scholarly journals Government Policy in Public Services in the Republic of Tatarstan, Russia

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Refly Setiawan ◽  
Mohamad Fikri Sulthan ◽  
Abdurrahman Abdurrahman
Keyword(s):  
Government Policy ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Cultural Development ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
The People ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
Descriptive Approach ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

AbstractGovernment policy is a step taken by the government to achieve a goal. The main objective of the policy of the Republic of Tatarstan is to provide the conditions for the full social and cultural development of the whole society, to strengthen civil society and society's morals on the basis of respect for the rights of citizens and their recognition as the highest value. This study aims to explain how government policies are related to public services and to find out how the government of the Republic of Tatarstan provides the best services for the welfare of the people. This research uses qualitative research methods with a descriptive approach. The results of this study explain that the government has taken the right policy steps in providing services to the community, namely by providing fast, responsive, optimal, fair, transparent service and utilizing technological advances for the welfare of the people in the Republic of Tatarstan.Keywords: Government Policy, Public Service, Republic of Tatarstan AbstrakKebijakan pemerintah merupakan suatu langkah yang diambil oleh pemerintah untuk tercapainya suatu tujuan. Tujuan utama dari kebijakan Republik Tatarstan adalah untuk menyediakan kondisi bagi perkembangan sosial dan budaya-budaya penuh seluruh masyarakat, untuk memperkuat masyarakat sipil dan moral masyarakat atas dasar penghormatan pada hak-hak yang di miliki warga negara serta pengakuannya sebagai nilai tertinggi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan bagaimana Kebijakan pemerintah terkait dengan pelayanan publik dan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pemerintah dalam memberikan pelayanan bagi kesejahteraan seluruh masyarakat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini  menjelaskan bahwa pemerintah Republik Tatarstan telah mengambil langkah kebijakan yang tepat dalam pelayanan kepada masyarakat yaitu dengan pelayanan yang cepat, tanggap, optimal, adil, transparan, dan memanfaatkan kemajuan teknologi demi kesejahteraan masyarakat di Republik Tatarstan.Kata Kunci: Kebijakan Pemerintah, Pelayanan Publik, Republik Tatarstan АннотацияПравительственная политика - это шаг, сделанный правительством для достижения цели. Основная цель политики Республики Татарстан - обеспечение условий для полноценного социального и культурного развития всего общества, укрепление гражданского общества и нравственности общества на основе уважения прав граждан и признания их высшее значение. Это исследование призвано объяснить, как политика правительства связана с государственными услугами, и выяснить, как правительство Республики Татарстан предоставляет лучшие услуги для благосостояния людей. В этом исследовании используются качественные методы исследования с описательным подходом. Результаты этого исследования объясняют, что правительство предприняло правильные политические шаги по предоставлению услуг населению, а именно путем предоставления быстрых, оперативных, оптимальных, справедливых и прозрачных услуг и использования технологических достижений на благо людей в Республике Татарстан.Ключевые слова: государственная политика, государственная служба, Республика Татарстан

scholarly journals PROBLEMATIKA PENERAPAN PIDANA MATI DALAM KONTEKS PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 207
Author(s):  
Slamet Tri Wahyudi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Government Policy ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The People ◽  
The Government

Law enforcement without direction and not based on the three pillars of the justice of law, legal certainty and the benefits to society can break the law anyway even violate human rights. As one of the policies of the government that are not considered mencerminakan the values of justice and disturbing for the people, the government policy that acts of omission or delay in the application of the death penalty. This research is a normative legal normative juridical approach. The data collected is secondary data were analyzed using qualitative methods juridical analysis. Based on these results it can be concluded that in the application of the death penalty there are serious legal issues, this is due to government policies that commit omission or delay in the execution of the death penalty is a violation of human rights as stipulated in Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution. Keywords: Death penalty, Justice, Legal Certainty, Law

scholarly journals Kajian Yuridis Tentang Kesadaran Warga Negara Untuk Menggunakan Hak Pilih Dalam Melaksanakan Demokrasi Pada Pemilihan Kepala Daerah

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 280
Author(s):  
Muzayanah Muzayanah
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Voting Rights ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Leadership Management ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The People ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Regional Leaders

