scholarly journals Formulasi Kebijakan Concreto in Abstracto UU ITE

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
Efendik Kurniawan ◽  
Ahmad Heru Romadhon ◽  
Indri Ayu Kusumawardani ◽  
Zakaria Zakaria ◽  
Akhmad Rudi Iswono
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Deductive Reasoning ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Cyber Space ◽  
The One

The focus of this research study aims to reaffirm the contents of article 45 paragraph (5) of the ITE Law related to complain offenses which are considered confusing in providing clear definitions and obscurity of legal certainty which can hinder the law enforcement process for justice seekers if there is a dispute in cyberspace. This type of research is normative legal research, descriptive using deductive reasoning. From the results of the discussion, this study shows that the complaint offense listed in the ITE Law which is abstract in nature is blurred if the complaint does not have a more concrete explanation of the meaning of the complaint. So that the Judicial Review needs to review the contents of the article. Policy formulation UU ITE No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions which was last amended by Act No. 19 of 2016 specifically with the interaction of social change and changes in law today address alignments on the one hand in the interests of a group. Fokus dalam studi penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menegaskan kembali isi pasal 45 ayat (5) UU ITE terkait dengan delik aduan yang dirasa membingungkan dalam memberikan definisi yang jelas serta terkaburnya sebuah kepastian hukum yang dapat menghambat proses penegakkan keadilan hokum bagi pencari keadilan apabila ada sengketa di ruang cyber space. Tipe Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif, deskriptif dengan mengunakan penalaran deduktif. Dari hasil pembahasan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa delik aduan yang tercantum dalam UU ITE yang bersifat abstrak menjadi kabur apabila delik aduan ini tidak mempunyai penjelasan yang lebih konkrit dari arti delik aduan tersebut. Sehingga dirasa perlu Judicial Review mengkaji lagi muatan pasal tersebut. Formulasi kebijakan UU ITE No. 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik yang terakhir diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 khususnya dengan interaksi perubahan sosial dan perubahan hukum dewasa ini menujukan keberpihakan pada satu sisi dalam kepentingan suatu golongan.

scholarly journals PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK PEWARISAN AKIBAT HIBAH BERDASARKAN HUKUM PROGRESIF

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Poniman Poniman
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Relevant Field

ABSTRAKPutusan Pengadilan Negeri Bekasi Nomor 95/PDT.G/2008/PN.BKS menolak dan menghukum gugatan penggugat untuk membayar biaya perkara, dan memutuskan bahwa harta pewaris seluruhnya menjadi hak anak luar kawin tidak diakui karena hibah dari pewaris. Dari sisi penegakan hukum positif, hakim mendasarkan putusan hanya pada pembuktian tanpa menelusuri realitas dari akta hibah tersebut yang cacat hukum. Kajian penelitian putusan ini menggunakan teori hukum progresif dalam upaya mencari keadilan, dengan mengkaji permasalahan, serta bagaimana penyelesaian konflik pewarisan akibat hibah berdasarkan hukum progresif. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian socio-legal dengan pendekatan induktif yang berparadigma post-positivisme. Penelitian ini dilakukan secara kualitatif dengan mengutamakan kedalaman data dengan narasumber yang berkompeten di bidangnya. Dari penelitian ini, realita bahwa anak luar kawin tidak diakui dapat menguasai seluruh harta pewaris dengan hanya berdasarkan pada akta keterangan hibah, mestinya tidak terjadi. Hal ini menunjukkan betapa lemahnya peradilan yang hanya menggunakan hukum formalisme semata, sebagai puncak kepastian hukumnya, sehingga tujuan manfaat dan keadilan belum terpenuhi. Pola hukum progresif berfondasi pada progresivitas manusia, bahwa manusia sebenarnya baik, penuh kasih sayang, saling tolong menolong, dan empati kepada sesama manusia. Berhukum yang benar adalah berhukum yang bertujuan demi tercapainya keadilan masyarakat.Kata kunci: hibah, harta warisan, anak luar kawin tidak diakui, hukum progresif. ABSTRACTBekasi District Court Decision Number 95/PDT.G/2008/ PN.BKS objected the claim and give sanction to the plaintiff to pay court costs, and decided that all the assets of the testator became solely the possession or title of the child out of wedlock of no recognition owing to the grant of the testator. In terms of positive law enforcement, the judges based the ruling solely on proving without probing the legitimacy of the legally flawed grant deed. This analysis employed the theory of progressive laws in an effort to seek justice by studying the problems as well as the conflict settlement of the case of grant-based heir derived from progressive law. This is a socio-legal research study using inductive approach through the perspective of post-positivism. Qualitative research was conducted primarily by collecting references from the experts in the relevant field. From this research, it can be inferred that the granting of ownership to the entire inheritance to the child out of wedlock of no recognition based solely upon a Grant Deed should not have occurred. This indicates just how weak the judiciary is, barely imposing a mere formal law as the culmination of its legal certainty resulting in the unfulfilled objectives of law, those of the benefit and equity. The pattern of progressive law is based on the progression of humans that human beings are actually good, compassionate, mutually helpful to each other, and empathetic for their fellow human beings. Indeed the true law is aimed at achieving social justice.Keywords: grant, inheritance, child out of wedlock of no recognition, progressive law.

