KRIMINALISASI KEBIJAKAN (BELEID) TERHADAP PEJABAT PEMERINTAH DALAM TINDAK PIDANA ADMINISTRATIVE CORRUPTION

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Basri Mulyani
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Government Officials ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Public ◽  
Food Packages ◽  
The Right

This article aims to examine the case of the distribution of clothing and food packages phase II in East Lombok Regency, or better known as Eid packages in terms of the legal considerations of the judge's decision. The point of policy confusion in state administrative law with criminal law or better known as administrative corruption. Government officials who must implement the policy, when the program is running, must deal with the criminalization of the policies that it implements. Based on these issues it is interesting to discuss related to the legal considerations of the judge's decision to release the accused and whether all government officials have the right to discretion in carrying out their positions. The research method used is a descriptive normative method, with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach. The results of the discussion revealed that criminal law is used carefully and operationalized truly as the last drug (ultimum remedium) and not necessarily used as the main drug (primum remedium) so that government officials are no longer afraid to carry out work in the public interest and community welfare.

scholarly journals MEREKONSTRUKSI SISTEM HUKUM ADMINISTRASI MENUJU HUKUM YANG MELAYANI

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 224
Author(s):  
Sri Nur Hari Susanto
Keyword(s):  
Public Service ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Paradigm Shift ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
The Public

This research aims to reconstruct the legal system, especially state administrative law so that it can function as a law that can serve the public interest. Other objectives is to study conceptually harmonize laws and regulations relating to public service. The method used is a normative legal research, which explores the use of a conceptual approach. The results showed that the reconstruction of the administrative law which is oriented toward public service, it must first pay attention to the paradigm shift of the administration of the state itself. It is thus necessary to take measures to harmonize the legislation of sectoral public services based on the principles / legal principles that are generally acceptedPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk merekonstruksi sistem hukum khususnya hokum administrasi negara sehingga dapat difungsikan sebagai hukum yang dapat melayani kepentingan publik. tujuan lainnya adalah melakukan kajian konsepsional mengharmonisasikan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan pelayanan publik. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normative, yang membahas menggunakan pendekatan konseptual. (conceptual Approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa rekonstruksi hukum administrasi negara yang memiliki orientasi terhadap pelayanan publik, maka harus terlebih dahulu memperhatikan perubahan paradigma terhadap administrasi negara itu sendiri. Dengan demikian perlu dilakukan langkah-langkah untuk  mengharmonisasikan peraturan perundang-undangan sektoral bidang pelayanan publik dengan berpedoman pada prinsip-prinsip/asas-asas hukum yang berlaku umum

scholarly journals Pemusnahan Uang Rupiah dalam Upacara Pitra Yadnya di Bali Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomer 7 Tahun 2011

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 409-415
Author(s):  
I Made Agus Mertajaya ◽  
I Made Suwitra ◽  
I Ketut Sukadana
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Public ◽  
Burning Money

This study aims to determine the application of sanctions to the perpetrators of the crime of destroying money in the pitra yadnya ceremony. The phenomenon that is happening now is that many Hindu people in Bali burn rupiah currency in the pitra yadnya ceremony on the grounds that it is a provision for the person being ceremonied. Grounded by the phenomenon the stuy examines two issues: a) how is regulate the destruction of money regulating in the to law Law Number 7 of 2011 concerning Currency, b) whether or not the burning of money as a fundametal provision in the pitra yadnya ceremony is classified as a criminal act. In conducting this research, the authors use normative the research method and statutory approachs and conceptual approach. Furthermore, the legal materials that have been collected are processed using the descriptive analysis method. The results showed that the regulation on the destruction of rupiah currency contained in Article 1 paragraph (10) of Law Number 7 of 2011 and Article 11 paragraph (1) to Article 11 paragraph (4) also regulates the destruction of rupiah. Burning money as a provision in the pitra yadnya ceremony cannot be classified as a criminal act because it does not fulfill the criminal element, namely the element of the intent of the act being committed and the inner will of the person burning the money in question. Apart from that, this also gets the penalties written off because they are considered connected to the public interest.

scholarly journals HUKUM ADMINISTRASI NEGARA SEBAGAI HIMPUNAN PERATURAN-PERATURAN ISTIMEWA

to-ra ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Chandra Aritonang
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
The State ◽  
The Public ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Law

Abstract State Administration in every action must be based on law to solve and resolve the problem mentioned above or there is no law. The State Administration can be forced to use its authority to revoke regulations. Administration as a law maker in its application when related to legal systematics has caused controversial matters in essence State Administration is part of public law, so that all actions in the application based on its function are solely intended for and in the public interest, this is no different from the law State Administration, Criminal Law and Others. A situation can lead to deviations from the State administration of the systematics of law. Therefore the State Administrative Law as a set of special regulations.   Keywords: state administration; public law; special regulations.  

