FORMATION SPLOSS OF CADETS COLLECTIVES OF PENAL LAW INSTITUTE

Author(s):  
Ольга Владимировна Ощепкова ◽  
Светлана Александровна Тарасова

В статье констатируется, что формирование человека как личности невозможно без социума. Социум воздействует на человека через группу. Наивысший уровень группового развития характеризует группу как коллектив, в котором одним из основных признаков является групповая сплочённость. Сплочённость - это единство мнений членов группы по самым важным для неё вопросам, единство действий в существенных жизненных ситуациях. Сплоченность группы основывается на совместной предметной деятельности и включает эмоциональную, ценностную и поведенческую сферы личности. Формирование сплоченности коллектива курсантов - сотрудников пенитенциарной системы - проходит в специфических условиях, влияющих на процесс сплоченности. Это: казарменное положение курсантов, рождающее феномен «публичности» и феномен групповой изоляции; авторитарный стиль руководства. Нами было проведено исследование сплоченности коллектива курсантов юридического института ФСИН России, для чего были использованы методика Сишора «Определение индекса групповой сплоченности»; методика определения ценностно-ориентационного единства В.С. Ивашкина, В.В. Онуфриевой. Анализ полученных результатов позволил сформулировать рекомендации для устранения проблемных вопросов и повышения эффективности данного процесса: построение отношений как «по горизонтали», так и «по вертикали» на основе взаимного уважения и доверия; формирование осознанного понимания общности целей учебной и профессиональной деятельности; рациональное применение всех форм досуговой деятельности; гибкое сочетание авторитарного и демократического стилей руководства; строгое соблюдение этики деловых отношений курсантами, строевыми офицерами, профессорско-преподавательским составом, руководством; управление конфликтами и стрессами. The article states that the formation of man as an individual is impossible without society. Society affects man through the group. The highest level of development group characterizes the group as a collective, in which one of the main symptoms is group solidarity. Unity is the unity of views of members of the Group on the most important issues for her, delivering the most significant situations. Solidarity group is based on joint substantive work and includes emotional, moral and behavioral sphere of the individual. Formation cohesion team recruits-the personnel of the penitentiary system-specific conditions that affect social cohesion. It: barracking students where the phenomenon of «publicity» and the phenomenon of group isolation; the authoritarian leadership style. We conducted a study of the cohesion of the team of cadets of the FSIN Law Institute of Russia, for which The methodology of Sishor «Defining the Index of Group Cohesion» was used; V.V. Onufrieva). Analysis of the results made it possible to formulate recommendations to address problematic issues and improve the effectiveness of the process: building relationships both horizontally and vertically on the basis of mutual respect and trust; Building a conscious understanding of the commonality of the goals of academic and professional activities; Rational application of all forms of leisure activities; a flexible combination of authoritarian and democratic leadership styles; strict adherence to the ethics of business relations by cadets, military officers, faculty, leadership; conflict and stress management.

1983 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 16-19
Author(s):  
Jack O'Neill

Probably the fundamental criticism within the discipline concerning conventional classroom interaction dynamics comes from our sister subsidiary, political socialization. This criticism takes two forms. One version focuses on the teacher's classroom role behavior. Dawson and Prewitt, for example argue that the democratic or authoritarian leadership style of an instructor is the one aspect of the teacher's role considered most important to the political socialization process. The instructor may or may not stress “disciplined learning of the material presented, rigid adherence to rules, and a deferential attitude toward himself as the authority figure.” The authors continue: The crucial notion for political socialization is that these conditions affect the political outlook of the students. Democratic leadership by the teacher fosters attitudes and skills consonant with democratic values. The authoritarian teacher induces his charges to think according to hierarchy and deference to power.


