scholarly journals WHISTLEBLOWER KASUS KORUPSI DAN UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUMNYA

PLENO JURE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-34
Author(s):  
Andreas Lumme
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Legal Structure

Masalah pokok dalam pembahasan ini adalah apakah undang-undang perlindungan saksi dan korban di Indonesia saat ini telah memberikan perlindungan hukum yang memadai berupa perlakuan khusus bagi pelapor (whistleblower) dan saksi pelaku yang bekerja sama (justice collaborators) dalam tindak pidana korupsi. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan normatif, yang dipadukan dengan pendekatan praktik. Hasil pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa hukum positif Indonesia khususnya UU No.13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban ternyata pelapor (whistleblower) dan saksi pelaku yang bekerja sama (justice collaborators) tindak pidana termasuk korupsi belum memperoleh pengaturan yang memadai, spesifik dan tegas. Kasus-kasus tindak pidana korupsi yang terjadi di Indonesia selama ini setelah berlakunya UU No.13 Tahun 2006, pelapor dan saksi pelaku yang bekerja sama belum mendapat perlindungan yang memadai. Masalah hubungan antara pemberdayaan sistem hukum (legal system) dan penegakan supremasi hukum (supremacy of law). Tujuan pembahasan yakni, menganalisis  pelaksanaan penegakan supremasi  hukum dan sistem hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia, serta kaitan antara penegakan supremasi  hukum dan pemberdayaan sistem hukum. Metode pembahasan didasarkan atas analisis data sekunder (studi dokumen) yang meliputi peraturan perundang-undangan, buku-buku, jurnal-jurnal, berita di media masa  dan dokumen lain yang relevan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ditemukan berbagai catatan buram penegakan supremasi hukum di Indonesia. Sikap dan perilaku  warga masyarakat dan para pemimpin tidak mencerminkan prinsip supremasi hukum. Hal ini disebabkan  oleh  lemahnya ketiga pilar sistem hukum (Three  Elements of Legal System) yang meliputi substansi hukum (legal substance), struktur hukum (legal structure) dan kultur hukum (legal culture). Karena  itu maka pembenahan ketiga komponen sistem hukum merupakan tuntutan yang bersifat mutlak untuk dipenuhi (conditio sine quanon) demi tegaknya prinsip supremasi hukum.

scholarly journals PRAKTIK PERCERAIAN ADAT LOMBOK DI MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 DITINJAU DARI SOSIOLOGI HUKUM

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (01) ◽  
pp. 151-164
Author(s):  
Rahmatun Ulfa
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Government Officials ◽  
Administrative Services ◽  
Legal Structure

This study aims to examine the reality of the practice of customary divorce in Tawun hamlet, Lombok. As well as explaining the forms of customary divorce of the Tawun Hamlet community, in terms of sociological law. This research is a type of field research using a qualitative approach. Primary data and secondary data were collected by means of observation, direct interviews and documentation. To study further, the author uses the theory of the legal system from three elements, namely legal substance, legal structure, and legal culture. The results showed that the occurrence of customary divorce in Tawun Hamlet is a common thing and is not legally disputed by the court. Government officials from elements of village heads, hamlet heads and marriage registrar officers who contribute to customary divorce who participate in administering administrative services, clearly contradict the laws and regulations regarding marriage itself. In addition, people's understanding of divorce continues to be dominated by classical Islamic law and is textual, patriarchal, making the position of women not seen as important because divorce is understood only as a male right.

scholarly journals THE REVITALIZATION OF THE INDONESIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IN THE ORDER OF REALIZING THE IDEAL STATE LAW

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (01) ◽  
pp. 12-25
Author(s):  
Ana Fauzia ◽  
Fathul Hamdani ◽  
Deva Octavia
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
System A ◽  
Judicial Corruption ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Corrupt Behavior ◽  
The Ideal

It can be called that the dynamics of national and state life in Indonesia are increasingly being tested by the same problem. For example, an outbreak of judicial corruption from the time to time, which was never ending. Law enforcers who are echoed as honorable professions, but on the other hand, these are exacerbated by the corrupt behavior of those professions. The sale and purchase of a case is no longer viewed as taboo, indeed it just looks like proper. Which means, it is a kind of a sign that the various legal regulations that normatively regulate the entire judicial process are ultimately unable to overcome the judicial corruption. The main objective of this research focuses on analysis related to efforts to revitalize the legal system in order to create an ideal rule of law as stated by Lawrance Friedman in his book namely "The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective". In this research, the method used is normative juridical using statutory, conceptual and historical approaches. The results of the research present an idea which is divided into three according to the three elements in the formation of a rule of law according to Lawrance Friedman, namely legal substance, legal structure, and legal culture. With regard to legal substance, the author provides the idea of a judicial preview as a method of validating the constitutionality of laws. Then related to the legal structure, the author provides ideas related to efforts to build morality and professionalism of law enforcement officials. Meanwhile, in terms of legal culture, the author provides ideas related to efforts to build a legal culture in society that is aware of the law and the constitution.

