On the prospects for the evolution of the problematics of economic theory in the period after the COVID-19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
pp. 3-14
Author(s):  
V. E. Dementiev
Keyword(s):  
Economic Theory ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Scientific Development ◽  
Economic Systems ◽  
Economic Science ◽  
Close Attention ◽  
Economic Agents ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
National Economies ◽  
Structural Solutions

The article is devoted to the prospects of the evolution of the problematics of economic theory in the post-COVID period. At the same time, the author proceeds from a number of methodological assumptions, including the following two. First, one of the general and enduring tasks of this theory is to anticipate the next challenges on the path of socio-economic development. Secondly, the reconstruction of history is considered in economic science as a tool not only for solving current problems, but also for predicting new challenges. For example, is it advisable to maintain the increased influence of the state on the economy in the context of COVID-19 after the end of the pandemic? This is one of the questions facing economic theory. It is given a non-trivial nature by the tendency of increasing various risks faced by socio-economic development. The challenges associated with the artificial overflow of information channels and manipulation of the behavior of economic agents require close attention. As a particularly important task of economic science, the author sees the search for ways to adapt national economies and their agents in the increased turbulence of the economic environment as a «new normality». As a result, the importance of scientific development of institutional and structural solutions that ensure the adaptability of socio-economic systems increases dramatically.

Sociostructural Aspects of Socio-Economic Development:The role of Economic approach

2014 ◽  
pp. 86-105
Author(s):  
M. Shabanova
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Structural Factors ◽  
Economic Approach ◽  
Economic Agents ◽  
Socio Economic Development

The author discusses the importance of studying socio-structural factors of socio-economic development through a broader application of the economic approach. The resources of status positions of economic agents are in the spotlight. A possible platform for interdisciplinary interactions is proposed which allows to increase the contribution of both economics and sociology in improving governance at all levels.

Structuralism as a Pamphlet (On the Book by E. Reinert “How Rich CountriesGot Rich... And Why Poor Countries Stay Poor”. 2nd ed.)

2014 ◽  
pp. 147-153
Author(s):  
P. Orekhovsky
Keyword(s):  
Economic Theory ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Structural Analysis ◽  
Increasing Returns ◽  
The Other ◽  
Static Theory ◽  
Poor Countries ◽  
Historical School ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
The Relationship

The review outlines the connection between E. Reinert’s book and the tradition of structural analysis. The latter allows for the heterogeneity of industries and sectors of the economy, as well as for the effects of increasing and decreasing returns. Unlike the static theory of international trade inherited from the Ricardian analysis of comparative advantage, this approach helps identify the relationship between trade, production, income and population growth. Reinert rehabilitates the “other canon” of economic theory associated with the mercantilist tradition, F. Liszt and the German historical school, as well as a reconside ration of A. Marshall’s analysis of increasing returns. Empirical illustrations given in the book reveal clear parallels with the path of Russian socio-economic development in the last twenty years.

Determining and evaluating the level of socio-economic risks for Russia to respond to ‘Grand Challenges’

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 443-469
Author(s):  
Nataliya V. KUZNETSOVA ◽  
Ekaterina V. KOCHEVA ◽  
Nikolai A. MATEV
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Risk Mitigation ◽  
Market Potential ◽  
Russian Regions ◽  
Economic Agents ◽  
Grand Challenges ◽  
Technological Gap ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Mitigation Methods ◽  
Economic Risks