scholarly journals Konsepsi Hukum Progresif dalam Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Efraim Mbomba Reda ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Role Models ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Positivism ◽  
Sociology Of Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Descriptive Method

Progressive law puts forward the sociology of law rather than legal certainty which is the focus of legal positivism. In Indonesia, this law was coined by Satjipto Rahardjo. This study aims to determine the formulation of progressive law in future criminal law, and to determine the actualization of the concept of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative legal research method with statute and conceptual approaches. The technique of collecting legal materials in this study is a descriptive method that aims to obtain the meaning of reality related to the problems to be discussed and solved in this study. The results show that in the current Criminal Code Bill, progressive law has been regulated, to be precise in Article 2 paragraph (1) and (2). Progressive law is also regulated in Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Then, the actualization of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia is a judge with the powers that take into account the sociological context of society in making decisions. Judges, prosecutors and lawyers can certainly discuss together in eradicating corruption. Efforts are also being made to reconstruct and redefine the power of law enforcement. This arrangement can also encourage the KPK to be more progressive in eradicating corruption, as well as building law enforcers who have morality so that they can become role models and increase public participation, for example by forming NGOs in preventing or fighting corruption in various agencies.

scholarly journals The Effectiveness of Cyber Crime Handling by the Special Criminal Directorate North Maluku Polda

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Irwan Ahdi ◽  
Syawal Abdulajid ◽  
Suwarti Suwarti
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Community Participation ◽  
Cyber Crime ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Application Of Law ◽  
Special Training ◽  
The North ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Indicators Of Success

This study aims to analyze the indicators that affect the effectiveness of the handling of Cyber Crime by the Directorate of Crimes at the North Maluku Police. As well as to reveal the process of handling Cyber Crime by the Directorate of Crime and Crime of North Maluku Police. Currently there are technical obstacles that result in the lack of legal certainty related to the problem of Cyber Crime, including the lack of structural and channeled coordination, as well as an understanding of the application of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 About Information and Electronic Transactions. Thus, the indicators of success that can affect the effectiveness of handling Cyber Crime by the Directorate of Crimes at the North Maluku Police are the Legal Mastery of the Directorate of Crimes in North Maluku regarding the ITE Law, Appropriate Law Enforcement, Community Participation, and Adequate Facilities and Infrastructure. Efforts to Handle Cyber Crime by the Crimean Directorate of North Maluku Police are the control of investigators in the field of Technology by equipping and facilitating officers with special training related to Cyber Crime, as well as providing modern facilities in investigations/investigations. In addition, in dealing with cybercrimes, it is necessary to introduce the paradigm and construction of investigator thinking from formalistic to imaginative, progressive and prioritizes the benefit of the community.

scholarly journals Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dibidang Transaksi Elektronik Sebagai Tindak Pidana Non-Konvensional

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-120
Author(s):  
Melani Melani ◽  
Hari Sutra Disemadi ◽  
Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Electronic System ◽  
Electronic Systems ◽  
Transaction Management ◽  
Legal Action ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Technology Utilization ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Cyber Space

