scholarly journals Pelaksanaan Pembagian Harta Bersama dalam Perkawinan Poligami Setelah Perceraian

PLENO JURE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-35
Author(s):  
Muhammad Kamran Imran

Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan bertujuan: Untuk mengetahui dan memahami efektivitas pelaksanaan pembagian harta bersama dalam perkawinan Poligami jika terjadi perceraian. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum dengan tipe penelitian hukum empiris atau (Socio Legal Study Research). Hasil Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa: Efektivitas pelaksanaan pembagian harta bersama dalam perkawinan poligami jika terjadi perceraian adalah kurang efektif. Oleh karena dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor dan tidak tercapainya sasaran atau tujuan yang ditentukan sebelumnya, sehingga derajat ukuran efektivitas tidak terpenuhi. Rekomendasi: (1) Perlu Pengaturan Hukum Positif yang mengatur  syarat mutlak berpoligami, harta bersama dengan istri terdahulu wajib dipisahkan dengan permohonan izin poligami bersamaan dengan penetapan harta bersama, untuk menghindari terjadinya penyelundupan hak istri terdahulu oleh suami dan memberikan kepastian hukum hak-hak istri terdahulu mengenai harta bersamanya. (2) Bahwa faktor-faktor yang bisa mempengaruhi efektivitas pelaksanaan pembagian harta bersama dalam perkawinan poligami, penegak hukum harus mengupayakan untuk mencegah hal tersebut, sehingga tolak ukur efektivitas pelaksanaan pembagian harta bersama dalam perkawinan poligami setelah perceraian dapat berjalan efektif. Abstract. This research was conducted to find out and understand the effectiveness of the implementation of the sharing of joint property in a polygamy marriage in case of divorce. This type of research is legal research with empirical legal research type (Socio Legal Study Research). The results of this study indicate that: The effectiveness of the distribution of shared assets in polygamy marriages in the event of a divorce is less effective. Because it is influenced by several factors and not achieving the goals or objectives determined beforehand, so the degree of measure of effectiveness is not met. Recommendations: (1) A Positive Legal Arrangement is required that regulates the absolute requirements of polygamy, shared assets with the previous wife must be separated from the request for a polygamy permit together with the determination of shared assets, to avoid smuggling the rights of the previous wife by the husband and provide legal certainty of the rights of the previous wife regarding property with him. (2) That the factors that can affect the effectiveness of the distribution of shared assets in polygamy marriages, law enforcement must strive to prevent this, so that the effectiveness of the distribution of shared assets in polygamy marriages after divorce can be effective.

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Efraim Mbomba Reda ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara

Progressive law puts forward the sociology of law rather than legal certainty which is the focus of legal positivism. In Indonesia, this law was coined by Satjipto Rahardjo. This study aims to determine the formulation of progressive law in future criminal law, and to determine the actualization of the concept of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative legal research method with statute and conceptual approaches. The technique of collecting legal materials in this study is a descriptive method that aims to obtain the meaning of reality related to the problems to be discussed and solved in this study. The results show that in the current Criminal Code Bill, progressive law has been regulated, to be precise in Article 2 paragraph (1) and (2). Progressive law is also regulated in Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Then, the actualization of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia is a judge with the powers that take into account the sociological context of society in making decisions. Judges, prosecutors and lawyers can certainly discuss together in eradicating corruption. Efforts are also being made to reconstruct and redefine the power of law enforcement. This arrangement can also encourage the KPK to be more progressive in eradicating corruption, as well as building law enforcers who have morality so that they can become role models and increase public participation, for example by forming NGOs in preventing or fighting corruption in various agencies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mutiara Hamdalah ◽  
Yudha Chandra Arwana ◽  
Asna Yusrina

