scholarly journals Legal Protection towards Fiduciary Recipients in Disputes of Fiduciary Object

2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (07) ◽  
Author(s):  
Niken Sarah Dayanti ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Accounts Receivable ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Trade Relationship ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Force

This thesis addressed the issue to examine the legal responsibility of the Collateral Manager as the object fiduciary administrator and how the legal protection effort to the fiduciary recipient is based on the principle of lex specialist derogate lex generalist. This writing is motivated by non-performance of contract settlement as well as acts against the law from the importer to the exporter in an international trade relationship based on credit facilities. The results of the research, the responsibility of the Collateral Manager in conduct of transferred objects should be referred to the mechanism for exercising power based on the principles of Good Corporate Governance through the Collateral Management Agreement. This is to depreciate the risk, in order to the objects cannot be transferred by another party as a Fiduciary. Legal fiduciary recipient has accounts receivable on an object can obtain executorial rights protected by the Law on Fiduciary which is equal as court decisions that has permanent legal force. This research is used normative juridical, through statutory approach and a case approach in the case of the Supreme Court Verdict Number 2239 K/Pdt/2014. Conclusion is based on the principle of lex posterior derogate lex priori, the Judicial Review Verdict Number 997/PK/Pdt/2018 provides permanent legal force and certainty of the executorial rights of the fiduciary recipient over the object of collateral which is still a dispute between the importer and the exporter.

GUILT AS A SUBJECTIVE SIDE OF LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY OF JUDGE

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaroslav Skromnyy ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Court Case ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Subjective Aspect

The article reveals the main aspects of determining the guilt of a judge as a subjective aspect of imposing legal responsibility on him. It was established that the key aspects of determining the guilt of a judge as a subjective aspect of imposing legal responsibility on him are represented by the provisions of such legislative and regulatory documents as the Constitution of Ukraine, the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine «On the independence of the judiciary», the Law of Ukraine «On the implementation of decisions and the application of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights», Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine «On judicial practice in cases of crimes against human life and health», Law of Ukraine «On the judicial system and the status of judges». It was found that the evidence of the judge's guilt in relation to the offense committed by him today is one of the important issues of imposing a certain type of legal liability on him. It has been determined that judges often commit offenses due to the adoption of unfounded and often illegal court decisions. It has been proved that the guilt of judges for the offenses committed by them is manifested as a result of non-compliance or disregard for the norms of procedural legislation or labor discipline. It has been determined that in order to make a court decision, a judge is obliged to determine the norms of the law, a number of bylaws and study judicial practice in considering the relevant court case. It has been established that one of the elements of a judge's fault is an inner conviction. It has been established that the subject of the court case regarding the adoption by the judge of an unjustified and illegal court decision is not the corpus delicti, which is present in the actions of the judge, but the legality of that, or the investigator will refuse to initiate a criminal case against the judge for making an unjust decision. It was found that the practical methods of determining the guilt of a judge in committing an offense should be a comprehensive study of the materials of the case, which is open against the judge, and the analysis of data from the judge's dossier, in particular, data on the consideration of such cases by a judge and the adoption of appropriate court decisions on them. It has been proven that quite often the release of a judge from legal liability occurs in conditions when offenses committed by a judge are re-qualified as a miscarriage of justice.

Conscientious Objection (European and American approaches)

Law and World ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-144
Keyword(s):  
Deep Understanding ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Conscientious Objection ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
State Regulations ◽  
Conscientious Objectors ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Individual

