Statin therapy improves survival in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension: a propensity score matching study

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 969-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luise Holzhauser ◽  
Ninel Hovnanians ◽  
Parham Eshtehardi ◽  
M. Khalid Mojadidi ◽  
Yi Deng ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luise Holzhauser ◽  
Ninel Hovnanian ◽  
Parham Eshtehardi ◽  
Khalid Mojadidi ◽  
David Goodman-Meza ◽  
...  

Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a multifactorial disease characterized by endothelial dysfunction and inflammation. In line with this, pleiotropic effects of statins have been found beneficial in PH resulting in hemodynamic improvement. However, the role of statins in subgroups of PH, especially inflammation triggered chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unknown and their effect on mortality has not yet been studied. Methods: Consecutive patients ≥18 years with severe PH (pulmonary artery systolic pressure ≥60 mmHg) and preserved left ventricular function (ejection fraction ≥50%) defined by transthoracic echocardiograms were included from January 2002 to August 2012. Patients were divided into two groups based on being on statin therapy for 12 consecutive months after diagnosis of PH. Propensity score matching was performed for all baseline demographics, comorbidities, labs, lipid profile, and medications with ratio matching of 1 (treated) to 5 (untreated controls). Subgroup analysis was done based on COPD status. Study endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality. Results: 2,363 patients (age 71±16; 31% male) were included, 140 (6%) patients were on statin therapy. 1-year mortality for the entire population was 34%. Following propensity score matching, 137 patients on statin (statin group) and 625 patients not on statin (controls), all-cause mortality was significantly lower in statin group compared to controls (15.3% vs. 36.2%, HR 0.38 [95% CI 0.25, 0.60], p<0.001). After stratifying patients based on COPD status, while statins significantly reduced 1-year all-cause mortality in patients without COPD (HR 0.30 [95%CI 0.16, 0.56], p<0.001), patients with COPD did not show a survival benefit from statins (HR 0.54 [95%CI 0.28, 1.05], p=0.069). Conclusions: In this study, we identify statin therapy as an independent predictor of lower 1-year mortality in patients with severe PH but interestingly not in the subgroup of patients with COPD. This observation might be linked to the high severity of PH in our study population and less likely to the lack of anti-inflammatory effects. However the overall survival benefit in patients with severe PH is a novel and promising finding that needs to be confirmed in large randomized trials.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5-6
Author(s):  
Ankita Kapoor ◽  
Samarthkumar Thakkar ◽  
Lucas Battel ◽  
Harsh P. Patel ◽  
Nikhil Agrawal ◽  
...  

Introduction: Sickle cell disorders (SCD) is associated with progressive dysfunction of vital organs, including the cardiovascular system. While the development of pulmonary hypertension and left ventricular dysfunction have been previously studied, the burden of arrhythmias in SCD patients remains largely unknown. Thus, we aim to describe and analyze the prevalence and impact of arrhythmias in hospitalized adult patients with SCD and their impact in patient-oriented outcomes. Methods: We identified incident arrhythmias in patients with SCD in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database in 2 years (2016-2017), using ICD-10 codes. We compared major patient characteristics, outcomes, and economic impact between groups of SCD patients with and without documented arrhythmias. A logistic regression model was used to control for age, sex, race, admission type, hospital characteristics, and relevant comorbidities. To increase statistical robustness, propensity-score matching for age, sex, income, and comorbidities was used to match 1144 SCD patients with arrhythmia and 1144 patients without. Results: Among inpatients with SCD in the database, 5,930 of 174,450 patients with SCD had documented arrhythmias (3.4%). The arrhythmia group consisted mostly of patients' sickle cell disease (5,650; 95%), while 245 had sickle cell trait, and 35 were classified as having other sickle cell disorders. Individuals in the arrhythmia group were significantly older (mean age 41.3, SD 14.1) than those with no arrhythmia (mean age 31.5, SD 10.3). Further, arrhythmia group had higher prevalence of hypertension (44.2% vs 19.1%, p&lt;0.001), congestive heart failure (25.8% vs 4.1%, p&lt;0.001), chronic kidney disease (24.0% vs 5.6%, p&lt;0.001), valvular heart disease (9.3% vs 1.5%, p&lt;0.001), myocardial infarction (4.1% vs 1.25%, p&lt;0.001), type 2 diabetes mellitus (3.5% vs 1.7%, p&lt;0.001), and pulmonary hypertension (3.5% vs 1.2%, p&lt;0.001). When looking at major outcomes, after adjusting for confounders, arrhythmias were positively associated with all cause in-hospital mortality with an adjusted OR of 53.6 (95% CI 44.3, 65.1). After propensity-matching (Table 1), the arrhythmia group had a higher rate of all-cause in-hospital mortality (6.12% vs 0.35%, p&lt;0.001), higher median length of stay (6.8 days vs 5.8 days, p&lt;0.001), and mean total hospital charges ($13,441 vs $10,255, p&lt;0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of stroke between both groups. Conclusions: The presence of arrhythmias in patients with SCD was associated with markedly increased all cause in-hospital mortality, even after adjusting for confounders via logistic regression and propensity-score matching analyses. Despite a relatively low overall prevalence of 3.4% among this large inpatient cohort, this data suggests that arrhythmias may confer an important excess disease burden in SCD patients, including higher mortality. Intuitively, arrythmias confer higher mortality in patients with chronic disorders and multiple cardiovascular risks, whether this is specific to SCD deserves further study. Also, studies are needed to better understand the occurrence particularly in relation to active vaso-occlusive crisis and to evaluate whether SCD individuals with arrhythmias could potentially benefit from more intensive monitoring and/or better cardiovascular disease control. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 849-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Badillo ◽  
Robert Schmidt ◽  
Eric M. Mortensen ◽  
Christopher R. Frei ◽  
Ishak Mansi

