scholarly journals Resection of oesophageal and oesophagogastric junction cancer liver metastases — a summary of current evidence

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas R. R. Weiss ◽  
Noel E. Donlon ◽  
Hans J. Schlitt ◽  
Christina Hackl
Keyword(s):  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Treatment Protocols ◽  
Oesophagogastric Junction

Abstract  Purpose Metastatic oesophageal cancer is commonly considered as a palliative situation with a poor prognosis. However, there is increasing evidence that well-selected patients with a limited number of liver metastases (ECLM) may benefit from a multimodal approach including surgery. Methods A systematic review of the current literature for randomized trials, retrospective studies, and case series with patients undergoing hepatectomies for oesophageal and oesophagogastric junction cancer liver metastases was conducted up to the 31st of August 2021 using the MEDLINE (PubMed) and Cochrane Library databases. Results A total of 661 articles were identified. After removal of duplicates, 483 articles were screened, of which 11 met the inclusion criteria. The available literature suggests that ECLM resection in patients with liver oligometastatic disease may lead to improved survival and even long-term survival in some cases. The response to concomitant chemotherapy and liver resection seems to be of significance. Furthermore, a long disease-free interval in metachronous disease, low number of liver metastases, young age, and good overall performance status have been described as potential predictive markers of outcome for the resection of liver metastases. Conclusion Surgery may be offered to carefully selected patients to potentially improve survival rates compared to palliative treatment approaches. Studies with standardized patient selection criteria and treatment protocols are required to further define the role for surgery in ECLM. In this context, particular consideration should be given to neoadjuvant treatment concepts including immunotherapies in stage IVB oesophageal and oesophagogastric junction cancer.

scholarly journals Surgical Treatment of Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ser Yee Lee ◽  
Peng Chung Cheow ◽  
Jin Yao Teo ◽  
London L. P. J. Ooi
Keyword(s):  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Progression Rate ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Management Algorithm ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases

Management of Neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) is challenging. The presence of NELM worsens survival outcome and almost 10% of all liver metastases are neuroendocrine in origin. There is no firm consensus on the optimal treatment strategy for NELM. A systematic search of the PubMed database was performed from 1995–2010, to collate the current evidence and formulate a sound management algorithm. There are 22 case series with a total of 793 patients who had undergone surgery for NELM. The overall survival ranges from 46–86% at 5 years, 35–79% at 10 years, and the median survival ranges from 52–123 months. After successful cytoreductive surgery, the mean duration of symptom reduction is between 16–26 months, and the 5-year recurrence/progression rate ranges from 59–76%. Five studies evaluated the efficacy of a combination cytoreductive strategy reporting survival rate of ranging from 83% at 3 years to 50% at 10 years. To date, there is no level 1 evidence comparing surgery versus other liver-directed treatment options for NELM. An aggressive surgical approach, including combination with additional liver-directed procedures is recommended as it leads to long-term survival, significant long-term palliation, and a good quality of life. A multidisciplinary approach should be established as the platform for decision making.

scholarly journals Impact of SARS-COV-2 Pandemic on Kidney Cancer Management

Kidney Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Melissa Bersanelli ◽  
Camillo Porta
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rates ◽  
Delayed Diagnosis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Original Data ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Renal Masses ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Cancer Management

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic still has a huge impact on the management of many chronic diseases such as cancer. Few data are presently available reagarding how the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has changed due to this unprecedented situation. Objective: To discuss the challenges and issues of the diagnosis and treatment of RCC in the COVID-19 era, and to provide recommendations based on the collected literature and our personal experience. Methods: Systematic review of the available Literature regarding the management of RCC during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Results: Our review showed a prevalence of narrative publications, raising the issue of the real relevance of the evidence retrieved. Indeed, the only original data about RCC and COVID-19 found were a small retrospective case series and two surveys, providing either patients’ or physicians’ viewpoints. Conclusions: The expected delayed diagnosis of RCC could lead to an increase of advanced/metastatic cases; thus, proper therapeutic choices for patients with small renal masses should be carefully evaluated case by case, in order to avoid negative effects on long-term survival rates. The controversial interaction between immune checkpoint blockade and COVID-19 pathogenesis is more hypothetical than evidence-based, and thus immunotherapy should not be denied, whenever appropriate. To avoid treatments which won’t have an impact on patients’ survival, a honest and accurate evaluation of the cost/benefit ratio of each treatment option should be always performed. Finally, SARS-CoV-2 swab positivity should not prevent the continuation of ongoing active treatments in asymptomatic cases, or or after symptoms’ resolution.

