scholarly journals KEKUASAAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DALAM PENGGUNAAN HAK ANGKET MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR 1945

Solusi ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-316
Author(s):  
Evi Purnamawati
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Separation Of Powers ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Legislative Oversight ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Research Type

This study analyzes the power of the questionnaire rights of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia. The House of Representatives is a House of Representatives and holds the power to form laws. The House of Representatives has the functions of legislative and legislative oversight. This research uses research methods using the method of literature (ribarary research). Type of normative juridical research through approaching legislation and conceptual approach of the research results of the House of Representatives, which essentially has the power to form the current law, the power began to widen towards supervision and budget, actually with the oversight function of the House of Representatives (DPR) towards the executive in practice the meaning of the teaching of separation of powers began to shift, the teaching of separation of powers between state institutions must not intervene with one another. In carrying out its functions the DPR has the right of Interpellation which is the right to request information from the Government in handling Government policies that have an impact on the life of society and the state. In addition, the DPR has the Right to Question, namely the Right to Investigate Government policies that are alleged to be in conflict with laws and regulations and express opinions outside the institution. Members of the DPR have the right to submit draft laws, ask questions, submit proposals and opinions, defend themselves, the right of immunity, and the right to protocol. The recommendation of this research is that the writer suggests that the DPR should make the regulation on questionnaire rights clearer especially about the process of using the questionnaire right so that there is no multi-interpretation so that violations do not occur in the process of using the inquiry right.

scholarly journals Kajian Yuridis Tentang Kesadaran Warga Negara Untuk Menggunakan Hak Pilih Dalam Melaksanakan Demokrasi Pada Pemilihan Kepala Daerah

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 280
Author(s):  
Muzayanah Muzayanah
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Voting Rights ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Leadership Management ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The People ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Regional Leaders

The Republic of Indonesia is a state based on the rule of law in implementing state administration based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. The administration of government with a democratic system in which the highest sovereignty is in the hands of the people and in its implementation the people elect a leader to run the government. To determine the regional leader / regional head must be carried out through regional head elections. Regional head elections are intended to continue the government which has ended its term of office. Therefore, regional head elections must be held simultaneously throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia. The holding of regional head elections is a big job and is the responsibility of all parties, including all citizens of the Republic of Indonesia, so that the implementation of regional head elections runs well. The regional head elections in question have been held and are the result of the hard work of various relevant state institutions that have carried out their duties and responsibilities, in this case the General Election Commission (KPU) which has held regional head elections simultaneously throughout the territory of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI). ). The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia regulates the voting rights of citizens to participate and actively participate in determining regional leaders / regional heads who will lead in their respective territories. Citizens have the right to vote to vote at regional head elections. This is of course an awareness and responsibility as citizens so that regional leaders / regional heads are elected who are able to organize government and create prosperity and justice based on the values contained in the principles of Pancasila. The problem in this research is how a juridical study of the awareness of citizens to use their voting rights in implementing democracy in regional head elections?This research is a normative juridical research with the Library Research research method. The data collection method uses secondary data in the form of primary legal materials and secondary and tertiary legal materials. The population in this study is a random population of residents / community of Pengkol hamlet, Mangunsari village, Gunung pati District, Semarang City. The results of the research show that people in this region as citizens of the Republic of Indonesia have the awareness and responsibility to exercise their voting rights in the implementation of regional head elections, especially the election for Mayor and Deputy Mayor of Semarang on December 9, 2020. Regional head elections in this region have been going well and in a conducive situation even though it was held during the Covid-19 pandemic. It is hoped that the holding of this regional head election will produce regional leaders who have reliable and quality leadership management and are able to bring the community to realize social justice for all Indonesian people.

