scholarly journals Meretas Jalan Peningkatan Pengetahuan Wisatawan Terhadap Bangunan Cagar Budaya di Kota Bandung

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-56
Author(s):  
Marciella Marciella
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Undergraduate Education ◽  
Heritage Tourism ◽  
Central Area ◽  
Cultural Tourism ◽  
Heritage Conservation ◽  
Heritage Buildings ◽  
Heritage Building ◽  
The City ◽  
Cultural Tourist

Heritage is one of the attractions in cultural tourism. The city of Bandung is known as a heritage city because it inherits various heritage buildings. A form in heritage conservation is through tourism. One of the stakeholders who use the heritage building for tourism is community. The example of the stakeholder is Historical Trips. Nowadays, heritage tourism is increasingly in demand, both by domestic tourists and international tourists. However, tourists' knowledge of cultural heritage buildings after attending heritage tours held by community is unknown. The purposes of this study are to find out the characteristics of Historical Trips’ users, find out the typology of tourists who took Explore Logeweg Tour and analyze tourist knowledge of cultural heritage buildings in the central area of ​​Bandung. Based on the result and discussion of the research, the conclusions of this study are the characteristics of Historical Trips’ users who joined Explore Logeweg are female, aged 31-50 years, work as private employees with undergraduate education, unmarried and from Bandung city. The typologies of cultural tourists who take part in the Explore Logeweg Tour held by the Historical Trips are the purposeful cultural tourist, the sightseeing cultural tourist, the serendipitous cultural tourist, and the casual cultural tourist. Tourists who attended Explore Logeweg Tour have enough and good knowledge of cultural heritage buildings in the central area of ​​Bandung. The level of their knowledge is at the level of knowing and understanding (comprehension).

Regeneration of a historic city block: the example of the relocation of the historic Atelier building to the cloister area of the Congregation of the Resurrection in Krakow

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bogusław Podhalański ◽  
Anna Połtowicz
Keyword(s):  
Twentieth Century ◽  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Steel Structure ◽  
City Block ◽  
Raising Awareness ◽  
Straight Line ◽  
Heritage Buildings ◽  
Heritage Building ◽  
Historic City ◽  
The City

Abstract The article discusses a project that features the relocation of the historic Atelier building, built by Krakow-based architect Wandalin Beringer (1839–1923) who was active in the early twentieth century, and the regeneration of a plot belonging to the Congregation of the Resurrection since 1885, which is located at 12 Łobzowska Street in Krakow. The method includes cutting the entire structure off at the foundation and then after reinforcing it with a steel structure transporting it in its entirety to the new location. The project included two possible variants of moving the building in a straight line, either by 21 or 59 metres and evaluates two projects of further regeneration, the adaptive reuse of the building as an exhibition and religious space as well as a proposal for the remodelling of the nearby plot that belongs to the Congregation into a space for meditation and as a recreational park. The aim of these measures is to prevent the demolition of this building, now over a century old, as a result of which a forgotten element of the cultural heritage of the city will be saved. This project was based on the results of analyses of the cultural and historical conditions of Krakow. The block of buildings in which the Atelier in question is located is a very attractive location, near to the very centre of Krakow, adjacent to residential, service and educational buildings. It is directly adjacent to the Monastery Complex of the Congregation of the Resurrection, listed as a heritage building under conservation protection (municipal registry of heritage buildings). In the second half of the twentieth century, the building was used as a workroom by artists such as Xawery Dunikowski and later by the sculptress Teodora Stasiak. The case of the Atelier may provide an inspiration for discussion as well as raising awareness among citizens and city authorities to avoid future situations in which cultural heritage may become forgotten or demolished.

scholarly journals Mapping Tourism Potential Based on Urban Heritage Tourism in Medan City

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Ponirin ◽  
Tappil Rambe ◽  
Leylia Khairani
Keyword(s):  
Heritage Tourism ◽  
Tourist Destinations ◽  
City Hall ◽  
Urban Heritage ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Heritage Buildings ◽  
Heritage Building ◽  
Tourism Potential ◽  
The City ◽  
Heritage Area

