scholarly journals The NorESM1-Happi used for evaluating differences between a global warming of 1.5 °C and 2 °C, and the role of Arctic Amplification

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trond Iversen ◽  
Ingo Bethke ◽  
Jens B. Debernard ◽  
Lise S. Graff ◽  
Øyvind Seland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Global Change ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Extratropical Cyclone ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Arctic Amplification ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Model Simulations ◽  
Slab Ocean ◽  
Fully Coupled

Abstract. Abstract. The global NorESM1-M model that produced results for CMIP5 (http://cmip-pcmdi.llnl.gov/cmip5/index.html) has been slightly upgraded to NorESM1-Happi, and has been run with double resolution (~ 1° in the atmosphere and the land surface) to provide model simulations to address the differences between a 1.5 °C and a 2.0 °C warmer climate than the 1850 pre-industrial. As a part of the validation of temperature-targeted model simulations, the atmosphere and land models have been run fully coupled with deep ocean and sea-ice as an extension of the NorESM1-M which produced CMIP5-results. Selected results from a standard set of validation experiments are discussed: a 500-year 1850 pre-industrial control run, three runs for the historical period 1850–2005, three detection and attribution runs, and three future projection runs based on RCPs. NorESM1-Happi has a better representation of sea-ice, improved Northern Hemisphere (NH) extratropical cyclone and blocking activity, and a fair representation of the Madden-Julian oscillation. The amplitude of ENSO signals is reduced and is too small, although the frequency is improved. The strength of the AMOC is larger and probably too large. Modern era global near-surface temperatures and the cloudiness are considerably under-estimated, while the precipitation and the intensity of the hydrological cycle are over-estimated, although the atmospheric residence time of water-vapour appears satisfactory. An ensemble of AMIP-type runs with prescribed SSTs and sea-ice from observations at present-day and a set of global CMIP5 models for a 1.5 °C and a 2.0 °C world (i.e. AMIP) has been provided by the model to a multi-model project (HAPPI, http://www.happimip.org/). This paper concentrates on the results from the NorESM1-Happi AMIP runs, which are compared to results from a slab-ocean version of the model (NorESM1-HappiSO) designed to emulate the AMIP simulation allowing SST and sea-ice to respond. The paper discusses the Arctic Amplification of the global change signal. The slab-ocean results generally show stronger response than the AMIP results to a global change, such as reduced NH extratropical cyclone activity, and different changes in the occurrence of blocking. A considerable difference in the reduction of sea-ice in the Arctic between a 1.5 °C and a 2.0 °C world is simulated. Ice-free summer conditions in the Arctic is estimated to be very rare for the 1.5 °C case, but to occur 40 % of the time for the 2.0 °C case. These results agree with some fully coupled models, but need to be further confirmed.

scholarly journals Arctic amplification under global warming of 1.5 and 2 °C in NorESM1-Happi

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 569-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lise S. Graff ◽  
Trond Iversen ◽  
Ingo Bethke ◽  
Jens B. Debernard ◽  
Øyvind Seland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Temperature Gradient ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Ocean Model ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Arctic Amplification ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Slab Ocean ◽  
Fully Coupled

Abstract. Differences between a 1.5 and 2.0 ∘C warmer climate than 1850 pre-industrial conditions are investigated using a suite of uncoupled (Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project; AMIP), fully coupled, and slab-ocean experiments performed with Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM1)-Happi, an upgraded version of NorESM1-M. The data from the AMIP-type runs with prescribed sea-surface temperatures (SSTs) and sea ice were provided to a model intercomparison project (HAPPI – Half a degree Additional warming, Prognosis and Projected Impacts; http://www.happimip.org/, last access date: 14 September 2019). This paper compares the AMIP results to those from the fully coupled version and the slab-ocean version of the model (NorESM1-HappiSO) in which SST and sea ice are allowed to respond to the warming, focusing on Arctic amplification of the global change signal. The fully coupled and the slab-ocean runs generally show stronger responses than the AMIP runs in the warmer worlds. The Arctic polar amplification factor is stronger in the fully coupled and slab-ocean runs than in the AMIP runs, both in the 1.5 ∘C warming run and with the additional 0.5 ∘C warming. The low-level Equator-to-pole temperature gradient consistently weakens more between the present-day climate and the 1.5 ∘C warmer climate in the experiments with an active ocean component. The magnitude of the upper-level Equator-to-pole temperature gradient increases in a warmer climate but is not systematically larger in the experiments with an active ocean component. Implications for storm tracks and blocking are investigated. We find considerable reductions in the Arctic sea-ice cover in the slab-ocean model runs; while ice-free summers are rare under 1.5 ∘C warming, they occur 18 % of the time in the 2.0 ∘C warming simulation. The fully coupled model does not, however, reach ice-free conditions as it is too cold and has too much ice in the present-day climate. Differences between the experiments with active ocean and sea-ice models and those with prescribed SSTs and sea ice can be partially due to ocean and sea-ice feedbacks that are neglected in the latter case but can also in part be due to differences in the experimental setup.

