Seven Mysteries of LAG-3: A Multi-faceted Immune Receptor of Increasing Complexity

Despite three decades of research to its name and increasing interest in immunotherapies which target it, LAG-3 remains an elusive co-inhibitory receptor in comparison to the well-established PD-1 and CTLA-4. As such, LAG-3 targeting therapies have yet to achieve the clinical success of therapies targeting other checkpoints. This could, in part, be attributed to the many unanswered questions that remain regarding LAG-3 biology. Of these, we (i) the function of the many LAG-3:ligand interactions; (ii) the hurdles that remain to acquire a high resolution structure of LAG-3; (iii) the under-studied LAG-3 signal transduction mechanism; (iv) the elusive soluble form of LAG-3; (v) the implications of the lack of (significant) phenotype of LAG-3 knockout mice; (vi) the reports of LAG-3 expression on epithelium and (vii) the conflicting reports of LAG-3 expression (and potential contributions to pathology) in the brain. These mysteries which surround LAG-3 highlight how the ever-evolving study of its biology continues to reveal ever-increasing complexity in its role as an immune receptor. Importantly, answering the questions which shroud LAG-3 in mystery will allow maximum therapeutic benefit of LAG-3 targeting immunotherapies in cancer, autoimmunity and beyond.

LRRC15 is an inhibitory receptor blocking SARS-CoV-2 spike-mediated entry in trans

SARS-CoV-2 infection is mediated by the entry receptor ACE2. Although attachment factors and co-receptors facilitating entry are extensively studied, cellular entry factors inhibiting viral entry are largely unknown. Using a surfaceome CRISPR activation screen, we identified human LRRC15 as an inhibitory receptor for SARS-CoV-2 entry. LRRC15 directly binds to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of spike protein with a moderate affinity and inhibits spike-mediated entry. Analysis of human lung single cell RNA sequencing dataset reveals that expression of LRRC15 is primarily detected in fibroblasts and particularly enriched in pathological fibroblasts in COVID-19 patients. ACE2 and LRRC15 are not co-expressed in the same cell types in the lung. Strikingly, expression of LRRC15 in ACE2-negative cells blocks spike-mediated viral entry in ACE2+ cell in trans, suggesting a protective role of LRRC15 in a physiological context. Therefore, LRRC15 represents an inhibitory receptor for SARS-CoV-2 regulating viral entry in trans.

Siglec-9 defines and restrains a natural killer subpopulation highly cytotoxic to HIV-infected cells

Siglec-9 is an MHC-independent inhibitory receptor expressed on a subset of natural killer (NK) cells. Siglec-9 restrains NK cytotoxicity by binding to sialoglycans (sialic acid-containing glycans) on target cells. Despite the importance of Siglec-9 interactions in tumor immune evasion, their role as an immune evasion mechanism during HIV infection has not been investigated. Using in vivo phenotypic analyses, we found that Siglec-9+ CD56dim NK cells, during HIV infection, exhibit an activated phenotype with higher expression of activating receptors and markers (NKp30, CD38, CD16, DNAM-1, perforin) and lower expression of the inhibitory receptor NKG2A, compared to Siglec-9- CD56dim NK cells. We also found that levels of Siglec-9+ CD56dim NK cells inversely correlate with viral load during viremic infection and CD4+ T cell-associated HIV DNA during suppressed infection. Using in vitro cytotoxicity assays, we confirmed that Siglec-9+ NK cells exhibit higher cytotoxicity towards HIV-infected cells compared to Siglec-9- NK cells. These data are consistent with the notion that Siglec-9+ NK cells are highly cytotoxic against HIV-infected cells. However, blocking Siglec-9 enhanced NK cells’ ability to lyse HIV-infected cells, consistent with the known inhibitory function of the Siglec-9 molecule. Together, these data support a model in which the Siglec-9+ CD56dim NK subpopulation is highly cytotoxic against HIV-infected cells even whilst being restrained by the inhibitory effects of Siglec-9. To harness the cytotoxic capacity of the Siglec-9+ NK subpopulation, which is dampened by Siglec-9, we developed a proof-of-concept approach to selectively disrupt Siglec/sialoglycan interactions between NK and HIV-infected cells. We achieved this goal by conjugating Sialidase to several HIV broadly neutralizing antibodies. These conjugates selectively desialylated HIV-infected cells and enhanced NK cells’ capacity to kill them. In summary, we identified a novel, glycan-based interaction that may contribute to HIV-infected cells’ ability to evade NK immunosurveillance and developed an approach to break this interaction.

