An in vitro Comparison of Marginal Accuracy in Temporary Crowns
ABSTRACT Purpose To compare the marginal accuracy of temporary crowns in vitro, using two autopolymerizing temporary crown materials. Materials and Methods Polyethyl methacrylate and bis-acryl composite were used to make 15 temporary crowns each, on an ivorine mandibular first molar, prepared as to receive a porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) crown. Matrices were made of polyvinyl siloxane impressions of a lower typodont arch. After crowns were fabricated, margins of the crowns were trimmed under magnification. Afterwards, margins of prepared tooth and crowns were marked. Each tooth-crown assembly was then observed under microscope (4×). With digital images of each surface, gap between margins of crown and preparation margin was measured in millimeters using computer software, after calibration. Two examiners made the measurements. Independent samples t-test and one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc analysis were applied to determine the mean marginal gap. Results Bis-acryl composite crowns exhibited 0.2 mm (SD ± 0.11) mean gap with greatest discrepancy at buccal margins. Mean gap with polyethyl methacrylate crowns was 0.3 mm (SD ± 0.17) with buccal and mesial margins exhibiting the greatest marginal discrepancy, at α <0.001. Conclusion Both materials did not exhibit ideal marginal accuracy, but temporary luting cement film thickness would compensate for the gap observed in the margins of bis-acryl composite crowns. How to cite this article Adnan S, Khan FR, Umer F. An in vitro Comparison of Marginal Accuracy in Temporary Crowns. J Contemp Dent 2013;3(3):121-126.