scholarly journals Risk Factors for Suicidal Ideation and Self-Harm among Undergraduate Students in a Private University in Ogun State, Nigeria

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 29-42
Author(s):  
Johnson F.A. ◽  
Ogunsanmi L. ◽  
Ayokanmi I.
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Suicidal Ideation ◽  
Young People ◽  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Suicide Ideation ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Intrapersonal Factors ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Point Rating Scale ◽  
Self Harm

Background: Today, the most prevalent and the leading cause of death among young people is suicide. Worldwide, suicide accounts for an estimated 6% of all deaths among young people. The study examined the various risk factors for suicidal ideation and self-harm amongst Babcock University undergraduates. Method: Descriptive survey research design was utilized with a multistage sampling technique to select 398 undergraduates. The instrument for data collection was a semi-structured questionnaire that sought information on the environmental, social, and intrapersonal factors influencing suicide ideation and self-harm. Results were presented via means and percentages for descriptive statistics; correlation and regression were used to determine the associations between suicidal ideation and the risk factors. Ethical clearance was sought from Babcock University Health Research Ethics Committee. Results: The distribution of participants showed that 46.0% (183) were males while 54.0% (215) were females. Environmental factors influencing suicidal ideation were computed and measured on a 21-point rating scale with a mean ± SD of 13.38±3.458. The respondents' mean ± SD for the social factors measured on a 27-point rating scale was 17.15±5.772. Correlation analysis showed that suicide ideation had a statistically significant relationship with gender (p<0.01), parents' spousal relationship (p<0.01), environmental (p<0.01), social (p<0.01), and intrapersonal factors (p<0.01). Self-harm had a significant relationship with parents' relationship (p<0.01), environmental (p<0.01), social (p<0.01) and intrapersonal factors (p<0.01). However, the practice of self-harm was not different across the two genders (p = 0.170). Conclusion: Suicidal behaviors have been seen to be a serious public health concern. The prevention and intervention programs of suicide and self-harm should consider the particular characteristics of adolescent suicide and self-harm. This should include social transmission and recognition of mental health disorders.

scholarly journals Examining risk factors for self-harm and suicide in LGBTQ+ young people: a systematic review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e031541
Author(s):  
A Jess Williams ◽  
Jon Arcelus ◽  
Ellen Townsend ◽  
Maria Michail
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Suicidal Ideation ◽  
Young People ◽  
Suicide Ideation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Self Harm ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal

IntroductionYoung people who identify as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer or Questioning (LGBTQ+) are at increased risk for self-harm, suicide ideation and behaviours. However, there has yet to be a comprehensive understanding of what risk factors influence these behaviours within LGBTQ+ young people as a whole. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine risk factors associated with self-harm, suicidal ideation and behaviour in LGBTQ+) young people.Methods and analysisA systematic review will be conducted, conforming to the reporting guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement recommendations. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Web of Science) will be systematically searched for cross-sectional, prospective, longitudinal, cohort and case–control designs which examine risk factors for self-harm and/or suicidal ideation and behaviour in LGBTQ+ young people (aged 12–25 years). Only studies published in English will be included. No date restrictions will be applied. Study quality assessment will be conducted using the original and modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scales. Meta-analysis or narrative synthesis will be used, dependent on findings.Ethics and disseminationThis is a systematic review of published literature and thereby ethical approval was not sought. The review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal, be publicly disseminated at conferences focusing on mental health, self-harm and suicide prevention. The findings will also be shared through public engagement and involvement, particularly those related to young LGBTQ+ individuals.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019130037.

Attachment Organization in Suicide Prevention Research

Crisis ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Venta ◽  
Carla Sharp
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Suicidal Ideation ◽  
Suicide Attempt ◽  
Interpersonal Relationships ◽  
Suicide Ideation ◽  
Suicide Attempts ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Self Harm

Background: Identifying risk factors for suicide-related thoughts and behaviors (SRTB) is essential among adolescents in whom SRTB remain a leading cause of death. Although many risk factors have already been identified, influential theories now suggest that the domain of interpersonal relationships may play a critical role in the emergence of SRTB. Because attachment has long been seen as the foundation of interpersonal functioning, we suggest that attachment insecurity warrants attention as a risk factor for SRTB. Aims: This study sought to explore relations between attachment organization and suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and self-harm in an inpatient adolescent sample, controlling for demographic and psychopathological covariates. Method: We recruited 194 adolescents from an inpatient unit and assigned them to one of four attachment groups (secure, preoccupied, dismissing, or disorganized attachment). Interview and self-report measures were used to create four variables reflecting the presence or absence of suicidal ideation in the last year, single lifetime suicide attempt, multiple lifetime suicide attempts, and lifetime self-harm. Results: Chi-square and regression analyses did not reveal significant relations between attachment organization and SRTB, although findings did confirm previously established relations between psychopathology and SRTB, such that internalizing disorder was associated with increased self-harm, suicide ideation, and suicide attempt and externalizing disorder was associated with increased self-harm. Conclusion: The severity of this sample and methodological differences from previous studies may explain the nonsignificant findings. Nonsignificant findings may indicate that the relation between attachment organization and SRTB is moderated by other factors that should be explored in future research.

