scholarly journals Legal regulation of the law enforcement function of the Federal service of the National guard of the Russian Federation as one of the main elements of the system of activities of the created executive body

2021 ◽  
pp. 147-150
Author(s):  
Lyudmila Garnik
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
National Guard ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Executive Authority ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Executive Body

In the article, the author analyzes the legal provisions governing the law enforcement function of the Federal Service of the National Guard of the Russian Federation (Rosgvardia), as one of the significant areas of activity of the created executive authority, designed to carry out state and public security, protection of human and civil rights and freedoms. The analysis of legal acts, according to the author, will allow the identification of unresolved issues at the legislative level and will contribute to the formulation of new proposals to improve the activities of Rosguard units.

scholarly journals Functions of the Federal service of the National guard troops of the Russian Federation

2020 ◽  
pp. 111-115
Author(s):  
Lyudmila Garnik
Keyword(s):  
Federal Government ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
National Guard ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Government Body ◽  
Executive Body

In this article, the author analyzes the legal provisions that consolidate the functions of the Federal Service of the National Guard Troops of the Russian Federation (Rosguard), in the process, which identifies the main (main), additional and optional areas of activity of the executive body under study, which helps to clarify and clarify the purpose created by a federal government body.

scholarly journals Discretionary Model of Legal Regulation of a Criminal Case and Criminal Prosecution Termination: Pro et Contra

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 214-222
Author(s):  
G. N. Kucherov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Enforcement Officer ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Law Enforcement Officer ◽  
The Law

The paper discusses the issues of choosing the most effective model of criminal proceedings termination, analyzes the proposed in the scientific literature model of refusal of the discretion of the law enforcement officer when making an appropriate procedural decision. The author, based on the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the decisions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, studies the relationship between the principle of justice and the legality of procedural decisions to terminate a criminal case and criminal prosecution. The author concludes that the discretionary model of legal regulation of a criminal case and criminal prosecution termination is an effective means of achieving the purpose of criminal proceedings, allowing the law enforcement officer to make a fair decision, given the nature, degree of social danger of the crime, the circumstances of its commission, information about the identity of the person who committed the crime. Refusal of the discretion of the law enforcement officer in the matter of terminating a criminal case will not only not contribute to the humanization of legislation, but will mark the victory of formalism over justice in criminal proceedings.

scholarly journals Application of the Principle of Increased Tolerance of Public Persons to Criticism Addressed to Them in the Russian Federation

2019 ◽  
pp. 29-34
Author(s):  
E. V. Loos
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Freedom Of Expression ◽  
European Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Russian Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Official Status

The article discusses the legal and philosophical aspects of the application in the Russian Federation of the principle of increased tolerance of public persons to criticism addressed to them established by the European Court of Human Rights. The author believes that the principle in question contradicts Article 19 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation that guarantees equality of human and civil rights and freedoms regardless of property and official status, membership in public associations, as well as other circumstances. The author has questioned the appropriateness of the introduction of the principle of increased tolerance in Russian law enforcement practice, since it does not contribute to the realization of the “spirit of the law,” while leading to unnecessary accumulation of the law. It is noted that the question of the balance between the right to freedom of expression and opinion and the right to protection of the honour and dignity of the person in the process of criticism of public persons and their activities cannot be settled exhaustively in the legislation as it affects the sphere of morality.

scholarly journals The Concept of Freedom of Enterprise Through the Prism of Criminal Law Characteristics of Fraud

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-299
Author(s):  
Yekaterina Yakimova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Entrepreneurial Activities

The research of issues connected with the analysis of business risks is relevant because of the problem of qualifying the actions of entrepreneurs under the fraud-related Articles of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Besides, the development of technologies increases the number of frauds in the digital environment, which makes it necessary to determine key features of fraudulent actions connected with the changes in the economic organization of the society connected with the digital transformation of some branches of the world economy in general and Russian economy in particular, of the social sphere, and of the specifics of public administration of some areas of life. The responsiveness of lawmakers manifested in amending a group of Articles in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation regarding the legal characteristics of fraud, shows that there are some problems in the legislative regulation of this sphere. The author believes that they are caused by an attempt to assess the degree of freedom of enterprise and the degree of involvement of each side of legal relations in the risk of investment. The analysis of legislation, the law enforcement practice, statistical data give reason to believe that most of the problems of legislative understanding of fraud in entrepreneurship are not connected with contradictions in the legal regulation, but rather with the drawbacks of the law enforcement practice, the prevalence of repressive methodology in classifying the actions of entrepreneurs and the inner conviction of the law enforcement employees that entrepreneurs intentionally strive to obtain negative results in any, and primarily entrepreneurial, activities. The author argues that further improvement of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation will not yield any tangible results, which testifies to a considerable transformation of the fraud-related Articles in the last 15 years. Changes in the practice of enforcement of the criminal law’s articles regarding fraud are only possible after the principles of such work are worked out by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, who at present pays much attention to this issue, although some clauses of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation require further analysis and improvement.

