scholarly journals Cancellation of Deed of Sale and Purchase Agreement Made Before Notary Public (Study at Notary Office of West Nusa Tenggara Province)

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Notary Public

Examination of notarized photocopy of a document on the example of свидительства o рождении (birth certificate)

2020 ◽  
Vol 310 ◽  
pp. 58-66
Author(s):  
Jacek Juszkiewicz ◽  
◽  
Judyta Malewska ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Expert Witness ◽  
Birth Certificate ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Notary Public

This article attempts to address certain aspects of forensic-legal examination of the authenticity of a document on the basis of a notarized photocopy (certified copy). The article outlines the essence of the notarial act – regulated in Article 98 of the Polish Notary Public Law – of certifying the conformity of a copy, extract or photocopy with a presented document and the dangers that may arise from regarding a notarized photocopy of a presented document as a photocopy of an authentic document. The role of the notary in terms of document authenticity verification has been signaled. From a forensic point of view, the lack of evidentiary equivalence between an original document and a certified photocopy in the process of testing the authenticity of a document was emphasized. Based on examples from the practice of an expert witness, the possibility of identifying a forgery on the basis of a notarized photocopy of a document свидительствo o рождении is presented. The authors attempt to formulate several postulates concerning the making of photocopies of documents and their subsequent notarization.

scholarly journals Kekuatan Hukum Pelekatan Sidik Jari Penghadap Oleh Notaris Pada Minuta Akta

Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 436
Author(s):  
Wulan Wiryantari Dewi ◽  
Ibrahim R
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
The People ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
Legal Consequences

The notary's role is to provide legal protection to the people who use his services. The presence of a Notary is indispensable for the community concerned to hold a legal relationship with other individuals so that the Notary may also be liable. In the provisions of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter c of the Amendment Law, it is stipulated that in carrying out his position, the Notary is required to attach fingerprints on the minutes of the deed, giving rise to various polemics, because the said provisions do not stipulate further if in this case the smoker suffers from finger defects or events that result in damage to fingerprints which makes the investigator unable to put his fingerprint. The purpose of this research is to find out how the efforts that can be done by a notary against those who are unable to put fingerprints and the legal consequences of the absence of fingerprints against the strength of the deed. This research is a type of normative legal research. The results of this study indicate that efforts can be made by a notary if there are those who suffer from finger defects or experience events that cause fingerprint damage so that they cannot attach their fingerprints to the minutes of the deed, the relevant Notary can explain the matter at the end of the deed. he made it because the fingerprints attached to the address are an act that is required to a notary that can lead to administrative sanctions as contained in the Amendment Law. Due to the legal absence of fingerprints attached to the strength of the deed that is the deed made by the relevant Notary Public remains an authentic deed even though the fingerprints of the tappers are not attached based on Article 1869 of the Civil Code and the deed is valid and legally binding as long as the provisions contained in Article 1320 are fulfilled Civil Code.

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN NOTARIS YANG MEMILIKI JABATAN STRUKTURAL DI PERGURUAN TINGGI

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Roosalina Kartini ◽  
Rusdianto Sesung
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcome ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Master Program ◽  
Structural Position ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
The University ◽  
Educational Agency

AbstractCharacteristic of Notarial as an esoteric science brings consequence which makes this science cannot be taught to person who does not possess knowledge within this field.  In order to produce high quality candidates of notary public, Some University as educational agency of notarial science provides structural position for notarial practitioner to become lecturer in Notarial Master Program at the University. This approach is conducted to adjust between learning curriculum of notarial science and learning outcome of the graduates as notary public. But this approach is obstructed with rules that are enacted in Regulation of Notary Public (Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris) which prohibit notary public to hold double positions as lecturer coupled with practitioner. Keywords: Notary Public, Double Positions, Structural Position. AbstrakKarakteristik ilmu Kenotariatan sebagai ilmu yang esoterik membawa konsekuensi bahwa ilmu tersebut tidak bisa diajarkan oleh orang yang tidak memahami seluk beluk dunia kenotariatan. Demi menghasilkan calon Notaris yang berkualitas beberapa Perguruan Tinggi penyelenggara program Magister Kenotariatan memberikan jabatan struktural kepada praktisi Notaris yang menjadi Dosen pengajar di Perguruan Tinggi tersebut agar mampu menyesuaikan kurikulum pembelajaran dengan kebutuhan praktek nantinya. Kondisi tersebut dihadapkan dengan ketentuan dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris yang mengatur larangan rangkap Jabatan Notaris. Kata kunci : Notaris, Rangkan Jabatan, Jabatan Struktural

