scholarly journals Análisis bibliométrico sobre heladas en cultivos y su relación con las soluciones generadas de diferentes investigaciones

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 376-394
Author(s):  
Harold Steven Moreno Vargas ◽  
Carlos Alberto Cardona Coy ◽  
Luz Angela Cuellar Rodríguez
Keyword(s):  
National Level ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Irrigation Systems ◽  
Climatic Variations ◽  
Palabras Clave ◽  
National University ◽  
Productivity Indices ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
Number Of Authors

Se analizaron un total de 40 artículos de investigación sobre el fenómeno de las heladas, afectaciones que tienen las heladas, sistemas de riego y soluciones y/o estrategias que se pueden encontrar hoy en día para minimizar el daño causado por este fenómeno durante el periodo comprendido entre 2001 a 2021, las bases de datos utilizadas fueron Science Direct y Scopus, de igual forma se encontraron artículos en repositorios de universidades a nivel nacional y asimismo en Google Scholar. En el análisis se incluyen las palabras clave, el año de publicación, enfoque, países, número de citas y número de autores. El número de publicaciones presentó un incremento durante los últimos años. Los resultados indicaron que “frost”, “frost problem”, “irrigation systems”, “frost solutions” fueron los términos en los cuales se hizo más frecuente en los títulos de las publicaciones, mediante el uso de los índices bibliométricos de productividad se encontró que el índice de colaboración más alto fue en los años de 2015 y 2019, durante los años de 2001, 2005, 2007 se presentó el índice Price más alto. La universidad Santo Tomás fue la institución más productiva en cuanto a desarrollo de investigación referentes a los temas, de igual forma a nivel nacional, otras universidades tuvieron un porcentaje de publicaciones con los temas relacionados, lo que indica que a nivel nacional este tema ha venido tomando mucha fuerza con relación a las variaciones climáticas que se presentan hoy en día. Los países con más números de publicaciones encontrados fueron Colombia, Brasil, Estados Unidos. Con relación a los idiomas encontrados por las publicaciones, se encontró un total de 42,5% en español, un 40% en inglés y un 17,5% en portugués.   A total of 40 research articles were analyzed on the phenomenon of frost, effects of frost, irrigation systems and solutions and/or strategies that can be found today to minimize the damage caused by this phenomenon during the period from 2001 to 2021, the databases used were Science Direct and Scopus, Articles were also found in national university repositories and in Google Scholar. The analysis includes keywords, year of publication, focus, countries, number of citations and number of authors. The number of publications has increased in recent years. The results indicated that "frost", "frost problem", "irrigation systems", "frost solutions" were the terms in which it became more frequent in the titles of the publications, using bibliometric productivity indices found that the highest collaboration index was in 2015 and 2019, during the years 2001, 2005, 2007 the highest Price index was presented. The Santo Tomás University was the most productive institution in terms of research development related to the topics, similarly at the national level, other universities had a percentage of publications with related topics, this indicates that at the national level this theme has been gaining a lot of strength in relation to the climatic variations that are presented today. The countries with the greatest number of publications found were Colombia, Brazil, United States. Regarding the languages found in the publications, a total of 42.5% were found in Spanish, 40% in English and 17.5% in Portuguese.  

scholarly journals Team Science in Precision Medicine (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gil Alterovitz ◽  
Ning An ◽  
John Mattison ◽  
Xinyun Chen
Keyword(s):  
Precision Medicine ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Team Science ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Highly Cited