The development and progress of electronic transactions has resulted in changes in the activities of human life in various fields which have directly given rise to new forms of legal action that require Indonesia to form arrangements regarding electronic transaction management. The purpose of this study is to find out the background of the birth of criminal law policies regarding electronic transactions and to find out the formulation of criminal acts regarding electronic transactions in Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. The results of this study indicate that the background of the birth of the criminal law policy in the field of electronic transactions is the development of crime through electronic systems in society. Although crime through an electronic system is virtual, it can be categorized as a real legal act or action. Juridically, legal actions in this cyber space are regulated in the ITE Law. This ITE Law is an absolute legal approach to safeguard security in cyberspace and produce legal certainty on technology utilization issues.

scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS PENERAPAN KONSEP LEX SPESIALIS SISTEMATIS PADA PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI BIDANG PERTAMBANGAN DIKAITKAN DENGAN AJARAN PERBARENGAN (CONCURSUS IDEALIS) DALAM HUKUM PIDANA

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tjahyo Kusumo
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Mining Sector ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
Penal Law ◽  
The One

ABSTRAKPerkembangan dan pembaharuan hukum pidana sudah meningkat dengan adanya penerapan penggabungan hukum dalam penyelesaian kasus tindak pidana. Perumusan masalah:Bagaimana penerapan konsep lex spesialis sistematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan Dikaitkan Dengan Ajaran Perbarengan Dalam Hukum Pidana? Bagaimana kepastian hukum penerapan konsep lex spesialis sistematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan dari sudut pandang keadilan ? Bagaimana implikasi hukum penerapan konsep lex spesialis sistematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan dalam pembaharuan hukum pidana?Tujuan Penelitian Untuk menjelaskan penerapan konsep lex spesialis systematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan Dikaitkan Dengan Ajaran Perbarengan Dalam Hukum Pidana Untuk menjelaskan kepastian hukum penerapan konsep lex spesialis systematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan dari sudut pandang keadilan.Untuk menjelaskan implikasi hukum penerapan konsep lex spesialis systematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan dalam pembaharuan hukum pidana Jenis penelitian hukumnya adalah secara normatif . Kesimpulan Penerapan konsep lex spesialis sistematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan Dikaitkan Dengan Ajaran Perbarengan Dalam Hukum Pidana terdapat dalam beberapa dakwaan yang terhadap terdakwa yang diperiksa pada persidangan. Hal ini dapat dilihat pada contoh kasus putusan Nomor: 16/Pid.Sus-PK/2018/PT.DKI dengan kronologinya: Terdakwa Nur Alam selaku Gubernur Sulawesi Tenggara didakwa sebagai yang melakukan, menyuruh melakukan perbuatan yang secara melawan hukum melakukan perbuatan memperkaya diri sendiri atau orangt lain atau suatu korporasi yang merugikan keuangan Negara atau perekonomian Negara. Kepastian hukum penerapan konsep lex spesialis systematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan dari sudut pandang keadilan yaitu bahwa Kebijakan hukum pidana melalui implementasi asas kekhususan sistematis (systematische specialiteit) merupakan upaya penting dalam harmonisasi dan sinkronisasi antar undang-undang yang terkandung sanksi pidana didalamnya, baik itu yang bersifat pure criminal act ataupun hukum pidana administrasi (administrative penal law). Asas kekhususan sistematis terdapat pada pasal 14 UU Tipikor. Interpretasi terhadap pasal ini tidak seragam sehingga seringkali mengakibatkan terjadinya kriminalisasi kebijakan pejabat. Sehingga masih belum mencapai keadilan. Implikasi hukum penerapan konsep lex spesialis sistematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan dalam pembaharuan hukum pidana bahwa penegak hukum, JPU dan hakim,baik di tingkat pertama, banding, maupun kasasi, dalam menyikapi perkara pidana yang mempertemukan dua ketentuan hukum pidana khusus secara sistematis.ABSTRACTThe development and renewal of criminal law has increased with the application of the incorporation of law in the resolution of criminal cases. Formulation of the problem: How is the application of the concept of a systematic lex specialist on law enforcement of criminal acts of corruption in the field of Mining Associated with the Doctrine of Reform in Criminal Law? What is the legal certainty of the application of the concept of a systematic lex specialist on law enforcement for criminal acts of corruption in the Mining field from the point of view of justice? What are the legal implications of applying the concept of a systematic lex specialist to law enforcement for corruption in the field of Mining in the renewal of criminal law?Research Objectives To explain the application of the concept of systematic lex specialists in law enforcement for corruption in the Mining field Attributed to the Doctrine of Reform in Criminal Law To explain the legal certainty of the application of the concept of systemic specialist lex in law enforcement for corruption in the mining field from the perspective of justice. legal implications of the application of the concept of systematic specialist lex in law enforcement for criminal acts of corruption in the field of Mining in the renewal of criminal law The type of legal research is normative.Conclusion The application of the concept of systematic lex specialists to law enforcement of criminal acts of corruption in the field of Mining Associated with the Doctrine of Collaboration in Criminal Law is contained in a number of charges against the defendants examined at trial. This can be seen in the example of case ruling Number: 16 / Pid.Sus-PK / 2018 / PT.DKI with its chronology: Defendant Nur Alam as the Governor of Southeast Sulawesi was charged as the one who committed, ordered to do an act that unlawfully commits an act of enriching oneself or any other person or corporation that is detrimental to the State's finances or the State's economy. Legal certainty The application of the concept of systematic specialist lex to law enforcement of corruption in the mining sector from the perspective of justice is that the criminal law policy through the implementation of the principle of systematic specificity (systematische specialiteit) is an important effort in the harmonization and synchronization between the laws contained in criminal sanctions therein , both those that are pure criminal act or administrative criminal law. The principle of systematic specificity is found in article 14 of the Corruption Law. The interpretation of this article is not uniform so it often results in the criminalization of official policies. So it still hasn't reached justice. Legal implications of the application of the concept of a systematic lex specialist on law enforcement for criminal acts of corruption in the Mining sector in the renewal of criminal law that law enforcement, prosecutors and judges, both at the first level, appeals, and cassation, in addressing criminal cases that bring together two specific criminal law provisions systematic.