Subject. The modern economic development strongly depend on a powerful regulator, such as grand challenges, which have become a critical barrier, requirement, level that should be attained. Considering the grand challenges, the country set up goals and tasks for the coming period and adjusts operations of economic agents. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the gap between the absolute and current market potential with reference to qualitative and quantitative indicators. The study is called to assess whether Russia is prepared for the existing and arising grand challenges. We also determine risk mitigation methods and the probability of negative scenarios. Objectives. We determine and evaluate the level of socio-economic risks for Russia to respond to the grand challenges. We also pinpoint key directions for the Russian regions to continue their socio-economic development in order to promote their further economic growth. Methods. The study presents the economic-mathematical modeling of the nexus among factors that determine socio-economic risks of the GRP dynamics to find their mitigation methods. In the study, the logit-model with dummy variables that attribute the regions to certain clusters. Results. We analyzed and classified risks of the Russian regions by 10 integral indicators. The article shows homogeneous regional zones exposed to similar socio-economic development risks. We also carry out the multivariate classification of the Russian regions by the risks assessed. As the findings show, the Russian regions strongly differ by socio-economic risks. The article spotlights priorities of the socio-economic development of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Conclusions and Relevance. As their key development vector, the Russian regions need to overcome the technological gap, mitigate the S&T potential risk and a drop in the innovative activity of the economy.

scholarly journals REGULATION OF SEPARATE ASPECTS OF ECONOMIC SECURITY IN THE SPHERE OF LAND AND PROPERTY RELATIONS

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (34) ◽  
pp. 26-31
Author(s):  
O.V. Mamatelashvili ◽  
◽  
Ts.T Khisamova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Geographical Location ◽  
Integral Characteristic ◽  
Economic Security ◽  
Natural Fertility ◽  
Land Resources ◽  
Economic Agents ◽  
Property Relations ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Land Relations

The article presents a scientific consideration of the development of regulation of economic security in the field of land and property relations through the prism of lease relations in the use of covered areas. The main problems in the field of land relations are revealed, which can be addressed by scientific research, including on the further development of methods for calculating the rental rate, which should be an integral characteristic that includes various parameters. The authors concluded that the rent rate should be differentiated taking into account various characteristics reflecting the quality of land resources, their natural fertility, geographical location, the level of economic efficiency of the type of activity planned on a specific land plot. Taken together, the listed characteristics make up the investment attractiveness of land resources. The article defines the principles of economic policy on which the system of ensuring economic security in the field of land and property relations should be built, taking into account the specific features and the level of socio-economic development of the regions. It is noted that opportunities for a balanced and sustainable development of territories are determined not only by the available resource potential, competitive advantages in the level of development, but also by the presence of institutional mechanisms for enhancing business activity of business, including in the land and property sphere. Currently, the most common form of land transactions are transactions for the acquisition of rights to lease state and municipal land. This form of land use is a type of rental relationship in the national economy. The important role of harmonization and establishment of a balance of economic interests of public law entities as land owners and tenants as economic agents is noted. The mechanism for the formation of rent on the basis of the agreed interests of the subjects of rental relations is one of the main institutional tools for land management in the region, on which the efficiency and rationality of their use, sustainable socio-economic development of territories and the state as a whole depend. The key principle of the formation of land payments should be the principle of economic justification of its value.

scholarly journals SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPED AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES UNDER GLOBALIZATION: ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCES

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (0) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Mindaugas Butkus ◽  
Smiltė Jonušaitė
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Main Idea ◽  
Economic Globalization ◽  
Economic Factors ◽  
Weak States ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Real Gdp ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
National Economies

Globalization is a process, which means the interrelationship of national economies across the whole world in affairs such as labor, trade, investment and the movement of services, goods and people with their knowledge and traditions. The phenomenon of globalization progresses all the time and involves total fields of the country. It can be claimed that every matter has its own advantages and disadvantages, globalization is not an exception. Because of these reasons, the study compares economic globalization, which manifests itself differently depending on the effects of globalization. Therefore, research objective – impact of globalization on strong and weak states of economic processes. Research objective – to analyze the contact of globalization on economic growth. Continuing, empirical research has chosen to investigate the interaction of some economic factors with real GDP, which is one of the main economic indicators characterizing the country’s economic development. The main idea in the future – to include as many economic factors as possible in the study in order to achieve more accurate results.