Legal Offers In Improving the Effectiveness of Forced Money Determination Efforts and Administrative Sanctions On the warning of a valid verdict that is not carried out by the defendant. The assessment of the formulation of the problem in this study is how the legal culture in Indonesia to the application of Article 116 paragraph (4) of Law No. 51 of 2009 on State Administrative Justice. In this paper the author also provides an understanding of the comparison of the State Administrative Law system (Indonesia) with Verwaltungsgerecht (Germany) in order to realize legal justice for the community. By using paradigms in terms of epistemological and axological aspects. In the implementation has not been found a special authority in overseeing the existence of the State Administrative Decision (KTUN) that has been validly decided by the judge, there are still some cases of defendants who do not carry out the warning of the verdict against the verdict. The defendant must pay forced money or administrative sanctions against it. From these cases, there should be special authority in supervising the KTUN that has been decided by the judge. The author in this paper offers a legal offer to improve the effectiveness in the implementation of the KTUN in improving legal certainty and guarantee of legal protection in the field of State Administrative Justice. The authors of this paper use descriptive doctrinal research methods, descriptive legal research that explains what should be communicated with the law in the review of das sollen and das sein.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Poniman Poniman

ABSTRAKPutusan Pengadilan Negeri Bekasi Nomor 95/PDT.G/2008/PN.BKS menolak dan menghukum gugatan penggugat untuk membayar biaya perkara, dan memutuskan bahwa harta pewaris seluruhnya menjadi hak anak luar kawin tidak diakui karena hibah dari pewaris. Dari sisi penegakan hukum positif, hakim mendasarkan putusan hanya pada pembuktian tanpa menelusuri realitas dari akta hibah tersebut yang cacat hukum. Kajian penelitian putusan ini menggunakan teori hukum progresif dalam upaya mencari keadilan, dengan mengkaji permasalahan, serta bagaimana penyelesaian konflik pewarisan akibat hibah berdasarkan hukum progresif. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian socio-legal dengan pendekatan induktif yang berparadigma post-positivisme. Penelitian ini dilakukan secara kualitatif dengan mengutamakan kedalaman data dengan narasumber yang berkompeten di bidangnya. Dari penelitian ini, realita bahwa anak luar kawin tidak diakui dapat menguasai seluruh harta pewaris dengan hanya berdasarkan pada akta keterangan hibah, mestinya tidak terjadi. Hal ini menunjukkan betapa lemahnya peradilan yang hanya menggunakan hukum formalisme semata, sebagai puncak kepastian hukumnya, sehingga tujuan manfaat dan keadilan belum terpenuhi. Pola hukum progresif berfondasi pada progresivitas manusia, bahwa manusia sebenarnya baik, penuh kasih sayang, saling tolong menolong, dan empati kepada sesama manusia. Berhukum yang benar adalah berhukum yang bertujuan demi tercapainya keadilan masyarakat.Kata kunci: hibah, harta warisan, anak luar kawin tidak diakui, hukum progresif. ABSTRACTBekasi District Court Decision Number 95/PDT.G/2008/ PN.BKS objected the claim and give sanction to the plaintiff to pay court costs, and decided that all the assets of the testator became solely the possession or title of the child out of wedlock of no recognition owing to the grant of the testator. In terms of positive law enforcement, the judges based the ruling solely on proving without probing the legitimacy of the legally flawed grant deed. This analysis employed the theory of progressive laws in an effort to seek justice by studying the problems as well as the conflict settlement of the case of grant-based heir derived from progressive law. This is a socio-legal research study using inductive approach through the perspective of post-positivism. Qualitative research was conducted primarily by collecting references from the experts in the relevant field. From this research, it can be inferred that the granting of ownership to the entire inheritance to the child out of wedlock of no recognition based solely upon a Grant Deed should not have occurred. This indicates just how weak the judiciary is, barely imposing a mere formal law as the culmination of its legal certainty resulting in the unfulfilled objectives of law, those of the benefit and equity. The pattern of progressive law is based on the progression of humans that human beings are actually good, compassionate, mutually helpful to each other, and empathetic for their fellow human beings. Indeed the true law is aimed at achieving social justice.Keywords: grant, inheritance, child out of wedlock of no recognition, progressive law.