The city of Medan is the third-largest city in Indonesia and has historical buildings or heritage that can be revitalized as a cultural heritage with tourism potential that can be developed. However, until now, the colonial heritage buildings have been destroyed up to 70%. This research method uses a tourism anthropology approach with a qualitative research type that focuses on tourist destinations. The research location is a heritage area, a colonial heritage building in the Merdeka Square segment, Maimoon segment, Benteng segment, Youth segment, Polonia segment, and Sambu segment. The study results reveal that Medan has a heritage in the form of historic buildings that have the potential to be developed and represent the identity of the city of Medan. The potential for tourism development can be carried out in 3 (three) potential areas, namely: 1) The youth segment, which includes Gedung Juang 45, which currently functions as the Sumatran Money Museum, Tip Top Restaurant, and Tjong A Fie Mansion. 2) the Maimoon segment, which includes: Maimoon Palace and the Great Mosque. 3) The Merdeka Square segment includes City Hall, which currently functions as the Grand City Hall, Hotel De Boer (currently called Grand Inna Hotel), and the London Sumatra building. Through urban tourism based on urban heritage tourism, tourists can be invited to appreciate and interpret the objects observed. It serves as education and recreation for the community. This activity is also a means of preserving the wealth and identity of the city of Medan.

scholarly journals KAJIAN KONSERVASI BANGUNAN MELALUI UNSUR PEMBENTUK ARSITEKTUR DALAM UPAYA PELESTARIAN BANGUNAN TUA DI KOTA BANDUNG Studi Kasus : Gedung Panti Karya, Jalan Merdeka no. 39 Bandung, Jawa Barat

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Raden Gurmilang Nur Rahadian
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Modern Architecture ◽  
Art Deco ◽  
Strategic Approach ◽  
Heritage Buildings ◽  
Heritage Building ◽  
Historical Heritage ◽  
Cultural Performances ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The City

City of Bandung is known as a city that has many historical heritage buildings. City of Bandung’s imageas a city of Art Deco needs to be treasuredand maintained as it is known worldwide as a point of interest which drivepeople from around the world to visit and study it. As time goes, modernization concentratingon economic development often presents a threat to historic old buildings in the city of Bandung. One of the impact of this dynamicdevelopment is the potential loss of historical heritage as an object of tourism,therefore, conservation efforts should be done accordingly. One of the effortis strategic approach in developing and improving tourism, especially in the city of Bandung, namely through the preservation of old buildings. The presentation in this study focuses on building conservationstudybya case study of Panti Karya Building located on Jalan Merdeka Number 39 Bandung West Java. The research method used for analysisis the qualitative method using architectural forming elements and building studies in the composition of triadic functions-forms-meanings. The findings of this study statedthat the Panti Karya Building has strongerModern Architecturecharacteristics rather than Art Deco Architecture. The value of preserving the architecture of Panti KaryaBuilding is described according to Bandung City Regulation No.19 of Year 2009 concerning Management of Cultural Heritage Areas and Buildings includingHistorical value–the third highest building of Southeast AsianWorkers' Union and also as a pioneer of post-independence development;Architectural value–the style of Modern Architecture that shows the spirit of independence;The value of science–the style of Modern Architecture represents the progress of science andtechnology;Social culturalvalues–as a place for socializing and holding cultural performances;lastly, Building age–63 years oldof agemakes this building worthy of being categorized as a cultural heritage building

scholarly journals Nurturing the Collective Memory of Plantation Traces

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-134
Author(s):  
Erond Litno Damanik
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Collective Memory ◽  
Public Spaces ◽  
Political Will ◽  
Heritage Buildings ◽  
Heritage Building ◽  
History Of ◽  
The City ◽  
City Identity

The article aims to explore and to discuss strategies for nurturing collective memory and identity in Medan City. The problem is focused on strategies to care for the collective memory and identity of the city while preserving cultural heritage buildings in Medan City. The theoretical references used are the collective memory and city identity approaches of Kusno. The study found that the collective memory and identity of the plantation are attached to the grandeur of the shape and variety of building architecture. The variety of architecture refers to masterpieces of internationally renowned architects, while the forms and patterns represent the climate, aesthetics, and success of the plantation. Novelty studies that the lack of protection of cultural heritage buildings has implications for the waning of collective memory and city identity. Economic and business battles, lack of government political will, and synergy with the private sector have an impact on the destruction of cultural heritage buildings. Cultural heritage buildings are an integral part of the history of Medan City with plantations. The study concluded that maintaining collective memory and plantation identity is a preservation activity of cultural heritage buildings. The strategy of nurturing for cultural heritage buildings is not enough through local regulations, utilization as public spaces, but also providing incentives for cultural heritage building owners. Artikel bertujuan mengeksplorasi dan mendiskusikan strategi merawat memori kolektif dan identitas perkebunan di Kota Medan. Permasalahan difokuskan pada strategi merawat memori kolektif dan identitas kota sekaligus melestarikan bangunan pusaka budaya di Kota Medan. Acuan teoritis dipergunakan adalah  pendekatan memori kolektif dan identitas kota dari Kusno. Kajian menemukan bahwa memori kolektif dan identitas perkebunan terlampir pada kemegahan bentuk dan ragam arsitektur bangunan. Ragam arsitektur menunjuk pada mahakarya arsitek kenamaan mancanegara; sedang bentuk dan pola merepresentasi iklim, estetika dan keberhasilan perkebunan. Novelty kajian bahwa kurangnya perlindungan bangunan pusaka budaya berimplikasi bagi memudarnya memori kolektif dan identitas kota. Pertarungan ekonomi dan bisnis, kurangnya political-will pemerintah serta sinergi dengan swasta berdampak bagi pemusnahan bangunan pusaka budaya. Bangunan pusaka budaya merupakan bagian integral sejarah Kota Medan dengan perkebunan. Kajian menyimpulkan bahwa memelihara memori kolektif dan identitas perkebunan adalah aktifitas pelestarian bangunan pusaka budaya. Strategi merawat bangunan pusaka budaya tidak cukup melalui Peraturan Daerah, pemamfaatan sebagai ruang publik, tetapi juga pemberian insentif bagi pemilik bangunan pusaka budaya. 

