Inputs from wastewater treatment plant effluent influence the temporal variability of nutrient uptake in an intermittent stream

Effluents from wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) affect water chemistry and in-stream nutrient uptake capacity from receiving freshwaters, thus altering the amount and fate of nutrients exported. In Mediterranean regions, the dilution capacity of receiving streams to buffer the WWTP biogeochemical fingerprint can vary seasonally due to changes in hydrologic conditions. We assessed the temporal patterns and controls on nutrient uptake in an intermittent Mediterranean stream receiving WWTP effluent inputs. We compiled data on longitudinal profiles of ambient concentrations of dissolved inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus along a 800 m reach on 47 sampling dates between 2001 and 2017 that cover a wide range of hydrological conditions. Data were used to estimate net nutrient uptake in the receiving stream. Ammonium concentration decreased along the reach in 72% of dates, and these decreases were coupled with increases of either nitrite or nitrate. This phenomenon suggests that the stream acted as a hot spot of nitrification. Conversely, concentration of phosphorus did not show any longitudinal pattern in 75% of dates, suggesting that uptake and release processes for this element were commonly counterbalanced. Finally, ammonium net uptake decreased when the stream had a low dilution capacity, suggesting that excess of available nutrients associated with WWTP inputs control de temporal variation of the bioreactive capacity of the receiving streams. Overall, this study suggests that water management should consider the biogeochemical interplay between WWTP operation and the functioning of receiving streams as a strategy to improve stream water quality in urban landscapes.

Nutrient Dynamics at the Sediment-Water Interface: Influence of Wastewater Effluents

Uptake and regeneration fluxes and concentrations of nutrients, i.e., nitrate (NO3−), ammonium (NH4+), phosphate (PO43−) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC), were evaluated upstream and downstream of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in the River Wandle, UK, from July to October 2019. Using chamber techniques, water-specific nutrient concentrations were measured at two exposures (3 and 10 min) to calculate fluxes. The WWTP effluent contributed to elevated concentrations and modified flux rates, resulting in significant differences at the study sites. Compared with summer, the concentrations of NO3− and DOC increased while NH4+ and PO43− decreased in autumn. Nutrient fluxes varied both temporally and spatially in uptake (i.e., storage in sediments) or regeneration (i.e., release into river water). Under the actions of physical and biological processes, the fluxes of NO3− and NH4+ showed opposite flux directions. Dissolved oxygen (DO) and bioabsorption mainly affected PO43− and DOC fluxes, respectively. Specifically, across all sites, NO3− was −0.01 to +0.02 mg/(m2 s), NH4+ was −29 to +2 μg/(m2 s), PO43− was −2.0 to +0.5 μg/(m2 s), and DOC was −0.01 to +0.05 mg/(m2 s). Further, we did find that these variations were related to nutrient concentrations in the overlying water. Our results provide further evidence to show that reductions in river nutrients are paramount for improving river ecological conditions. Additionally, we suggest that more research is needed to evaluate chamber-based experimental approaches to make them more comparable to in-situ flux methods. Highlights • Sewage effluent resulted in elevated nutrient concentrations and modified fluxes. • Flux was affected by initial nutrient concentrations, DO and microbial activity. • Inexpensive approaches to study nutrient dynamics are needed for river restoration.

Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Pollutant Levels in Wastewater and the Waters of the Zarqa River, Jordan

Assamra wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) is the largest treatment facility in Jordan. Treated wastewater is discharged into the Zarqa River (ZR) and used to irrigate fodder and vegetables. ZR also includes surface runoff, stormwater, and raw wastewater illegally discharged into the river. This study examined pharmaceutically active compounds (PhAC) in water resources in the ZR basin. Samples of WWTP influent and effluent and river water from four sites along ZR were collected. Concentrations of 18 target antibiotics, one stimulant, and 15 other PhACs were determined in the samples. Five antibiotics were detected in WWTP influent (510–860 ng L−1 for ∑Antibiotics) and six in the effluent (2300–2600 ng L−1 for ∑Antibiotics). Concentrations in the effluent of all antibiotics except clarithromycin increased by 2- to 5-fold compared with those in influent, while clarithromycin concentration decreased by around 4- fold (from 308 to 82 ng L−1). WWTP influent and effluent samples contained 14 non-antibiotic PhACs, one simulant, and six antibiotics at detectable concentrations. The dominant PhACs were paracetamol (74% of ∑PhACs) in the influent and carbamazepine (78% of ∑PhACs) in the effluent. At ZR sampling sites, carbamazepine was the dominant PhAC in all cases (800–2700 ng L−1). The antibiotics detected in WWTP effluent were also detected at the ZR sites. In summary, water in ZR is contaminated with PhACs, including antibiotics, and wastewater discharge seems to be the main pathway for this contamination. The occurrence of antibiotics and other PhACs in the irrigated soil requires investigation to assess their fate.