scholarly journals House Arrest of the Accused (Suspect): Full Isolation and the Right to Walk

2020 ◽  
pp. 43-46
Author(s):  
Valentina N. Gaponova ◽  
◽  
Varsenik A. Vinogradova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Preventive Measure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
House Arrest ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

The article analyzes the changes in the legal regulation of the house arrest and the practice of its imposition. Particular attention is given to the controversial issue of the right of the accused under house arrest to leave the premises for a walk. The authors note that the Normative Transformation of House Arrest, which brought it closer to detention, set the law enforcement task to overcome the established stereotypes in the interpretation of specific provisions related to the essence of this preventive measure. First, it concerns the “regime” of isolation, specifically, the possibility of the accused to take walks. Today, when the house arrest implies ultimate isolation of the accused with the right to live in their home, the court’s permission for the accused to leave the place of residence is not based on the law. The authors conclude that the positive decision of the court is permissible only because of applying the law by analogy. At the same time, it is necessary to take into account the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the responsibility of the state to take care of the health of persons whose possibilities in this part are limited due to the election of preventive measures with isolation from society.

Trends in the Legislation of the Russian Federation in the Sphere of Regulated Procurements

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 0-0 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ольга Беляева ◽  
Olga Byelyayeva
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Specific Group ◽  
Uniform Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Entities ◽  
The Way

The article contains the analysis of the Russian legislation on regulated purchases during the period starting the year 2012. It contains substantiated civil nature of purchasing relations, the circle of people whose purchasing activities are subordinated to the effects of legislation regulating the contractual system and to the Federal law “Of purchase of goods, works and services by certain types of legal entities”. The author traces the trends that are relevant to the development of legislation on purchasing practices. Specially outlined is the trend of extrapolation of the law when this law has no specific group of participants to regulate, and the tendency of creating “the purchasing code”, in other words, to eliminate differentiated legal regulation and to establish common purchase standards to be applied to the whole of contract system. The article describes the possible pending changes in the contract legislation. Also, an attempt is made to assess the effectiveness of the regulated procurements legislation which helps to identify problem areas such as distortions in the meaning of the law the way it is interpreted in by-laws, existence of legal gaps and collisions, lack of uniform law-enforcement standards.

Analogy as ways to overcome gaps in penal legislation of a sentence of deprivation of liberty

2020 ◽  
pp. 142-148
Author(s):  
Александр Александрович Храмов
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
General Theory ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Theory Of Law ◽  
Principle Of Legality

Актуальность статьи обусловлена отсутствием в теории уголовно-исполнительного права и практике его применения научно обоснованной методики установления реальных пробелов в уголовно-исполнительном законодательстве, единых границ и условий применения аналогии закона и права для преодоления существующих в нем пробелов, в частности, при исполнении наказания в виде лишения свободы. В статье отмечаются теоретические и практические аспекты преодоления по аналогии не только некоторых реально существующих пробелов уголовно-исполнительного законодательства исправительными учреждениями, но и других недостатков правового регулирования. С учетом признанных общей теорией права и наукой уголовно-исполнительного права положений по преодолению пробелов в законе и праве, а также требований российского законодательства (ч. 3 ст. 55 Конституции РФ) делается вывод, что в правоприменительной практике имеются случаи применения уголовно-исполнительного законодательства по аналогии (как правило, аналогии «закона»), которое приводит к ущемлению прав и свобод человека и гражданина и нарушению принципа законности (ст. 8 УИК РФ). В связи с этим автором предлагается установить четкие границы и пределы использования аналогии закона и права для преодоления существующих (и возможно, будущих) пробелов уголовно-исполнительного законодательства при исполнении наказаний, в том числе в виде лишения свободы. The relevance of the article is due to the absence in the theory of criminal enforcement law and the practice of its application of a scientifically sound methodology for establishing real gaps in criminal enforcement legislation, common boundaries and conditions for the application of the analogy of law and law to overcome existing gaps in it, in particular in the execution of sentences of deprivation of liberty. The article notes the theoretical and practical aspects of overcoming by analogy not only some real gaps in penal enforcement legislation by correctional institutions, but also other shortcomings of legal regulation. Taking into account the provisions recognized by the general theory of law and the science of criminal enforcement law to overcome gaps in law and law, as well as the requirements of Russian legislation (Art. 55, part 3, of the Constitution of the Russian Federation) concludes that there are cases of application of penal enforcement legislation by analogy in law enforcement practice (As a rule, analogy of law"), which leads to infringement of human and civil rights and freedoms and violation of the principle of legality (article 8 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation). In this regard, the author proposes to establish clear limits and limits on the use of the analogy of law and law to overcome existing (and possibly future) gaps in criminal enforcement legislation in the execution of sentences, including imprisonment.