Dominant Expression of PVRIG and TIGIT Inhibitory Pathways in Bone Marrow of Multiple Myeloma Patients

Introduction Blocking inhibitory immune checkpoints holds promise to treat multiple myeloma (MM) patients. However, currently available checkpoint inhibitors have not shown significant clinical benefits for MM patients, warranting the need for alternative checkpoint blockers. The immune checkpoint TIGIT was recently shown to be the most upregulated immune inhibitory receptor on CD8+ T cells in MM patients' bone marrow (BM), compared to other checkpoints (Guillerey C., Blood. 2018). Preclinical models demonstrated the dominant effects of TIGIT blockade or depletion, by significantly improving mice survival, reducing myeloma cell numbers and exhausted T cell hallmarks (Minnie S., Blood. 2018). As a result, several clinical trials using anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibodies have been recently initiated in MM patients. The DNAM-1 family, in addition to TIGIT, also includes the inhibitory receptor PVRIG, that competes with the co-activating receptor DNAM-1 for the binding to the shared ligand PVRL2, similarly to the TIGIT/PVR/DNAM-1 interaction. Accordingly, TIGIT and PVRIG co-blockade were shown to synergize in enhancing T cell activity and anti-tumor activity in preclinical models (Whelan S., Cancer Immunol. Res. 2019). PVRL2 together with PVR (ligand of TIGIT) were shown to be highly expressed on plasma cells and on CD14+ cells in BM of MM patients (Lozano E., Clin. Cancer Res. 2020). This study aimed at evaluating DNAM-1 axis receptors expression in MM patients' BM. Methods Fresh BM aspirates were collected from 21 MM patients with progressive disease (PD) or in complete response (CR) after obtaining IRB approval. BM mononuclear cells were isolated and single cell suspensions were obtained followed by staining with anti-human antibodies to evaluate DNAM-1 axis members and PD-1 expression. BM biopsies from 6 MM patients (each patient had 4 core on the Tissue Micro-Array T291 USBiomax) were stained for PVRL2 expression by immuno-histochemistry (IHC). Results Flow cytometry analysis of PD-1 and DNAM-1 axis receptors revealed a significant lower fraction of PD1+ cells among cell populations examined compared with other receptors. TIGIT expression was the highest on NK, CD8+ and NKT cells compared to CD4+ T cells, which is in line with previous published data (Lozano E. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020). In contrast, DNAM-1 was expressed on CD8+ T, NK and NKT cells with prominent high expression on CD4+ T cells (Fig 1A). The highest expression among the receptors was of PVRIG on all lymphoid populations, except CD4+ where DNAM-1 was more highly expressed. Importantly, 50% of CD8+ T cells co-expressed TIGIT and PVRIG, supporting a combinatorial therapeutic approach (Fig. 1B). Additionally, the expression of the PVRL2 ligand on MM plasma and endothelial cells was demonstrated by IHC. FACS analysis further supported PVRL2 expression on plasma cells in MM BM (Fig 2). A higher expression of PVRIG, TIGIT and PD-1 was present on DNAM-1 negative CD8+ T cells (Fig 3A, B), suggesting accumulation of exhausted cells in MM tumor microenvironment (TME) as previously described (Minnie S., Blood. 2018). PVRIG had significantly higher expression on DNAM+ cells, compared to PD-1 and TIGIT (Fig 3C), suggesting the potential of its blockade to enhance DNAM-1 activation and subsequent proliferation of earlier differentiated memory cells in MM TME. Finally, CR patients had a trend for higher DNAM-1 expression on CD8+ T cells compared to those with PD (Fig 3D). This is consistent with other reports in mice showing that the expression of DNAM-1 negatively correlates with BM myeloma cell numbers (Minnie S., Blood. 2018). Conclusions DNAM-1 axis receptors are dominantly expressed on lymphocytes in BM of MM patients, with PVRIG exhibiting the most prominent expression. The reduced expression of DNAM-1 in PD patients' TME, compared to CR patients, suggests a link between DNAM-1 axis and clinical outcomes. Recent data suggest TIGIT is an attractive target for blockade in MM. Our new findings highlight for the first time the dominant expression of PVRIG, as well as TIGIT, and suggest that combined blockade of TIGIT with PVRIG may potentially benefit MM patients, placing the DNAM-1 axis as a dominant pathway in MM therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Frenkel: Compugen Ltd.: Current Employment, Other: in the event of frontal participation, I will be reimbursed for my travel expenses by Compugen Ltd.. Alteber: Compugen Ltd.: Current Employment. Cojocaru: Compugen Ltd.: Current Employment. Ophir: Compugen Ltd.: Current Employment.