scholarly journals KENDALA DALAM PELAKSANAAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PRAKTIK PARANORMAL SEBAGAI TINDAK PIDANA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1908
Author(s):  
Yusi Permatasi ◽  
Yuwono Prianto
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
The Law

In Society, Paranormal practices is considered as common things. Paranormal Practices is used for any good and also for crime, so to cope with the activities, government had regulated the act to control the crime by using paranormal background. The paranormal practices have been included as criminal acts. It has regulated in article 545 and article 546 of the criminal law act and set on as supernatural powers activity. As time passes, there are constraint in the alleviation law it’s law enforcement. This research was done with empirical or law sociological point of view, where Lawrence M. Friedman state that the elements of the legal system consist of Legal Structure, Legal Substance, and Legal Culture. The result of this research is the paranormal practices are differentiate by it used which is good or bad. The bad paranormal practices cause loss for society. This gave rise to uncertainty of law enforcement on the paranormal practices, therefore it need a deep research which is not only from the law enforcement point of view, but also the religious and cultural represented by figure.

scholarly journals Corruption: Working Hasn’t Completed

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-137
Author(s):  
Gde Made Swardhana ◽  
I Nyoman Sukandia
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Hard Work ◽  
External Factors ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
Policy Control ◽  
Individual Needs ◽  
External Causes ◽  
The Relationship

This article discusses problems of corruption which until now hasn’t been completed in its eradication process. Every effort is made to find both internal and external causes in order to get the solution. The problem that is studied sociologically is, why is corruption incomplete? If corruption isn’t yet complete, and work isn’t finished yet, then how can work be completed? Understanding Corruption can be called work is complete, must be understood from the anti-corruption values and principles contained therein. It’s include honesty, independence, discipline, responsibility, hard work, simple, courage, and justice. It’s need to be applied by each individual to be able to overcome external factors so that corruption doesn’t occur. To prevent the occurrence of external factors, in addition to having it, each individual needs to deeply understand the anti-corruption principles of accountability, transparency, fairness, policy, and policy control. Therefore the relationship between anti-corruption principles and values is an inseparable unity. Success or failure to solve the problem of corruption is expected in the legal system that makes the handle in solving corruption cases, namely strengthening the legal structure, legal substance and legal culture of the community.

scholarly journals Implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) in the Field of Securing Plantation Assets

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 5-9
Author(s):  
Junaedi Junaedi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Oil Palm ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Serious Crime ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Fresh Fruit Bunches

This article discusses the implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) in the Field of Securing Plantation Assets, especially at PT Perkebunan Nusantara (PTPN) IV. Good Corporate Governance (GCG) in the area of ​​securing assets in PTPN IV can be measured by the three elements of the legal system, namely: the legal substance (the Forestry Law); its legal structure (Law Enforcement Officials: Forestry and Police PPNS); corporate legal culture. The three systems are interrelated with one another. Systemic law enforcement efforts must pay attention to the elements of the legal system because it is the essence of law enforcement. the findings in the field of plantation crime mode are massive and organized. With regard to theft of oil palm, many people believe that it is often carried out by oil palm ninja (simple crime), but in reality theft by "oil palm ninja" is about 10% to 15% only. In reality, there is an oil palm mafia operating in PTPN IV's estates which holds 85% of these oil thieves. 90% organized / serious crime. The criminal act of theft and embezzlement of oil palm FFB (Fresh fruit bunches) in the PTPN IV area is massive and can be categorized as very critical.

Rekonstruksi Budaya Hukum Berdimensi Pancasila dalam Upaya Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Anajeng Esri Edhi Mahanani
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
National Values ◽  
Legal Structures ◽  
Reconstruction Model ◽  
Main Factor ◽  
The Ideal

The issue of weak law enforcement in Indonesia is indeed not a new issue, but this issue has still not been resolved until now. The purpose of this discussion is to find the ideal law enforcement model in accordance with national values. First, the discussion of this article will look at the correlation between law enforcement and the legal system which ultimately can be concluded that law enforcement always correlates with the optimal legal system at work, namely legal structure, legal substance and legal culture. One of these sub-systems does not work properly and optimally, so the ideals of ideal law enforcement will not be achieved easily. This paper then discusses the hypotheses of the three law enforcement subsystems, in fact that legal culture being the main factor, namely the determination of other subsystems. A good legal culture will encourage legal structures to form substantive norms and implement legislation with responsibility. Next discussed is the determination of the reconstruction model of legal culture that has the Pancasila dimension. Pancasila in this case becomes a filter in reconstruction the legal culture in order to enforce the law in accordance with the original noble values ​​of the Indonesian nation. Bad habits in the community should not be interpreted as a noble culture of the nation.   Keywords: “legal structure”, “legal substance”, “legal culture”, “reconstruction”, “Pancasila”

REKONSTRUKSI SISTEM PENYELENGGARAAN PASAR MODAL SYARIAH

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 268
Author(s):  
Salsabila Nadhifa ◽  
Nabitatus Sa’adah
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Capital Markets ◽  
Capital Market ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
Similar Concept ◽  
Different Types ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Capital Market

The capital market that is widely used by people is not in accordance with the provisions contained in sharia principles. Therefore, a capital market with sharia. Conventional capital markets and Islamic capital markets have a similar concept but differ in principles and have different types of contracts. This difference between conventional capital market principles and the principles contained in the Islamic capital market results in the need for regulations that specifically regulate the Islamic capital market. so it is necessary to update the Law No. 8 of 1995 concerning Capital Markets. Judging from the legal system, the Sharia Capital Market still has weaknesses related to the legal substance, legal structure and legal culture so that reconstruction of Islamic capital market regulations must be conducted. The method used in this writing is analytical descriptive and uses a normative juridical approach.