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI SEBAGAI LEMBAGA NEGARA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR 1945

Solusi ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-105
Author(s):  
Johansyah Johansyah
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Executive Branch ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Election Results ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

The Constitutional Court is the executive branch of the judiciary that is independent and separate from other branches of power, namely the government (executive) and legislative institutions. The Constitutional Court as a first and last level judiciary does not have an organizational structure as large as the Supreme Court which is the peak of a judicial system whose structure is vertically and horizontally covers five judicial environments, namely the general court environment, the state administrative court environment, the religious court environment, and military court environment. As an organ of judicial power that operates the judicial function, the Constitutional Court is independent, both structurally and functionally. The functions and authorities of the Constitutional Court based on Law No. 24 of 2003, namely the Constitutional Court has the authority to hear: Test the laws against the Republic of Indonesia 1945 Constitution; Decide on authority disputes between state institutions whose authority is granted by the Republic of Indonesia 1945 Constitution; Decide the dissolution of political parties; Decide disputes about election results; Give a verdict on the opinion of the House of Representatives that the President and / or Vice-President are suspected of violating the law in the form of treason, corruption, bribery, other serious crimes, or despicable acts, or no longer fulfill the conditions as President and or Vice President, as intended in the Republic of Indonesia 1945 Constitution.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN PRINSIP KEPENTINGAN UMUM TERHADAP KEBERADAAN TANAH TERLANTAR DI INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 383
Author(s):  
Nyoman Arif Budiman
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Common Interest ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The People ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

This journal shall be entitled as " Implementation Of Public Interest Principles To Neglected Land In Indonesia".The existence of the land on earth must be beneficial both for the welfare and happiness that has it and for the people and the state. The purpose of this study is to know and understand the absolute limits of property rights to land; and want to understand the relationship between the principle of public interest in land. The method in this research is normative by using  conceptual  approach and statute approach. This journal’s preparation is done by legal research, and the approach method being used in this journal shall be used is the combination of the statute approach and the conceptual approach. The result of this research is the essence of the principle of public interest to the land is to create development based on the principle of humanity in the balance as stipulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The exemption of land rights is caused by public and private interest with the provision of compensation and guided by the principle of musyawarah. While the revocation of land rights is the spirit of the provisions of Article 18 of the Basic Agrarian Laws states that for the interest of the state and the state and the common interest of the people of the right to land may be revoked by compensation. The legal effort that a third party can take to exploit the state land (abandoned land) is to apply the right to the government (Provincial or Regency / City Land Office). Jurnal ini mengambil julul “Penerapan Prinsip Kepentingan Umum Terhadap Terlantar. Keberadaan atas tanah di muka bumi ini  harus bermanfaat baik bagi kesejahteraan dan kebahagiaan yang mempunyainya maupun bagi masyarakat dan negara. Tujuan dari penelitian ini ialah ingin mengetahui dan memahami batas-batas absolut dari hak milik  terhadap tanah; dan ingin memahami hubungan antara prinsip kepentingan umum atas tanah. Jurnal ini mengangkat permasalahan yang juga menjadi tujuan penulisan yaitu apa hakikat kepentingan umum atas tanah dan apa upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh pihak ketiga terhadap tanah terlantar. Penyusunan jurnal ini dilakukan dengan tipe penelitian normatif dan menggunakan pendekatan peaturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah Hakekat dari prinsip kepentingan umum terhadap tanah ialah untuk menciptakan pembangunan yang berlandaskan asas perikemanusiaan dalam keseimbangan sebagaimana diatur dalam UUD NRI tahun 1945. Pembebasan hak atas tanah disebabkan oleh kepentingan umum dan swasta dengan pemberian ganti rugi dan berpedoman pada asas musyawarah. Sedangkan pencabutan hak atas tanah merupakan semangat dari ketentuan Pasal 18 UUPA menggariskan bahwa untuk kepentingan bangsa dan negara serta kepentingan bersama (hanya untuk kepentingan umum) dari rakyat hak atas tanah dapat dicabut dengan memberikan ganti kerugian. Upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan pihak ketiga untuk dapat memanfaatkan tanah negara (tanah terlantar) ialah melakukan permohonan hak kepada kepada pemerintah (Kantor Pertanahan Provinsi atau Kabupaten/Kota).

scholarly journals PROSPEK PERLINDUNGAN PENYANDANG DISABILITAS TERHADAP PERILAKU DISKRIMINATIF DI KOTA SEMARANG*

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 253
Author(s):  
Lita Tyesta ALW
Keyword(s):  
Equal Treatment ◽  
Specific Reference ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Persons With Disabilities ◽  
Discriminatory Behavior ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
To Receive

This research aims to determine the prospects of persons with disabilities protection against discriminatory behavior in Semarang. The research method is normative using the laws approach (statutory approach), and the conceptual approach (conceptual approach). Results of the study found that the government of Semarang have prospects in providing protection and fulfillment of the rights of persons with disabilitas of discriminatory behavior. Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Act1945 does not set a specific reference on Disability, but set firmly and clearly regarding non- discrimination, equality before the law, and the right to receive equal treatment before the law throughout Indonesia.