The Article concerns the legal issues, connected with the situation, when a person (or group of people) disobey requirements of the Law or other State regulations on the basis of religious or nonreligious belief. The Author analyses almost all related issues – whether imposing certain obligation on individuals, to which the individual has a conscientious objection based on his/her religious beliefs, always represents interference with his/her religion rights, and if it does, then what is subject of the interference – forum integrum or forum externum; whether neutral regulation, which does not refer to religion issues at all, could ever be regarded as interference into someone’s religious rights; whether opinion or belief, on which the individual’s objection and the corresponding conduct is based, must necesserily represent the clear “manifest” of the same religion or belief in order to gain legal protection; what is regarded as “manifest” of the religion or other belief in general and whether a close and direct link must exist between personal conduct and requirements of the religious or nonreligious belief; what are the criteria of the “legitimacy” of the belief; to what extent the following factors should be taken into consideration : whether the personal conduct of the individual represents the official requirements of corresponding religion or belief, what is the burden which was imposed on the believer’s religious or moral feelings by the State regulation, also, proportionality and degree of sincerity of the individual who thinks that his disobidience to the Law is required by his/her religious of philosofical belief. The effects (direct or non direct) of the nonfulfilment of the law requirement (legal responsibility, lost of the job, certain discomfort, etc..) are relevant factors as well. By the Author, all these circumstances and factors are essencial while estimating, whether it arises, actually, a real necessity and relevant obligation before a state for making some exemptions from the law to the benefi t of the conscientious objectors, in cases, if to predict such an objection was possible at all. So, the issues are discussed in the prism of the negative and positive obligations of a State. Corresponding precedents of the US Supreme Court and European Human Rights Court have been presented and analysed comparatively by the Author in the Article. The Article contains an important resume, in which the main points, principal issues and conclusion remarks are delivered. The Author shows, that due analysis of the legal aspects typical to “Conscientious objection” is very important for deep understanding religious rights, not absolute ones, and facilitates finding a correct answer on the question – how far do their boundaries go?

scholarly journals TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP POLIS ELEKTRONIK DALAM PERJANJIAN ASURANSI

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 115
Author(s):  
Vianda Karina Ika Putri ◽  
Bambang Winarno ◽  
A. Rachmad Budiono
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Insurance Contract ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
The Law ◽  
Insurance Agreement ◽  
Policy Agreement ◽  
Made In ◽  
Legal Force

Abstract: Electronic policy or e-policy is an insurance contract that happends due to an electronic commercial transactions. But e-policy has been in Indonesia although there is no clear legal framework related to the existence of these e-policy. The purpose of this study are 1) Determine and analyze how the legality of e-policy according to the law in Indonesia. 2) Determine and analyze how the strength of e-policies evidence in the event of a dispute between the parties. Judicial review of electronic policy in the insurance agreement, namely: 1) E-polis as a form of agreement which could be interpreted is not qualify as legitimate e-policy agreement contrary to KUHDagang to be equivalent for sub law. So, insurance agreement can be interpreted is not meet objective conditions of an agreement that could result in the agreement is null and void (Article 1320 of KUHPerdata). 2) The strength of evidence on e-policy will have a strong legal force if the e-policy is made in the form of a deed in writing and acknowledged by both parties entered into an agreement, but if e-policy just softfile that send by email then e-policy does not have the strength of evidence because it was not in accordance with the provisions of Indonesian laws. Keywords: Agreement, E-policy, The Insurance Agreement Abstrak: Polis elektronik atau e-polis merupakan kontrak asuransi yang terjadi akibat suatu transaksi komersial elektronik. Namun e-polis telah berada di Indonesia meski belum ada payung hukum yang jelas terkait adanya e-polis ini. Tujuan Penelitian ini ialah 1) Mengetahui dan menganalisis keabsahan e-polis menurut hukum di Indonesia, 2) Mengetahui dan menganalisis bagaimana kekuatan pembuktian e-polis dalam hal terjadi sengketa antara para pihak. Tinjauan yuridis terhadap polis elektronik dalam perjanjian asuransi, yakni : 1) E-polis sebagai suatu bentuk perjanjian yang dapat diartikan tidak memenuhi syarat sah perjanjian karena e-polis bertentangan dengan KUHDagang yang setara dengan Undang-Undang. Sehingga perjanjian asuransi tersebut dapat diartikan tidak memenuhi syarat objektif suatu perjanjian yang dapat mengakibatkan perjanjian tersebut batal demi hukum (Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata). 2) Kekuatan pembuktian pada e-polis akan memiliki kekuatan hukum yang kuat apabila e-polis dibuat dalam bentuk akta yang tertulis dan diakui oleh kedua belah pihak yang mengadakan perjanjian, namun apabila e-polis tersebut hanya berbentuk softfile yang dikirim melalui email maka e-polis tersebut tidak memiliki kekuatan pembuktian karena tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan-ketentuan hukum positif Indonesia. Kata Kunci : Perjanjian, E-polis, perjanjian asuransi

scholarly journals ANALISIS KEABSAHAN KEPUTUSAN GUBERNUR JAWA TENGAH NOMOR 660.1/6 TAHUN 2017 TENTANG IZIN LINGKUNGAN KEGIATAN PENAMBANGAN DAN PEMBANGUNAN PABRIK PT SEMEN INDONESIA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 32 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN DAN PENGELOLAAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1288
Author(s):  
Arief Hidayat ◽  
Ahmad Redi
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Central Java ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Force