The Inhibitory Receptor GPR56 (Adgrg1) Is Specifically Expressed by Tissue-Resident Memory T-Cell in Mice But Dispensable for Their Differentiation and Function In Vivo

Tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells with potent antiviral and antibacterial functions protect the epithelial and mucosal surfaces of our bodies against infection with pathogens. The strong proinflammatory activities of TRM cells suggest requirement for expression of inhibitory molecules to restrain these memory T cells under steady state conditions. We previously identified the adhesion G protein-coupled receptor GPR56 as an inhibitory receptor of human cytotoxic lymphocytes that regulates their cytotoxic effector functions. Here, we explored the expression pattern, expression regulation, and function of GPR56 on pathogen-specific CD8+ T cells using two infection models. We observed that GPR56 is expressed on TRM cells during acute infection and is upregulated by the TRM cell-inducing cytokine TGF-β and the TRM cell-associated transcription factor Hobit. However, GPR56 appeared dispensable for CD8+ T-cell differentiation and function upon acute infection with LCMV as well as Listeria monocytogenes. Thus, TRM cells specifically acquire the inhibitory receptor GPR56, but the impact of this receptor on TRM cells after acute infection does not appear essential to regulate effector functions of TRM cells.

Regulation of the Expression, Oligomerisation and Signaling of the Inhibitory Receptor CLEC12A by Cysteine Residues in the Stalk Region

CLEC12A is a myeloid inhibitory receptor that negatively regulates inflammation in mouse models of autoimmune and autoinflammatory arthritis. Reduced CLEC12A expression enhances myeloid cell activation and inflammation in CLEC12A knock-out mice with collagen antibody-induced or gout-like arthritis. Similarly to other C-type lectin receptors, CLEC12A harbours a stalk domain between its ligand binding and transmembrane domains. While it is presumed that the cysteines in the stalk domain have multimerisation properties, their role in CLEC12A expression and/or signaling remain unknown. We thus used site-directed mutagenesis to determine whether the stalk domain cysteines play a role in CLEC12A expression, internalisation, oligomerisation, and/or signaling. Mutation of C118 blocks CLEC12A transport through the secretory pathway diminishing its cell-surface expression. In contrast, mutating C130 does not affect CLEC12A cell-surface expression but increases its oligomerisation, inducing ligand-independent phosphorylation of the receptor. Moreover, we provide evidence that CLEC12A dimerisation is regulated in a redox-dependent manner. We also show that antibody-induced CLEC12A cross-linking induces flotillin oligomerisation in insoluble membrane domains in which CLEC12A signals. Taken together, these data indicate that the stalk cysteines in CLEC12A differentially modulate this inhibitory receptor’s expression, oligomerisation and signaling, suggestive of the regulation of CLEC12A in a redox-dependent manner during inflammation.