scholarly journals Visum et Repertum as Evidence for Criminal Acts in Domestic Violence

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-53
Author(s):  
Jatmiko Raharjo ◽  
Syamsuddin Muchtar ◽  
Audyna Mayasari Muin
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
The Law

The aim of the study is to determine the application of Visum et Repertum as evidence for criminal acts in domestic violence. This study was empirical legal research. The location of this study was conducted in Kejaksaan Negeri Klaten. The result of the research showed that as proof of domestic violence with evidence Visum et Repertum was one of the law enforcements oriented to realize for legal certainty and protection of victims in proving the occurrence of criminal acts in domestic violence. The lack of evidence bothers the process of law enforcement, regarding requirements to determine the victim provided at least two evidence and for the judges to decide on criminal cases with valid evidence at least can be avoided by using Visum et Repertum. The obstacles to prove the evidence for criminal acts in domestic violence with Visum et Repertum includes the differences of understanding among law enforcement officials about the use of Visum et Repertum for criminal acts in domestic violence.

scholarly journals Pelaksanaan Pembagian Harta Bersama dalam Perkawinan Poligami Setelah Perceraian

PLENO JURE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-35
Author(s):  
Muhammad Kamran Imran
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Study ◽  
Study Research ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
Research Type ◽  
Joint Property

Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan bertujuan: Untuk mengetahui dan memahami efektivitas pelaksanaan pembagian harta bersama dalam perkawinan Poligami jika terjadi perceraian. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum dengan tipe penelitian hukum empiris atau (Socio Legal Study Research). Hasil Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa: Efektivitas pelaksanaan pembagian harta bersama dalam perkawinan poligami jika terjadi perceraian adalah kurang efektif. Oleh karena dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor dan tidak tercapainya sasaran atau tujuan yang ditentukan sebelumnya, sehingga derajat ukuran efektivitas tidak terpenuhi. Rekomendasi: (1) Perlu Pengaturan Hukum Positif yang mengatur  syarat mutlak berpoligami, harta bersama dengan istri terdahulu wajib dipisahkan dengan permohonan izin poligami bersamaan dengan penetapan harta bersama, untuk menghindari terjadinya penyelundupan hak istri terdahulu oleh suami dan memberikan kepastian hukum hak-hak istri terdahulu mengenai harta bersamanya. (2) Bahwa faktor-faktor yang bisa mempengaruhi efektivitas pelaksanaan pembagian harta bersama dalam perkawinan poligami, penegak hukum harus mengupayakan untuk mencegah hal tersebut, sehingga tolak ukur efektivitas pelaksanaan pembagian harta bersama dalam perkawinan poligami setelah perceraian dapat berjalan efektif. Abstract. This research was conducted to find out and understand the effectiveness of the implementation of the sharing of joint property in a polygamy marriage in case of divorce. This type of research is legal research with empirical legal research type (Socio Legal Study Research). The results of this study indicate that: The effectiveness of the distribution of shared assets in polygamy marriages in the event of a divorce is less effective. Because it is influenced by several factors and not achieving the goals or objectives determined beforehand, so the degree of measure of effectiveness is not met. Recommendations: (1) A Positive Legal Arrangement is required that regulates the absolute requirements of polygamy, shared assets with the previous wife must be separated from the request for a polygamy permit together with the determination of shared assets, to avoid smuggling the rights of the previous wife by the husband and provide legal certainty of the rights of the previous wife regarding property with him. (2) That the factors that can affect the effectiveness of the distribution of shared assets in polygamy marriages, law enforcement must strive to prevent this, so that the effectiveness of the distribution of shared assets in polygamy marriages after divorce can be effective.

scholarly journals KEBIJAKAN PERLUASAN ALAT BUKTI HUKUM ACARA PIDANADALAM UPAYA MEWUJUDKAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM BERKEADILAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 199
Author(s):  
Ani Triwati ◽  
A. Heru Nuswanto ◽  
Endah Pujiastuti
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Electronic Document ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
Electronic Documents ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Witness Statements ◽  
Article 5

<em>One of the renewal of legal instruments in criminal procedural law is the expansion of evidence ie electronic information and / or electronic document and / or its printed outcome. Arrangement of evidence in criminal procedural law in Indonesia pursuant to Article 184 KUHAP, Article 5 paragraph (1) and (2) and Article 44 letter of Information and Electronic Transaction Act, covering witness statements, expert information, letters, instructions, defendants, electronic information and / or electronic documents and / or prints. The decision of the Constitutional Court Number 20 / PUU-XIV / 2016 that for electronic information and / or electronic document as evidence is done in the framework of law enforcement at the request of the police, prosecutor and / or other law enforcement institutions determined by law. Electronic information and / or electronic documents as evidence must be obtained in accordance with the provisions of Article 31 paragraph (3) of the Information and Electronic Transactions Act, this relates to the value of legal certainty and the value of justice for the litigant</em>

scholarly journals UPAYA HUKUM PENINJAUAN KEMBALI DALAM PERKARA PIDANA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 198
Author(s):  
Ani Triwati ◽  
Subaidah Ratna Juita ◽  
Tri Mulyani
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Binding Force ◽  
Legal Remedy ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The One