scholarly journals THE INSURANCE OF LIABILITY AS AN ATTEMPT OF RISK TRANSFERING OVER THE LOSS CAUSED BY NOTARY PULIC AND LAND DEED OFFICIALS

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 194
Author(s):  
Ghansham Anand ◽  
Agus Yudha Hernoko ◽  
Mokhamad Khoirul Huda
Keyword(s):  
Public Officials ◽  
Public Insurance ◽  
Professional Liability ◽  
Injured Party ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Court Proceeding

<p>This study primarily aimed to identify the type of insurance of liabilities as an attempt of risk transferring over the loss caused by the notary public and land deed officials. The method of this study was juridical-normative. The result showed that the notary public and land deed officials (PPAT) were both public officials authorized to establish an authentic deed due to clients’ requests. Any violation or negligence by Notary public and land deed officials that was out of the track of legal law might lead the clients into a disadvantageous situation. Such violation or negligence made the established deed null and void, void-able, or even turned into an private deed. This brought an effect to the client as the injured party, and thus, they might file a lawsuit in case of suing for compensation, indemnification, and interest through court proceeding.  Therefore, it needed an agency of risk-transfering in the form of insurance. The insurance of professional liability is a product of public insurance taking-over a risk that is supposed to be charged by the Notary Public and Land Deed Officials. The object of this insurance refers to the insurer’s obligation to pay compensation over particular loss the client has suffered and other expenses due to the risk.</p>

scholarly journals Imunitas Hukum Bagi Notaris Yang Membuka Rahasia Jabatan

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Rita Permanasari ◽  
Akhmad Khisni
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Political ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Law Regulation

ABSTRAKKetentuan Pasal 4 dan Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf f Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris mewajibkan notaris untuk menjaga kerahasiaan segala sesuatu mengenai akta yang dibuatnya dan segala keterangan yang diperoleh guna pembuatan akta sesuai dengan sumpah janji jabatan kecuali undang-undang menentukan lain. Kemungkinan terhadap pelanggaran kewajiban tersebut berdasarkan Pasal 16 ayat (11) Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, seorang notaris dapat dikenai sanksi berupa teguran lisan sampai dengan pemberhentian dengan tidak hormat. Terlebih lagi dengan adanya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia dengan Nomor: 49/PUU–X/2012 memutuskan telah meniadakan atau mengakhiri kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD) yang tercantum dalam Pasal 66 ayat (1) UUJN membuat notaris seakan-akan tidak ada perlindungan hukum bagi notaris dalam menjalankan tugas jabatannya. Ikatan Notaris Indonesia (INI) harus berusaha menjalankan peranan pembinaan dan perlindungan meningkatkan pengetahuan, kemampuan dan keterampilan para notaris. Demikian juga menjalin hubungan dengan para penegak hukum lainnya, agar penegak hukum lainnya yang ada hubungan dengan notaris dapat memahami kedudukan notaris sesuai UUJN.Berangkat dari pemikiran inilah kewajiban ingkar notaris masih tetap dipertahankan oleh pembuat undang-undang dalam revisi Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Tahun 2014 yang merupakan konfigurasi kekuatan perlindungan terhadap profesi dan jabatan notaris dari sisi politik.Kata Kunci : Jabatan Notaris, Hak Ingkar, Perlindungan Hukum.ABSTRACTThe provisions of Article 4 and Article 16 paragraph (1) sub-paragraph f of the Notary's Office Law require a notary to maintain the confidentiality of all matters concerning the deeds it has made and all the information obtained for the deed in accordance with the oath of pledge of office except the law otherwise. The possibility of breach of such obligation under Article 16 paragraph (11) of Notary Law Regulation, a notary public may be subject to sanctions in the form of oral reprimands until dismissal with disrespect. Moreover, with the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia with the number : 49 /PUU-X/2012 deciding to have canceled or terminated the authority of the Regional Supervisory Board (MPD) listed in Article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN made a notary as if there was no legal protection for a notary in performing duties. The Indonesian Notary Bond (INI) should endeavor to undertake the role of guidance and protection to increase the knowledge, abilities and skills of the notaries. Likewise establish relationships with other law enforcers, so that other law enforcement who has relationship with the notary can understand the position of notary under the UUJN.Departing from this thought the obligation of notarization is still maintained by the lawmakers in the revision of the Law Regulation of Position Notary on Year 2014 which is the configuration of the strength of the protection of the profession and the notary's position from the political side.Keyword : Position of Notary, Right of Remedy, Legal Protection.