scholarly journals Stronger Arctic amplification from ozone-depleting substances than from carbon dioxide

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Chiao Liang ◽  
Lorenzo M. Polvani ◽  
Michael Previdi ◽  
Karen Louise Smith ◽  
Mark R. England ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Montreal Protocol ◽  
Lapse Rate ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Arctic Amplification ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Arctic Warming ◽  
Ozone Depleting Substances

Abstract Arctic amplification (AA) - the greater warming of the Arctic near-surface temperature relative to its global mean value - is a prominent feature of the climate response to increasing greenhouse gases. Recent work has revealed the importance of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) in contributing to Arctic warming and sea-ice loss. Here, using ensembles of climate model integrations, we expand on that work and directly contrast Arctic warming from ODS to that from carbon dioxide (CO$_2$), over the 1955-2005 period when ODS loading peaked. We find that the Arctic warming and sea-ice loss from ODS are slightly more than half (52-59\%) those from CO$_2$. We further show that the strength of AA for ODS is 1.44 times larger than that for CO$_2$, and that this mainly stems from more positive Planck, albedo, lapse-rate, and cloud feedbacks. Our results suggest that AA would be considerably stronger than presently observed had the Montreal Protocol not been signed.

Arctic amplification as a rapid response to increased CO2

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler Janoski ◽  
Michael Previdi ◽  
Gabriel Chiodo ◽  
Karen Smith ◽  
Lorenzo Polvani
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Forced Response ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
Lapse Rate ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Arctic Amplification

<p>Arctic amplification (AA), or enhanced surface warming of the Arctic, is ubiquitous in observations, and in model simulations subjected to increased greenhouse gas (GHG) forcing. Despite its importance, the mechanisms driving AA are not entirely understood. Here, we show that in CMIP5 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5) general circulation models (GCMs), AA develops within a few months following an instantaneous quadrupling of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>. We find that this rapid AA response can be attributed to the lapse rate feedback, which acts to disproportionately warm the Arctic, even before any significant changes in Arctic sea ice occur. Only on longer timescales (beyond the first few months) does the decrease in sea ice become an important contributor to AA via the albedo feedback and increased ocean-to-atmosphere heat flux. An important limitation of our CMIP5 analysis is that internal climate variability is large on the short time scales considered. To overcome this limitation – and thus better isolate the GHG-forced response – we produced a large ensemble (100 members) of instantaneous CO<sub>2</sub>-quadrupling simulations using a single GCM, the NCAR Community Earth System Model (CESM1). In our new CESM1 ensemble we find the same rapid AA response seen in the CMIP5 models, confirming that AA ultimately owes its existence to fast atmospheric processes.</p>

scholarly journals Recent changes in Antarctic Sea Ice

2015 ◽  
Vol 373 (2045) ◽  
pp. 20140163 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Turner ◽  
J. Scott Hosking ◽  
Thomas J. Bracegirdle ◽  
Gareth J. Marshall ◽  
Tony Phillips
Keyword(s):  
Southern Ocean ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Surface Wind ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Intrinsic Variability ◽  
Sea Ice Extent ◽  
Amundsen Sea ◽  
Near Surface

In contrast to the Arctic, total sea ice extent (SIE) across the Southern Ocean has increased since the late 1970s, with the annual mean increasing at a rate of 186×10 3  km 2 per decade (1.5% per decade; p <0.01) for 1979–2013. However, this overall increase masks larger regional variations, most notably an increase (decrease) over the Ross (Amundsen–Bellingshausen) Sea. Sea ice variability results from changes in atmospheric and oceanic conditions, although the former is thought to be more significant, since there is a high correlation between anomalies in the ice concentration and the near-surface wind field. The Southern Ocean SIE trend is dominated by the increase in the Ross Sea sector, where the SIE is significantly correlated with the depth of the Amundsen Sea Low (ASL), which has deepened since 1979. The depth of the ASL is influenced by a number of external factors, including tropical sea surface temperatures, but the low also has a large locally driven intrinsic variability, suggesting that SIE in these areas is especially variable. Many of the current generation of coupled climate models have difficulty in simulating sea ice. However, output from the better-performing IPCC CMIP5 models suggests that the recent increase in Antarctic SIE may be within the bounds of intrinsic/internal variability.

scholarly journals Numerical investigation of the Arctic ice-ocean boundary layer; implications for air-sea gas fluxes

