scholarly journals The 9-SRA Scale: A Simplified 9-Items Version of the SRA Scale to Assess Altruism

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 6999
Author(s):  
Enrique Manzur ◽  
Sergio Olavarrieta
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Altruistic Behavior ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Potential Applications ◽  
Validation Procedure ◽  
Item Scale ◽  
Adequate Reliability

In a classic study, Rushton and colleagues presented a 20-item scale to assess the altruistic behavior of people: the Self-Report Altruism (SRA) scale. This article focuses on the development of a simplified 9-item scale—the 9-SRA scale—describing the entire refinement and validation procedure using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The 9-SRA shows adequate reliability and validity and represents a more parsimonious instrument to assess altruism and for use in empirical studies focused on human and prosocial behavior. The article discusses the advantages and potential applications of the new scale.

I Should Have Known Better: Development of a Self-Report Measure of Gullibility

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 408-423
Author(s):  
Alessandra K. Teunisse ◽  
Trevor I. Case ◽  
Julie Fitness ◽  
Naomi Sweller
Keyword(s):  
Social Intelligence ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Factor Analyses ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Large Pool ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
Item Scale ◽  
Report Measure

The aim of this research was to explore the predictors of gullibility and to develop a self-report measure of the construct. In Studies 1 to 3, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on a large pool of items resulting in a 12-item scale with two factors: Persuadability and Insensitivity to cues of untrustworthiness. Study 4 confirmed the criterion validity of the scale using two distinct samples: scam victims and members of the Skeptics Society. Study 5 demonstrated positive relationships between gullibility and the self-reported persuasiveness of, and likelihood of responding to, unsolicited emails. Throughout the article, analyses of a variety of measures expected to converge with the scale provided evidence for its construct validity. Overall, these studies demonstrate that the construct of gullibility is distinct from trust, negatively related to social intelligence, and that the Gullibility Scale is a reliable and valid measure of gullibility.

Technical Analysis of Scores on the Self-Efficacy Self-Report Scale

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley T. Erford ◽  
Hallie Schein ◽  
Kelly Duncan
Keyword(s):  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Test Protocol ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
General Self Efficacy ◽  
Unidimensional Scale

The purpose of this study was to provide preliminary analysis of reliability and validity of scores on the Self-Efficacy Self-Report Scale, which was designed to assess general self-efficacy in students aged 10 to 17 years. Confirmatory factor analysis on cross-validated samples was conducted revealing a marginal fit of the data to the 19-item unidimensional scale. Studies of internal consistency and test–retest reliability revealed adequate levels of total scale consistency. Criterion-related validity estimates were moderate to strong. Norms and a test protocol are provided to encourage free use of the scale for student assessment and research purposes.

scholarly journals Factorial Structure of the Self-Report Barriers for Practice Physical Exercise in Mexican Athletes University Students

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Juan Francisco Aguirre Chavez ◽  
Perla Jannet Jurado Garcia ◽  
Susana Ivonne Aguirre Vasquez ◽  
Jose Rene Blanco Ornelas
Keyword(s):  
Body Image ◽  
Physical Exercise ◽  
University Students ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Factorial Structure ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
The Stability

The present study intends to investigate if the psychometric results are replicated for the Self-Report of Barriers to the Practice of Physical Exercise (ABPEF) in Mexican athletes university students. A total of 651 university students participated (mean age = 20.8 ± 2.4 years). The factorial structure of the questionnaire was analyzed through confirmatory factor analyzes, which showed that a structure of four factors is viable and adequate. The four factors (body image, fatigue, obligations and environment), based on statistical and substantive criteria, have shown adequate fit indicators of reliability and validity. In addition, the results of the factorial analyzes carried out with the sub-samples indicate the existence of strong evidence of the stability of the factorial structure. Future research should replicate these findings in larger samples.

Measuring Collateral Consequences Among Individuals Registered for a Sexual Offense: Development of the Sexual Offender Collateral Consequences Measure

Sexual Abuse ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 107906322110197
Author(s):  
Emma Hamilton ◽  
Delida Sanchez ◽  
Matthew L. Ferrara
Keyword(s):  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Sexual Offender ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Sexual Offense ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Collateral Consequences ◽  
Validity Indicators ◽  
Validated Instrument ◽  
Adequate Reliability

Collateral consequences faced by individuals convicted of a sexual offense have been widely referenced in the literature. There is yet to be a systematic examination of collateral consequences affecting individuals, however, due to measurement inconsistencies and the absence of a psychometrically validated instrument. The current study developed and validated a measure of collateral consequences faced by individuals convicted of a sexual offense. Specifically, this study investigated (a) the underlying factor structure of collateral consequences commonly endorsed by individuals convicted of a sexual offense through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) procedures and (b) reliability and validity indicators of the aforementioned scale. Participants were 218 individuals convicted of and registered for a sexual offense in the state of Texas. Study measures included a pool of 66 collateral consequences items in addition to psychological self-report instruments addressing hopelessness, shame, social well-being, and discrimination. EFA results revealed a two-dimensional construct representing collateral consequences affecting areas of social and psychological well-being. The current measure demonstrated adequate reliability and validity. Limitations and future directions of findings are addressed.

