southern health
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

34
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
pp. ebmental-2021-300287
Author(s):  
James SW Hong ◽  
Rebecca Sheriff ◽  
Katharine Smith ◽  
Anneka Tomlinson ◽  
Fathi Saad ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe effects of COVID-19 on the shift to remote consultations remain to be properly investigated.ObjectiveTo quantify the extent, nature and clinical impact of the use of telepsychiatry during the COVID-19 pandemic and compare it with the data in the same period of the 2 years before the outbreak.MethodsWe used deidentified electronic health records routinely collected from two UK mental health Foundation Trusts (Oxford Health (OHFT) and Southern Health (SHFT)) between January and September in 2018, 2019 and 2020. We considered three outcomes: (1) service activity, (2) in-person versus remote modalities of consultation and (3) clinical outcomes using Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) data. HoNOS data were collected from two cohorts of patients (cohort 1: patients with ≥1 HoNOS assessment each year in 2018, 2019 and 2020; cohort 2: patients with ≥1 HoNOS assessment each year in 2019 and 2020), and analysed in clusters using superclasses (namely, psychotic, non-psychotic and organic), which are used to assess overall healthcare complexity in the National Health Service. All statistical analyses were done in Python.FindingsMental health service activity in 2020 increased in all scheduled community appointments (by 15.4% and 5.6% in OHFT and SHFT, respectively). Remote consultations registered a 3.5-fold to 6-fold increase from February to June 2020 (from 4685 to a peak of 26 245 appointments in OHFT and from 7117 to 24 987 appointments in SHFT), with post-lockdown monthly averages of 23 030 and 22 977 remote appointments/month in OHFT and SHFT, respectively. Video consultations comprised up to one-third of total telepsychiatric services per month from April to September 2020. For patients with dementia, non-attendance rates at in-person appointments were higher than remote appointments (17.2% vs 3.9%). The overall HoNOS cluster value increased only in the organic superclass (clusters 18–21, n=174; p<0.001) from 2019 to 2020, suggesting a specific impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on this population of patients.Conclusions and clinical implicationsThe rapid shift to remote service delivery has not reached some groups of patients who may require more tailored management with telepsychiatry.


BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S323-S323
Author(s):  
Amy Grimason ◽  
Adrian East

AimsShannon Clinic was established as the regional secure unit in Northern Ireland in 2005 and provides medium secure care to Northern Ireland's population of 1.8 million. Previous research has shown that inpatient admissions are shorter when compared to other secure units. Northern Ireland has less secure beds per population than the other UK nations, which can be a driver for shorter hospital stays. This review was undertaken to examine if shorter inpatient stays were associated with poorer outcomes.MethodAll the discharges from Shannon Clinic to the Southern Health and Social Care Trust were reviewed over a period of 10 years (2009-2019). The outcome measures examined were mortality, readmission rate and reoffending rate. Crude rates for these were calculated. To allow for comparison, these rates were compared to the systematic review findings of Fazel et al (2016), which was an international review examining patient outcomes following discharge from secure hospitals.DUNDRUM 1 Triage Security scores for the patient group were also reviewed, to ensure a sample representative of patients needing medium secure care.Result41 patients had been discharged during this period. DUNDRUM 1 Triage Security scores ranged from 2.44 to 3.2.The average length of admission was 415.5 days. This is shorter than the average reported by Fazel et al (2016).The crude rates for all of the variables calculated (mortality, readmission to hospital and reoffending) for patients discharged from Shannon to the trust were less of those reported in the systematic review by Fazel et al (2016).ConclusionThis review suggests that patient outcomes are not negatively impacted by shorter inpatient stays in secure hospitals. A possible reason for this is the regional model of care approach, which helps ensure continuity and safe management of the transition between secure care and the community. In addition, there is close multidisciplinary working with supported living providers in the trust area to ensure patients' needs are met.Following this initial review, there are now plans to review discharge outcomes for all patients discharged during this period. There are five trust areas in total in Northern Ireland so this will allow for comparison across the region.The review has also been used within the unit to develop information leaflets for patients at admission and posters for display in the unit. We hope this will provide clarity to patients about secure care and a sense of optimism from the start of their admission.


BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S95-S96
Author(s):  
Sunday Neru ◽  
Edet Ededet

AimsTo ensure that health care practitioners at Antelope house, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust in Southampton are providing service users information, advice and stop smoking support in line with smoke free policies in the trust.BackgroundSmoking is the single largest preventable cause of ill health and premature death in England. Cigarette smoking causes a wide range of diseases and medical conditions like cancers, heart diseases and stroke.The prevalence of stroke is extremely high among people with mental health problems especially those admitted to hospital.Stopping smoking reduces the risk of developing preventable diseases and premture death.These are the background behind this audit.MethodData were collected using the following ways:Use of desinged questionaire.Looking into Rio elecronic recordsStandard used and compared against was Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust '' smoke free trust policies'20 cases were looked into and examined.ResultMost staff are not implementing the Trust no smoking policies well and documentation of the informtion given are not complete.Most service users prefer to use e-cigarettes.Most people between 30 and 50 years old range do not smoke.For those of clozapine, the impact of cigarettes smoking not explained.ConclusionThe trust smoke free policies are not well implemented by health care practitioners at Antelope house mental health unit, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust in Southampton.


2021 ◽  
pp. 135581962110108
Author(s):  
Mirza Lalani ◽  
Helen Hogan

Objective In recent years there has been a proliferation of patient safety policies in the United Kingdom triggered by well publicized failures in health care. The Learning from Deaths (LfD) policy was implemented in response to failures at Southern Health National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust. This study aims to develop a narrative to enable the understanding of the key drivers involved in its evolution and implications for future national patient safety policy development. Methods A qualitative study was undertaken using documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews (n = 12) with policymakers from organizations involved in the design, implementation and assurance of LfD at a system level. Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Approach was used to frame the policymaking process. Results The publication of the Southern Health independent review and subsequent highlighting by the Care Quality Commission of a fragmented approach to learning from deaths across the NHS opened a ‘policy window.’ Under the influence of the families affected by patient safety failures and the then Secretary of State, acting as ‘policy entrepreneurs,’ recently developed methods for mortality review were combined with mechanisms to enhance transparency and governance. This rapidly created a framework designed to ensure NHS organizations identified remedial safety problems and could be accountable for addressing them. Conclusions The development of LfD exhibits several common features with other patient safety policies in the NHS. It was triggered by a crisis and the need for a prompt political response and attempts to address a range of concerns related to safety. In common with other safety policies, LfD contains inherent tensions related to its primary purpose, which may hinder its impact. In the absence of formal evaluations of these policies, deeper understanding of the policymaking process offers the possibility of identifying potential barriers to goal achievement.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Claire Tucker ◽  
Michael Miller

Health-sciences medical universities that host dental hygiene programs typically work on the model of offering upper division coursework, meaning that they enroll only students who complete their first two years at a different institution. The current study investigated the impact of ‘transfer shock’ on students who transferred into a dental hygiene program from community colleges compared to those transferring from four-year universities. This included testing for differences between student grade point average and NBDHE pass rates for the two groups of transfer students. A total of 166 students who graduated from a dental hygiene program at a mid-southern health-sciences university from 2014-2018 were included in the study. The subjects were placed into two groups by the location of their lower division courses: community college or four-year university. Paired t-tests suggested the presence of transfer shock for both groups. First-attempt pass rates: 95.5%, with a program GPA of 3.12 for the community college group and 98%, with a program GPA of 3.27 for the four-year university group. Transfer shock did occur in the program in the study, so program administrators in dental hygiene academic units should be aware of the impact of transfer and help build bridges that support students to aid in their success.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 166
Author(s):  
Emma Tumilty ◽  
Fiona Doolan-Noble ◽  
Anna Tiatia Fa'atoese Latu ◽  
Kathryn McAuley ◽  
Jack Dummer ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common chronic condition managed in primary care. AIMTo understand how patients with severe COPD living in the Southern Health Region (Otago and Southland) experience and cope with the condition. METHODSSemi-structured interviews were undertaken with 23 patients with severe COPD (defined using the 2013 GOLD classification). A thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTSPatients’ accounts of living with severe COPD revealed four themes: loss, adaptation, isolation and social support. All participants discussed their sense of loss in coming to terms with having COPD and the ongoing restrictions or changes that were associated with breathlessness and fatigue. These losses required adaptation in daily living. Some patients struggled to adjust to new limitations and needed to rely on others for support. Others found ways to adapt their surroundings or ways of doing things while trying to maintain the same activities. Isolation was described in two ways – direct (no longer being able to easily socialize because activities often caused breathlessness) and indirect (the feeling of being isolated from others because they do not understand what it is like to live with COPD). Social support, including support provided by group-based pulmonary rehabilitation, helped to address the problems of social isolation. DISCUSSIONLiving with severe COPD is a ‘balancing act’ between insecurity (loss and isolation) and resilience (adaptation and social support). Health-care providers need to be proactive in identifying and managing patients’ unmet health needs and promote activities that reduce social isolation.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e034323
Author(s):  
Lauralie Richard ◽  
Georgia Richardson ◽  
Chrystal Jaye ◽  
Tim Stokes