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bigdeli ◽  
B. Loose ◽  
S. T. Cole
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Water Column ◽  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Mixed Layer Depth ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Layer Depth ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Resolution Model ◽  
Simplifying Assumptions ◽  
Vertical Spacing

Abstract. In ice-covered regions it can be challenging to determine air-sea exchange – for heat and momentum, but also for gases like carbon dioxide and methane. The harsh environment and relative data scarcity make it difficult to characterize even the physical properties of the ocean surface. Here, we seek a mechanistic interpretation for the rate of air-sea gas exchange (k) derived from radon-deficits. These require an estimate of the water column history extending 30 days prior to sampling. We used coarse resolution (36 km) regional configuration of the MITgcm with fine near surface vertical spacing (2 m) to evaluate the capability of the model to reproduce conditions prior to sampling. The model is used to estimate sea-ice velocity, concentration and mixed-layer depth experienced by the water column. We then compared the model results to existing field data including satellite, moorings and Ice-tethered profilers. We found that model-derived sea-ice coverage is 88 to 98 % accurate averaged over Beaufort Gyre, sea-ice velocities have 78 % correlation which resulted in 2 km/day error in 30 day trajectory of sea-ice. The model demonstrated the capacity to capture the broad trends in the mixed layer although with a bias and model water velocities showed only 29 % correlation with actual data. Overall, we find the course resolution model to be an inadequate surrogate for sparse data, however the simulation results are a slight improvement over several of the simplifying assumptions that are often made when surface ocean geochemistry, including the use of a constant mixed layer depth and a velocity profile that is purely wind-driven.

scholarly journals Mechanism of Seasonal Arctic Sea Ice Evolution and Arctic Amplification

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwang-Yul Kim ◽  
Benjamin D. Hamlington ◽  
Hanna Na ◽  
Jinju Kim
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Air Temperature ◽  
Surface Air Temperature ◽  
Longwave Radiation ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Turbulent Heat ◽  
Arctic Amplification ◽  
Ice Melting ◽  
Downward Longwave Radiation

Abstract. Sea ice melting is proposed as a primary reason for the Artic amplification, although physical mechanism of the Arctic amplification and its connection with sea ice melting is still in debate. In the present study, monthly ERA-interim reanalysis data are analyzed via cyclostationary empirical orthogonal function analysis to understand the seasonal mechanism of sea ice melting in the Arctic Ocean and the Arctic amplification. While sea ice melting is widespread over much of the perimeter of the Arctic Ocean in summer, sea ice remains to be thin in winter only in the Barents-Kara Seas. Excessive turbulent heat flux through the sea surface exposed to air due to sea ice melting warms the atmospheric column. Warmer air increases the downward longwave radiation and subsequently surface air temperature, which facilitates sea surface remains to be ice free. A 1 % reduction in sea ice concentration in winter leads to ~ 0.76 W m−2 increase in upward heat flux, ~ 0.07 K increase in 850 hPa air temperature, ~ 0.97 W m−2 increase in downward longwave radiation, and ~ 0.26 K increase in surface air temperature. This positive feedback mechanism is not clearly observed in the Laptev, East Siberian, Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas, since sea ice refreezes in late fall (November) before excessive turbulent heat flux is available for warming the atmospheric column in winter. A detailed seasonal heat budget is presented in order to understand specific differences between the Barents-Kara Seas and Laptev, East Siberian, Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas.

scholarly journals Mid-Holocene Northern Hemisphere warming driven by Arctic amplification

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. eaax8203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyo-Seok Park ◽  
Seong-Joong Kim ◽  
Andrew L. Stewart ◽  
Seok-Woo Son ◽  
Kyong-Hwan Seo
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
High Latitude ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Arctic Amplification ◽  
The Holocene ◽  
Holocene Thermal Maximum ◽  
Thermal Maximum

The Holocene thermal maximum was characterized by strong summer solar heating that substantially increased the summertime temperature relative to preindustrial climate. However, the summer warming was compensated by weaker winter insolation, and the annual mean temperature of the Holocene thermal maximum remains ambiguous. Using multimodel mid-Holocene simulations, we show that the annual mean Northern Hemisphere temperature is strongly correlated with the degree of Arctic amplification and sea ice loss. Additional model experiments show that the summer Arctic sea ice loss persists into winter and increases the mid- and high-latitude temperatures. These results are evaluated against four proxy datasets to verify that the annual mean northern high-latitude temperature during the mid-Holocene was warmer than the preindustrial climate, because of the seasonally rectified temperature increase driven by the Arctic amplification. This study offers a resolution to the “Holocene temperature conundrum”, a well-known discrepancy between paleo-proxies and climate model simulations of Holocene thermal maximum.

scholarly journals CMIP5 Projections of Arctic Amplification, of the North American/North Atlantic Circulation, and of Their Relationship