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Baumert ◽  
Michael Becker ◽  
Marko Neumann ◽  
Roumiana Nikolova

Der vorliegende Beitrag geht der Frage nach, ob Schülerinnen und Schüler, die nach der vierten Klasse in Berlin in ein grundständiges Gymnasium wechseln, in Abhängigkeit vom Profil des besuchten Gymnasiums im Vergleich zu Grundschülern mit vergleichbaren Lernvoraussetzungen unterschiedliche Lernzuwächse im Leseverständnis, in Mathematik und Englisch erreichen. Auf der Datengrundlage der ELEMENT-Studie wurde die Leistungsentwicklung von Schülerinnen und Schülern an grundständigen Gymnasien (N = 1758) und Grundschulen (N = 3169) während der 5. und 6. Jahrgangsstufe mithilfe von Propensity Score Matching-Analysen (PSM) modelliert. Nach Kontrolle von leistungsrelevanten Unterschieden zwischen den Schülergruppen am Ende der 4. Jahrgangsstufe zeigten sich für das Leseverständnis am Ende der 6. Klasse keine statistisch signifikanten Unterschiede. Für die Mathematikleistung ließen sich Unterschiede lediglich zugunsten eines grundständigen Gymnasiums, das zum Untersuchungszeitpunkt noch kein spezifisches Profil entwickelt hatte, nachweisen. In der Domäne Englisch, in der die curricularen Unterschiede zwischen den Schulzweigen stärker akzentuiert sind, wurden positive Ergebnisse im Vergleich zu den Grundschulen für die so genannten Schnellläuferzüge, die englisch-bilingualen Klassen und das grundständige Gymnasium ohne spezifisches Profil ermittelt. Die Lernstände am Ende der 6. Klasse in den altsprachlichen Gymnasien fielen dagegen im Vergleich zu den Grundschulen geringer aus. Die Befunde widersprechen der Annahme, dass mit dem frühen Übergang auf ein grundständiges Gymnasium automatisch eine besondere Förderung der Lesefähigkeit und des mathematischen Verständnisses besonders leistungsfähiger Schülerinnen und Schüler erreicht werde. Die Ergebnisse zu den Englischleistungen weisen hingegen darauf hin, dass Unterschiede in der Leistungsentwicklung auftreten können, sofern die Aufteilung auf Schulen mit unterschiedlichen Bildungsprogrammen mit curricularen Unterschieden im Unterricht einhergeht. Methodische und inhaltliche Implikationen der Befunde und Grenzen ihrer Generalisierbarkeit werden diskutiert.


2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niko Kohls ◽  
Harald Walach

Validation studies of standard scales in the particular sample that one is studying are essential for accurate conclusions. We investigated the differences in answering patterns of the Brief-Symptom-Inventory (BSI), Transpersonal Trust Scale (TPV), Sense of Coherence Questionnaire (SOC), and a Social Support Scale (F-SoZu) for a matched sample of spiritually practicing (SP) and nonpracticing (NSP) individuals at two measurement points (t1, t2). Applying a sample matching procedure based on propensity scores, we selected two sociodemographically balanced subsamples of N = 120 out of a total sample of N = 431. Employing repeated measures ANOVAs, we found an intersample difference in means only for TPV and an intrasample difference for F-SoZu. Additionally, a group × time interaction effect was found for TPV. While Cronbach’s α was acceptable and comparable for both samples, a significantly lower test-rest-reliability for the BSI was found in the SP sample (rSP = .62; rNSP = .78). Thus, when researching the effects of spiritual practice, one should not only look at differences in means but also consider time stability. We recommend propensity score matching as an alternative for randomization in variables that defy experimental manipulation such as spirituality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document