scholarly journals IDENTIFIKASI INDEKS KENYAMANAN KOTA YOGYAKARTA BERDASARKAN KRITERIA CULTURAL HERITAGE

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 634
Author(s):  
Ayu Candra Kurniati ◽  
Fahril Fanani
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Social Life ◽  
City Planning ◽  
Original Form ◽  
Form And Function ◽  
Total Percentage ◽  
Heritage Buildings ◽  
Heritage Building ◽  
And Function ◽  
The City

The ideal city planning, in fact is the combination between livable and sustainable city, where the city is able to maintain the quality of life in the present as well as the future, furthermore it generates a comfortable atmosphere for a place to live as seen from many aspects.  Yogyakarta is one of the livable cities in Indonesia with the highest index score, 68.14% for social life and 70.89% for the preservation of cultural heritage building. Considering the mission of Yogyakarta which is to enhance cultural quality and strengthen morality, behavior and cultural value of the community, it is considerable to conduct a research regarding to livable city index in Yogyakarta based on the criteria of cultural heritage.   Furthermore, this research used scoring dichotomy data as a methodology with variables: the changes in building's form and function, the ownership status and the usage of cultural heritage building, as well as the amount of cultural heritage buildings that have been demolished and/or in the process of demolition. The results show the highest livable index for preservation of cultural heritage building is in cultural preservation area Kotagede (41.77%), followed by Kraton (20.66%), Malioboro (14.06%), Pakualaman (13.21%) and the least is Kotabaru (10.03%). Kotagede has the highest livable index due to the amount of cultural heritage building compared to other preservation areas. From the total percentage, 42.9% of the buildings are in the original form, 30% have its function changed, 70% are in personal ownership, 21.6% are in group/association, and 45.5% are not demolished. The conclusion of this study is that the existence of cultural heritage building in the city will increase the value of environmental identity which is resembles the character of the area and the community within

scholarly journals UPAYA PEMERINTAH DALAM MELESTARIKAN URBAN HERITAGE DALAM MENDUKUNG LIVEABLE CITY KOTA YOGYAKARTA

KURVATEK ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 7-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahril Fanani ◽  
Ayu Candra Kurniati
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
The Past ◽  
Heritage Buildings ◽  
Heritage Building ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Descriptive Approach ◽  
The Government ◽  
The City ◽  
Heritage Area

Cultural heritage has values on the past cultural heritage that must be preserved and maintained in order to support urban development in the future. The city of Yogyakarta has been appointed as one of the "Liveable Cities" in Indonesia (IAP, 2014) in terms of preservation of cultural heritage. Based on the Government Regulation of Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta No. 40/2014 in terms of “Determaning Cultural Heritage Areas”, stated that Yogyakarta has 5 (five) Cultural Heritage Areas (KCB) which are: Kraton, Kotabaru, Pakualaman, Malioboro and Kotagede. The purpose of this study is to identify the government's efforts to preserve the Yogyakarta cultural heritage building in terms of maintaning the Liveable City Index of Yogyakarta. Next, collecting data method is using observation, interviews and literature studies. The research method is a qualitative descriptive approach, by using preservation variables considering with liveable city criteria, such as: protection, development and utilitation of cultural heritage buildings. Furthermore, the results is the Yogyakarta`s government has prepared conservation guidelines and management of cultural heritage buildings for each cultural heritage area, but those guidelines and management are not integrated with the governor's regulation. The conclusion obtained is the lack of integration from several policies / regulations set by the government in the preserving of cultural heritage buildings

scholarly journals Preservation of Art Style in Interior and Architecture Cultural Heritage Buildings: A Case Study in Hotel Kartika Wijaya & Hotel Niagara Malang

