Studies across subspecialties of neurology (SON) report noninferiority of telemedicine (TM) compared with face-to-face intervention (FTF-I)
Background: Studies across subspecialties of neurology (SON) report noninferiority of telemedicine (TM) compared with face-to-face intervention (FTF-I). Clinical scales (CS) are important tools for outcome measures in clinical care. However, which CS in FTF-I can be used in teleneurology is unclear. Objectives: Define the most used CS in studies comparing TM with FTF-I in different SON. Design and Setting/Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase for randomized controlled trials, published from 2011 to April 2021, with Key words ‘’telemedicine’’ cross-referenced with ‘’neurology’’ or neurological diseases, considering the synonyms. Results: 43 eligible studies in 400 records, from 12 countries, with 5600 patients and 8 SON: stroke (10), headache (4), epilepsy (6), cognitive disorders (7), demyelinating diseases (8), movement disorders (3), neuromuscular diseases (3), and vestibular diseases (2). The most used CS: National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) for stroke impairment and limitation; Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) and Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) for headache disability; Quality Of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOL-31) for seizure burden; Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) and Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) for cognitive function and caregiver burden in dementia care; Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) for disability and fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis; Parkinson’s disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) and Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) for QOL and disability in PD; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) for severity in ALS; and Vertigo Symptom Scale Short form (VSS-SF) for vertigo. Conclusions: We present feasible CS usually applied in teleneurology that can be used as important tools for future findings in TM research and practice.