BACKGROUND The concept of a meta-topical brainforest is proposed, to reflect a link between collaborative research and complex ecosystems. Tropical rainforests leverage a diversity of species to capture and convert solar energy into carbon-based life, and research teams can harvest a similar benefit from a diversity of data, tools, and thought paradigms. According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), team science is “a collaborative and often cross-disciplinary approach to scientific inquiry that draws researchers who otherwise work independently or as co-investigators on smaller-scale projects into collaborative centers and groups” 1. Thus, team science occurs when artificial boundaries such as departments and institutions are crossed, allowing collaboration in integrated networks. Over the past two decades, the concept has received increasing attention to better understand and address global challenges 2. In 2007, Stefan Wuchty et al. examined 19.9 million research articles in the Institute for Scientific Information Web of Science database and 2.1 million patent records on multiple topics. They concluded that a team-authored paper has increased probability of being highly cited 3. The systems being formed through interdisciplinary collaborations help teams reach achievements that individual researchers are less likely to accomplish. Kohane pointed out 4 that precision medicine in particular requires a higher level of coordination between various agencies and suggests the boundaries between research projects and clinical care institutions should be blurred to link gathered data. The exponential growth and causal interdependencies of ‘-omics’ fields dictate that expertise across disciplines is essential to making meaningful and durable contributions to the understanding of human biology. OBJECTIVE This brief viewpoint aims to explore the impact of cross-institution team science on the development of precision medicine. We hypothesized that international organizations with co-leaders tend to publish more impactful papers than organizations without. Using Pearson's chi-square test and the Mann-Whitney U test, we validated our hypothesis. METHODS Information was collected from the eHealth Catalogue of Activities developed by the nonprofit Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) in 2015 5. The catalog lists international genomic and clinical data-sharing initiatives, and the eHealth Task Team updated the catalog through 2017. The data on the executive leadership team and publications were obtained from the websites of these organizations. If such information was not found, additional data were acquired by directly contacting the organizations or searching on Google Scholar. The impact of papers was evaluated by their number of citations, a criterion of research quality 3. In this paper, co-leadership means that a person holds a leadership position in different organizations concurrently. If two papers from separate organizations have at least one author in common, these two organizations are regarded as having a co-author relationship. Nonparametric tests were performed to verify the hypothesis. We used SPSS version 22.0 (SPSSInc) and R to perform two-tailed tests with an α level of .05. The significance of the correlation between the nominal variables co-leadership and co-authorship was examined by Pearson's chi-square test of independence and expressed in a contingency table. Pearson's chi-square test of goodness of fit was adopted to evaluate whether organizations with co-leaders had a greater number of publications than organizations without, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to examine whether the former organizations published papers that received more citations than the latter. RESULTS We analyzed data from 69 organizations in the catalog and found 16 pairs with co-leader relationships in 2015. Among the 374 publications from these organizations at that time, 13 pairs had co-authors. By 2017, the number of institutions in the catalog increased to 87, and there were 37 pairs with co-leadership, corresponding to 30 organizations. Information on 7,064 papers was collected, showing that 55 organizations had co-authored publications, with 436 papers in total. A. Number of publications The chi-square goodness of fit test suggests that the number of papers being published is strongly correlated with the category of the organization - organizations in a co-leadership network or organizations without a co-leadership (P<0.001, 2015 & 2017). B. Quality of publications The citation number of each paper was obtained from Google Scholar. The results of the Mann-Whitney U test indicated that the number of citations received by publications of organizations with and without co-leaders differed significantly (Z=-13.547, p<0.001, 2017). Papers from the former organizations had a higher mean rank (3603.35 for the group of papers whose publishers are in the co-leadership network, and 2702.67 for the other group), which means that the organizations with co-leaders tended to have a greater number of highly cited papers. C. Relationship between co-leader and co-author In the chi-square test of independence, the total sample size is the number of lines in a fully connected diagram. The results indicate that in both 2015 and 2017, organizations with co-leaders tended to publish papers together, suggesting that co-leadership will lead to co-authorship (P<0.001, 2015 & 2017). CONCLUSIONS These results illustrate the concept of meta-topical brainforests in precision medicine and may have broader implication: cross-enterprise cooperation plays an essential role in solving complex issues. As a field-crossing example, Sovacool suggested researchers should incorporate expertise and data from indigenous groups to address global environmental challenges 6. One hopes the analogy persists and the extraordinary natural future-proofing mechanisms in rainforests by incorporating novel combinations of ancestral DNA coincide with similar continued diversification in research networks and widely impactful publication.

scholarly journals Why are new journals created? An international analysis of Information and Documentation titles (2013-2018)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristóbal Urbano ◽  
Rosângela Schwarz Rodrigues ◽  
Marta Somoza-Fernández ◽  
Josep-Manuel Rodríguez-Gairín
Keyword(s):  
Google Scholar ◽  
Bibliographic Databases ◽  
Annual Number ◽  
Leading Role ◽  
University Systems ◽  
National University ◽  
Acceso Abierto ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Number Of Citations