Department of Internal Medicine. University Hospital of Patras. Patras.

2022 ◽  
Vol 35 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Themistoklis Paraskevas ◽  
Eleousa Oikonomou ◽  
Maria Lagadinou ◽  
Vasileios Karamouzos ◽  
Nikolaos Zareifopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
Case Series ◽  
High Flow ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
High Flow Oxygen

Introduction: Oxygen therapy remains the cornerstone for managing patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and several modalities of non-invasive ventilation are used worldwide. High-flow oxygen via nasal canula is one therapeutic option which may in certain cases prevent the need of mechanical ventilation. The aim of this review is to summarize the current evidence on the use of high-flow nasal oxygen in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.Material and Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search of the databases PubMed and Cochrane Library until April 2021 using the following search terms: “high flow oxygen and COVID-19” and “high flow nasal and COVID-19’’.Results: Twenty-three articles were included in this review, in four of which prone positioning was used as an adjunctive measure. Most of the articles were cohort studies or case series. High-flow nasal oxygen therapy was associated with a reduced need for invasive ventilation compared to conventional oxygen therapy and led to an improvement in secondary clinical outcomes such as length of stay. The efficacy of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy was comparable to that of other non-invasive ventilation options, but its tolerability is likely higher. Failure of this modality was associated with increased mortality.Conclusion: High flow nasal oxygen is an established option for respiratory support in COVID-19 patients. Further investigation is required to quantify its efficacy and utility in preventing the requirement of invasive ventilation.

FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) versus FOLFIRI plus bev as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Updated survival results of the phase III TRIBE trial by the GONO group.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 657-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Cremolini ◽  
Fotios Loupakis ◽  
Gianluca Masi ◽  
Vittorina Zagonel ◽  
Francesca Bergamo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Effect ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Term Survival

657 Background: The phase III TRIBE trial met its primary endpoint, by demonstrating that first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bev significantly prolongs PFS, as compared to FOLFIRI plus bev. Also RECIST response rate, early response rate and deepness of response were significantly increased. At the first statistical analysis, with a median follow-up of 32.2 months, OS results were considered preliminary. Methods: Between July 2008 and May 2011, 508 patients were randomized to either FOLFIRI plus bev (arm A, n=256) or FOLFOXIRI plus bev (arm B, n=252). Both treatments were administered for a maximum of 12 cycles followed by 5FU/bev until progression. Results: At a median follow-up of 48.1 months, 374 deaths were recorded (Arm A=200 vs. Arm B=174). Median OS for Arm B vs. Arm A was 29.8 vs. 25.8 months (HR=0.80, 95% CI, 0.65-0.98, p=0.030). Long-term survival rates are reported in Table 1. Treatment effect was consistent across all analyzed subgroups. Among clinical variables, ECOG performance status of 1 or 2, right-sided primary tumor, synchronous metastases, disease not confined to the liver, unresected primary tumor, high Kohne score negatively affected prognosis at univariate analyses. At an exploratory model accounting for these variables, adjusted HR for treatment effect on OS was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.61-0.96, p=0.020). Conclusions: FOLFOXIRI plus bev improves survival of mCRC patients, as compared to FOLFIRI plus bev. The estimated 5-years OS rate of patients treated with FOLFOXIRI plus bev was equal to 24.9%, with an absolute benefit of 12.5% compared to controls. FOLFOXIRI plus bev represents a valuable option for the upfront treatment of mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT00719797. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Breast Cancer Liver Metastases: US-guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation—Intermediate and Long-term Survival Rates

