Friendly settlement of dispute in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights

The existing approaches of lawyers to understanding the characteristics, types and structure of decisions of the Court of Justice of the Council of Europe, adopted by it on the basis of amicable settlement of disputes and substantiation on this basis of the author's concept of phenomena declaration of amicable settlement and unilateral declaration of the Government. The author analyzes and critically comprehends the doctrinal conclusions and provisions of national legislation on the need to separate the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, which, along with the rulings of the Court of Justice, are subject to mandatory implementation by the State party to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Berbasis Asas Tanggung Jawab Negara Di Indonesia

Environmental law enforcement put forward settlement of dispute through administration law as well as civil and criminal law. Based on the principle of state responsibility, the state will guarantee that the utilization of natural resources will provide benefits for the greater well-being and quality of life, both present and future generations as a goal of the implementation of sustainable development.The formulation of the problem a point issue is environmental management in Indonesia by the state in accordance with the principle of state responsibility? And, how is the implementation of sanctions as environmental law enforcement based on Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 22 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of Environmental Protection and Management? The method used in this research is juridical normative with regulation approach. The results of the study conclude that Indonesia has not been maximized in carrying out the function of the principle of state responsibility because there is still a lot of forest destruction that has occurred, and law enforcement, both administrative, civil and criminal, should be carried out in a balanced manner so that the deterrent effect of law enforcement can be a reflection for the parties who will do environmental damage

THE IMPACT OF PANDEMIC ON LEGAL SYSTEM: IMPACT ON ARBITRATION LAW

One of the impacts of the outbreak of COVID-19 is the state legal system. Legal system in a broad sense consists of legislation, the state’s legal personnel (executive) and the judicial system. A part of the judicial system is a private settlement of dispute by arbitration. Arbitration is subject to the arbitration law. The COVID-19 has forced the closure of the arbitration proceedings. This is a problem for arbitration. This article tried to analyse the possible solution to the closure of the proceedings. This article used the normative method by analysing the existing arbitration law and arbitration rules. This article argued, although arbitration may not be able to be commenced amid pandemic, that future arbitration law (and amendment of existing arbitration law) should foresee feasible events with a smaller ”pandemic”, i.e., epidemic and other force-majeure related events. This article recommended firstly, the introduction of provision(s), which recognizes virtual arbitration. Secondly, changes of some procedural issues in the arbitration proceedi ngs.

Resolution of Child Custody Dispute: Legislative Foundation and Contemporary Application of Sulh in the Shariah Court of Malaysia (Mediasi dalam Menyelesaikan Isu Penjagaan Kanak-Kanak: Asas Perundangan dan Aplikasi Sulh oleh Mahkamah Syariah di Malaysia)

Mediation or sulh at the Malaysian Shariah Court deals with a variety of issues relating to Islamic family law including the child custody issues. Disputes that exist between the parties can be resolved through litigation (court) and non-litigation (outside the court). Sulh is one of the non-litigation methods in settling disputes in peace and harmony. The Government initiative by introducing sulh since 2001 helps in reducing the backlog of cases, speeds up settlement of dispute and it has become a very constructive method of resolving disputes amicably. This article aims to discuss and analyse the principles of sulh in Islamic Law, its foundations and its implementation in Malaysia particularly in child custody disputes. The article also will look at how sulh interacts with the new implementation of the Special Court of Hadanah established in the Shariah Court of Federal Territories (MSWP). The methodology adopted, is library-based research to collect information, data and theories involved, from selected materials including journal articles, textbooks, statutes, as well as interview method. The data were analysed using the content analysis method. The study concludes that the practice of sulh in the child custody disputes is not only in line with the Islamic Law but also plays a vital role in protecting the children’s rights as outlined by the intent of the Divine Guidance (Maqasid Shariah). Keywords: Sulh, mediation, Shariah court, child custody dispute, ADR. Abstrak Mediasi atau Sulh yang dilaksanakan di Mahkamah Syariah melibatkan pelbagai isu kekeluargaan termasuklan kes penjagaan kanak-kanak. Pertikaian yang terjadi diantara pihak-pihak dapat diselesaikan melalui dua kaedah iaitu perbicaraan (di dalam mahkamah) dan penyelesaian tanpa perbicaraan (luar mahkamah). Sulh adalah salah satu kaedah penyelesaian pertikaian secara damai dan harmoni yang dilakukan tanpa perbicaraan. Inisiatif Kerajaan memperkenalkan Sulh mulai tahun 2001 telah membantu mengurangkan lambakan kes di mahkamah, menyelesaikan kes dalam tempoh yang singkat dan ianya menjadi kaedah yang sangat konstruktif dalam menyelesaikan pertikaian secara damai tanpa sengketa. Tujuan kertas kerja ini disediakan adalah untuk membincangkan serta menganalisa kewujudan Sulh di dalam Undang-Undang Islam, melihat kepada asas serta pelaksanaan Sulh di Malaysia terutama dalam kes melibatkan pertikaian penjagaan kanak-kanak. Artikel ini juga meneliti bagaimana pelaksanaan Sulh membantu ke arah pelaksanaan Mahkamah Khas Hadhanah yang baharu ditubuhkan di Mahkamah Syariah Wilayah Persekutuan (MSWP). Metodologi yang dilaksanakan di dalam kertas kerja ini melibatkan kajian perpustakaan bagi mengumpulkan maklumat, data dan teori yang terlibat daripada bahan-bahan terpilih termasuklah jurnal artikel, buku teks, statut serta kaedah temubual. Data yang diperolehi kemudiannya dianalisa menggunakan kaedah analisa kandungan. Kajian ini menyimpulkan bahawa amalan Sulh melibatkan pertikaian penjagaan kanak-kanak bukan sahaja selari dengan Undang-Undang Islam, namun Sulh juga berperanan penting dalam melindungi hak kanak-kanak seperti yang digariskan oleh Maqasid Syariah. Kata Kunci: Sulh, mediasi, mahkamaah Syariah, pertikaian penjagaan kanak-kanak, ADR.

