Influence of Technological Cutting Parameters on Surface Texture of Austenitic Stainless Steel

2014 ◽  
Vol 693 ◽  
pp. 430-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grzegorz M. Krolczyk ◽  
Stanislaw Legutko ◽  
Radoslaw W. Maruda

The paper presents the contribution in engineering of surfaces particularly in surface texture of Austenitic Stainless Steels. The objective of the investigation was to determine the surface texture of austenitic stainless steel after turning with coated carbide tool point. The investigation included geometrical parameters of Surface Integrity for different technological cutting parameters in dry turning process of austenitic stainless steel. The article presents the surface roughness parameters with the roughness profiles (irregular slopes). The percentage of isotropic surfaces and Bearing Area of ​​Primary Model. Analyses were performed for variable cutting parameters. An Infinite Focus Measurement Machine (IFM) was used for the surface texture analysis. The study was performed within a production facility during the machining of electric motor parts and deep-well pumps.

2014 ◽  
Vol 657 ◽  
pp. 23-27
Author(s):  
M. Grzegorz Krolczyk ◽  
Stanisław Legutko ◽  
W. Radoslaw Maruda

The study presents the contribution in engineering of surfaces particularly in surface morphology of Austenitic Stainless Steels. The objective of the investigation was to determine the surface morphology of austenitic stainless steel after turning with coated carbide tool point. The investigation included geometrical parameters of SI for different cutting parameters in dry turning process of austenitic stainless steel. The study has been performed within a production facility during the production of electric motor parts and deep-well pumps.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohanad Alabdullah ◽  
A. Polishetty ◽  
G. Littlefair

Inferior surface quality is a significant problem faced by machinist. The purpose of this study is to present a surface texture analysis undertaken as part of machinability assessment of Super Austenitic Stainless Steel alloy-AL6XN. The surface texture analysis includes measuring the surface roughness and investigating the microstructural behaviour of the machined surfaces. Eight milling trials were conducted using combination of cutting parameters under wet machining. An optical profilometer (noncontact) was used to evaluate the surface texture at three positions. The surface texture was represented using the parameter, average surface roughness. Scanning Electron Microscope was utilised to inspect the machined surface microstructure and correlate the microstructure with the surface roughness. Results showed that maximum roughness values recorded at the three positions in the longitudinal direction (perpendicular to the machining grooves) were 1.21 μm (trial 1), 1.63 μm (trial 6), and 1.68 μm (trial 7), respectively, whereas the roughness values were greatly reduced in the lateral direction. Also, results showed that the feed rate parameter significantly influences the roughness values compared to the other cutting parameters. The microstructure of the machined surfaces was distorted by the existence of cracks, deformed edges, and bands and wear deposition due to machining process.


2012 ◽  
Vol 723 ◽  
pp. 247-251
Author(s):  
Hai Dong Yang ◽  
Zhi Ding

Austenitic stainless steel has poor cutting performance, especially when the inappropriate choice of tool materials and cutting parameters, cutting tool life will be shortened and the quality of machined surface is poor. In this paper, 0Cr18Ni9 stainless steel dry cutting tests had been done with nano-TiAlN coated carbide blade YGB202, the relationship between tool life and cutting speed, tool wear mechanism had been analyzed. In order to improve the processing efficiency and tool life, process parameters were optimized.


2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-26
Author(s):  
Septi Boucherit ◽  
Sofiane Berkani ◽  
Mohamed Athmane Yallese ◽  
Riad Khettabi ◽  
Tarek Mabrouki

In the current paper, cutting parameters during turning of AISI 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel are studied and optimized using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and the desirability approach. The cutting tool inserts used in this work were the CVD coated carbide. The cutting speed (vc), the feed rate (f) and the depth of cut (ap) were the main machining parameters considered in this study. The effects of these parameters on the surface roughness (Ra), cutting force (Fc), the specific cutting force (Kc), cutting power (Pc) and the Material Removal Rate (MRR) were analyzed by ANOVA analysis.The results showed that f is the most important parameter that influences Ra with a contribution of 89.69 %, while ap was identified as the most significant parameter (46.46%) influence the Fc followed by f (39.04%). Kc is more influenced by f (38.47%) followed by ap (16.43%) and Vc (7.89%). However, Pc is more influenced by Vc (39.32%) followed by ap (27.50%) and f (23.18%).The Quadratic mathematical models, obtained by the RSM, presenting the evolution of Ra, Fc, Kc and Pc based on (vc, f, and ap) were presented. A comparison between experimental and predicted values presents good agreements with the models found.Optimization of the machining parameters to achieve the maximum MRR and better Ra was carried out by a desirability function. The results showed that the optimal parameters for maximal MRR and best Ra were found as (vc = 350 m/min, f = 0.088 mm/rev, and ap = 0.9 mm).


2008 ◽  
Vol 392-394 ◽  
pp. 55-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Tang ◽  
Bang Yan Ye ◽  
Qiang Wu ◽  
W.W. Wang ◽  
Xing Yu Lai

Based on reviewing the applications and machining of the stainless steels, the cutting performance of the austenitic stainless steel 1Cr18Ni9Ti is analyzed through the contrastive experiments. This paper studies drilling minipore mechanics of hard-to-cut material—Austenitic Stainless Steel 1Cr18Ni9Ti by simulation and experiment, analogy results displays the trend that drill thrust, torque and temperature changed with amount of feed, it matches with test result in the same cutting condition well. The research results would be of great benefit for the selection of proper tools and cutting parameters in drilling austenitic stainless steels.


