive manufacturing processes, and their practical application for the particular purpose is reviewed.

Electrochemical Defect Analysis (EC-D) of Additive Manufactured Components

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Sous ◽  
Tim Herrig ◽  
Thomas Bergs ◽  
Florian Karges ◽  
Nicole Feiling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Quality Control ◽  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Electrochemical Machining ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Defect Analysis ◽  
Test Rig ◽  
Camera System ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Manufacturing Technologies

Abstract Due to more freedom in design and flexibility in production, parts produced by additive manufacturing technologies (AM) offer a huge potential for the manufacture of turbomachinery components. Because of the layer by layer built structure, internal defects like cracks or gaseous pores can occur. These defects considerably reduce the mechanical properties and increase the importance of quality control, especially in the field of turbomachinery. Therefore, in this study, an electrochemical defect analysis (EC-D) of additive manufactured components is introduced, performed and validated in comparison to a nondestructive X-ray testing of the same part. A test rig was developed, which allows an alternation between electrochemical machining and subsequent optical documentation of each removed layer. The documentation of the surface and the macroscopic defects in the AM-parts are captured by an integrated camera system.

The Earlier the Better? Investigating the Importance of Timing on Effectiveness of Design for Additive Manufacturing Education

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohan Prabhu ◽  
Scarlett R. Miller ◽  
Timothy W. Simpson ◽  
Nicholas A. Meisel
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Design For Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Layer Deposition ◽  
Subtractive Manufacturing ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Design Ideas ◽  
Am Processes

Additive Manufacturing (AM) is a novel process that enables the manufacturing of complex geometries through layer-by-layer deposition of material. AM processes provide a stark contrast to traditional, subtractive manufacturing processes, which has resulted in the emergence of design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) to capitalize on AM’s capabilities. In order to support the increasing use of AM in engineering, it is important to shift from the traditional design for manufacturing and assembly mindset, towards integrating DfAM. To facilitate this, DfAM must be included in the engineering design curriculum in a manner that has the highest impact. While previous research has systematically organized DfAM concepts into process capability-based (opportunistic) and limitation-based (restrictive) considerations, limited research has been conducted on the impact of teaching DfAM on the student’s design process. This study investigates this interaction by comparing two DfAM educational interventions conducted at different points in the academic semester. The two versions are compared by evaluating the students’ perceived utility, change in self-efficacy, and the use of DfAM concepts in design. The results show that introducing DfAM early in the semester when students have little previous experience in AM resulted in the largest gains in students perceiving utility in learning about DfAM concepts and DfAM self-efficacy gains. Further, we see that this increase relates to greater application of opportunistic DfAM concepts in student design ideas in a DfAM challenge. However, no difference was seen in the application of restrictive DfAM concepts between the two interventions. These results can be used to guide the design and implementation of DfAM education.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document