The Republic of Indonesia is a state based on the rule of law in implementing state administration based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. The administration of government with a democratic system in which the highest sovereignty is in the hands of the people and in its implementation the people elect a leader to run the government. To determine the regional leader / regional head must be carried out through regional head elections. Regional head elections are intended to continue the government which has ended its term of office. Therefore, regional head elections must be held simultaneously throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia. The holding of regional head elections is a big job and is the responsibility of all parties, including all citizens of the Republic of Indonesia, so that the implementation of regional head elections runs well. The regional head elections in question have been held and are the result of the hard work of various relevant state institutions that have carried out their duties and responsibilities, in this case the General Election Commission (KPU) which has held regional head elections simultaneously throughout the territory of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI). ). The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia regulates the voting rights of citizens to participate and actively participate in determining regional leaders / regional heads who will lead in their respective territories. Citizens have the right to vote to vote at regional head elections. This is of course an awareness and responsibility as citizens so that regional leaders / regional heads are elected who are able to organize government and create prosperity and justice based on the values contained in the principles of Pancasila. The problem in this research is how a juridical study of the awareness of citizens to use their voting rights in implementing democracy in regional head elections?This research is a normative juridical research with the Library Research research method. The data collection method uses secondary data in the form of primary legal materials and secondary and tertiary legal materials. The population in this study is a random population of residents / community of Pengkol hamlet, Mangunsari village, Gunung pati District, Semarang City. The results of the research show that people in this region as citizens of the Republic of Indonesia have the awareness and responsibility to exercise their voting rights in the implementation of regional head elections, especially the election for Mayor and Deputy Mayor of Semarang on December 9, 2020. Regional head elections in this region have been going well and in a conducive situation even though it was held during the Covid-19 pandemic. It is hoped that the holding of this regional head election will produce regional leaders who have reliable and quality leadership management and are able to bring the community to realize social justice for all Indonesian people.

scholarly journals History of self-determination of the people of Donbass. experience of the Soviet Republic of Donetsk and Krivoy Rog

2019 ◽  
pp. 148-152
Author(s):  
Vladislav V. Gruzdev ◽  
Dmitriy A. Babichev ◽  
Natal'ya A. Babicheva
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Cultural Development ◽  
Self Determination ◽  
Political Status ◽  
The People ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right ◽  
Historical Past

The article is devoted to the burning problem that arose in 2014 in the Ukraine, in the regions of Lugansk and Donetsk, and that concerns the right of the people of Donbass to self-determination. This problem is not only of a local territorial nature, but it is also one of the most complex debatable problems of international law. Since the right to self-determination contradicts the principle of territorial integrity of the state, the consideration and solution of this issue is the most burning for the whole population living on the territory of the self-proclaimed people's republics of Lugansk and Donetsk. In the article, the authors analyse the concept of "self-determination of the people" and give a generalised characteristic of it, approving that it is the right of every nation to solve the issues of state structure, political status, economic, social and cultural development independently and at its own discretion. The author also examines the historical past of the people of Donbass, where, in terms of the Republic of Donetsk and Krivoy Rog and various documentary historical and legal materials, we come to the conclusion that the population of Donbass has the right to social, economic, cultural, spiritual and other development just as all the recognised countries of the world.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN PRINSIP KEPENTINGAN UMUM TERHADAP KEBERADAAN TANAH TERLANTAR DI INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 383
Author(s):  
Nyoman Arif Budiman
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Common Interest ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The People ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