2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sugeng Mulyono ◽  
Jamal Abdul Nasir

This research aimed to describe organizational cultural and style of leadership, analyzing organizational culture pursuant to style of leadership, analyzing organizational cultural influence to performance of lecture, and analyzing the direct and indirect influence of leadership style to the Private University lecturers’ performance. In taking the sample it uses multi stages of sampling with amount of sample as much 280 lectures. Data collecting uses questioner, interview and detection of relevant document; while analysis of data uses descriptive analysis and path analysis. The results of research indicate that: style of authority leadership have a negativity effect and significant to organizational culture; style of democratic leadership and laissez faire have positive effect and significant to organizational culture; style of democratic and authoritarian leadership have a positive effect and significant to the lecturers’ performance; style of leadership laissez faire have a negative effect and significant to the lecturers’ performance; organizational cultural have a positive effect and significant to the lecturers’ performance; leadership authority and democratic style indirectly influence positively and significant to the lecturers’ performance; and leadership style of laissez faire indirectly negatively influences the lecturers’ performance.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-117
Author(s):  
Mila Purani Sistiyan ◽  
Palikhatun Palikhatun ◽  
Payamta Payamta

Aim -This study aimed at gaining the empirical evidence vis-a-vis the effect of budgetary participation, organizational commitment, and leadership styles on the employees’ performance.  Design -This study made use of the primary data garnered from questionnaires distributed to the employees who were directly engaged in the preparation of budget within the work units in working area of the state treasury service office (in Indonesian language known by Kantor Pelayanan Perbendaharaan Negara and abbreviated as KPPN) of Surakarta. The work units covered several regions such as Surakarta, Sukoharjo, and Wonogiri. This study incorporated 80 work units under both ministry and institution. Of 165 questionnaires which were distributed, 116 pieces were returned and could further be analyzed. The independent variables in this study fell into budgetary participation, organizational commitment, and leadership styles, whereas the dependent variable was the employees’ performance.  Findings -The results indicated the following details: 1) budgetary participation had a positive effect on the employees ‘performance; 2) organizational commitment had a positive effect on the employees’ performance; 3a) the authoritarian leadership style had no effect on the employees’ performance; 3b) the democratic leadership style had a positive effect on the employees’ performance; and 3c) the laissez-faire leadership style had no effect on the employees’ performance.


Author(s):  
Timotej Ribič ◽  
Miha Marič

Employees represent a key part of the organization. Their satisfaction has direct effect on co-workers and their productivity. Leader is largely responsible to create general satisfaction in work environment. With organizing, choosing appropriate management concepts and correct approach to his employees, he creates good relationships with colleagues and contributes to the internal culture of the organization. Good interpersonal relationships are thus an important factor in building success in the company and the operation of processes, as they directly affect work performance, organizational climate and organizational culture. Many companies use classic and wellknown leadership styles. Regardless of the chosen style, it is noticed an alienated relationship between the manager and the employee. The issue can be attributed to strict adherence to the set organizational structure and, in connection with this, the expression of the legitimate power of leaders, yet to some extent the problem is in different understanding of leadership, both with individuals and leaders themselves. The newer leadership style, called Leader-member Exchange Theory, focuses on building relationships, mutual respect and trust, and treating employees as co-workers on the same horizontal hierarchical level. The implementation of this style of management can be seen mainly in foreign markets. This approach is not well known or widespread in Slovenia, nevertheless it is noticed in some companies. Based on a case study from the business environment, we studied a company with such leadership in Slovenia.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Kris Setyaningsih

This research aims to investigate the leadership style of school principle of Tunas Teladan Elementary School Palembang and its’ implications to the quality of students. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, the data was collected through documentation, interviews, and observation. The study found that: 1) the leadership style of the headmaster in Tunas Teladan Elementary School, Palembang, is democratic combination with family values, but occasionally in certain situations he applies an authoritarian leadership pattern; 2) the leadership style brought about positive implications for the quality of students, both viewed from academic and non-academic aspects. Based on the results of these studies, it is expected that the leadership pattern of the school principals in Tunas Teladan Elementary School Palembang can be learnt as an example model for managers of educational institutions, both formal and non-formal, especially in improving the quality of students.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Titin Ulandari

This article aims to describe the meaning of educational leadership, principals' leadership and the variety of leadership styles applied by principals, as well as the situation in which the leadership style is suitable. Leadership is the ability to influence and direct a group to reach the target. The leadership of the principal means the role of the principal to direct school resources so that the achievement of school goals is achieved. There are at least three leadership styles, namely: authoritarian leadership, democratic leadership, and free leadership (laissez-faire).