scholarly journals Penyalahgunaan Kewenangan Pejabat Pemerintahan Dan Ruang Lingkupnya Menurut Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan

Solusi ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-192
Author(s):  
Barhamudin Barhamudin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Government Officials ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Legal Domain ◽  
Stated Purpose ◽  
Legal Force

The purpose of this research is to find out, study and analyze in determining the element of abusing authority in government administrative laws. In this study using normative research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Legal materials consisting of Primary Legal Materials, Secondary Legal Materials and Tertiary Legal Materials. The results obtained are benchmarks to determine the existence of abuse of authority according to administrative law, in this case UUAP occurs if government officials or officials conduct discretion without going through procedures and the purpose is not carried out within the scope of what has been determined by Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration in article 17 and article 18 includes: a. The statute goes beyond the authority; b. prohibition of confusing authority; c. prohibition of arbitrary actions. d. beyond the term of office or the validity period of the Authority; e. beyond the territorial validity of the Authority; and / or f. contrary to statutory provisions. g is outside the scope of the field or material given Authority; and / or h. contrary to the stated purpose of the Authority. Abuse of authority either according to administrative law or criminal law has the respective legal domain. Decisions and / or Actions that are determined and / or carried out by exceeding illegitimate Authority if it has been tested and there is a Court Decision that has permanent legal force and Courts that have permanent legal force.

scholarly journals Pemanfaatan Sempadan Pantai Kedonganan oleh Pengusaha Cafe Berdasarkan Perda Kabupaten Badung Nomor 26 Tahun 2013

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 638-644
Author(s):  
I Gede Yogi Arya Windiarta ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Temporary Suspension ◽  
License Revocation ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Administrative Sanctions

Spatial plans that are accommodated in a legal norm both at the central, provincial and city levels are in synergy with each other. The purpose of this study is to find out the legal arrangements in the Badung RTRW Regional Regulation on the use of the Kedonganan beach border by cafe entrepreneurs and what sanctions are imposed on the cafe entrepreneurs if they violate the Badung RTRW Regional Regulation. To achieve this goal, a normative research method is used using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study, namely the regulation of cafe entrepreneurs who set up cafes on the Kedonganan beach border, are regulated in Article 74 paragraph (2) letter d of the Badung Regency Regulation Number 26 of 2013 that by not building permanently on the beach border. In addition, it must also pay attention to the public interest. Sanctions that can be imposed on cafe entrepreneurs who set up cafes on the Kedonganan beach border if they violate the Badung Regency Regulation Number 26 of 2013 include criminal sanctions, namely Article 115 in the form of imprisonment or fines. Administrative sanctions in the form of written warnings; temporary suspension of activities: temporary suspension of public services; business closure; license revocation; license cancellation; demolition of buildings; restoration of space functions; and/or administrative fines as regulated in Article 112 paragraph (2).

Tanggung Jawab Hukum Penilai Publik terhadap Laporan Penilaian Kegiatan Pengadaan Tanah bagi Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum (Studi Atas Kantor Jasa Penilai Publik Toto Suharto)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gagah Yaumiyya Riyoprakoso ◽  
AM Hasan Ali ◽  
Fitriyani Zein
Keyword(s):  
Future Development ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Government ◽  
Conducting Research ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Systematic Explanation

This study is based on the legal responsibility of the assessment of public appraisal reports they make in land procurement activities for development in the public interest. Public assessment is obliged to always be accountable for their assessment. The type of research found in this thesis is a type of normative legal research with the right-hand of the statue approach and case approach. Normative legal research is a study that provides systematic explanation of rules governing a certain legal category, analyzing the relationship between regulations explaining areas of difficulty and possibly predicting future development. . After conducting research, researchers found that one of the causes that made the dispute was a lack of communication conducted between the Government and the landlord. In deliberation which should be the place where the parties find the meeting point between the parties on the magnitude of the damages that will be given, in the field is often used only for the delivery of the assessment of the compensation that has been done.