The creation or title changes of scientific journals in the information and documentation (ID) area in the period 2013-2018 are analyzed. Based on the total of 62 such journals identified through ISSN Portal and Ulrichsweb, the following are described: characteristic aspects such as country, language, type of publisher, and access model; presence in bibliographic databases, citations, or journal directories; survival and volume of articles published; annual number of citations to articles according to Google Scholar; thematic scope declared by the editors; and finally, the justification given by the editors for the change of title or the creation of a new journal. Among the main conclusions regarding newly created titles, the leading role of academic publishers in expanding national university systems and open-access titles stands out. In general, new publications generate few articles per year, have little presence in databases, and receive few citations. Title changes were found only in journals published by commercial publishers. In both cases, journals with a general thematic scope predominate and a significant number of journals did not justify their creation or change of title. Abstract Se analiza la creación o cambios de título de las revistas científicas del área de Información y Documentación (ID) en el periodo de 2013-2018. A partir de un total de 62 revistas identificadas a través de ISSN Portal y Ulrichsweb se describen: aspectos característicos como países, idiomas, tipos de editor y modelo de acceso; la difusión en bases de datos bibliográficas, de citas o directorios de revistas; la pervivencia y el volumen de producción de artículos; número de citas anual de los artículos en Google Scholar; alcance temático que declaran los editores; y finalmente, la justificación que los editores exponen en el cambio de título o en la creación de una nueva revista. Como conclusiones principales respecto a los títulos de nueva creación, destaca el protagonismo de los editores académicos de sistemas universitarios nacionales en expansión y de los títulos en acceso abierto. En general las nuevas publicaciones generan pocos artículos por año, tienen poca presencia en bases de datos y reciben pocas citas. Los cambios de títulos se detectan sólo en editoriales comerciales. En ambos casos predominan las revistas de alcance temático general y un número importante de revistas no justifica su creación o el cambio de título.

scholarly journals Analysis of Publications of the Russian Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgeons in Foreign Top-Rated Journals

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 9-19
Author(s):  
A. P. Sereda ◽  
M. A. Andrianova
Keyword(s):  
Sports Medicine ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Pubmed Central ◽  
Orthopaedic Surgeons ◽  
Avant Garde ◽  
National Trauma ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Number Of Citations

The present paper is dedicated to the publications analysis by Russian authors in top-rated foreign journals. The aim of the research to define the avant-garde status of the national trauma and orthopaedics science. The authors of the present paper analyzed the publications in the first thirty journals under the heading «Orthopaedics and sports medicine» from Scimago Journal & Country Rank rating. The search was conducted from the moment of the first issue of each journal. Total number of publications was calculated, total number of publications from each author, number of publications per institution, citations of each publication in PubMed Central и Google Scholar. The subject, chronologic characteristics and relation of the year of publication with number of citations were analyzed. 

scholarly journals DIRECTIONS AND AREAS OF TOURISM RESEARCH IN KAZAKHSTAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 1418-1424
Author(s):  
Jan A. WENDT ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Key Words ◽  
Research Directions ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Research Fields ◽  
Tourism Geography ◽  
Research Material ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
Clear Increase ◽  
Number Of Authors

The aim of the article is to analyze research directions in tourism and the geography of Kazakhstan's tourism in order to identify those areas of research that are most often and underrepresented and cited in the literature, which will allow to identify potential, poorly recognized problems and research directions. The research material includes articles from journals indexed in Scopus. Research methods include statistical and bibliometric analysis of the number of authors, articles, journals and citations. In defining the research fields, classical classifications of research in tourism geography were used. Over the last five years, there has been a clear increase in the number of publications indexed in the Scopus database by over 450% in 2020 compared to 2015. Kazakhstan, tourism and tourism is the most frequently used key words. The articles with key words: ecocultural, marketing, sustainability, development and natural values have the highest number of citations, whose citations exceed the average value for the analyzed set of articles. The conducted research has indicated the most frequently chosen directions and areas of research in the field of tourism geography in Kazakhstan. These include articles in the field of development management and marketing. However, the texts from the ecocultural field have the highest impact factor defined by the number of those cited. Marketing, sustainability, development and natural values are on the next positions.

scholarly journals Data analysis tools for the study of scientific citations

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (36) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Cristian Morales Alarcón ◽  
Ciro Radicelli García ◽  
Margarita Pomboza Floril
Keyword(s):  
Applied Sciences ◽  
Educational Institution ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
National University ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Systemic Design ◽  
Number Of Authors

This research work made a study of scientific citations, with the aim of identifying aspects that may influence the citations of a higher educational institution. We analyzed 219 records of publications of the National University of Chimborazo and 10304 records of manuscripts from Ecuador. This work had a qualitative approach and a systemic design. As a result, it was found that the impact of scientific publications is reflected by the number of citations that have the documents published by the higher education institutions; in this sense, publications with larger citations are not related to the number of authors or volume of the published magazine, but they are supported by a quality research and correspond mostly to applied sciences.