2011 ◽  
Vol 314-316 ◽  
pp. 1020-1024
Author(s):  
Yun Hai Jia

High deformation hardening, low thermal conductivity, high built-up edge tendency of austenitic stainless steels were the main factors that make their machinablity difficult. For determination of the suitable cutting parameters in machining austenitic stainless steel by PcBN cutting tools, the samples which were prepared to be used in the experiment, 300 mm in length and 60 mm in diameter, were dry machined in a numerical control lathe. During experiments, dry turning parameters, such as feed rate, cutting speed and cut depth were investigated. The suitable cutting speed and feed rate were determined according to workpieces surface roughness, cutting tools flank wear. Finally, cutting speed of 160 to 200 m/min, feed rate of 0.06 to 0.08 mm/rev and cut depth of 0.10 mm gave the satisfied results.


Alloy Digest ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  

Abstract ALZ 316 is an austenitic stainless steel with good formability, corrosion resistance, toughness, and mechanical properties. It is the basic grade of the stainless steels, containing 2 to 3% molybdenum. After the 304 series, the molybdenum-containing stainless steels are the most widely used austenitic stainless steels. This datasheet provides information on composition, physical properties, hardness, elasticity, and tensile properties. It also includes information on corrosion resistance as well as forming, heat treating, and joining. Filing Code: SS-756. Producer or source: ALZ nv.


Alloy Digest ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (9) ◽  

Abstract CarTech 347 is a niobium+tantalum stabilized austenitic stainless steel. Like Type 321 austenitic stainless steel, it has superior intergranular corrosion resistance as compared to typical 18-8 austenitic stainless steels. Since niobium and tantalum have stronger affinity for carbon than chromium, carbides of those elements tend to precipitate randomly within the grains instead of forming continuous patterns at the grain boundaries. CarTech 347 should be considered for applications requiring intermittent heating between 425 and 900 °C (800 and 1650 °F). This datasheet provides information on composition, physical properties, hardness, and tensile properties. It also includes information on corrosion resistance as well as forming, heat treating, machining, and joining. Filing Code: SS-1339. Producer or source: Carpenter Technology Corporation.


Metals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1845
Author(s):  
Francesca Borgioli ◽  
Emanuele Galvanetto ◽  
Tiberio Bacci

Low-temperature nitriding allows to improve surface hardening of austenitic stainless steels, maintaining or even increasing their corrosion resistance. The treatment conditions to be used in order to avoid the precipitation of large amounts of nitrides are strictly related to alloy composition. When nickel is substituted by manganese as an austenite forming element, the production of nitride-free modified surface layers becomes a challenge, since manganese is a nitride forming element while nickel is not. In this study, the effects of nitriding conditions on the characteristics of the modified surface layers obtained on an austenitic stainless steel having a high manganese content and a negligible nickel one, a so-called nickel-free austenitic stainless steel, were investigated. Microstructure, phase composition, surface microhardness, and corrosion behavior in 5% NaCl were evaluated. The obtained results suggest that the precipitation of a large volume fraction of nitrides can be avoided using treatment temperatures lower than those usually employed for nickel-containing austenitic stainless steels. Nitriding at 360 and 380 °C for duration up to 5 h allows to produce modified surface layers, consisting mainly of the so-called expanded austenite or gN, which increase surface hardness in comparison with the untreated steel. Using selected conditions, corrosion resistance can also be significantly improved.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 168781401987089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingshuai Xu ◽  
Zhihui Wan ◽  
Ping Zou ◽  
Qinjian Zhang

There are many problems and physical phenomena in turning process, like machined surface quality, cutting force, tool wear, and so on. These factors and the chip shape of workpiece materials, which is an important aspect to study the mechanism of ultrasonic vibration–assisted turning, go hand in hand. This article first introduces the types and changes of chip, meanwhile the chip formation mechanism of ultrasonic vibration–assisted turning is studied and analyzed, and the turning experiments of 304 austenitic stainless steel with and without ultrasonic vibration are carried out. The difference of chip morphology between ultrasonic vibration–assisted turning and conventional turning is contrasted and analyzed from the macroscopic and microscopic point of view. The influence of process parameters on chip shape and the impact of chip shape on machining effect are also analyzed. Results indicate that when process parameters (vibration frequency, ultrasonic amplitude, and cutting parameters) are suitably selected, ultrasonic vibration–assisted turning can gain access to better chip shape and chip breaking effect than conventional turning. By contrast with conventional turning, phenomenon of serrated burr on the chip edge and the surface defects of chip in ultrasonic vibration–assisted turning have improved significantly. Moreover, it is found that superior chip morphology in ultrasonic vibration–assisted turning can be acquired under the circumstance of comparatively small cutting parameters (cutting speed, depth of cut, and feed rate); at the same time, preferable chips can also obtain ranking machining effect.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document