This journal shall be entitled as " Implementation Of Public Interest Principles To Neglected Land In Indonesia".The existence of the land on earth must be beneficial both for the welfare and happiness that has it and for the people and the state. The purpose of this study is to know and understand the absolute limits of property rights to land; and want to understand the relationship between the principle of public interest in land. The method in this research is normative by using  conceptual  approach and statute approach. This journal’s preparation is done by legal research, and the approach method being used in this journal shall be used is the combination of the statute approach and the conceptual approach. The result of this research is the essence of the principle of public interest to the land is to create development based on the principle of humanity in the balance as stipulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The exemption of land rights is caused by public and private interest with the provision of compensation and guided by the principle of musyawarah. While the revocation of land rights is the spirit of the provisions of Article 18 of the Basic Agrarian Laws states that for the interest of the state and the state and the common interest of the people of the right to land may be revoked by compensation. The legal effort that a third party can take to exploit the state land (abandoned land) is to apply the right to the government (Provincial or Regency / City Land Office). Jurnal ini mengambil julul “Penerapan Prinsip Kepentingan Umum Terhadap Terlantar. Keberadaan atas tanah di muka bumi ini  harus bermanfaat baik bagi kesejahteraan dan kebahagiaan yang mempunyainya maupun bagi masyarakat dan negara. Tujuan dari penelitian ini ialah ingin mengetahui dan memahami batas-batas absolut dari hak milik  terhadap tanah; dan ingin memahami hubungan antara prinsip kepentingan umum atas tanah. Jurnal ini mengangkat permasalahan yang juga menjadi tujuan penulisan yaitu apa hakikat kepentingan umum atas tanah dan apa upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh pihak ketiga terhadap tanah terlantar. Penyusunan jurnal ini dilakukan dengan tipe penelitian normatif dan menggunakan pendekatan peaturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah Hakekat dari prinsip kepentingan umum terhadap tanah ialah untuk menciptakan pembangunan yang berlandaskan asas perikemanusiaan dalam keseimbangan sebagaimana diatur dalam UUD NRI tahun 1945. Pembebasan hak atas tanah disebabkan oleh kepentingan umum dan swasta dengan pemberian ganti rugi dan berpedoman pada asas musyawarah. Sedangkan pencabutan hak atas tanah merupakan semangat dari ketentuan Pasal 18 UUPA menggariskan bahwa untuk kepentingan bangsa dan negara serta kepentingan bersama (hanya untuk kepentingan umum) dari rakyat hak atas tanah dapat dicabut dengan memberikan ganti kerugian. Upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan pihak ketiga untuk dapat memanfaatkan tanah negara (tanah terlantar) ialah melakukan permohonan hak kepada kepada pemerintah (Kantor Pertanahan Provinsi atau Kabupaten/Kota).

scholarly journals KEKUASAAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DALAM PENGGUNAAN HAK ANGKET MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR 1945

Solusi ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-316
Author(s):  
Evi Purnamawati
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Separation Of Powers ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Legislative Oversight ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Research Type

This study analyzes the power of the questionnaire rights of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia. The House of Representatives is a House of Representatives and holds the power to form laws. The House of Representatives has the functions of legislative and legislative oversight. This research uses research methods using the method of literature (ribarary research). Type of normative juridical research through approaching legislation and conceptual approach of the research results of the House of Representatives, which essentially has the power to form the current law, the power began to widen towards supervision and budget, actually with the oversight function of the House of Representatives (DPR) towards the executive in practice the meaning of the teaching of separation of powers began to shift, the teaching of separation of powers between state institutions must not intervene with one another. In carrying out its functions the DPR has the right of Interpellation which is the right to request information from the Government in handling Government policies that have an impact on the life of society and the state. In addition, the DPR has the Right to Question, namely the Right to Investigate Government policies that are alleged to be in conflict with laws and regulations and express opinions outside the institution. Members of the DPR have the right to submit draft laws, ask questions, submit proposals and opinions, defend themselves, the right of immunity, and the right to protocol. The recommendation of this research is that the writer suggests that the DPR should make the regulation on questionnaire rights clearer especially about the process of using the questionnaire right so that there is no multi-interpretation so that violations do not occur in the process of using the inquiry right.