scholarly journals Legal Regulation and Organization of the Work of Management Subjects Related to the Dismissal of Employees of the Penal System of the Russian Federation due to the Loss of Trust

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 635-641
Author(s):  
Svetlana V. Zavitova ◽  
Nataliya A. Mel’nikova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Logical System ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Selection Of

Introduction: the article considers problematic issues related to the work of management subjects (managers) and attestation commissions in situations when an employee of the penal system of the Russian Federation is dismissed due to the loss of trust. The aim of this study is to identify gaps in the current legislation on the service that arise when a measure of responsibility such as dismissal due to the loss of trust is applied; another aim consists in formulating proposals for improving legislation in this area. Methods: methodological basis of our study is represented by a set of methods of scientific cognition, among which the main place belongs to formal-logical, system-structural, and comparative-legal methods. Results: the study has shown that there are many problematic issues in the law enforcement practice regarding the dismissal of employees due to the loss of trust. The norms of the law do not clearly distinguish the components of corruption offenses for which an employee is subject to dismissal due to the loss of trust or may be brought to another type of liability. The issue regarding the status of the decision of the attestation commission remains unresolved; its decision is of an advisory nature, but at the same time, it is fundamental for making a decision by the employee’s superior. There is an ongoing discussion on the composition of the attestation commission; and options for the selection of independent experts are proposed. Discussion: dismissal due to the loss of trust is a specific type of disciplinary penalty, and its implementation is carried out by authorized management entities within the framework of disciplinary proceedings. The procedure for making a decision on the dismissal of employees of the penal system due to the loss of trust needs further improvement in its legal and organizational aspects, taking into account modern law enforcement and judicial practice.

Certain issues relating to the calculation of the time spent in detention and the calculation of sentences for convicted prisoners detained in the penal correction detention centre

2020 ◽  
pp. 15-21
Author(s):  
Ольга Александровна Алфимова
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Detention Center ◽  
Detention Centre ◽  
Problematic Issue ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Correction System

В статье освещается правовая регламентация вопросов, связанных с исчислением сроков наказания и их зачета в отношении осужденных к лишению свободы, оставленных в следственных изоляторах уголовно-исполнительной системы. На сегодняшний день ст. 72 УК РФ в новой редакции не учитывает такую категорию осужденных, которые в порядке ст. 77 УИК РФ были оставлены в СИЗО (или тюрьме) для выполнения работ по хозяйственному обслуживанию. Еще одним проблемным вопросом в части положений ст. 72 УК РФ в новой редакции является то, что законодатель не учитывает тяжесть совершенного преступления и наличие рецидива в отношении осужденных к лишению свободы женщин. При зачете таким женщинам времени содержания под стражей в срок наказания правоприменитель должен руководствоваться более льготным положением п. «б» ч. 3.1 ст. 72 УК РФ (из расчета 1:1,5), а не 1:1, как у мужчин согласно п. «а» ч. 3.1 ст. 72 УК РФ. Такое «двойное смягчение» закона в отношении осужденных женщин продиктовано, как мы полагаем, принципом гуманизма. Однако в данном случае он нивелирует другие не менее важные принципы уголовного и уголовно-исполнительного законодательства, такие как справедливость, равенство перед законом и законность. This article covers the legal regulation of issues related to the calculation of sentences and their set-off in respect of convicted persons to deprivation of liberty left in remand centres of the penal correction system. To date, Art. 72 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, in its new version, does not take into account such a category of convicts who, in accordance with Art. 77 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, were left in a pre-trial detention center (or prison) for the performance of economic maintenance works. Another problematic issue in the part of the provisions of Art. 72 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in the new version, in our opinion, is that the legislator does not take into account the gravity of the crime committed and the presence of recidivism against convicted women to the deprivation of liberty of women. When such women are credited with the time of detention during their sentence, the law enforcement officer should be guided by the more preferential provision of paragraph (b) of paragraph 3.1 Art. 72 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (on the basis of 1:1.5), not 1:1 as in men according to item “a” of Pt 3.1 Art. 72 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. This “double easing” of the law for convicted women is dictated, we believe, by the principle of humanism. However, in this case, it equalizes other equally important principles of criminal and penal enforcement legislation, such as justice, equality before the law and the rule of law.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document