Author(s):  
Efendik Kurniawan ◽  
Ahmad Heru Romadhon ◽  
Indri Ayu Kusumawardani ◽  
Zakaria Zakaria ◽  
Akhmad Rudi Iswono

The focus of this research study aims to reaffirm the contents of article 45 paragraph (5) of the ITE Law related to complain offenses which are considered confusing in providing clear definitions and obscurity of legal certainty which can hinder the law enforcement process for justice seekers if there is a dispute in cyberspace. This type of research is normative legal research, descriptive using deductive reasoning. From the results of the discussion, this study shows that the complaint offense listed in the ITE Law which is abstract in nature is blurred if the complaint does not have a more concrete explanation of the meaning of the complaint. So that the Judicial Review needs to review the contents of the article. Policy formulation UU ITE No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions which was last amended by Act No. 19 of 2016 specifically with the interaction of social change and changes in law today address alignments on the one hand in the interests of a group. Fokus dalam studi penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menegaskan kembali isi pasal 45 ayat (5) UU ITE terkait dengan delik aduan yang dirasa membingungkan dalam memberikan definisi yang jelas serta terkaburnya sebuah kepastian hukum yang dapat menghambat proses penegakkan keadilan hokum bagi pencari keadilan apabila ada sengketa di ruang cyber space. Tipe Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif, deskriptif dengan mengunakan penalaran deduktif. Dari hasil pembahasan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa delik aduan yang tercantum dalam UU ITE yang bersifat abstrak menjadi kabur apabila delik aduan ini tidak mempunyai penjelasan yang lebih konkrit dari arti delik aduan tersebut. Sehingga dirasa perlu Judicial Review mengkaji lagi muatan pasal tersebut. Formulasi kebijakan UU ITE No. 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik yang terakhir diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 khususnya dengan interaksi perubahan sosial dan perubahan hukum dewasa ini menujukan keberpihakan pada satu sisi dalam kepentingan suatu golongan.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-53
Author(s):  
Jatmiko Raharjo ◽  
Syamsuddin Muchtar ◽  
Audyna Mayasari Muin

The aim of the study is to determine the application of Visum et Repertum as evidence for criminal acts in domestic violence. This study was empirical legal research. The location of this study was conducted in Kejaksaan Negeri Klaten. The result of the research showed that as proof of domestic violence with evidence Visum et Repertum was one of the law enforcements oriented to realize for legal certainty and protection of victims in proving the occurrence of criminal acts in domestic violence. The lack of evidence bothers the process of law enforcement, regarding requirements to determine the victim provided at least two evidence and for the judges to decide on criminal cases with valid evidence at least can be avoided by using Visum et Repertum. The obstacles to prove the evidence for criminal acts in domestic violence with Visum et Repertum includes the differences of understanding among law enforcement officials about the use of Visum et Repertum for criminal acts in domestic violence.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Andika Prawira Buana ◽  
Hasnan Hasbi ◽  
Muhammad Kamal ◽  
Aan Aswari

An agreement is a legal relationship between one person and another person or several persons in order to accomplish a certain thing that has been agreed upon. The Agreement becomes the Law for the parties who make and comply with the content of the agreement. In principle, the treaty embraces the principle of contractual freedom, but that freedom has certain limitations that cannot be violated for the sake of justice, usefulness and legal certainty. The purpose of this research is to describe juridically the wetness and consequences of the illegal cell phone sale and purchase agreement. This research method uses normative legal research type using secondary data and is analyzed based on juridical descriptive. The results of this study argue that the absence of a mobile phone sale agreement is illegal because it does not meet the legal requirements of the agreement which is lawful under the applicable positive law and that the agreement is declared void by law and is considered to be a non-binding agreement.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-90
Author(s):  
Foni Mega Wahyuni ◽  
Triono Eddy ◽  
Triono Eddy ◽  
Alpi Sahari ◽  
Alpi Sahari