scholarly journals Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik Berkaitan Dengan Kontrak Kerjasama

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Maslikan Maslikan ◽  
Sukarmi Sukarmi
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Business Entities

AbstrakDalam pasal 1 ayat (1) UU No 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris, Notaris  adalah pejabat umum yang berwenang untuk membuat akta otentik dan kewenangan lainnya sebagaimana dimaksud dalam undang-undang ini. Salah satu kewenangan notaris adalah membuat akta otentik, dimana hal tersebut sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam pasal 15 UU No 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.Hal ini penulis mencoba menelaah kewenangan notaris dalam pembuatan akta otentik berkaitan dengan kontrak kerjasama.Peneitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normative, dimana pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual.Akta-akta yang dibuat oleh Notaris misalnya pedirian Perseroan Terbatas (PT), perubahan dan risalah umum pemegang saham, pendirian yayasan, pendirian bahan usaha-badan usaha lainnya, kuasa untuk menjual, perjanjian sewa menyewa, perjanjian jual beli, keterangan hak waris, wasiat, pendirian CV termasuk perubahannya, pengakuan utang, perjanjian kredit dan dan pemberian hak tanggungan, perjanjian kerjasama, kontrak kerja, segala bentuk perjanjian yang tidak dikecualikan kepada pejabat lain, oleh sebab itu akta yang berkaitan dengan kontrak kerjasama mutlak merupakan wewenang oleh sorang Notaris untuk membuat akta otentik tersebutKata Kunci : kewenangan notaris, akta otentik, kontrak kerjasama AbstractIn article 1 paragraph (1) of Law No 30 Year 2004 concerning Notary Public, Notary is a public official authorized to make authentic deed and other authority as referred to in this law. One of the authority of a notary is to make an authentic deed, which is in accordance with the provisions of Article 15 of Law No 30 Year 2004 regarding Notary Position.This author tries to examine the authority of notary in making authentic deed related to cooperation contract. This research uses normative law research method, where the research approach used is the approach of legislation and conceptual approach.Notarial deeds made by a Notary, such as the establishment of a Limited Liability Company (PT), general shareholder changes and minutes, establishment of foundations, establishment of materials of other business entities, authorization to sell, lease agreements, sale and purchase agreements, inheritance rights, , the establishment of the CV including amendments, recognition of debts, credit agreements and the granting of mortgages, cooperation agreements, contracts of employment, all forms of agreements not excluded to other officials, therefore deeds relating to the contract of cooperation are absolutely authorized by a Notary to make the authentic deedKeywords: notary authority, authentic deed, cooperation contract

scholarly journals Peran Notaris Dalam Transaksi Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Lokasi Pembangunan Komplek Perkantoran Pemerintah Kabupaten Sekadau

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 234
Author(s):  
Mochamad Elmo Sidiq ◽  
Amin Purnawan
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Development Site ◽  
Notary Public