Feasibility study of the application of treated wastewater for the irrigation of forest species in a Saharan area

Background: After suffering from an acute problem of excess water for a long time, the Oasis of Ouargla benefited from an aerated lagoon treatment plant, producing biologically treated domestic effluents. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of reusing this effluent for watering plants. The experiment was conducted in the Ouargla WWTP, which is located in the region of Said Otba (northeast of Ouargla), north of the national road NR 49. Methods: The study area was selected based on the originality of the study and availability of water. The plants used were Acacia farnesiana and Leucaena leucocephala. The selection of Leucaena was based on the following criteria: It is used as a windbreak, it is very tolerant to drought, and it is used as a fodder to maintain soil fertility. And, Acacia was selected because it is used as a fodder, protects the soil against erosion, and to fix nitrogen. The watering of these plants is done jointly by treated wastewater from the WWTP and well water (WW), of which the latter was used as a control. Sampling and analysis of the irrigation water were performed according to the experimental protocol. To show the growth rate of the two plants studied, biometric measurements were taken weekly for 25 weeks. Results: The physicochemical analyses show that the treated wastewater is of poor quality belonging to the last class of Riverside’s C5-S4, with an excessive salinity (EC) of 13.51 dS/m and an Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) of 12.61 against EC of 2.49 dS/m and 2.13 for the WW. At the end of the experiment, it was found that irrigation with purified wastewater (PWW) gave less growth compared to that with WW. Statistical analyses of the biometric measurements confirmed that there is a highly significant difference at P<0.05. Conclusion: The reuse of WWTP effluent gives less interesting results but is still possible. It is recommended to choose Salt-tolerant crops, as well as the dilution of these waters by the addition of less salty waters.

Climatological and Epidemiological Conditions Are Important Factors Related to the Abundance of blaKPC and Other Antibiotic Resistance Genes (ARGs) in Wastewater Treatment Plants and Their Effluents, in an Endemic Country

Several physicochemical and season factors have been related to the abundance of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), considered hotspots of bacterial resistance. However, few studies on the subject have been carried out in tropical countries endemic for resistance mechanisms such as blaKPC. In this study, the occurrence of ARGs, particularly blaKPC, was determined throughout a WWTP, and the factors related to their abundance were explored. In 2017, wastewater samples were taken from a WWTP in Colombia every 15 days for 6 months, and a total of 44 samples were analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR. sul1, sul2, blaKPC, and ermB were found to be the most prevalent ARGs. A low average reduction of the absolute abundance ARGs in effluent with respect to influent was observed, as well as a greater absolute abundance of ARGs in the WWTP effluent in the rainy season. Factors such as temperature, pH, oxygen, total organic carbon (TOC), chemical oxygen demand (COD), and precipitation were significantly correlated with the absolute abundance of several of the ARGs evaluated. A generalized linear mixed-effects model analysis showed that dissolved oxygen and precipitation in the sampling day were important factors related to the absolute concentration of blaKPC over time. In conclusion, the abundance of ARGs in the WWTP could be influenced by endemic conditions and physicochemical and climatological parameters. Therefore, it is necessary to continuously monitor clinical relevant genes in WWTPs from different global regions, even more so in low-income countries where sewage treatment is limited.

Macroinvertebrate interactions stimulate decomposition in WWTP effluent-impacted aquatic ecosystems

Aquatic ecosystems worldwide are impacted by an influx of nutrients and sludge particles from wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluents, leading to a degradation of benthic habitats and a loss of associated macroinvertebrate taxa. Hence, in habitats impacted by WWTPs, only a few tolerant macroinvertebrate taxa remain. These tolerant detritivore macroinvertebrate taxa play an important role in the degradation of organic matter, and biotic interactions between these taxa may either enhance or reduce the rate of sludge degradation. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine if the interaction between asellids and tubificids, both highly abundant in systems impacted by WWTP effluent, enhances the degradation of sludge. To this end, growth and reproduction of both taxa, sludge degradation and nutrient concentrations in the overlying water were measured in a 28-day laboratory experiment, subjecting WWTP sludge to 4 treatments: a control without macroinvertebrates, a tubificid, an asellid, and an asellid + tubificid treatment. Sludge degradation, phosphate concentration in the overlying water and asellid reproduction were enhanced when asellids and tubificids were jointly present, whereas tubificid growth and reproduction were hampered in comparison to the tubificid treatment. Hence, our results suggest that the biotic interactions between these tolerant detritivores stimulate sludge degradation, and thus possibly mitigating the negative impacts of WWTP-derived sludge particles on the benthic environment.