<p>Dengan adanya Putusan MK No. 34/PUU-XI/2013, untuk upaya hukum luar biasa yaitu peninjauan kembali dapat dilakukan lebih dari satu kali. Putusan MK yang memperbolehkan upaya hukum luar biasa peninjauan kembali lebih dari satu kali tersebut, berkaitan dengan kepastian hukum dan keadilan. Apabila peninjauan kembali diperbolehkan lebih dari satu kali tetapi tidak ada pembatasan sampai berapa kali maka perkara tersebut tidak akan ada akhirnya, bahwa adanya asas litis finiri oportet (setiap perkara harus ada akhirnya) tidak akan terpenuhi. Beberapa permasalahan yang perlu dibahas adalah apakah dengan adanya Putusan MK No. 34/PUU-XI/2013 dapat memenuhi nilai keadilan dan kepastian hukum. Selanjutnya bagaimana pengaturan mengenai peninjauan kembali sebagai implementasi Putusan MK No. 34/PUU- XI/2013 agar asas kepastian hukum dan asas litis finiri oportet akan terpenuhi. Putusan MK No. 34/PUU- XI/2013, yang menyatakan bahwa Pasal 268 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia tahun 1945 dan tidak mempunyai kekuatan mengikat, dapat memenuhi kepastian hukum tanpa mengabaikan nilai keadilan. Hal ini dapat dilihat dari pihak kepentingan terpidana yang mana dengan diperbolehkannya peninjauan kembali dalam perkara pidana lebih dari satu kali, memberikan kesempatan untuk memperoleh kebenaran materiil dan keadilan sehingga dapat diperoleh kepastian hukum yang berkeadilan bagi terpidana mengenai perkara yang dihadapi. Untuk memenuhi asas litis finiri oportet, perlu dilakukan pengaturan bahwa untuk upaya hukum peninjauan kembali dalam perkara pidana dapat dilakukan dua kali, hal ini dilakukan untuk mencapai kepastian hukum yang berkeadilan. Di satu pihak peninjauan kembali dapat dilakukan lebih dari satu kali untuk mencari kebenaran materiil dan memenuhi nilai keadilan. Di lain pihak adanya pembatasan permohonan peninjauan kembali yang boleh dilakukan dua kali adalah untuk menjamin kepastian hukum, sehingga nilai kemanfaatan, keadilan dan kepastian hukum dapat terpenuhi.</p><p>With the Constitutional Court No. 34 / PUU-XI / 2013, for an extraordinary legal remedy which reconsideration can be done more than once. Constitutional Court ruling that allows an extraordinary legal remedy reconsideration more than once that, with regard to legal certainty and justice. If allowed to review more than one time but there are no restrictions on how many times it is the case there will be no end, that the principle of litis finiri oportet (every case there should be eventually) will not be met. Some issues that need to be addressed is whether the Constitutional Court No. 34 / PUU-XI / 2013 can satisfy the value of justice and legal certainty. Furthermore, how the arrangements regarding the review of the implementation of the Constitutional Court as No. 34 / PUU-X / 2013 that the principle of legal certainty and the principle of litis finiri oportet will be met. Constitutional Court decision No. 34 / PUU-XI / 2013, which states that Article 268 paragraph (3) of Law No. 8 of 1981 on Criminal Procedure is contrary to the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in 1945 and has no binding force, can meet the legal certainty without ignoring the value of justice. It can be seen from the interests of the convict which the permissibility of judicial review in criminal cases more than once, providing an opportunity to acquire the material truth and justice so as to obtain legal certainty to convict justice regarding the case at hand. To meet the principle of litis finiri oportet, it is necessary that the arrangements for legal remedy reconsideration in criminal cases can be done twice, this is done to achieve a just rule of law. On the one hand, the review can be performed more than once to search for the material truth and fulfill justice values. On the other hand the restrictions on the reconsideration request should be done twice is to ensure legal certainty, so that the value of expediency, justice and the rule of law can be fulfilled.</p>

scholarly journals JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DECISIONS OF POLYGAMIC POLICY IN SEMARANG RELIGIOUS COURT

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 333
Author(s):  
Peni Rinda ◽  
Achid Ulfi Sukriya
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Active Role ◽  
Mutual Benefit ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The People ◽  
Principle Of Justice ◽  
Religious Courts

Polygamy is a problem in marriages that is often discussed. Polygamy marriage as regulated in the polygamous marriage law, it is under the principle of monogamy which is not actually the absolute monogamous principle, but it is also called the principle of open monogamy. In the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) polygamy is the permission for a husband to have more than one wife on certain conditions. The method used in this legal research was sociological juridical approach that is the juridical review of the judge's verdict on polygamy permit in the Religious Courts of Semarang. The basic consideration to create the benefit of the people is that the active role of the Religious Court judges interpret the law in actual in order to apply the existing law in accordance with the needs of the development of society to achieve the mutual benefit. Elements in the principle of mutual benefit is not only the principle of legal certainty, but in the consideration there must also be the principle of benefit and the principle of justice

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document