ABSTRAKProblematik penelitian ini adalah : Apa dasar hukum  Peran Notaris dalam Transaksi Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Lokasi Pembangunan Komplek Perkantoran Pemerintah Kabupaten Sekadau? apa peran Notaris  Dalam Transaksi Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Lokasi Pembangunan Komplek Perkantoran Pemerintah Kabupaten Sekadau? dan apa akibat hambatan hukum atas Peran Notaris dalam Transaksi Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Lokasi Pembangunan Komplek Perkantoran Pemerintah Kabupaten Sekadau?Penelitian ini adalah dengan pendekatan yuridis-empiris yang bersumber dari pengumpulan data yang diperoleh dari data primer dan data sekunder, kemudian dianalisis dengan metode analisis kualitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah teknik wawancara. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis data kualitatif.Hasil temuan peneliti menunjukkan bahwa Dasar hukum Notaris dan/atau PPAT dalam pertanahan, didasarkan pada Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris dan Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor : 1 Tahun 2006 tentang Ketentuan Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor : 37 Tahun 1998 tentang Peraturan Jabatan Pejabat Pembuatan Akta Tanah. Keputusan Presiden Nomor 55 Tahun 1993 maupun Peraturan Presiden Nomor 65 Tahun 2006, peralihan hak atas tanah tersebut dapat dilakukan melalui/dihadapan Notaris dan/atau PPAT. Peran nyata keterlibatan notaris dalam pembangunan komplek kantor Pemerintah Kabupaten Sekadau adalah pembuatan Akta Notaris Nomor 9 tanggal 06 Juli 2005 tentang Surat Perjanjian Pelepasan Hak atas Tanah di antara PT Sinar Bintang Sakti dan Pemda Kabupaten Sekadau dan Pembuatan Akta Notaris No. 10 tanggal 06 Juli 2005 tentang surat Pengakuan hutang yang pada pokoknya Pemkab Sekadau mengakui mempunyai hutang kepada CHAN INDRA, dengan jaminan tanah yang telah diterima pelepasan hak atas tanah dari CHAN INDRA selaku Direktur PT. Sinar Bintang Sakti. Perdebatan Notaris berwenang untuk membuat akta yang berkaitan dengan akta-akta pertanahan mengakibatkan keraguan mengenai keabsahan terhadap akta notaris yang terdapat dalam proyek pembangunan perkantoran di Pemerintah Kabupaten Sekadau.Kata Kunci : Notaris, Pengadaan Tanah, Kabupaten Sekadau. ABSTRACTIn relation to the authority of Notary, as mentioned in UUJN Number 30 Year2004 jo Law Number 2 Year 2014, Article 15 paragraph (2) letter (f), that Notary has authority to make deed related to land.The problematic of this research is: What is the legal basis of Notary's Role in Transaction of Land Procurement For Development Site of Sekadau Regency Government Complex  what is the role of Notary In Transaction of Land Procurement For Development Site of Sekadau Regency Government Complex ?; and what are the consequences of the legal barrier to the Notary's Role in the Land Acquisition Transaction for the Location of the Sekadau Regency Government Complex ?This research is with juridical-empirical approach that comes from collecting data obtained from primary data and secondary data, then analyzed by qualitative analysis method. Data collection techniques used are interview techniques. Data analysis techniques used qualitative data analysis.The findings of the researcher indicate that the legal basis of Notary and / or PPAT in the land is based on Law Number 30 Year 2004 regarding Notary Position and Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency Number 1 Year 2006 regarding Provisions on Implementation of Government Regulation Number 37 Year 1998 on the Regulation of Officials of the Establishment of Deed of Land. Presidential Decree No. 55/1993 and Presidential Regulation No. 65/2006, the transfer of land rights can be done through / in the presence of a Notary and / or PPAT. The real role of notary involvement in the construction of the Sekadau District Government office complex is the making of Notarial Deed No. 9 dated July 6, 2005 concerning Letter of Agreement on the Release of Land Rights between PT Sinar Bintang Sakti and the Regional Government of Sekadau Regency and the Notarial Deed. 10 dated July 6, 2005, concerning letters of recognition of debt principally Pemkab Sekadau acknowledged to have a debt to CHAN INDRA, with guaranteed land that has been received the release of land rights from CHAN INDRA as Director of PT. Sinar Bintang Sakti. The debate of a Notary is authorized to make deeds relating to land deeds lead to doubts about the validity of the notarial deed contained in office building projects in the Sekadau District Government.Suggestions to lawmakers to anticipate differences in legal interpretation in the future, it is recommended that both Law No. 30 of 2004 in conjunction with Law Number 2 Year 2014 on UUJN and the Notary Profession Code of Ethics, to strengthen the explanation of legislation has been compiled.Keywords : Notary Public, Land Procurement, Sekadau District.