Deciphering the Influence of Multiple Anthropogenic Inputs on Taxonomic and Functional Profiles of the Microbial Communities in Yitong River, Northeast China

We conducted physicochemical parameters analysis, 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction to explore the impact of human inputs on the bacterioplankton communities within a tributary of the largest river flowing through a megacity in northeast China. Agriculture largely accounted for the alteration of diversity and functions of the microbial communities. Furthermore, nutrients were significantly declined at the reservoir outlet, and WWTP effluent discharge caused changes in the river microbial community. NH3-N and NO3--N were the main environmental factors that drive the shift of the bacteria community, and rare taxa played a more important role in the response to environmental changes compared with the abundant ones. The occurrence of the human-specific fecal indicator was mostly derived from agriculture, and its increase in relative abundance was observed in the effluent. Thus, our study provides guidance for ecological assessment and management of rivers by revealing the response pattern of river bacterioplankton to multiple types of anthropogenic stressors.

Global distribution of wastewater treatment plants and their released effluents into rivers and streams

The main objective of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is to remove contaminants such as pathogens, nutrients, and organic and other pollutants from wastewaters using physical, biological and/or chemical processes prior to discharge into receiving waterbodies. However, since WWTPs cannot remove all contaminants, they inevitably represent concentrated point sources of residual contaminant loads into surface waters. To understand the severity and extent of the impact of wastewater discharges from such facilities into rivers and lakes, as well as to identify opportunities of improved management, detailed information about WWTPs is required, including (1) their explicit geospatial locations to identify the waterbodies affected; and (2) individual plant characteristics such as population served, flow rate of effluents, and level of treatment of processed wastewaters. These characteristics are especially important for contaminant fate models that are designed to assess the distribution of substances that are not typically included in environmental monitoring programs, such as contaminants of emerging concern. Although there are several regional datasets that provide information on WWTP locations and characteristics, data are still lacking at a global scale, especially in developing countries. Here we introduce HydroWASTE, a location-explicit global database of 58,502 WWTPs and their characteristics. This database was developed by combining national and regional datasets with auxiliary information to derive or complete missing WWTP characteristics, including the amount of people served. A high-resolution river network with streamflow estimates was used to georeference WWTP outfall locations and calculate each plant’s dilution factor (i.e., the ratio of the natural discharge of the receiving waterbody to the WWTP effluent discharge). The utility of this information was demonstrated in an assessment of the distribution of wastewaters at a global scale. Results show that 1.2 million kilometers of the global river network receive wastewater input from upstream WWTPs, of which more than 90,000 km are downstream of WWTPs that offer only primary treatment. Wastewater ratios originating from WWTPs exceed 10 % in over 72,000 km of rivers, mostly in areas of high population densities in Europe, USA, China, India, and South Africa. In addition, 2,533 plants show a dilution factor of less than 10, which represents a common threshold for environmental concern.

Application of Anammox-Based Processes in Urban WWTPs: Are We on the Right Track?

The application of partial nitritation and anammox processes (PN/A) to remove nitrogen can improve the energy efficiency of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) as well as diminish their operational costs. However, there are still several limitations that are preventing the widespread application of PN/A processes in urban WWTPs such as: (a) the loss of performance stability of the PN/A units operated at the sludge line, when the sludge is thermally pretreated to increase biogas production; (b) the proliferation of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) in the mainstream; and (c) the maintenance of a suitable effluent quality in the mainstream. In this work, different operational strategies to overcome these limitations were modelled and analyzed. In WWTPs whose sludge is thermically hydrolyzed, the implementation of an anerobic treatment before the PN/A unit is the best alternative, from an economic point of view, to maintain the stable performance of this unit. In order to apply the PN/A process in the mainstream, the growth of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) should be promoted in the sludge line by supplying extra sludge to the anaerobic digesters. The AOB generated would be applied to the water line to partially oxidize ammonia, and the anammox process would then be carried out. Excess nitrate generated by anammox bacteria and/or NOB can be removed by recycling a fraction of the WWTP effluent to the biological reactor to promote its denitrification.