scholarly journals The Treatment of Bone Marrow Lesions Associated with Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis: Comparing Intraosseous and Intraarticular Injections with Bone Marrow Concentrate and Platelet Products

2021 ◽  
pp. E279-E288
Author(s):  
Ehren Dodson

Background: Bone marrow lesions are a radiographic indication of bony pathology closely associated with advanced osteoarthritis of the adjacent joint. Injection of autologous orthobiologic products, including bone marrow concentrate and platelet-rich plasma, have demonstrated safety and efficacy in treating both advanced osteoarthritis (via intraarticular injection) and associated bone marrow lesions (via intraosseous injection). The relative efficacy of intraarticular versus intraosseous injection of orthobiologics has not been evaluated at the present time. Objectives: The objective was to evaluate differences in orthobiologic bone marrow lesions treatment, either as a collateral result of intraarticular injection with bone marrow concentrate and platelet products alone, or intraosseous plus intraarticular injection as measured by patient reported outcomes. Study Design: This study employed a prospective case-matched cohort design. Setting: This study took place at a single outpatient interventional orthopedic pain clinic. Methods: Using data from a prospective orthobiologic treatment registry of knee patients, a population of knee osteoarthritis with bone marrow lesions patients who had undergone only intraarticular knee injections of bone marrow concentrate and platelets (for symptomatic advanced osteoarthritis) were age, gender, and disease severity case-matched to a series of advanced osteoarthritis and bone marrow lesions patients who underwent intraosseous plus intraarticular injections. Self-reported patient outcomes for Numeric Pain Scale, International Knee Documentation Committee, lower extremity functional scale, and a modified single assessment numeric evaluation were compared between the 2 treatment groups. Results: Eighty patients were included, 40 in each group. Although pain and functional outcome scores were significantly improved in both treatment groups, there was no statistically significant differences in patient reported outcomes based on the type of treatment. Limitations: There are several limitations to this study, including multiple providers performing the injections, varying onset of symptoms to treatment, and additional injections after their initial treatment, that were not controlled. In addition, increasing the sample size may be beneficial as well, particularly with the large bone marrow lesions group, which did suggest possible improvement with intraosseous plus intraarticular over the intraarticular, although was not statistically significant in our sample. Limited data availability for this cohort as well as some missing data are other limitations to consider. Conclusion: Treating knee bone marrow lesions with intraosseous bone marrow concentrate and platelet products did not affect patient reported outcomes. Key words: Intraosseous, intraarticular, bone marrow concentrate, bone marrow lesion, bone marrow edema, knee osteoarthritis, platelet-rich plasma, injection

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0029
Author(s):  
Christopher Hajnik ◽  
Sam Akhavan ◽  
Douglas J. Wyland ◽  
Steven B. Cohen ◽  
Laith M. Jazrawi ◽  
...  