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (13) ◽  
pp. 5254-5271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Barnes ◽  
Lorenzo M. Polvani
Keyword(s):  
North Atlantic ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Arctic Region ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Arctic Amplification ◽  
Arctic Warming ◽  
The North ◽  
Sequence Of Events

Abstract Recent studies have hypothesized that Arctic amplification, the enhanced warming of the Arctic region compared to the rest of the globe, will cause changes in midlatitude weather over the twenty-first century. This study exploits the recently completed phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) and examines 27 state-of-the-art climate models to determine if their projected changes in the midlatitude circulation are consistent with the hypothesized impact of Arctic amplification over North America and the North Atlantic. Under the largest future greenhouse forcing (RCP8.5), it is found that every model, in every season, exhibits Arctic amplification by 2100. At the same time, the projected circulation responses are either opposite in sign to those hypothesized or too widely spread among the models to discern any robust change. However, in a few seasons and for some of the circulation metrics examined, correlations are found between the model spread in Arctic amplification and the model spread in the projected circulation changes. Therefore, while the CMIP5 models offer some evidence that future Arctic warming may be able to modulate some aspects of the midlatitude circulation response in some seasons, the analysis herein leads to the conclusion that the net circulation response in the future is unlikely to be determined solely—or even primarily—by Arctic warming according to the sequence of events recently hypothesized.

scholarly journals The Impact of Regional Arctic Sea Ice Loss on Atmospheric Circulation and the NAO

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 889-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasmus A. Pedersen ◽  
Ivana Cvijanovic ◽  
Peter L. Langen ◽  
Bo M. Vinther
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Atmospheric Circulation ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Ice Cover ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Arctic Sea ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Sea Ice Reduction

Abstract Reduction of the Arctic sea ice cover can affect the atmospheric circulation and thus impact the climate beyond the Arctic. The atmospheric response may, however, vary with the geographical location of sea ice loss. The atmospheric sensitivity to the location of sea ice loss is studied using a general circulation model in a configuration that allows combination of a prescribed sea ice cover and an active mixed layer ocean. This hybrid setup makes it possible to simulate the isolated impact of sea ice loss and provides a more complete response compared to experiments with fixed sea surface temperatures. Three investigated sea ice scenarios with ice loss in different regions all exhibit substantial near-surface warming, which peaks over the area of ice loss. The maximum warming is found during winter, delayed compared to the maximum sea ice reduction. The wintertime response of the midlatitude atmospheric circulation shows a nonuniform sensitivity to the location of sea ice reduction. While all three scenarios exhibit decreased zonal winds related to high-latitude geopotential height increases, the magnitudes and locations of the anomalies vary between the simulations. Investigation of the North Atlantic Oscillation reveals a high sensitivity to the location of the ice loss. The northern center of action exhibits clear shifts in response to the different sea ice reductions. Sea ice loss in the Atlantic and Pacific sectors of the Arctic cause westward and eastward shifts, respectively.

scholarly journals Climate change between the mid and late Holocene in northern high latitudes – Part 2: Model-data comparisons

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 609-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. Zhang ◽  
H. S. Sundqvist ◽  
A. Moberg ◽  
H. Körnich ◽  
J. Nilsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Arctic Region ◽  
Summer Temperature ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
High Latitudes ◽  
Climate Response ◽  
Model Data ◽  
Model Simulations

Abstract. The climate response over northern high latitudes to the mid-Holocene orbital forcing has been investigated in three types of PMIP (Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project) simulations with different complexity of the modelled climate system. By first undertaking model-data comparison, an objective selection method has been applied to evaluate the capability of the climate models to reproduce the spatial response pattern seen in proxy data. The possible feedback mechanisms behind the climate response have been explored based on the selected model simulations. Subsequent model-model comparisons indicate the importance of including the different physical feedbacks in the climate models. The comparisons between the proxy-based reconstructions and the best fit selected simulations show that over the northern high latitudes, summer temperature change follows closely the insolation change and shows a common feature with strong warming over land and relatively weak warming over ocean at 6 ka compared to 0 ka. Furthermore, the sea-ice-albedo positive feedback enhances this response. The reconstructions of temperature show a stronger response to enhanced insolation in the annual mean temperature than winter and summer temperature. This is verified in the model simulations and the behaviour is attributed to the larger contribution from the large response in autumn. Despite a smaller insolation during winter at 6 ka, a pronounced warming centre is found over Barents Sea in winter in the simulations, which is also supported by the nearby northern Eurasian continental and Fennoscandian reconstructions. This indicates that in the Arctic region, the response of the ocean and the sea ice to the enhanced summer insolation is more important for the winter temperature than the synchronous decrease of the insolation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document