Radiology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 253 (3) ◽  
pp. 861-869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Franca Meloni ◽  
Anita Andreano ◽  
Paul F. Laeseke ◽  
Tito Livraghi ◽  
Sandro Sironi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Breast Cancer Liver Metastases

scholarly journals P14.61 Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) combined with lomustine (CCNU) and temozolomide (TMZ) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients - a bi-centric analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii81-iii81
Author(s):  
L Lazaridis ◽  
N Schäfer ◽  
T Schmidt ◽  
A Stoppek ◽  
J Weller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combined Therapy ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Abstract BACKGROUND TTFields combined with TMZ demonstrated significantly improved PFS, OS and long-term survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM) patients, compared to TMZ monotherapy in the EF-14 trial; independent of MGMT-promotor methylation-status, age, grade of resection and performance status. Recently, improved efficacy of lomustine (CCNU)/TMZ compared to TMZ monotherapy in ndGBM patients with MGMT-promotor methylation was reported in the CeTeG trial (NOA-09). Taken into account that TTFields showed a strong safety profile as well as a high potential being combined with other modalities and the very encouraging results for methylated MGMT-promotor GBM patients in the CeTeG trial, there is a strong rationale in combining these treatment regimens. Here, we present a case series of patients receiving a combination of both modalities, TTFields and CCNU/TMZ. METHODS Patients with ndGBM and MGMT-promotor methylation underwent a combined therapy of TTFields plus CCNU/TMZ after surgery and radiochemotherapy. Safety, feasibility as well as first efficacy results of this combined therapy are reported at data cut-off (31.12.2018). Most recent data, including compliance to TTFields therapy, will be presented at the EANO annual meeting. RESULTS Twelve patients with MGMT-promotor methylated ndGBM (median, range: age 49.5, 26–69; KPS 90, 60–100) have been treated with a combination of TTFields plus CCNU/TMZ. The analysis included patients with complete resection (n=6), partial resection (n=5) as well as biopsy (n=1). CTCAE grade 3 hematotoxicities were observed in six patients, but were not considered to be related to the addition of TTFields to lomustine/TMZ. Medical device site reactions (low-grade skin reactions) were detected in five patients. At data cut-off, the analyzed patient population demonstrated a median PFS of 18.7 months, whereas the median OS was not yet reached. CONCLUSION The results of this analysis provide first indication that the combination of TTFields/lomustine/TMZ is safe and feasible. Moreover, the observed survival outcomes point to preliminary beneficial effects of the triple combination. Additional follow-up and a higher sample size is required and planned for further toxicity analysis and efficacy assessment of this combination.

Colorectal liver metastases management in the Veterans Health Administration: Geographic disparity.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 694-694
Author(s):  
Dalia A. Mobarek ◽  
Brendan C. Visser ◽  
Steven Krasnow ◽  
Ji Won Chang ◽  
Patricia Nechodom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Veterans Health Administration ◽  
Disease Diagnosis ◽  
Veterans Health ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Geographic Disparity

694 Background: Multidisciplinary management including surgical resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases (CLM) offers the greatest chance of long-term survival. We aimed to study surgical intervention types, rates and factors affecting the decision making in the Veterans Health Administration. Methods: The Veterans Affairs Central Cancer Registry (VACCR) and VA Informatics & Computing Infrastructure (VINCI) were queried and linked to retrospectively analyze stage IV CLM from 10/01/2004-12/31/2012. Cohort construction and statistical analyses were performed utilizing SQL Server, SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and Microsoft Excel. Results: We identified 118 VA stations and 1245 subjects meeting the inclusion criteria. Hemicolectomy was identified in 79%, (637) and 21 % (168) liver metastatectomy. Open versus laparoscopic hemicolectomy was 87.96% and 12.04% respectively. Follow-up imaging post metastatic disease diagnosis was carried in 88.9% (1,108) subjects. Immense variation in the percentage of surgeries conducted and the sites of surgery when stratified by geographic location. The percentage of patients receiving surgery at the colon remained high across almost all the stations. In 53 stations, hemicolectomy and hepatectomy were attempted in at least 15% of subjects with stage IV colorectal cancer and isolated liver metastases. Of the high volume stations, only 52% had a 15% or higher percentage of hemicolectomy and hepatectomy. Subjects receiving hepatectomy only were the least frequent and occurred in only three stations. Age at diagnosis, gender, Charlson comorbidity scores and the performance status at diagnosis did not differ significantly among surgery versus no-surgery groups. Conclusions: Geographic disparity emerged as a factor affecting metastatectomy decisions. Ongoing analysis to identify and analyze the differences amongst various stations is underway. Additional characterization of the liver metastases including size, number, and specific hepatic lobe and the surgical expertise is underway.