The Impact of Anglicizing Former German-Language Psychology Journals on Authorship and Citation Frequencies

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Günter Krampen ◽  
Thomas Huckert ◽  
Gabriel Schui
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
English Language ◽  
General Trend ◽  
Native Language ◽  
Impact Factors ◽  
German Language ◽  
Journal Articles ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Number Of Authors

Exemplary for other than English-language psychology journals, the impact of recent Anglicization of five former German-language psychology journals on (1) authorship (nationality, i.e., native language, and number of authors, i.e., single or multiple authorships), (2) formal characteristics of the journal (number of articles per volume and length of articles), and (3) number of citations of the articles in other journal articles, the language of the citing publications, and the impact factors (IF) is analyzed. Scientometric data on these variables are gathered for all articles published in the four years before anglicizing and in the four years after anglicizing the same journal. Results reveal rather quick changes: Citations per year since original articles’ publication increase significantly, and the IF of the journals go up markedly. Frequencies of citing in German-language journals decrease, citing in English-language journals increase significantly after the Anglicization of former German-language psychology journals, and there is a general trend of increasing citations in other languages as well. Side effects of anglicizing former German-language psychology journals include the publication of shorter papers, their availability to a more international authorship, and a slight, but significant increase in multiple authorships.

Bibliometric Analysis of Current Drug Metabolism: The Twentieth Anniversary from 2000-2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 685-703
Author(s):  
Waseem Hassan ◽  
Jean Paul Kamdem ◽  
Mohammad Amjad Kamal ◽  
Joao Batista Teixeira da Rocha
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Drug Metabolism ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Continuous Growth ◽  
H Index ◽  
Current Drug ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Twentieth Anniversary ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
Number Of Citations

Background: Scopus is regularly covering Current Drug Metabolism from 2000 onwards. Objective: The major objective is to perform the 1st bibliometric analysis of Current Drug Metabolism (CDM). Methods: The data was retrieved from Scopus in April-May 2020 for detail analysis. Results: The total number of publications was found to be 1551, with 955 reviews (61.57%) and 466 articles (30.05%). From 2000 onwards, we calculated the relative growth rate and doubling time. Based on the number of publications, total 4418 authors, 3235 institutions and 83 countries were directly involved in all publications. M.A. Kamal is the highly productive scientist with fifty-three (53 or 3.73%) publications, King Abdulaziz University is the top university with the highest number of publications (58 or 4.13%) and the USA is the top-ranked country with 365 publications (25.96%). We also provided the h-index, total citations (TC), h-index without self-citations (WSC) and total WSC of the top ten authors, universities and countries. In citations analysis, Prof. Zhou S.F. was the top scientist with the highest (1594) number of citations. In institutional category Department of Drug Metabolism, Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, United States, is the top ranked institutes with 654 total citations. While, United States is the top-ranked country with 18409 total citations. In co-words analysis, 3387, 30564 and 17333 terms in titles of the manuscripts, abstracts and keywords were recorded, respectively. This indicated that CDM principally focused on understanding drug development ranging from its efficacy to delivery, metabolism, distribution, safety and mechanism of actions. Similarly, various specific drugs were thoroughly discussed in publications. Various enzymatic, genetics, proteins and cancer-related aspects were also described. For data presentations, we used VOSviewer graphical maps. Conclusion: The data confirm that CDM showed continuous growth in the number of publications and citations. However significant measures are needed to make overall progress and improve the rankings in relevant categories.

scholarly journals Global research activity on antimicrobial resistance in food-producing animals

2021 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Waleed M. Sweileh
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Hot Spots ◽  
One Health ◽  
Research Collaboration ◽  
Search Query ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Research Theme ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
Number Of Citations

