Banking should always be assessed health to stay fit in serving the customers,<br />the Bank that classified unhealthy can inflict the bank institution itself and of<br />the others, namely the customers of the bank. To assess a health bank can be<br />viewed from various aspects of assessment, this research aimed to determine<br />whether the bank is in a very healthy, healthy, healthy enough, less healthy or<br />unhealthy. There were several methods that can be used to assess or analyze<br />the health of the banking, namely CAMEL, CAMELS and RGEC. This research<br />was a quantitative research, with descriptive approach. The data used was<br />secondary data on 34 banking companies consisted of 11 companies of Syaria<br />public banks and 23 companies of Syaria business units. Analysis conducted<br />in this study was to use the calculation of financial ratios that have been set by<br />the financial services authority. The results showed that the health level of<br />Syaria public Bank and Syaria Business Unit with using CAMELS method and<br />RGEC showed health predicate of the bank in accordance with the standards<br />set by Bank Indonesia, for the period 2011 can be concluded that the Syaria<br />public Banks and Sharia Business Unit of composite rankings ”HEALT”, the<br />period of 2012 with the conclusion of composite rating ”HEALT”, and for the<br />period of 2013 with the conclusion of composite rating ”HEALT”. RGEC<br />method can be said to be better than in the two previous methods, namely<br />CAMELS and CAMEL, through RGEC, BI (Bank Indonesia) wanted banks to<br />be able to identify problems early, performed the appropriate and faster follow-up improvements, and implemented Good Corporate Governance (GCG) and<br />better risk management so banks will be more resilient in the face of crisis