Examining the Link Between Character Strengths and Positive and Negative Mental Health Indicators in Iranian Adolescents

2021 ◽  
pp. 073428292110053
Author(s):  
Mahsa Jabbari ◽  
Shahriar Shahidi ◽  
Leili Panaghi ◽  
Mohammad Ali Mazaheri ◽  
Eva Oberle
Keyword(s):  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Character Strengths ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Health Indicators ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Positive Development ◽  
Response Patterns ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Grade Level Differences

Character strengths are an important foundation for positive development and thriving in adolescence. Most research on character strengths has been conducted with youths in Western cultures. We examined character strengths in relation to positive and negative well-being indicators in a sample of Iranian youths. We investigated the reliability and validity of the Farsi version of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth (VIA Y-96)—a self-report survey commonly used in Western contexts. Participants were adolescents in Iran ( N = 1,359; 48.5% female; M age = 13.54, SD = 1.00) who completed the VIA Y-96 and questionnaires assessing life satisfaction, positive/negative experiences, depression, anxiety, and stress. We found that reliability coefficients were acceptable for most of the VIA subscales. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), as well as a second-order CFA, supported the construct validity of the Farsi VIA Y-96. Correlations between the character strengths and positive and negative well-being indicators supported convergent validity. Measurement invariance for the VIA Y-96 was established in this study comparing boys’ and girls’ response patterns. Sex and grade level differences were found for some of the subscales. Overall, the Farsi VIA Y-96 had acceptable psychometric properties, suggesting that it can be used in research on character strengths with Iranian youths.

Factor Structure of the Borderline Personality Inventory in Adolescents

2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henri Chabrol ◽  
Annie Montovany ◽  
Emmanuelle Ducongé ◽  
Ana Kallmeyer ◽  
Etienne Mullet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Borderline Personality ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Factorial Analysis ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Psychotic Symptoms ◽  
Developmental Issues

Summary: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a frequent disorder in in- and outpatient settings. However, empirical studies suggest that BPD lacks construct validity in adolescents. Problems with validity may be linked to the fact that borderline symptoms can occur in the course of normal adolescence. This study examined the factor structure of borderline symptomatology in a community-based sample of 616 adolescents (mean age = 16.9±1.5). Borderline symptomatology was assessed by the Borderline Personality Inventory (BPI), a self-report instrument for which reliability and validity have been demonstrated. An exploratory factorial analysis, which was performed on the first half of the sample, extracted six factors. They were the dissociative/psychotic symptoms factor, the substance use factor, the interpersonal instability factor, the affectivity/identity disturbances factor, the narcissistic features factor, and the impulsivity factor. This six- factor model was tested using a confirmatory factorial analysis on the second half of the sample and on the whole sample. It provided an adequate fit with the data. This factor structure captured central components of borderline symptomatology. As it differs from the one obtained in the study of the BPI in adults, these components may be specific to adolescents and reflect developmental issues rather than psychopathology.

Testing the Self-Efficacy Questionnaire With Korean Children in Institutionalized Care

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 734-742
Author(s):  
Youngmi Kim ◽  
Kyeongmo Kim ◽  
Shinhye Lee
Keyword(s):  
South Korea ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Significant Negative Correlation ◽  
The Self ◽  
Korean Children ◽  
Practical Evaluation ◽  
Confirmatory Factor

Purpose: We tested the reliability and validity of the Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for Children (SEQ-C) in a sample of children living in orphanages in South Korea. Methods: Our study sample consisted of 334 children aged 13–18 obtained using a convenience sampling method. We conducted a confirmatory factor analysis to identify the factor structure of the 24 self-efficacy items and used a Pearson correlation to explore the scale’s validity. Results: The findings show the SEQ-C is a reliable scale with a three-factor model measuring social, academic, and emotional self-efficacy. Construct validity was also supported by finding a significant negative correlation between self-efficacy and depression. Conclusions: Our study informs social workers and researchers that the SEQ-C measure is a useful tool for practical evaluation and intervention that can be used for children with disadvantaged socioeconomic backgrounds in South Korea.

Evaluation of the MacDonald, Kessel, and Fuller Self-Report Trust Scale

1988 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 961-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosemary R. Lagace ◽  
Gary K. Rhoads
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Factor Solution ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Trust Scale

An assessment of the dimensionality and reliability of the Self-report Trust Scale developed by MacDonald, Kessel, and Fuller in 1972 was made. Using 287 full-time employed adults as subjects, the initial confirmatory factor analysis of a one-factor solution was soundly rejected. Further analyses supported a two-factor solution with four items each. It is recommended that both dimensions (trust and suspicion) be investigated in research.

Screening Adolescents with Mental Retardation for Depression

2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah H. Ailey
Keyword(s):  
Mental Retardation ◽  
Dual Diagnosis ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
School Nurses ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Mild Mental Retardation ◽  
Depression Subscale ◽  
Individualized Educational Plans ◽  
Adequate Reliability

This study investigated the reliability and validity of the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) using 27 adolescents with mild mental retardation attending schools in a large metropolitan area. Cronbach's alpha was 0.79 and the test/retest correlation was 0,90 at 10 days to 2 weeks, indicating adequate reliability. Scores on the self-report CDI were compared with scores on an observer-completed inventory of psychopathology filled out by teachers and other staff, the Reiss Scales for Children's Dual Diagnosis. For female students, statistically significant negative associations were found between scores on the CDI and scores on the Reiss Scales and its depression subscale. Screening adolescents with mental retardation for depression should be an important part of Individualized Educational Plans for school nurses. School staff report should not be the only method of screening for depression in adolescents with mild mental retardation. School nurses may find the CDI useful as a self report screening tool for depression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document