Abstract Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global challenge that requires a “One Health” approach to achieve better public health outcomes for people, animals, and the environment. Numerous bibliometric studies were published on AMR in humans. However, none was published in food-producing animals. The current study aimed at assessing and analyzing scientific publications on AMR in food-producing animals. Method A validated search query was developed and entered in Scopus advanced search function to retrieve and quantitatively analyze relevant documents. Bibliometric indicators and mapping were presented. The study period was from 2000 to 2019. Results The search query retrieved 2852 documents. During the period from 2015 to 2019, approximately 48% of the retrieved documents were published. The article about the discovery of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance in pigs received the highest number of citations (n = 1970). The Journal of Food Protection (n = 123; 4.3%) ranked first in the number of publications while the Applied and Environmental Microbiology journal ranked first in the number of citations per document. The USA led with 576 (20.2%) documents followed by China (n = 375; 13.1%). When the number of publications was standardized by income and population size, India (n = 51.5) ranked first followed by China (n = 38.3) and Brazil (n = 13.4). The growth of publications from China exceeded that of the USA in the last 3 years of the study period. Research collaboration in this field was inadequate. Mapping author keywords showed that E. coli, Salmonella, poultry, Campylobacter, chicken, cattle, and resistant genes were most frequent. The retrieved documents existed in five research themes. The largest research theme was about AMR in Salmonella in food-producing animals. The most recent research theme was about the dissemination and molecular transfer of AMR genes into the environment and among different bacterial strains. Conclusion Hot spots of research on AMR in food-producing animals match the world regions of reported hot spots of AMR in animals. Research collaboration in this field is of great importance, especially with low- and middle-income countries. Data on AMR need to be collected nationally and internationally to implement the “One Health” approach in the fight against AMR.

Publishing patterns and citation performance of manuscripts relating to paediatric cardiology and congenital heart disease: comparison of paediatric and adult cardiology journals

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Rohit S. Loomba ◽  
Danielle Sheikholeslami ◽  
Aaron Dyson ◽  
Saul Flores ◽  
Enrique Villarreal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Congenital Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Congenital Heart ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Lower Number ◽  
The Other ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
H Index ◽  
Paediatric Cardiology ◽  
Number Of Citations

Abstract Background: Manuscripts pertaining to paediatric cardiology and CHD have been published in a variety of different journals. Some of these journals are journals dedicated to paediatric cardiology, while others are focused on adult cardiology. Historically, it has been considered that manuscripts published in journals devoted to adult cardiology have greater citation potential. Our objective was to compare citation performance between manuscripts related to paediatric cardiology and CHD published in paediatric as opposed to adult cardiology journals. Methods: We identified manuscripts related to paediatric cardiology and CHD published in five journals of interest during 2014. Of these journals, two were primarily concerned with adult cardiology, while the other three focused on paediatric cardiology. The number of citations for these identified manuscripts was gathered from Google Scholar. We compared the number of citations (median, mean, and 25th, 75th, 90th, and 95th percentiles), the potential for citation, and the h-index for the identified manuscripts. Results: We identified a total of 828 manuscripts related to paediatric cardiology and congenital heart as published in the 5 journals during 2014. Of these, 783 (95%) were published in journals focused on paediatric cardiology, and the remaining 45 (5%) were published in journals focused on adult cardiology. The median number of citations was 41 in the manuscripts published in the journals focused on adult cardiology, as opposed to 7 in journals focused on paediatric cardiology (p < 0.001). The h-index, however, was greater for the journals dedicated to paediatric cardiology (36 versus 27). Conclusion: Approximately one-twentieth of the work relating to paediatric cardiology and CHD is published in journals that focus predominantly on adult cardiology. The median number of citations is greater when manuscripts concerning paediatric cardiology and CHD are published in these journals focused on adult cardiology. The h-index, however, is higher when the manuscripts are published in journals dedicated to paediatric cardiology. While such publications in journals that focus on adult cardiology tend to generate a greater number of citations than those achieved for works published in specialised paediatric cardiology journals, the potential for citation is no different between the journals. Due to the drastically lower number of manuscripts published in journals dedicated to adult cardiology, however, median performance is different.

scholarly journals Mindfulness y el Abordaje del TDAH en el Contexto Educativo

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene López SECANELL ◽  
Sabina Pastor NÚÑEZ
Keyword(s):  
Google Scholar ◽  
Palabras Clave ◽  
Revisión Sistemática

RESUMEN: El objetivo del presente trabajo ha sido la realización de una revisión sistemática de estudios sobre la eficacia de las intervenciones basadas en mindfulness en el tratamiento del TDAH para su posible puesta en práctica en el contexto educativo. Así mismo también se ha analizado la metodología y el diseño de cada estudio. El proceso de investigación se realizó en las bases de datos PsycINFO, ERIC, Dialnet plus, Roderic y Google Scholar, utilizando palabras clave y determinados criterios de inclusión y de exclusión. Solo seis artículos de 121 cumplían estos criterios. Los resultados muestran como las investigaciones evidencien una reducción de la sintomatología principal del TDAH mediante el mindfulness. Al mismo tiempo, concluimos la falta de estudios y programas de mindfulness y TDAH inclusivos en ámbitos educativos.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document