Reconstrues Legislation: The Effectiveness of Presidential Veto in Government System in Indonesia Based on the State of The Republic of Indonesia 1945 Constitution

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 429
Author(s):  
La Ode Muhammad Elwan
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Real Space ◽  
The State ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Legal Power ◽  
Head Of State ◽  
Political Interests ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Almost All

In the Indonesian Government System, the president is the supreme authority of the government under the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia. After 4 (four) amendments to the 1945 Constitution, the presidential power experienced a shift in function and role as a result of the magnitude of the flow of political interests, so that almost all the power of the president on the authority of legislation in the 1945 Constitution of the 1945 Constitution largely lacked a permanent legal power and formal juridical. We know that the substance of the authority of presidential legislation if based on the presidential system of government does not exist and is not given real space. Consequently, the president as the mandate of the people's sovereignty must be able to control the system of government even though the fact that there is dominance of the legislative institution to the presidential institution together with the cabinet that is the authority of presidential legislation in the constitution of the state 1945 Constitution has no law forces so that the wheel of development does not run normally -target is planned. The hope is that our country's constitution must be able to guarantee the principle of balance of authority and mutual supervision that governs the legislation of the president against the product of the law. Writing methodology based on the literature review contained in books, papers, newspapers, scientific articles, journals, and legislation as the object under study. The results of the study and analysis conclude: (1) The Veto of the President is not effective when reviewed in the constitutional document of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia; (2) The inconsistency of the Presidential Government System of Indonesia with the contents of the articles of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia; (3) it is recommended that the fifth amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the revision of Law Number 12 Year 2011 on the Establishment of Legislation to be followed up by MPR RI and the President; (4) The Presidential Regulation in Lieu of Law, according to the authors must be absolutely given to the President without the intervention of the House of Representatives because the President as Head of State and has the Highest Government Authority under the 1945 Constitution between State Institutions.

Funkcje kontrolne parlamentów na ziemiach polskich w początkach XIX w.

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-158
Author(s):  
Piotr Miłosz Pilarczyk
Keyword(s):  
Nineteenth Century ◽  
Separation Of Powers ◽  
The State ◽  
Early Nineteenth Century ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

One of the aspects of the principle of separation of powers in the state is control of the executive by the legislature. As regards the Polish lands in the early nineteenth century, we can speak about Polish parliamentarism only in the Duchy of Warsaw, the Kingdom of Poland and the Republic of Cracow. Although these states did not recognize the principle of parliamentary accountability, their parliaments voiced criticism of the authorities and there occurred the problem of controlling the executive. Parliament of the Duchy of Warsaw tried to usurp this right itself. Parliament of the Kingdom of Poland claimed the right to charge a civil officer of the government with crimes committed while in office. In that state the ability to control emerged during the November Uprising. In the Republic of Cracow all attempts at obtaining the right of control encountered the objection on the part of three supervising neighbours (Russia, Prussia, and Austria).  

scholarly journals PARAMETER PENGAWASAN POLITIK DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT REPUBLIK INDONESIA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 229
Author(s):  
Hananto Widodo
Keyword(s):  
Good Governance ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Free Government ◽  
Government Authority