1993 ◽  
Vol 8 (0) ◽  
pp. 121-134
Author(s):  
Kap Jin Lee

Generally speaking, military organization requires high standard of task performance. But relationship to subordinates is equally important, too. In the military, 'Situation' and tasks to be performed are changing according to one's rank. So it is natural that officers in higher rank are used to exhibit more matured and balanced leadership behavior than those in lower rank. Based on this idea, we may suggest an ideal military leadership style. This article extracted a proposed ideal leadership model by applying military leadership characteristics and the leadership theories. Then a group of military officers' leadership style was studied to find out differences from the proposed model. Author picked the examining group from the active duty marine officers and supplied them with 3 types of questionnaires. Questionnaire A (QA) is to examine the individual quality of leadership, questionnaire B (QB) is to identify each perception to leadership style and questionnaire C (QC) is to find out each actual exhibition of leadership behavior. It is interesting that the group having 'A' quality prefers 'B' leadership style perception and exhibits 'C' behavior. By and large, the group needs to improve both dimensions of leadership behavior; task and relationship. Also maturing pattern in leadership shows irregular forms. Ranks from Captains to Lieutenant Colonels show some deficiencies from the normal pattern of maturity. The study result does not represent all military officers but may provide a useful tool to analyze the pattern of military officers leadership style not only as a group but also as an individual.


2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Derecskei

The objective of organizational creativity is to identify those factors that could affect creativity. One of the most influential factors is the leadership style. Following the review of literatures, we investigated this phenomenon in the Hungarian labor market. We analyzed the answers of more than 600 Hungarian employees. We asked them to categorize their leader on the basis of which classic Lewin leadership style is most characteristic of him or her. After this, they needed to judge how the perceived leadership style would affect the two phases of their workplace creativity. Similarly to international results, democratic leadership style proved to be stimulating, while the authoritarian leadership style was inhibitory. It has also been proved that not only leadership style influences creativity, as the model of successful creative organization cannot be described with the behavior of the leader(s) only.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Aji Heru Muslim ◽  
Sri Harmianto

This research aims to describe the headmaster’s leadership style at SD/MI (Primary School) Muhammadiyah in Banyumas Regency. This is a descriptive qualitative research. Subjects in this research are headmasters and teachers at SD/MI Muhammadiyah in Banyumas Regency, namely MI Muhammadiyah Wangon, SD Muhammadiyah Cipete, and MI Muhammadiyah Pasirmuncang. Data collection technique used in this research is interview. Data validity is checked using technique of source triangulation. The findings show that the leadership style implemented by headmasters at SD/MI Muhammadiyah in Banyumas Regency is a democratic leadership style. This is shown in the way the headmasters carry out their leadership function. For example, as a leader, the headmaster gives information, evaluation, motivation, and innovation for school development, runs situational and non-authoritarian leadership, behaves wisely, and gives directions, examples, as well as rewards. The headmaster always prioritizes a sense of unity and togetherness with the school community. The headmaster uses a strategy of getting close to the community. In dealing with problems, the headmaster solves them calmly and gracefully and discusses them in deliberations in accordance with the development of the problem, and after the decision the problem can be resolved properly. Moreover, the school principal is open to accepting opinions, criticisms and suggestions from staffs.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Titin Ulandari ◽  
Hade Afriansyah

This article aims to describe the meaning of educational leadership, principals' leadership and the variety of leadership styles applied by principals, as well as the situation in which the leadership style is suitable. Leadership is the ability to influence and direct a group to reach the target. The leadership of the principal means the role of the principal to direct school resources so that the achievement of school goals is achieved. There are at least three leadership styles, namely: authoritarian leadership, democratic leadership, and free leadership (laissez faire).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document