scholarly journals LOOKING BACK AS THE FOUNDATION FOR THE STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT OF CONTROLLED SOCIO-ECONOMIC SYSTEMS

2021 ◽  
pp. 123-137
Author(s):  
Алексей Васильевич Тебекин
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Economic Systems ◽  
Scientific School ◽  
Strategic Development ◽  
The Public ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Implementation Of The Strategy

Цель статьи - в интересах обеспечения эффективности формирования и реализации стратегии социально-экономического развития Российской Федерации на период до 2030 года проанализировать результаты реализации «Стратегии-2020», обсуждение которых не нашло должного отражения как в системе государственного управления, так и в научной среде. В качестве инструмента анализа результатов реализации «Стратегии-2020» в работе использован «взгляд назад» как элемент зрительной системы научной школы предпринимательства Й. Шумпетера. Выбор указанного инструмента обусловлен тем, что именно он дает понимание, на каком фундаменте реализации прошлых стратегий придется строить и реализовывать стратегии будущего развития управляемой социально-экономической системы. Научная новизна заключается в сформулированных на основе комплексного анализа результатов реализации «Стратегии-2020» рекомендациях по формированию «Стратегии-2030» социально-экономического развития Российской Федерации. N the interests of ensuring the effectiveness of the formation and implementation of the strategy for the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030, the author has analyzed the results of the implementation of the «Strategy 2020» the discussion of which has not been properly reflected both in the public administration system and in the scientific community. As a tool for analyzing the results of the implementation of «Strategy 2020», the work uses a «look back» as an element of the visual system of the scientific school of entrepreneurship by J. Schumpeter. The choice of this tool is due to the fact that it is he who gives an understanding on what foundation the implementation of past strategies will have to build and implement strategies for the future development of a controlled socio-economic system. On the basis of a comprehensive analysis of the results of the implementation of the «Strategy-2020» recommendations were formulated for the formation of the “Strategy-2030” of the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation.

scholarly journals TAX DISTRIBUTION OF REGIONAL ECONOMIC COOPERATION UNDER GLOCALIZATION AND LOCAL SELFFGOVERNANCE REFORMING CONDITIONS

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1(70)) ◽  
pp. 85-97
Author(s):  
O.I. LAIKO ◽  
V.P. TALPA ◽  
Z.V. CHECHOVICH
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Economic Cooperation ◽  
Economic Systems ◽  
Regional Economic ◽  
Investment Projects ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Scientific Principles ◽  
Regulatory Measures ◽  
Administrative Units ◽  
Stimulation Of