Penerapan Hukum Wakaf Uang di Indonesia Perspektif Legal System Theory

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masdar Masdar
Keyword(s):  
System Theory ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Muslim Society ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

Cash waqf in Indonesia has been long enough implemented based on some rules enacted by government and other rules defined by The Waqf Board of Indonesia (BWI). However, the implementation of cash waqf has not reached the level of success. Therefore, this article studies the application of cash waqf law in Indonesia according to Friedman’s legal system theory. The legal system theory of Friedman firstly looks at the substance of the law, which is the rules or regulations; and secondly it examines the structure of the law, encompassing the law enforcement agencies, such as judge, prosecutor, police and legal counselors. And lastly the theory examines the element of legal culture, which is a response from Muslim society. The first two examinations indicate that there is nothing to be a problem. But from the last examination there is a problem regarding the trust from Muslim society. From the legal culture point of view, the implementation of cash waqf by the government, which is performed by BWI, needs attracting society’s credentials in order to improve and maximize the performance of cash waqf in Indonesia.

Problematika Yuridis Wakaf Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-138
Author(s):  
Eva Mir'atun Niswah
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
Clear Explanation

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) is one of movable objects that can be represented according to waqf regulation (Undang-Undang No. 41 Tahun 2004 Tentang Wakaf). The previous regulations did not mention IPR as waqf object. IPR becomes waqf object because there is a shift of  paradigm on productive waqf. However, the waqf regulation (Undang-Undang No. 41 Tahun 2004 Tentang Wakaf) has many juridical problems. For example, there is no specific explanation about IPR waqf as well as money waqf. Besides, the IPR practice is very rare due to unclear forms of IPR waqf. Juridical problems on IPR waqf are related to legal substance, legal structure and legal culture. On legal substance, there is no clear explanation and mechanism of IPR waqf. On legal structure, there is no clear explanations about who can be the wakif or nazir on IPR waqf. On legal culture, many people are still unfamiliar with intangible waqf object (the conventional waqf object is land). Therefore, the acceptance of an intangible object such as IPR as a waqf object is very low.

Mediation Effectiveness in Sharia Economic Dispute Settlement: Phenomenology in Bukittinggi Religious Court

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Riska Fauziah Hayati ◽  
Busyro Busyro ◽  
Bustamar Bustamar
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Analysis Framework ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
Inhibiting Factors ◽  
The Law ◽  
Mediation Effectiveness

<p dir="ltr"><span>The main problem in this paper is how the effectiveness of mediation in sharia economic dispute resolution based on PERMA No. 1 of 2016 at the Bukittinggi Religious Court, and what are the inhibiting factors success of mediation. To answer this question, the author uses an inductive and deductive analysis framework regarding the law effectiveness theory of Lawrence M. Friedman. This paper finds that mediation in sharia economic dispute resolution at the Bukittinggi Religious Court from 2016 to 2019 has not been effective. The ineffectiveness is caused by several factors that influence it: First, in terms of legal substance, PERMA No.1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts still lacks in addressing the problems of the growing community. Second, in terms of legal structure, there are no judges who have mediator certificates. Third, the legal facilities and infrastructure at the Bukittinggi Religious Court have supported mediation. Fourth, in terms of legal culture, there are still many people who are not aware of the law and do not understand mediation well, so they consider mediation to be unimportant.</span> </p><p><em>Tulisan ini mengkaji tentang bagaimana efektivitas mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah berdasarkan PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi dan apa saja yang menjadi faktor penghambat keberhasilan mediasi. Untuk menjawab pertanyaan tersebut, penulis menggunakan kerangka analisa induktif dan deduktif dengan mengacu pada teori efektivitas hukum Lawrence M. Friedman. </em><em>Tulisan ini menemukan bahwa m</em><em>ediasi dalam p</em><em>enyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi </em><em>dari tahun 2016 sampai 2019 </em><em>belum efektif</em><em>. Hal ini karena dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor. </em><em> </em><em>Pertama, dari segi substansi hukum, yaitu PERMA No. 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan masih memiliki kekurangan dalam menjawab persoalan masyarakat yang terus berkembang. Kedua, dari segi struktur hukum, belum adanya hakim yang memiliki sertifikat mediator. Ketiga, sarana dan prasarana hukum di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi sudah mendukung mediasi. Keempat, dari segi budaya hukum, masih banyaknya masyarakat yang tidak sadar hukum dan tidak mengerti persoalan mediasi dengan baik, sehingga menganggap mediasi tidak penting.</em><em></em></p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document