From Jan Sunwai to Rajasthan Right to Hearing Act 2012: Fostering Transparency and Accountability through Citizen Engagement

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 282-296
Author(s):  
Vidhi Agrawal ◽  
Hari Nair
Keyword(s):  
Civic Engagement ◽  
Digital Technology ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Public Servants ◽  
The People ◽  
Form Part ◽  
Informed Citizenry ◽  
The Government ◽  
Right To Information ◽  
The Right

This study examines the evolution of the movement for transparency towards redressing grievances and holding public servants accountable to the people. It explains how three legislations—Right to Information Act (RTI, India, 2005), Rajasthan Guaranteed Delivery of Public Services Act (RGDPS, 2011) and the Right to Hearing Act (RTH, Rajasthan, 2012)—form part of a continuum in the people’s struggle for transparency. The analysis of the three acts as a continuum is significant because together these are gradually changing the administration-centric Indian polity into a citizen-centric one. If the RTI Act ensured an informed citizenry, the RGDPS Act recognized the government’s duty to provide public services and the RTH Act guaranteed that the people were heard by the government. This right to hearing may be traced back to the Jan Sunwai, which was a pivotal forum in the struggle for transparency because it functioned as a dialogical space between the people and the state, as well as a forum for social auditing and civic engagement. Of late however, the Jan Sunwai is being transformed by digital technology. This transformation poses the challenge of converting a participatory polity alive with people’s voices into a transactional state regimented by technology.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REGIONAL GOVERNMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS IN INDONESIAN REGIONAL REGULATIONS

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-182
Author(s):  
Enny Agustina
Keyword(s):  
Local Governments ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
The People ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose of the study: This article aimed to analyze the implementation of the regional government and administrative sanctions in Indonesian regional regulations. Methodology: The research method used is normative legal research. The data were analyzed using a qualitative descriptive technique. Main Findings: The final results showed that the type of relationship between the central and the local governments does not reduce the right of the local people to participate (freely) in the implementation of the regional government. The relationship between the central government and the regions did not diminish the rights of the people. Applications of this study: Local government sanctions and administration in Indonesian regional regulations. Novelty/Originality of this study: The task of the government is to realize the state’s objectives as formulated in the unveiling of the Constitution 1945 of the Republic of Indonesia, and this duty is a comprehensive task. This requires the regulations to direct the implementation of governance that is more in line with the expectations and needs of the community (citizen-friendly).

scholarly journals PARAMETER PENGAWASAN POLITIK DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT REPUBLIK INDONESIA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 229
Author(s):  
Hananto Widodo
Keyword(s):  
Good Governance ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Free Government ◽  
Government Authority

<em>Amendments to the 1945 Constitution have provided support to the DPR, including strengthening the DPR's oversight function. Article 22 Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The DPR's supervisory function as a compilatory composer is elaborated in Article 79 paragraphs (2) and (3) of Law No. 17 of 2014 concerning the People's Consultative Assembly, the People's Representative Council, the Regional Representative Council and the Regional People's Representative Council (MD3). In Article 79 paragraphs (2) and (3) of MD3 Law only norms are formulated which become the object of interpellation and the questionnaire rights are legislation and policies. The formulation of Article 79 paragraphs (2) and (3) does not explain the parameters used by the DPR to request policies from the Government. The purpose of this article is to provide parameters for the use of interpellation rights and questionnaire rights to government policies. This type of research in this paper is normative research. With primary legal material for the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and Law No. 17 of 2014 concerning the People's Consultative Assembly, the People's Representative Council, the Regional Representative Council and the Regional People's Representative Council (MD3). The parameters of the right of interpellation and the right of questionnaire to government policies that were born from free government authority are general principles of good governance (AAUPB).</em>

scholarly journals ANALISIS TRANSPORTASI YANG OPTIMAL GUNA MEMINIMISASI PRAKTEK IHTIKAR PADA DISTRIBUSI PUPUK BERSUBSIDI

IQTISHODUNA ◽  
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Misbahul Munir, Irmayanti Hasan
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Cost Minimization ◽  
Transportation Cost ◽  
Market Mechanism ◽  
Market Prices ◽  
Religious Texts ◽  
The People ◽  
Descriptive Approach ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