ObjectiveTo explore the perspectives of primary healthcare (PHC) professionals providing care to refugees through mainstream general practice.DesignQualitative exploratory design with semistructured interviews subjected to inductive thematic analysis.Setting and participantsNine general practices enrolled in the Dunedin Refugee Resettlement Programme, in New Zealand (NZ)’s southern health region. Participants included nine general practitioners and six practice nurses.ResultsThree analytical constructs were identified: relational engagement with refugees, refugee healthcare delivery and providers’ professional role shaped by complexity. Building meaningful relational connections involved acknowledging refugees’ journeys by getting to know them as people. This was instrumental for the development of an empathetic understanding of the complex human trajectories that characterise refugees’ journeys to NZ. Participants encountered challenges in providing care to refugees with respect to time-limited consultations, variable use of interpreter services, fragmentation of care between agencies and need for improved health infrastructure to ensure a fluid interface between PHC, secondary care and community support services. The current business model of NZ general practice was perceived to interfere with value-driven care and discouraged tailoring of care to specific patient groups, raising concerns about the ‘fit’ of mainstream general practice to address the complex healthcare needs of refugees. Meeting the needs of refugees across the social determinants of health involved a lot of ‘behind the scenes work’ particularly in the absence of shared information systems and the lack of well-established referral pathways to connect refugees to services beyond the health sector. This led to providers feeling overwhelmed and uncertain about their ability to provide appropriate care to refugees.ConclusionsThis study provides rich context-specific findings that enhance PHC responsiveness to the needs of refugees in NZ.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e032993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunhuan Lao ◽  
David Lees ◽  
Sandeep Patel ◽  
Douglas White ◽  
Ross Lawrenson

ObjectivesTo (1) explore the regional and ethnic differences in rates of publicly funded osteoarthritis-associated hip and knee replacement surgeries and (2) investigate the mortality after surgery.DesignPopulation-based, retrospective, cross-sectional study.SettingGeneral population in New Zealand.ParticipantsPatients with osteoarthritis who underwent publicly funded primary hip and knee replacement surgeries in 2005–2017. Patients aged 14–99 years were included.Primary and secondary outcome measuresAge-standardised rate, standardised mortality ratio (SMR) and 30 days, 90 days and 1 year mortality.ResultsWe identified 53 439 primary hip replacements and 50 072 primary knee replacements with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis. The number and age-standardised rates of hip and knee replacements increased over time. Māori had the highest age-standardised rate of hip replacements, followed by European/others and Pacific, and Asian had the lowest rate. Pacific had the highest age-standardised rate of knee replacements, followed by Māori and European/others, and Asian had the lowest rate. The Northern Health Network had the lowest rate of hip surgeries, and the Southern Health Network had the lowest rate of knee surgeries. The SMRs of patients undergoing hip and knee replacements were lower than the general population: 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.95) for hip and 0.79 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.82) for knee. The SMRs were decreasing over time. The patterns of 30 days, 90 days and 1 year mortality were similar to the SMR.ConclusionsThe numbers of publicly funded osteoarthritis-associated primary hip and knee replacements are steadily increasing. Māori people had the highest age-standardised rate of hip replacements and Pacific people had the highest rate of knee replacements. The Northern Health Network had the lowest rate of hip surgeries, and the Southern Health Network had the lowest rate of knee surgeries. Compared with the general population, patients who had hip and knee replacements have a better life expectancy.


BMJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. k1411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Torjesen
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document