PERSINGGUNGAN KEWENANGAN MENGADILI PENYALAHGUNAAN DISKRESI ANTARA PENGADILAN TUN DAN PENGADILAN TIPIKOR / INTERCEPTION OF JUSTICE AUTHORITY OF DISCRETION ABUSE BETWEEN ADMINISTRATION COURT AND CORRUPTION COURTS

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
Budi Suhariyanto
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Government Officials ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
State Finance ◽  
The Law ◽  
To Receive

Diskresi sebagai wewenang bebas, keberadaannya rentan akan disalahgunakan. Penyalahgunaan diskresi yang berimplikasi merugikan keuangan negara dapat dituntutkan pertanggungjawabannya secara hukum administrasi maupun hukum pidana. Mengingat selama ini peraturan perundang-undangan tentang pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi tidak merumuskan secara rinci yang dimaksudkan unsur menyalahgunakan kewenangan maka para hakim menggunakan konsep penyalahgunaan wewenang dari hukum administrasi. Problema muncul saat diberlakukannya Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 dimana telah memicu persinggungan dalam hal kewenangan mengadili penyalahgunaan wewenang (termasuk diskresi) antara Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dengan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Pada perkembangannya, persinggungan kewenangan mengadili tersebut ditegaskan oleh Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2015 bahwa PTUN berwenang menerima, memeriksa, dan memutus permohonan penilaian ada atau tidak ada penyalahgunaan wewenang (termasuk diskresi) dalam Keputusan dan/atau Tindakan Pejabat Pemerintahan sebelum adanya proses pidana. Sehubungan tidak dijelaskan tentang definisi dan batasan proses pidana yang dimaksud, maka timbul penafsiran yang berbeda. Perlu diadakan kesepakatan bersama dan dituangkan dalam regulasi tentang tapal batas persinggungan yang jelas tanpa meniadakan kewenangan pengujian penyalahgunaan wewenang diskresi pada Pengadilan TUN.Discretion as free authority is vulnerable to being misused. The abuse of discretion implicating the state finance may be prosecuted by both administrative and criminal law. In view of the fact that the law on corruption eradication does not formulate in detail the intended element of authority abuse, the judges use the concept of authority abuse from administrative law. Problems arise when the enactment of Law No. 30 of 2014 triggered an interception in terms of justice/ adjudicate authority on authority abuse (including discretion) between the Administrative Court and Corruption Court. In its development, the interception of justice authority is affirmed by Regulation of the Supreme Court Number 4 of 2015 that the Administrative Court has the authority to receive, examine and decide upon the appeal there is or there is no misuse of authority in the Decision and / or Action of Government Officials prior to the criminal process. That is, shortly before the commencement of the criminal process then that's when the authority of PTUN decides to judge the misuse of authority over the case. In this context, Perma No. 4 of 2015 has imposed restrictions on the authority of the TUN Court in prosecuting the abuse of discretionary authority.

Freedom of Expression versus Privacy and the Right to Reputation

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Voorhoof
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Freedom Of Expression ◽  
Media Freedom ◽  
Investigative Journalism ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Right Of Privacy ◽  
The One ◽  
Grand Chamber ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact

The normative perspective of this chapter is how to guarantee respect for the fundamental values of freedom of expression and journalistic reporting on matters of public interest in cases where a (public) person claims protection of his or her right to reputation. First it explains why there is an increasing number and expanding potential of conflicts between the right to freedom of expression and media freedom (Article 10 ECHR), on the one hand, and the right of privacy and the right to protection of reputation (Article 8 ECHR), on the other. In addressing and analysing the European Court’s balancing approach in this domain, the characteristics and the impact of the seminal 2012 Grand Chamber judgment in Axel Springer AG v. Germany (no. 1) are identified and explained. On the basis of the analysis of the Court’s subsequent jurisprudence in defamation cases it evaluates whether this case law preserves the public watchdog-function of media, investigative journalism and NGOs reporting on matters of public interest, but tarnishing the reputation of public figures.

RIGHT OF ACTION TO CHALLENGE TRANSACTIONS THAT RESULT IN FOREIGN INVESTORS GAINING CONTROL OVER BUSINESS ENTITIES OF STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 112-138
Author(s):  
D.A. FEDYAEV
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Foreign Investor ◽  
Foreign Investors ◽  
The Public ◽  
Right Of Action ◽  
Judicial Proceedings ◽  
The Law ◽  
Business Entities ◽  
The Right

In the Russian Federation, as in a number of other economically developed countries, there are legal restrictions on the admission of foreign investors to participate in commercial corporate organizations of strategic importance for national defence and state security. Failure by foreign investors to comply with this mechanism leads to the nullity of transactions and, as a consequence, to legal disputes, the subject of which are mainly restitution claims. There have been numerous problems and academic debates in recent court practice regarding the reasons and the possibility of satisfying such claims. In particular, in view of the changed circumstances after the conclusion of the contested transaction, the real public interest is not always visible pursued by the claim for application of consequences of its invalidity. The author proposes that in the course of judicial proceedings in such cases, when the defendant raises the relevant reasoned objections, not only to state the fact of violation of the law by a foreign investor, but also to reveal the public interest defended by the foreign investor. The author proposes that, in such cases, the defendant’s arguments should not be limited to stating that the foreign investor has breached the law. If one is not established, a claim may be dismissed under certain conditions, taking into account established doctrinal approaches to the understanding of the right of action.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document