<em>Amendments to the 1945 Constitution have provided support to the DPR, including strengthening the DPR's oversight function. Article 22 Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The DPR's supervisory function as a compilatory composer is elaborated in Article 79 paragraphs (2) and (3) of Law No. 17 of 2014 concerning the People's Consultative Assembly, the People's Representative Council, the Regional Representative Council and the Regional People's Representative Council (MD3). In Article 79 paragraphs (2) and (3) of MD3 Law only norms are formulated which become the object of interpellation and the questionnaire rights are legislation and policies. The formulation of Article 79 paragraphs (2) and (3) does not explain the parameters used by the DPR to request policies from the Government. The purpose of this article is to provide parameters for the use of interpellation rights and questionnaire rights to government policies. This type of research in this paper is normative research. With primary legal material for the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and Law No. 17 of 2014 concerning the People's Consultative Assembly, the People's Representative Council, the Regional Representative Council and the Regional People's Representative Council (MD3). The parameters of the right of interpellation and the right of questionnaire to government policies that were born from free government authority are general principles of good governance (AAUPB).</em>

scholarly journals The Legal Protection for Female Workers in the Perspective of Islamic Law and Law No. 11 Year 2020 on Job Creation

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 524-534
Author(s):  
Ismail Koto ◽  
Ida Hanifah
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Job Creation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Female Workers ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Special Rights

On Monday, 5 October 2020, the Draft Law on Job Creation was ratified by the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia and the manuscript was signed by the government on November 3, 2020. Therefore, since November 3, 2020, the Draft Law on Job Creation promulgated in Law Number 11 Year 2020 on Job Creation. Based on the existing official text, the researcher intended to compare the rights of female workers as regulated in Law Number 13 of 2003 on Manpower with Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation. The research method used in this study was a normative juridical research, with a statutory and conceptual approach, descriptive analytical research specifications, data collection by literature study, and qualitative data analysis. The protection of female workers as referred to in the previous labor law was still valid and was not discussed at all in Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation. Therefore, it could be ascertained that the refusal of workers during the process of the Draft Law on Job Creation is wrong. The article which was amended related to the protection of female workers did not change the substance of the protection of female workers as previously regulated through Law Number 13 Year 2003 on Manpower. The Qur'an has been explained that people need to provide special rights for female workers. Explicitly, there is no verses in the Qur'an that mentioned the word 'special rights for female workers'. However, implicitly, there were general arguments based on the verses in the Qur'an that could be used as a basis for granting this right. Some of the special rights of female workers were implicitly communicated in Islamic teachings.

scholarly journals HAK ANGKET DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT REPUBLIK INDONESIA (DPR RI) TERHADAP KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI (KPK)

Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-202
Author(s):  
Dasep Muhammad Firdaus
Keyword(s):  
Human Resources ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Institutional Authority ◽  
Balance Principle ◽  
Democratic State ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

AbstractIndonesia as a constitutional and democratic state has three governmental branches which are executive, legislative and judicial power; and executed on the check and balance principle. One of the check and balance principles implementation can be seen in the House of Representatives of Indonesia (DPR)’s Parliamentary Scrutiny function which is mandated by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD 1945), the right of inquiry to investigate all forms of implementation of laws and government policies that are allegedly contrary to the legislation. Recently the rights had been applied to evaluate KPK (corruption eradication commission) as an independent institution and free from any authority. Substantially the inquiry right was applied to evaluate KPK regarding the following aspects: institutional, authority, human resources, and expenditure budgets. Through legal tracing on related laws and regulations, that were descriptively analyzed regarding the DPR's inquiry right implementation towards KPK; it was found the DPR's inquiry rights to the KPK is constitutionally regulated in Article 20A of the UUD 1945, Law Number 17 of 2014 Article 79 paragraph (1), (2) and (3) and Constitutional Court Decision Case No. 36 and 37 / PUU-XV / 2017. Based on those regulations, DPR has rights to ask for KPK’s accountability upon their duties and authority and KPK is obliged to respect and implement DPR recommendations produced from the inquiry rights.Keywords:People’s Representative Council, Rights of Inquiry, Corruption Eradication Commission AbstrakIndonesia sebagai negara demokrasi kontitusional terdiri dari cabang kekuasaan eksekutif, legislatif, dan yudikatif berdasar prinsip check and balance. Wujud prinsip tersebut ada dalam ketatanegaraan Indonesia terlihat pada fungsi pengawasan DPR RI yang diamanatkan oleh UUD NRI Tahun 1945, antara lain melalui hak angket untuk menyelidiki segala bentuk pelaksanaan UU maupun kebijakan pemerintah yang diduga bertentangan dengan peraturan perundang-undangan. Salah satunya adalah hak angket yang ditujukan terhadap KPK sebagai lembaga bersifat independen dan bebas dari kekuasaan manapun. Secara subtantif pelaksanaan hak dilakukan untuk mengevaluasi KPK dari sisi kelembagan, kewenangan, sumber daya manusia hingga anggaran belanja. Melalui penelusuran peraturan perundang-undangan yang dianalisis secara deskriptif atas hak angket DPR terhadap KPK; ditemukan bahwa landasan hukum hak angket DPR terhadap KPK secara konstitusional diatur di dalam Pasal 20A UUD NKRI Tahun 1945, Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 Pasal 79 ayat (1), (2) dan (3) dan Putusan MK No. Perkara 36 dan 37/PUU-XV/2017 . Atas dasar ketentuan tersebut, DPR berhak meminta pertanggungjawaban pelaksanaan tugas dan kewenangan KPK dan KPK sebagai lembaga penegak hukum harus menghormati dan melaksanakan rekomendasi yang telah dihasilkan pansus angket dan.Kata Kunci:DPR, Hak Angket, KPK