PT. Gresik as Petro Chemical fertilizer producer, has sought to meet the needs (needs), but the reality of peasant producers demand fertilizer Exes field remains a regional issue (especially in East Java), which is quite interesting to study. To illustrate the phenomenon that occurs in the process and pattern of distribution of subsidized fertilizer in certain regions (East Java) with descriptive approach and / or approach the minimum transportation cost (minimization of transportation). To analyze the economic aspects of Islam to attempt to detect ikhtikar minimization practices (hoarding of fertilizer). Islam is very concern about the issue of availability of goods and their distribution among the people, so many religious texts (both from al-Quran and the Sunnah) which expressly condemn and prohibit all forms of ihtikar (hoarding), and all forms of practice that leads to ihtikar , such as monopoly and unfair competition in the market mechanism. In fact, if there has been hoarding goods, the government has the right to force the merchants to sell goods to the prevailing standard price in the market. In fact, according to the scholars, goods stockpiled by the merchants sold their capital and merchants are not allowed to take advantage as a penalty against them. Had the traders were reluctant to sell their goods at market prices, then the law enforcement authorities (judges) may seize the goods and then distribute them to people who need them.  

scholarly journals Urgensi Keterbukaan Informasi dalam Pelayanan Publik sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan yang Baik

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-234
Author(s):  
Kadek Cahya Susila Wibawa
Keyword(s):  
Public Service ◽  
Information Disclosure ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Community Services ◽  
Service Needs ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

Abstract Basicly, The government carries out three main duties, namely: organizing government, carrying out development, and holding public services. State that is required to attend to serve every citizen and citizen to fulfill the rights and basic needs of the community under government approval, accept the mandate of the UUD NRI 1945 (Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia). Based on data or empirical facts, the fact that public services in Indonesia are still not optimal. The quality of community services that have not been optimal, determine the expectations of the community, will reduce the essence of the objectives of the government (state) to realize social welfare for all the people of Indonesia. For this reason, one of the efforts that must be done immediately in realizing good and prime public services is to optimize public information disclosure in the implementation of public services. The main key to understanding good governance is understanding the principles of good governance. Starting from these principles, a benchmark for the performance of a government will be obtained. Information disclosure is one of the important principles of good governance, which can help to realize good and excellent public service delivery. The constitutional guarantee of the right to public information disclosure agreed is contained in Article 28F of the UUD NRI 1945, then further regulated in Act Number 14 / 2008 Concerning Public Information Openness (UU KIP), related to the budget for public service needs, namely transparent, effective and efficient, accountable and accountable. Public services related to information disclosure will create good governance. Keywords: Information disclosure, public service, good governance. Abstrak Pemerintah pada prinsipnya menjalankan tiga tugas utama, yaitu: menyelenggarakan pemerintahan, melaksanakan pembangunan, dan menyelenggarakan pelayanan publik. Negara wajib hadir untuk melayani setiap warga negara dan penduduk untuk memenuhi hak dan kebutuhan dasar masayarakat dalam kerangka pelayanan publik, sebagaimana amanat UUD NRI 1945. Berdasarkan data atau fakta empiris, tercermin bahwa pelayanan publik di Indonesia masih belum optimal. Kualitas pelayanan publik yang belum optimal, sebagaimana harapan masyarakat, akan mengurangi esensi tujuan pemerintah (negara) untuk mewujudkan kesejahteraan sosial bagi seluruh rakyat Indonesia. Untuk itu salah satu upaya yang harus segera dilakukan dalam mewujudkan pelayanan publik yang baik dan prima adalah mengoptimalkan keterbukaan informasi publik di dalam penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik. Kunci utama memahami good governance adalah pemahaman atas prinsip-prinsip di dalamnya. Bertolak dari prinsip-prinsip ini akan didapatkan tolak ukur kinerja suatu pemerintahan. Keterbukaan informasi merupakan salah satu prinsip yang penting dari good governance, yang dapat membantu untuk mewujudkan penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik yang baik dan prima. Jaminan konstitusional terhadap hak atas keterbukaan informasi publik sebagaimana termaktub dalam Pasal 28F UUD NRI 1945, kemudian diatur lebih lanjut ke dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 Tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik (UU KIP), menjadi dasar bagi pemerintah untuk melaksanakan fungsi pelayanan publik yang baik, yaitu yang transparan, efektif dan efisien, akuntabel serta dapat dipertanggungjawabkan. Pelayanan publik yang didasarkan pada keterbukaan informasi, akan mewujudkan suatu tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik. Kata kunci: Keterbukaan informasi, pelayanan publik, tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik (good governance).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document