The State of Indonesia is a State of Law. But, in fact the ideals of the idea of the State of Law that was built by developing the legal tool itself as a system that is functional and just to achieve community welfare and social justice has not been optimally done. This is reflected in the new Environmental Permit issued by Central Java Governor Ganjar Pranowo (No. 660.1 / 6 of 2017 on Environmental Permit for Mining and Construction Activities of PT Semen Indonesia Plant) is considered to have injured the ideals of the law itself. The new Environmental Permit is contradictory to the content of the Review Judgment issued by the Supreme Court (Supreme Court Verdict Decision Number 99 PK / Tun 2016), because in the ruling it ordered that the Governor Replace the old Environmental Permit, which was issued in 2012 and did not issue New Environmental Permit. The verdict contains the basis of judges' consideration in deciding cases that have reflected fairness and legal certainty. The result of the research on the validity of the Environmental Permit Decree on the Review Judgment issued by the Supreme Court concluded that the decree should be invalid because it is not in line with the decision of the court which has permanent legal force.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERUSAHAAN FACTOR DALAM PENAGIHAN PIUTANG DAGANG PADA TRANSAKSI ANJAK PIUTANG (FACTORING)

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Dewa Ayu Dwi Mayasari
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Legal Interpretation ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Accounts Receivable ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Law

Research in connection with jurnal writing thesis takes the theme the protection of the law against companies factor in billing accounts receivable factoring transactions. Problems studied involves two things; the first what factors the company’s legal position as a buyer on receivables in factoring and financing institution both what form of legal protection that can be given to companies factor of a possible failure of the trade receivables collection. This includes research conducted legal research categories, namely normative legal research literature or legal research based on secondary data. The approach used is the approach ot the laws and facts approach. Next to for further analysis techniques use the description legal interpretation techniques based argumentative theory, principles, and concepts relevan laws. The results showed that the company,s legal position as a purchaser of  factoring receivables is very weak and vulnerable than risk the possibility of failure of collection of accounts receivable due to non fulfillment of the achievements by the customer. In this context there is no guarantee of  legal protection for the company for the payment or refund factor its receivables in full. The next from legal protection that can be given to the factor as a buyer of receivables is; a) apply the type of recourse factoring in the factoring agreement with the burden of responsibility is on the client in case of failure of collection of accounts receivable, b) implement a system of personal/corporate guarantees, and c) apply the prudential banking principles

scholarly journals URGENSI DAN PENGATURAN UU TENTANG CONTEMPT OF COURT UNTUK MENJAMIN HARKAT, MARTABAT DAN WIBAWA PERADILAN

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Wisnu Mulyadi
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
The Press ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Good Attitude

The phenomenon of the Contempt of Court is an event that is rife in Indonesia lately. It is considered to reduce the dignity, majesty and authority of the judiciary and its apparatus. Particularly the dignity and authority of the judge. Attitudes and actions displayed by the search for justice, legal practitioners, the press, political and social organizations, NGOs, academics, judicial commission, as well as various other parties in such a way can be categorized injure the dignity, majesty and authority of the judiciary, good attitude and actions directed against the judicial process, judicial officials, as well as court decisions. Lack of strict legal instruments and adequate to serve as guidelines and benchmarks to judge such a phenomenon is made Contempt of Court always the case. View of the judge is an arm of God would have been contrary to Contempt of Court. The judge in charge of prosecuting and providing justice for justice seekers should not accept the bad treatments. This study is based on normative research method using statutory approach and conceptual approaches. Legislation that used is Law No. 4 of 1985 on the Supreme Court, Code of criminal law, the law book of the law of criminal procedure, the draft book of the Criminal Justice Act 2012 and draft the Code of Criminal Procedure 2012. This research is expected to contribute significantly for the creation benchmarks and appropriate guidelines in terms of the establishment of regulations and legislation on Contempt of Court Act

Omnipotence and the Law: A Psychoanalytically Oriented Analysis

1988 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 421-458
Author(s):  
C. G. Schoenfeld
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
The Unconscious ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Studies ◽  
Dred Scott ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Law ◽  
Infants And Young Children