scholarly journals Government Policy in Public Services in the Republic of Tatarstan, Russia

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Refly Setiawan ◽  
Mohamad Fikri Sulthan ◽  
Abdurrahman Abdurrahman
Keyword(s):  
Government Policy ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Cultural Development ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
The People ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
Descriptive Approach ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

AbstractGovernment policy is a step taken by the government to achieve a goal. The main objective of the policy of the Republic of Tatarstan is to provide the conditions for the full social and cultural development of the whole society, to strengthen civil society and society's morals on the basis of respect for the rights of citizens and their recognition as the highest value. This study aims to explain how government policies are related to public services and to find out how the government of the Republic of Tatarstan provides the best services for the welfare of the people. This research uses qualitative research methods with a descriptive approach. The results of this study explain that the government has taken the right policy steps in providing services to the community, namely by providing fast, responsive, optimal, fair, transparent service and utilizing technological advances for the welfare of the people in the Republic of Tatarstan.Keywords: Government Policy, Public Service, Republic of Tatarstan AbstrakKebijakan pemerintah merupakan suatu langkah yang diambil oleh pemerintah untuk tercapainya suatu tujuan. Tujuan utama dari kebijakan Republik Tatarstan adalah untuk menyediakan kondisi bagi perkembangan sosial dan budaya-budaya penuh seluruh masyarakat, untuk memperkuat masyarakat sipil dan moral masyarakat atas dasar penghormatan pada hak-hak yang di miliki warga negara serta pengakuannya sebagai nilai tertinggi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan bagaimana Kebijakan pemerintah terkait dengan pelayanan publik dan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pemerintah dalam memberikan pelayanan bagi kesejahteraan seluruh masyarakat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini  menjelaskan bahwa pemerintah Republik Tatarstan telah mengambil langkah kebijakan yang tepat dalam pelayanan kepada masyarakat yaitu dengan pelayanan yang cepat, tanggap, optimal, adil, transparan, dan memanfaatkan kemajuan teknologi demi kesejahteraan masyarakat di Republik Tatarstan.Kata Kunci: Kebijakan Pemerintah, Pelayanan Publik, Republik Tatarstan АннотацияПравительственная политика - это шаг, сделанный правительством для достижения цели. Основная цель политики Республики Татарстан - обеспечение условий для полноценного социального и культурного развития всего общества, укрепление гражданского общества и нравственности общества на основе уважения прав граждан и признания их высшее значение. Это исследование призвано объяснить, как политика правительства связана с государственными услугами, и выяснить, как правительство Республики Татарстан предоставляет лучшие услуги для благосостояния людей. В этом исследовании используются качественные методы исследования с описательным подходом. Результаты этого исследования объясняют, что правительство предприняло правильные политические шаги по предоставлению услуг населению, а именно путем предоставления быстрых, оперативных, оптимальных, справедливых и прозрачных услуг и использования технологических достижений на благо людей в Республике Татарстан.Ключевые слова: государственная политика, государственная служба, Республика Татарстан

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document