Lobbying of Qatar's Interests in the United States and the Qatar Diplomatic Crisis

Qatar lobbied its interests in the US in order to ease tensions with the Gulf c tries which declared a blockade on Qatar in June 2017. Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Egypt accused Qatar of supporting terrorism, demanded to break off all ties with Iran and to close the Turkish military base on its territory. The article analyses the lobbying campaign against the blockade. It uses the facts and data disclosed by the consulting and lobbying firms according to “The Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938” and “The Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995”. Three main conclusions are drawn: 1) The US is not interested in settlement of dispute through the support of one party. The White House prefers the “divide and rule” strategy. 2) There is little chance of successful lobbying in the US for any state that cooperates with Iran. 3) The balance-of-power approach in analysing of the development of Qatari-Saudi crisis shows that attempt of the both parties to “buck-pass” by one superpower is uneffisient. The reason is that both Qatar and Saudi coalition act like US's clients. Although Qatar is not as powerful as its rivals, but it uses the “defensive realism” strategy, that allows it to disrupt aggressive efforts and increase the costs of the Saudi coalition.

ՀԱՇՏՈՒԹՅԱՆ ՀԱՄԱՁԱՅՆՈՒԹՅՈՒՆԸ ՀԱՇՏԱՐԱՐԱԿԱՆ ԳՈՐԾԸՆԹԱՑՆԵՐՈՒՄ ՈՐՊԵՍ ՎԵՃԻ ԼՈՒԾՄԱՆ ՄԻՋՈՑ/SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AMONG CONCILIATION PROCEDURES AS A DISPUTE OF RESOLUTION/МИРОВОЕ СОГЛАШЕНИЕ СРЕДИ ПРИМИРИТЕЛЬНЫХ ПРОЦЕДУР КАК СРЕДСТВО РАЗРЕШЕНИЯ СПОРОВ

The given article analyzes the main issues of peaceful settlement of civil law disputes in the Republic of Armenia. The definitions of the concept of a settlement agreement, as well as the features and advantages of its application in conciliation procedures for the settlement of dispute have been presented. Hence, we try to propose some steps to improve legislative issues.

Fatwa DSN MUI In Managing The Dispute Settlement Of Sharia Economic In Indonesia Through Basyarnas

Sharia Council is an institution that plays a role in securing the standard of Sharia in every Islamic Financial institution in the world. In Indonesia, the role is conducted by the National Sharia Council (DSN) established by the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) in 1998, strengthened by the Decree of the MUI Leadership Board. Kep-754/MUI/II/1999 dated February 10, 1999. The existence of MUI DSN in managing the settlement of sharia banking disputes has not been fully recognized by the people of Indonesia. It can be seen in the implementation of sharia contracting in sharia banking has not yet decided dispute resolution option through National Syariah Arbitration Board (BASYARNAS). The purpose of writing a paper is to know the legal basis of the binding force of the Fatwa DSN in arranging the settlement of dispute Sharia Economy in Indonesia through BASYARNAS and its consequences for the Islamic financial institutions (LKS) who disobey the fatwa DSN. This research is a normative research with the philosophical, juridical and sociological approach. Data analysis with qualitative descriptive. The results of this study indicate that the legal basis of the power of the DSN Fatwa in regulating the settlement of Sharia Banking disputes is Article 26 of Law No. 21 Th. 2008 and Article 31 of Decree of the Board of Managing Directors of Bank Indonesia Number 32/34/1999. There will a negative impact for LKS do not comply with the content of the DSN Fatwa, such as the difficulty in carry out its activities, aside of negatively influencing the performance and level of credibility of DPS in LKS.

PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARIAH DI INDONESIA

The development of sharia banking and finance institutions is so fast,but in terms of laws and regulatory regulations are still left behind. Among the regulations that still need to be addressed is the regulation related to the settlement of dispute sharia banking business. Where in this case there are still juridical problems, namely the dualism of judicial authority in the settlement of Islamic banking disputes. The result of the study shows that the settlement of Islamic banking dispute in Indonesia can be done through two lines, both litigation and nonlitigation channels. Religious Courts are the competent jurisdiction to resolve Islamic banking disputes on litigation channels, while through non-litigation channels can be done through deliberation, banking mediation, shariah arbitration and judiciary within the General Courts. The National Shariah Arbitration Board (BASYARNAS) is the most strategic forum for resolving the dispute over sharia banking because BASYARNAS can resolve disputes quickly, simply, and at a low cost. Keywords:sharia,dispute,jurisdiction,litigation<br /><br />

CUSTOMARY COURT AS ALTERNATIVE TO SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTE IN SOUTH SULAWESI

Customary court is a process conducted in connection with the duty to examine, to adjudicate and to decide a case in the community, which has long ago become a means to seek for justice. Customary court aims at returning broken order resulted from existing dispute. This research mainly focuses on how the essence of customary court in South Sulawesi is and how customary court serves to settle dispute in South Sulawesi. Employing socio-legal method, the research results explain that the Customary court in South Sulawesi has no longer been relied on in settlement of disputes existing in the community as the result of modern court domination.