Humaniora ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Sri Rachmayanti ◽  
Christianto R. ◽  
Anak Agung Ayu Wulandari
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Interior Design ◽  
Historic Buildings ◽  
Historical Building ◽  
Art Deco ◽  
Heritage Buildings ◽  
Heritage Building ◽  
Art Style

Kartika Wijaya Hotel and Niagara Hotel-Malang are two heritage buildings, which are well managed to preserve their historical building that, has been established since 1891. We can find good harmony and variety in interior elements and design styles, such as Colonial style, Art Noveau and Art Deco style. The purpose of documentating this heritage building that has different design styles is for those who needed. The data will be classified according to the period of the development of the buildings and characteristics of existing styles. The research objective on Kartika Wijaya hotel building and art styles is to preserve historic buildings in Indonesia, through documentation of interior elements and architectures, and to conducted a study of the interior and architectures elements, interior design ornaments, that founded in historical Kartika Wijaya Hotel and Niagara Hotel in Malang, whose the existence needs to be preserved. 

scholarly journals URGENCY OF INSURANCE FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE BUILDING IN SURABAYA

Yuridika ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 232
Author(s):  
Hilda Yunita Sabrie
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Local Community ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Insurance Companies ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Heritage Buildings ◽  
Heritage Building

The cultural heritage of a region is the identity and richness of history for the region. Given the importance of the existence of cultural heritage in an area, the local government should pay special attention to the continuity of its existence. Through inventory, listing the cultural heritages, maintenance until its restoration must be done properly and continuously. This is not only the responsibility of the local government, but it is the responsibility of all parties including the local community. But in practice, local government or society are less concerned about the existence of cultural heritage in the area. This research focuses on cultural heritage buildings in Surabaya because this city is one of the cities in Indonesia which has many buildings of cultural heritage with various conditions. Local governments need to act quickly and effectively to solve the problem, so the solution can be done by including third parties such as insurance companies engaged in the insurance of losses, which can help to cover some form of damage that occurred in the building of the reserve culture in Surabaya. From the problems mentioned above, the research method used is statute approach and conceptual approach.

WISATA KAWASAN PECINAN KOTATUA JAKARTA: SUATU TINJAUAN POTENSI PENGEMBANGAN PARIWISATA PERKOTAAN DI INDONESIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ary Sulistyo
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Collective Memory ◽  
18Th Century ◽  
Heritage Tourism ◽  
The Other ◽  
Cultural Resources ◽  
Tourist Destination ◽  
Tourist Destinations ◽  
The City

<p><em>The function of a city is not only for economic development, but also the city tells the story of the collective memory of its citizens who still exist in their past culture. These culture are the city's cultural resources for tourism. One of them is the Kotatua area of Jakarta, there is a Chinatown area, known as Glodok. This study aims to describe how the Glodok Chinatown cultural area was transformed into an urban tourist destination from the 18th century to the present. This area has many historical attractions or historical tourist destinations such as centers of sacred activity (temples / temples, and churches), as well as profane activity centers (markets, roads / alleys, etc.). Therefore the future development must refer to Law No. 11 of 2010 concerning Cultural Heritage that the use of cultural heritage must be based on protection and development not the other way around. So that it is expected that conservation-based tourism in the Glodok Chinatown area can sustain well without any changes which certainly damage the element of authenticity as Chinatown areas in Jakarta and Indonesia in general.</em><em></em></p><p> </p><p>Keyword: <em>Kotatua, Glodok, City, Cultural Heritage, Tourism</em></p>

The Potential of Cultural Heritage Tourism to Promote Sustainable Urban Development: The Case of Tainan City

2013 ◽  
Vol 316-317 ◽  
pp. 446-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsing Ping Kuo ◽  
Kang Li Wu
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Urban Development ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Heritage Tourism ◽  
Tourism Development ◽  
Cultural Tourism ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Sustainable Urban Development ◽  
Tainan City ◽  
Cultural Heritage Tourism

As cultural heritage tourism is widely regarded as a key element of promoting sustainable urban development and making a city competitive, allocating suitable budget for developing cultural heritage tourism thus becomes an important issue. Tainan City is an ancient cultural city with many cultural heritages, up to 112 attractions, in Taiwan. As the budget of local governments to promote tourism activities is limited, it is exceptionally important to assess the potential of cultural heritage tourism. Modified the cultural tourism assessment indicators proposed by Mckercher and Ho, this study assessed the potential of eight cultural heritage attractions in Tainan City by surveying visitors who have visited these attractions to verify the positioning of tourism development and to prioritize the resources for enhancing these attractions. The outcomes can provide a reference for decision-makers to promote sustainable tourism and allocate resources.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document