scholarly journals Factors in the Assessment of Suicidality in Youth

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Posner ◽  
Glenn A. Melvin ◽  
Barbara Stanley ◽  
Maria A. Oquendo ◽  
Madelyn Gould
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Suicidal Ideation ◽  
Young People ◽  
Cause Of Death ◽  
Suicidal Behavior ◽  
Suicide Ideation ◽  
Youth Suicide ◽  
Standardized Terminology ◽  
And Behavior ◽  
Clinical Populations

ABSTRACTSuicide remains a leading cause of death among youth, and suicide ideation and behavior are relatively common in both normal and clinical populations. Clinicians working with young people must assess for the presence of suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, and other risk factors, in order to determine the level of risk. This paper provides the clinician with a summary of risk factors for youth suicide, as well as providing standardized terminology to enhance assessment of suicidal ideation and behavior.

scholarly journals An Exploratory Cohort Study of the Association Between the Level of Testosterone and Suicidal Ideation in the Hospitalized Adolescent Female With Depression in China

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Liu ◽  
Shaohua Wang ◽  
Chuang Xue ◽  
Xiwen Hu ◽  
Guoling Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Suicidal Ideation ◽  
Suicide Attempt ◽  
Suicidal Behavior ◽  
Suicide Ideation ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Female Adolescent ◽  
Adolescent Female

Abstract BackgroundTo date, around 4 per 100, 000 adolescent committed suicide within the 29 OECD countries. The suicidal behavior is related to psychological factors, genetics, neurobiology, and other biomarkers. We aimed to investigate the risk factors for the suicidal ideation, especially the association between suicide ideation and different levels of testosterone in the adolescent female with depression. The goal of this study is to aid the development of strategies to intervene the suicidal behavior for the depressed female adolescent. MethodIn this single center, prospective cohort study, we enrolled adolescent female with depression. We collected baseline demographic data, age adjusted level of testosterone, Symptom Self-rating Scale, and information about the suicidal ideation, non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), and suicide attempt. We used multivariate logistic regression to determine the risk factors for the suicidal ideation. ResultsTotal 113 hospitalized adolescent female enrolled with a mean age of 13.5 (1.20). Among these patients, there were 86 (76.1%) subjects suffered from the suicidal ideation, while 59 (52.2%) of them had NSSI and 23 (20.4%) had suicide attempt behavior. In the final model, higher level of testosterone (p = 0.04) and higher age (p = 0.02) were associated with the higher odds of having suicidal ideation.ConclusionIn this exploratory cohort study, suicidal ideation was prevalent. It is important to assess the level of testosterone in the adolescent female with depression. This study is consistent with the other studies. It shows the age is a potential predictor for the suicidal ideation in the hospitalized adolescent female with depression.

scholarly journals Predicting suicide following self-harm: systematic review of risk factors and risk scales

2016 ◽  
Vol 209 (4) ◽  
pp. 277-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa K. Y. Chan ◽  
Henna Bhatti ◽  
Nick Meader ◽  
Sarah Stockton ◽  
Jonathan Evans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Suicide Ideation ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mental Healthcare ◽  
Sufficient Evidence ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Self Harm ◽  
The Individual

BackgroundPeople with a history of self-harm are at a far greater risk of suicide than the general population. However, the relationship between self-harm and suicide is complex.AimsTo undertake the first systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies of risk factors and risk assessment scales to predict suicide following self-harm.MethodWe conducted a search for prospective cohort studies of populations who had self-harmed. For the review of risk scales we also included studies examining the risk of suicide in people under specialist mental healthcare, in order to broaden the scope of the review and increase the number of studies considered. Differences in predictive accuracy between populations were examined where applicable.ResultsTwelve studies on risk factors and 7 studies on risk scales were included. Four risk factors emerged from the metaanalysis, with robust effect sizes that showed little change when adjusted for important potential confounders. These included: previous episodes of self-harm (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.68, 95% CI 1.38–2.05, K = 4), suicidal intent (HR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.91–3.81, K = 3), physical health problems (HR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.16–3.43, K = 3) and male gender (HR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.70–2.46, K = 5). The included studies evaluated only three risk scales (Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS), Suicide Intent Scale (SIS) and Scale for Suicide Ideation). Where meta-analyses were possible (BHS, SIS), the analysis was based on sparse data and a high heterogeneity was observed. The positive predictive values ranged from 1.3 to 16.7%.ConclusionsThe four risk factors that emerged, although of interest, are unlikely to be of much practical use because they are comparatively common in clinical populations. No scales have sufficient evidence to support their use. The use of these scales, or an over-reliance on the identification of risk factors in clinical practice, may provide false reassurance and is, therefore, potentially dangerous. Comprehensive psychosocial assessments of the risks and needs that are specific to the individual should be central to the management of people who have self-harmed.