Objectives: Bone Marrow Lesions (BML) are a common finding on knee MRI. In the knee, BML have a strong correlation to patient-reported pain, function, joint deterioration and rapid progression to TKR. Histologic analyses of BML have demonstrated findings consistent with fracture and bony remodeling of the trabeculae. The Subchondroplasty (SCP®) Procedure aims to treat the bone defects present in the BML by percutaneously filling them with a bone substitute material, designed to flow through intact bone, harden at body temperature and then heal through natural bone turnover. Previous retrospective, single-center case series have demonstrated improvements in patient-reported outcomes. The purpose of this prospective, multi-center study is to evaluate the 2-year clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with BML of the knee treated with the Subchondroplasty Procedure. Methods: Seventy patients were treated between 2012 and 2017 for BML of the tibial plateau and/or femoral condyle. Self-drilling cannulas were inserted into the BML using arthroscopic and fluoroscopic guidance, then injected with AccuFill® Bone Substitute Material. All patients also underwent arthroscopy to aid in targeting the underlying bony lesion and address intra-articular pathology. MRIs and radiographs were obtained pre-operatively, at 6, 12 and 24 months, with additional radiographs collected at 6 weeks and 3 months. Patient-reported outcomes, including VAS pain, IKDC and KOOS were collected pre-operatively, 2 and 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. Results: Seventy patients (36 males and 34 females), average age 57 were consented and enrolled in the study. Preoperative K-L grade included 1.4% Grade 0, 2.9% Grade 1, 27.1% Grade 2, 55.7% Grade 3 and 7.1% Grade 4. Fifty eight tibial plateaus and 41 femoral condyles were treated (29 bipolar lesions treated). VAS Pain scores improved from a mean of 6.2/10 pre-op to 2.9/10 at 1 year. IKDC scores improved from mean 33.9 pre-op to 61.3 at 1 year. KOOS scores improved from baseline to 1 year (Fig. 1) with mean KOOS Pain from 45.8 to 73.9, ADL 52.9 to 79.2, Symptoms 49.7 to 71.9, Sports 21.2 to 49.9 and Quality of Life 18.1 to 52.3. All patient-reported outcomes showed statistically significant improvement at one year. Two year outcomes collected to date appear to follow the same trend. The last study subject is due to return in January 2019 at which point the final 2 year analysis will be completed. Six patients (8.6%) converted to arthroplasty (1 UKA and 5 TKA) at one year. To date, the 24 month conversion rate is 16.1% out of 62 subjects. The final conversion rate for 24 months will be calculated after the final subject returns. Radiographs and MRIs demonstrated good incorporation of the AccuFill material through 12 months with evidence of early remodeling and a lack of OA progression in the majority of subjects. Twenty-four month MRIs demonstrate continued remodeling of the AccuFill material. Conclusion: This study presents statistically and clinically-meaningful evidence of improvements in clinical outcomes following Subchondroplasty procedure for BML of the knee. The low conversion rate suggests this less-invasive procedure may delay the need for knee arthroplasty. MR imaging demonstrates good incorporation of the BSM and evidence of remodeling and reduction in material volume over time. [Figure: see text][Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110188
Author(s):  
Laura E. Keeling ◽  
John W. Belk ◽  
Matthew J. Kraeutler ◽  
Alexandra C. Kallner ◽  
Adam Lindsay ◽  
...  

Background: Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) has emerged as a therapeutic option for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). Purpose: To systematically review the literature to evaluate the efficacy of isolated BMAC injection in the treatment of OA of the knee joint. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to July 2020 to identify human studies that assessed the clinical outcomes of isolated BMAC injection for the treatment of knee OA. The electronic search strategy used was “bone marrow aspirate concentrate knee osteoarthritis.” Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, including a total of 299 knees with a mean follow-up of 12.9 months (range, 6-30 months). Of all patient-reported outcomes assessed across studies, 34 of 36 (94.4%) demonstrated significant improvement from baseline to latest follow-up ( P < .05). Five studies evaluating numerical pain scores (visual analog scale and Numeric Rating Scale) reported significant improvements in pain level at final follow-up ( P < .01). However, 3 comparative studies evaluating BMAC in relation to other therapeutic injections failed to demonstrate the clinical superiority of BMAC. Conclusion: The BMAC injection is effective in improving pain and patient-reported outcomes in patients with knee OA at short- to midterm follow-up. Nevertheless, BMAC has not demonstrated clinical superiority in relation to other biologic therapies commonly used in the treatment of OA, including platelet-rich plasma and microfragmented adipose tissue, or in relation to placebo. The high cost of the BMAC injection in comparison with other biologic and nonoperative treatment modalities may limit its utility despite demonstrable clinical benefit.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prathap Jayaram ◽  
Gu Eon Kang ◽  
Brett L Heldt ◽  
Olumide Sokunbi ◽  
Bo Song ◽  
...  

Background: Leukocyte-rich platelet-rich plasma (LR-PRP) has demonstrated to be beneficial for patient with knee osteoarthritis (KOA); however, reliable objective end points to accurately assess its therapeutic effects is lacking. Aim: To investigate the efficacy of LR-PRP as assessed by functional and patient-reported outcomes at early time-points (6 weeks). Materials & methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study in 12 patients with diagnosed KOA (Kellgren Lawrence score of II–III), who underwent a single ultrasound-guided LR-PRP injection. Results: There was significant improvement in timed up and go, pain and quality of life scales and balance parameters. There were nonsignificant improvements in range of motion and gait parameters. Conclusion: LR-PRP demonstrates efficacy in meaningful end points for functional and patient reported outcomes at early time points in patients with KOA.