scholarly journals Surgical Options for Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases

HPB Surgery ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irinel Popescu ◽  
Sorin Tiberiu Alexandrescu
Keyword(s):  
Liver Resection ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Palliative Treatment ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Portal Vein Ligation ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Surgical Options

Although the frontiers of liver resection for colorectal liver metastases have broadened in recent decades, approximately 75% of these patients present with unresectable metastases at the time of their diagnosis. In the past, these patients underwent only palliative treatment, without the chance of a cure. In the previous two decades, several therapeutic strategies have been developed that render resectable those metastases that were initially unresectable, thus offering the chance of long-term survival and even a cure to these patients. The oncosurgical modalities that are available include liver resection following portal vein ligation/embolization, “two-stage” liver resection, one-stage ultrasonically guided liver resection, hepatectomy following conversion chemotherapy, and liver resection combined with thermal ablation. Moreover, in recent years, certain authors have recommended the revisiting of the concept of liver transplantation in highly selected patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases and favorable prognostic factors. By employing such therapies, the number of patients with colorectal liver metastases who undergo a potentially curative treatment could increase to 40%. The safety profile of these approaches is acceptable (morbidity rates as high as 45%, mortality rates of less than 5%). Furthermore, the 5-year survival rates (approximately 30%) are significantly increased over those that were achieved with palliative treatment.

scholarly journals Hepatic Arterial Embolization for the Treatment of Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Lee ◽  
H. Leon Pachter ◽  
Umut Sarpel
Keyword(s):  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Arterial Embolization ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Embolization

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have a high predilection for metastasizing to the liver and can cause severe debilitating symptoms adversely affecting quality of life. Although surgery remains the treatment of choice, many liver metastases are inoperable at presentation. Hepatic arterial embolization procedures take advantage of the arterial supply of NET metastases. The goals of these therapies are twofold: to increase overall survival by stabilizing tumor growth, and to reduce the morbidity in symptomatic patients. Patients treated with hepatic arterial embolization demonstrate longer progression-free survival and have 5-year survival rates of nearly 30%. The safety of repeat embolizations has also been proven in the setting of recurrent symptoms or progression of the disease. Despite not being curative, hepatic arterial embolization should be used in the management of NETs with liver metastases. Long-term survival is not uncommon, making aggressive palliation of symptoms an important component of treatment.

Current Concepts on Tissue Adhesive Use for Meniscal Repair—We Are Not There Yet: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110036
Author(s):  
Niv Marom ◽  
Gabriella Ode ◽  
Francesca Coxe ◽  
Bridget Jivanelli ◽  
Scott A. Rodeo
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Primary Repair ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Tissue Adhesive ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Promising Alternative

Background: Tissue adhesives (TAs) represent a promising alternative or augmentation method to conventional tissue repair techniques. In sports medicine, TA use has been suggested and implemented in the treatment of meniscal tears. The aim of this review was to present and discuss the current evidence and base of knowledge regarding the clinical usage of TAs for meniscal repair. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for studies reporting on clinical outcomes of TA usage for meniscal repair in humans in the English language published before January 2020. Results: Ten studies were eligible for review and included 352 meniscal repairs: 94 (27%) were TA-based repairs and 258 (73%) were combined suture and TA repairs. Concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed in 224 repairs (64%). All included studies utilized fibrin-based TA. Of the 10 studies, 9 were evidence level 4 (case series), and 8 reported on a cohort of ≤40 meniscal repairs. Rates of meniscal healing were evaluated in 9 of 10 studies, with repair failure seen in 39 repairs (11%). Conclusion: The use of TAs, specifically fibrin-based TAs, for meniscal repair shows good results as either an augmentation or primary repair of various configurations of meniscal tears. However, this review reveals an absence of comparative high-quality evidence supporting the routine use of TAs for meniscal repair and emphasizes the lack of an ideal TA designed for that purpose. Further high-quality research, basic science and clinical, will facilitate the development of new materials and enable testing their suitability for use in meniscal repair.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document