scholarly journals Risk factors for suicidality in Huntington disease

Neurology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 92 (14) ◽  
pp. e1643-e1651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew McGarry ◽  
Michael P. McDermott ◽  
Karl Kieburtz ◽  
Wai Lun Alan Fung ◽  
Elizabeth McCusker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Suicidal Ideation ◽  
Suicide Attempt ◽  
Huntington Disease ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Cag Repeat ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Outcome Variable ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial

ObjectiveMost suicidality literature in Huntington disease (HD) is based on natural history studies or retrospective reviews, but reports on risk factors from clinical trials are limited.MethodsWe analyzed 609 participants from 2CARE, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with up to 5 years of follow-up, for risk factors related to suicidality. The primary outcome variable was the time from randomization until the first occurrence of either suicidal ideation or attempt. We also considered time from randomization until the first suicide attempt as a secondary outcome variable.ResultsDepression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, antidepressant or anxiolytic use, and prior suicide attempt at baseline were associated with time to ideation or attempt. Baseline employment status, marital status, CAG repeat length, tetrabenazine use, and treatment assignment (coenzyme Q10 or placebo) were not associated with suicidality. Time-dependent variables from the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale Behavioral Assessment were associated with time to suicidal ideation or attempt, driven mainly by items related to depressed mood, low self-esteem/guilt, anxiety, suicidal thoughts, irritability, and compulsions. Variables associated with time to suicide attempt alone were generally similar.ConclusionThese data suggest psychiatric comorbidities in HD are predictive of suicidal behavior while participating in clinical trials, reinforcing the importance of clinical surveillance and treatment towards lessening risk during participation and perhaps beyond. Designing a composite algorithm for early prediction of suicide attempts in HD may be of value, particularly given anticipated trials aimed at disease modification are likely to be long-term.Clinicaltrials.gov identifierNCT00608881.

The Effects of Suicide Ideation Assessments on Urges to Self-Harm and Suicide

Crisis ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahel Eynan ◽  
Yvonne Bergmans ◽  
Jesmin Antony ◽  
John R. Cutcliffe ◽  
Henry G. Harder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Suicidal Ideation ◽  
Suicide Risk ◽  
Suicide Ideation ◽  
Psychiatric Service ◽  
Exclusion Criterion ◽  
Primary Concern ◽  
Assessment Protocol ◽  
Self Harm ◽  
Study Participants

Background: Participants’ safety is the primary concern when conducting research with suicidal or potentially suicidal participants. The presence of suicide risk is often an exclusion criterion for research participants. Subsequently, few studies have examined the effects of research assessments on study participants’ suicidality. Aims: The purpose of this research was to examine the patterns of postassessment changes in self-harm and suicide urges of study participants who were recently discharged from an inpatient psychiatric service. Method: Study participants (N = 120) were recruited from patients with a lifetime history of suicidal behavior admitted with current suicidal ideation or suicide attempt to an inpatient psychiatric service and/or a crisis stabilization unit. Participants were assessed for suicidal ideation with the Suicide Ideation Scale at 1, 3, and 6 months following their discharge from hospital. The risk assessment protocol was administered at the start and at the end of each of the study follow-up assessments. Results: Changes in self-harm and suicide urges following study assessments were small, infrequent, and were most likely to reflect a decrease in suicidality. Similarly, participants rarely reported worsening self-control over suicidal urges, and when they did, the effect was minimal. By the end of the 6-month follow-up period, increases in self-harm and suicidal urges postassessment were not seen. Conclusion: The inclusion of suicidal participants in research interviews rarely increased suicide risk. Research involving suicidal individuals is possible when study protocols are well planned and executed by trained assessors and clinicians who are able to identify participants at risk and provide intervention if necessary. The few participants that required intervention had high levels of suicide ideation and behavior at baseline and almost all reported symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. Further study is needed to better characterize this subgroup of participants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document