Topicality. The urgency is explained by the need of use of taxation regulatory leverage for stimulation of territorial communities cooperation, as well as the development of scientifically substantiated grounds for the economic cooperation of regional economic systems is to be developed in order to increase their socio-economic development and on the basis of improving of the institutional basis in favorable conditions for local self-government reform and inclusion of local systems globalization processes. In the process of active decentralization reform, realization of efforts to build effective local selfgovernance and achieve the development of territorial economic systems on the basis of European integration and the implementation of international best practices and trends, it is necessary to regulate the use of cooperation measures. The practice of applying of contractual forms of cooperation between administrative units in order to improve their economic capacity, which has been spread in the EU, has not been widely disseminated and implemented in Ukraine, despite its exceptional value as a measure to stimulate the socio-economic development of the regions and as an instrument for implementing of strategic documents initiatives on regional policy in Ukraine and in the EU.Aim and tasks. The purpose of the article is to determine the scientific basis for tax incentives for regional economic cooperation as a measure of increase of socio-economic development level, to substantiate the proposals of stimulation of the implementation of investment and innovative projects, that are aimed at improving the community's welfare on local, regional, national and international levels due cooperation tools and better use of local resources and the benefits of territorial units during their participation in economic exchange, that is - during the glocalization process.Research results. It's proposed the scientific principles of tax stimulation of economic cooperation at the regional level and the essence of regional economic cooperation process, achieved by administrative units, is determined. It's stated that such sense should correspond and improve the existing principles and provisions of the European regional policy, implementation means of which are to be updated in accordance with national features and trends of economic system development. The scientific principles and measures that are to stimulate economic cooperation are developed on the basis of actual provisions of the modern institutional environment, including the Tax and Budget Codes of Ukraine. It has been established that the proposed regulatory tax measures have become possible for practical use, on the basis of appropriate scientific justification, due to modern changes in the budget legislation and are promising for implementation, especially in the aspect of the implementation of new large-scale investment projects, and as a lever to support the development of economic growth.The list of local taxes and fees with the help of which it is possible to stimulate regional economic cooperation is determined, the methodical bases of the regulation of economic cooperation are formulated, in the context of inclusion of territorial communities in the processes of global economic exchange. The measures of stimulation of economic cooperation and implementation of strategically important investment projects with global character are proposed. The measures are to establish preferential rates for local taxes within the existing powers of local self-governmental bodies, the application of privileges for reinvestment operations, the drawing up of strategic plans for promising investment-oriented taxation at the territorial level communities and regions.Conclusion. The results of the research are outlined in the article, in the form of regulatory measures, and are actually necessary for central and regional authorities, since they contain a scientific justification for the effective promotion of economic transformations in a territorial context in according to the implementation needs of the reform of local self-governance and taking into account the influence of the processes of globalization. The prospect for further research includes the formulation of methodological approaches to the determining of tax regulators set that are to stimulate socio-economic development and stimulate regional cooperation, to assess the effectiveness of such regulatory measures.

scholarly journals From Growth Poles and Clusters to Business Ecosystems Dynamics: The ILDI Counterproposal

2020 ◽  
pp. 115-126
Author(s):  
Charis Vlados ◽  
Dimos Chatzinikolaou
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Competitive Ability ◽  
Local Development ◽  
Economic Systems ◽  
Spatial Evolution ◽  
Economic Organizations ◽  
Business Ecosystems ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
And Diffusion

The study of spatial socio-economic development constitutes a significant field of analysis of innovation creation and diffusion. Understanding the spatial evolution of the different socio-economic systems in the age of globalization requires a synthesizing and integrated theoretical approach to how innovation is generated and replicated. This article aims to study three significant spatial socio-economic development theories –the growth poles, the clusters, and the business ecosystems. A literature review reveals that (a) the concept of growth poles concerns mostly the analysis of spatial polarization between specific territories and regions, (b) the clusters concept addresses the issue of developed inter-industrial competition and co-operation from a meso-level perspective, and (c) the analytical field of business ecosystems provides an evolutionary approach that can be valorized for all co-evolving spatial socio-economic organizations. In this context, an eclectically interventional mechanism to strengthen innovation is suggested. The Institutes of Local Development and Innovation (ILDI) policy is proposed for all firms and business ecosystems, of every size, level of spatial development, prior knowledge, specialization, and competitive ability. The ILDI is presented as an intermediate organization capable of diagnosing and enhancing the firm’s physiology in structural Stra.Tech.Man terms (strategy-technology-management synthesis).

General Requirements for Digital Government

2011 ◽  
pp. 98-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolae Costake
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Present Article ◽  
Information And Communications Technology ◽  
Economic Systems ◽  
Communications Technology ◽  
Digital Government ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Modern Information ◽  
Points Of View

“Digital government” (DG), “online government,” “e-government (eGvt),” and “e-governance (eG)” are widely used terms. They suggest the use of modern information and communications technology (ICT) in the governance of socio-economic systems (SES). It is widely accepted that the goal consists in increasing the performance of the governance. This can be considered in the sense of improving the services provided to citizens and organizations and also of improving the socio-economic development. There are still various points of view concerning the scope and strategy. The purpose of the present article, based on existing results and trends, is to propose a set of general requirements for the informatized governance of socio-economic systems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document