Procedures for handling cases of traffic violations in Indonesia are regulated by Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transport (LLAJ Law) which is a substitute for Act Number 14 of 1992 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation and Law Number 8 Year 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law. In addition, there are several derivative regulations that complement the provisions in the Act. Traffic violations in the Criminal Procedure Act (KUHAP) are grouped together with minor criminal offenses to follow the procedure for examining fast events. The method in this research is empirical juridical legal research type, which is a study that conducts a study of research in the field, conducted a direct research (risearch) regarding the enforcement of court proceedings quickly in the settlement of traffic violation cases. This research uses a qualitative approach. Based on the research, it was found that there were several obstacles in enforcing fast trial law in the settlement of traffic violations, among others: First, the number of traffic violations in Medan City which made the Judges who heard would be overwhelmed, coupled with less extensive room facilities or inadequate infrastructure facilities. which will make the room will be filled with traffic violators who will sit in the courtroom. Second, in the trial process of fast events there are still many traffic violators who use brokers in their law enforcement processes, because the crowds of court officials sometimes find it difficult to distinguish which brokers often play in the maintenance of the law enforcement process.


Author(s):  
Vike Elva Maisela ◽  
Lego Karjoko

PPAT (Land deed official) as the public officer shall notice on the principles of accountability to form legal certainty. This legal study analyses the stages done by PPAT on Boyolali regency in making the land deed to warrant the formal truth and the material truth. This was normative legal research. The findings of this legal research showed a legal fact which PPAT on Boyolali regency has not implemented the principles of accountability in making the deed. PPAT in Boyolali regency has not warranted the formal and material truth of the deed since there has not been a regulation that states PPAT shall explain the principles of accountability. Consequently, the PPAT deed does not possess legal certainty.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Helmi Helmi ◽  
Fauzi Syam ◽  
Harry Setya Nugraha ◽  
Retno Kusniati

The debate on the absolute competency of the State Administrative Court in Indonesia to set the dispute over the State Financial Losses Report (LHPKKN) is proved to have caused dissenting opinion. The judgments between one administrative court to other court in Indonesia cause main problem of achieving justice and legal certainty. This research examines the issue of absolute competence of the Administrative Court in adjudicating disputes on the State Financial Losses Report published by the Financial and Development Monitoring Agency (BPKP). This article uses normative legal research and implement the statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. These approaches are used to discern and analyze several related legal materials or documents scientifically. The aims and objectives of this research are to find a legal solution on how this classic issue has to be approached and solved. As a result, it is found through this article that the Administrative Court has absolute competence in deciding disputes on the Report on the Calculation of State Financial Losses issued by the Financial and Development Monitoring Agency, which is supported by several fundamental reasons.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 575-581
Author(s):  
I Nyoman Budiantara ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
I Nyoman Sutama

Freedom of expression in public is the right of every citizen which is protected by law. There are several principles that must be followed in expressing opinions in public, namely the principle of balancing rights and obligations, deliberation and consensus, legal certainty and justice, proportionality, and benefits. However, the fact is that demonstrations are often carried out in an anarchic manner. The purpose of this study is to determine the authority of the Bali police in law enforcement against anarchic demonstrations, and to find out the obstacles faced by the Balinese police in dealing with demonstrations. This study uses empirical legal research because of the gap between theory and reality. The results of the research that the authority of the Bali Regional Police in law enforcement against anarchist demonstrations refers to Law/8/1998 and the National Police Chief Regulation No. Pol. 16 of 2006, as well as Protap No. PROTAP/1/X/2010. Barriers to the Bali Police in dealing with anarchic demonstrations are divided into internal inhibiting factors such as knowledge, emotions, and delays in information. The external such as no permission to protest, influenced by alcohol. To the public, to always comply with the laws and regulations in terms of demonstrations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document