Quantitative data as a clue to auxiliary contraction processes
This paper is a quantitative corpus study of the variable contraction of English auxiliaries (e.g. John has ~ John’s been there all day). I examine auxiliaries after non-pronoun subjects, and find the following. First, auxiliaries often surface in an “intermediate” form, one which loses its initial consonant, but retains a reduced vowel (e.g. [?z] for has). After proposing an analysis of these forms, I examine the effect of subject weight on contraction, finding that contraction occurs less often after longer subjects. Finally, I discuss the implications of these findings for where contraction must be situated in the grammar.
2013 ◽
Vol 25
(1)
◽
pp. 17-41
◽
Keyword(s):
2019 ◽
Vol 70
(2)
◽
pp. 200-215
Keyword(s):
1977 ◽
Vol 35
◽
pp. 126-129
1987 ◽
Vol 45
◽
pp. 918-919
1985 ◽
Vol 43
◽
pp. 486-487
Keyword(s):
1990 ◽
Vol 48
(3)
◽
pp. 368-369
2018 ◽
Vol 4
(2)
◽
pp. 43-55
Keyword(s):