2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652199801
Author(s):  
Michael R. Baria ◽  
W. Kelton Vasileff ◽  
James Borchers ◽  
Alex DiBartola ◽  
David C. Flanigan ◽  
...  

Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) are injectable treatments for knee osteoarthritis. The focus of previous studies has compared their efficacy against each other as monotherapy. However, a new trend of combining these 2 injections has emerged in an attempt to have a synergistic effect. Purpose: To systematically review the clinical literature examining the combined use of PRP + HA. Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using PubMed and Embase. The following search terms were used: knee osteoarthritis AND platelet rich plasma AND hyaluronic acid. The review was performed by 2 independent reviewers who applied the inclusion/exclusion criteria and independently extracted data, including methodologic scoring, PRP preparation technique, HA composition, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Results: A total of 431 articles were screened, 12 reviewed in full, and 8 included in the final analysis: 2 case series, 3 comparative, and 3 randomized studies. Average follow-up was 9 months. The modified Coleman Methodology Score was 38.13 ± 13.1 (mean ± SD). Combination therapy resulted in improved PROs in all studies. Of the comparative and randomized studies, 2 demonstrated that combination therapy was superior to HA alone. However, when PRP alone was used as the control arm (4 studies), combination therapy was not superior to PRP alone. Conclusion: Combination therapy with PRP + HA improves PROs and is superior to HA alone but is not superior to PRP alone.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Habib Zahir ◽  
Bijan Dehghani ◽  
Xiaoning Yuan ◽  
Yurii Chinenov ◽  
Christine Kim ◽  
...  

AbstractAutologous blood-derived products such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) are widely used to treat musculoskeletal conditions, including knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, the clinical outcomes after PRP administration are often variable, and there is limited information about the specific characteristics of PRP that impact bioactivity and clinical responses. In this study, we aimed to develop an integrative workflow to evaluate responses to PRP in vitro, and to assess if the in vitro responses to PRP are associated with the PRP composition and clinical outcomes in patients with knee OA. To do this, we used a coculture system of macrophages and fibroblasts paired with transcriptomic analyses to comprehensively characterize the modulation of inflammatory responses by PRP in vitro. Relying on patient-reported outcomes and achievement of minimal clinically important differences in OA patients receiving PRP injections, we identified responders and non-responders to the treatment. Comparisons of PRP from these patient groups allowed us to identify differences in the composition and in vitro activity of PRP. We believe that our integrative workflow may enable the development of targeted approaches that rely on PRP and other orthobiologics to treat musculoskeletal pathologies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (19) ◽  
pp. 7374
Author(s):  
Gilberto Y. Nakama ◽  
Sabrina Gonzalez ◽  
Polina Matre ◽  
Xiaodong Mu ◽  
Kaitlyn E. Whitney ◽  
...  

Recent efforts have focused on customizing orthobiologics, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and bone marrow concentrate (BMC), to improve tissue repair. We hypothesized that oral losartan (a TGF-β1 blocker with anti-fibrotic properties) could decrease TGF-β1 levels in leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP) and fibrocytes in BMC. Ten rabbits were randomized into two groups (N = 5/group): osteochondral defect + microfracture (control, group 1) and osteochondral defect + microfracture + losartan (losartan, group 2). For group 2, a dose of 10mg/kg/day of losartan was administrated orally for 12 weeks post-operatively. After 12 weeks, whole blood (WB) and bone marrow aspirate (BMA) samples were collected to process LP-PRP and BMC. TGF-β1 concentrations were measured in WB and LP-PRP with multiplex immunoassay. BMC cell populations were analyzed by flow cytometry with CD31, CD44, CD45, CD34, CD146 and CD90 antibodies. There was no significant difference in TGF-β1 levels between the losartan and control group in WB or LP-PRP. In BMC, the percentage of CD31+ cells (endothelial cells) in the losartan group was significantly higher than the control group (p = 0.008), while the percentage of CD45+ cells (hematopoietic cells-fibrocytes) in the losartan group was significantly lower than the control group (p = 0.03).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document