scholarly journals Islamic Justice Perspective On Notary The Perpetrators Criminal Action

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Ira Alia Maerani
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Islamic Perspective ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

This study aims to find out to know the form of violations and witnesses to the notary position based on Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary and the perspective of Islamic justice in viewing a notary who is indicated to have committed a crime in connection with an authentic deed he made.            This research uses normative law research or dogmatic law research using the doctrinal method. Normative legal research includes research on legal principles, research on legal systematics, research on vertical and horizontal synchronization stages, comparison of law and legal history.            This research concludes that the notary public is a public official who makes an authentic deed and has the authority as regulated in Article 15,16, 17 of Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary Public. The notary is obliged to act on trust; honest; independent; objective and safeguard the interests of parties involved in legal actions. Notaries in carrying out their duties and positions if convicted of violations, may be subject to sanctions or sanctions in the form of civil, administrative, and notary code of ethics in accordance with Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary Positions. Even so, the Notary Position Law does not regulate criminal sanctions against Notaries. Whereas in practice there is an opportunity for a legal action or violation by a notary related to an authentic deed he made that can be qualified as a criminal offense. A notary who is indicated to have committed a crime in carrying out his authority as a Public Official, of course, must be a concern of the government and law enforcement because the law must be upheld against anyone who commits indiscriminate violations. This rule is a manifestation of the principle of "equality before the law" (equality before the law) which is a fundamental element in the concept of the rule of law. Honesty values; keep the mandate; fair; and this objective is synergistic with the values of justice in an Islamic perspective that promotes justice and problems. Described in the Qur'an An-Nisa verses 58 and 135 and QS. Al Ma'idah verse 8. Islamic law also regulates justice in recording a deed, for example just in recording accounts receivable debts (Q.S. Al Baqoroh: 282)Keywords: Islamic Perspective; Justice; Notary Public; Perpetrators; Criminal Act

scholarly journals Prohibition of interrogation of notaries as witnesses in criminal proceedings

1970 ◽  
pp. 345-349
Author(s):  
Ulyana Polyak
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Made In

The current criminal procedure law of Ukraine stipulates that a witness is obliged to give a true testimony during pre-trial investigation and trial, however, the legislator made an exception for this by specifying the categories of persons who have been granted immunity from immunity, ie they are released by law. testify. The article deals with the problems of law and practice regarding the prohibition of the interrogation of a notary as a witness in criminal proceedings and the release of him from the obligation to keep the notarial secret by the person who entrusted him with the information which is the subject of this secret. The notion of notarial secrecy is proposed to be changed, since the subject of this secrecy is not only information that became known to the notary public from the interested person, but also those information that the notary received from other sources in the performance of their professional duties, as well as the procedural activity of the notary himself, is aimed at achieving a certain legal result. The proposal made in the legal literature to supplement the CPC of Ukraine with the provisions that a notary is subject to interrogation as a witness on information that constitutes a notarial secret, if the notarial acts were declared illegal in accordance with the procedure established by law The proposal to increase the list of persons who are not subject to interrogation as witnesses about the information constituting a notarial secret is substantiated, this clause is proposed to be supplemented by provisions that, apart from the notary, are not notarized, other notarials, notaries as well as the persons mentioned in Part 3 of Art. 8 of the Law of Ukraine "On Notary". Amendments to the current CPC of Ukraine by the amendments proposed in this publication will significantly improve the law prohibiting the interrogation of a notary as a witness in criminal proceedings, as well as improve certain theoretical provisions of the institute of witness immunity in criminal proceedings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document