This article seeks to illuminate the effect of unconscious infantile omnipotence fantasies upon the law and some of its major officials. First, psychoanalytic discoveries about the omnipotence ideas of infants and young children are detailed, and an attempt is made to relate these ideas to the current overestimation of the status and effectiveness of international law. Then the possible relationship between such infantile notions and today's incredible litigiousness is discussed. Considered next in the light of infantile omnipotence beliefs is a series of landmark Supreme Court decisions since 1793—including the disastrous Dred Scott decision that helped to precipitate the Civil War. One of the possibilities raised is that the acceptance of the antimajoritarian concept of “judicial review” reflects the displacement of unconscious omnipotence fantasies from parents onto judges. Discussed next is the implicit logic of currently popular (but clearly unsound) Critical Legal Studies doctrines that, in effect, assign “omnipotence” both to judges and to the law they are presumably free to manipulate in the service of political goals. Finally, an attempt is made to understand why the public tends to ascribe “omnipotence” to judges and prosecutors and why the unconscious omnipotence notions of judges, prosecutors, and policemen are likely to affect their own official behavior.

scholarly journals Law for ethnographers

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 205979911772060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracey Elliott ◽  
Jennifer Fleetwood
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Activity ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Ethnographic Research ◽  
Legal Action ◽  
Illegal Activity ◽  
The Future ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Law

Despite a long history of ethnographic research on crime, ethnographers have shied away from examining the law as it relates to being present at, witnessing and recording illegal activity. However, knowledge of the law is an essential tool for researchers and the future of ethnographic research on crime. This article reviews the main relevant legal statutes in England and Wales and considers their relevance for contemporary ethnographic research. We report that researchers have no legal responsibility to report criminal activity (with some exceptions). The circumstances under which legal action could be taken to seize research data are specific and limited, and respondent’s privacy is subject to considerable legal protection. Our review gives considerable reason to be optimistic about the future of ethnographic research.

scholarly journals MENAKAR PROGRESIFITAS LEMBAGA PERADILAN DALAM MEWUJUDKAN DEMOKRASI BERINTEGRITAS

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 2102-2117
Author(s):  
Alda Rifada Rizqi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Legal Positivism ◽  
The People ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Will ◽  
The Law ◽  
Corrupt Behavior

Democracy with integrity will be realized if carried out in accordance with the will of the people as holders of sovereignty, the KPU (Komisi Pemilihan Umum) as the election organizer has the authority to make regulations that support a better democracy. KPU (Komisi Pemilihan Umum) Regulation No. 20 of 2018 as evidence that the KPU is committed to participating in preventing corrupt behavior. It was considered to have been considered as an effort to protect the interests of the people, but the regulation was submitted to a judicial review at the Supreme Court. Then, based on legal-formal considerations and based on the legal positivism of the Supreme Court, the request for the test is granted. The decision distanced itself from progressive legal values that justified the denial of what was regulated in legislation in order to put forward the values of public justice, because basically the law was made to fulfill human interests, accommodating the will of the people for the sake of order.

scholarly journals Legal Examination of the Constitutional Court Number 28/PUU-XI/2013 Concerning the Case of Judicial Review of Law Number 17 of 2012 Concerning Cooperatives

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
Lauddin Marsuni ◽  
Salle Salle ◽  
Syarifuddin Syarifuddin ◽  
La Ode Husen
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Technical Analysis ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Normative Approach ◽  
Natural Person ◽  
Analysis Methods ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Force

This study aims to understand the legal review on Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 28/PUU-XI/2013 on the review of Law No. 17 of 2012 on Cooperatives against The 1945 Constitution. The benefits of this research are socialization and provide legal awareness about cooperatives activities in Indonesia. This research uses a normative approach that focuses on studying the legal and regulatory norms associated with the object of the problem. The technical analysis used in this study is the Hermeneutic and Interpretation analysis methods. The results of the study indicate that Phrase “natural person” in the cooperatives sense was based on Article 1 point 1 of Law No. 17 of 2012 is against Article 33 section (1) of The 1945 Constitution because that definition leads to individualism. Furthermore, although the Petitioner's petition is only regarding certain articles it contains substantial norm content, it will cause other articles in Law No. 17 of 2012 has no binding legal force. Therefore the Petitioner's petition must be declared in accordance with the law for all contents of Law No. 17 of 2012. As for the sake of legal certainty, Law No. 25 of 1992 valid for a while awaiting the establishment of a new Law.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document