Sodium butyrate induces genotoxic stress in function of photoperiod variations and differentially modulates the expression of genes involved in chromatin modification and DNA repair in Petunia hybrida seedlings

Planta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 251 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Pagano ◽  
Corrado L’Andolina ◽  
Maria Elisa Sabatini ◽  
Susana de Sousa Araújo ◽  
Alma Balestrazzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Sodium Butyrate ◽  
Petunia Hybrida ◽  
Chromatin Modification ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Expression Of Genes

scholarly journals DNA repair and the evolution of transformation in Bacillus subtilis. II. Role of inducible repair.

Genetics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 411-422
Author(s):  
M F Wojciechowski ◽  
M A Hoelzer ◽  
R E Michod
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Bacillus Subtilis ◽  
Plasmid Dna ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Physiological State ◽  
Transformation Rate ◽  
Exogenous Dna ◽  
Expression Of Genes ◽  
Cell Subpopulations ◽  
Experimental Treatments

Abstract In Bacillus subtilis, DNA repair and recombination are intimately associated with competence, the physiological state in which the bacterium can bind, take up and recombine exogenous DNA. Previously, we have shown that the homologous DNA transformation rate (ratio of transformants to total cells) increases with increasing UV dosage if cells are transformed after exposure to UV radiation (UV-DNA), whereas the transformation rate decreases if cells are transformed before exposure to UV (DNA-UV). In this report, by using different DNA repair-deficient mutants, we show that the greater increase in transformation rate in UV-DNA experiments than in DNA-UV experiments does not depend upon excision repair or inducible SOS-like repair, although certain quantitative aspects of the response do depend upon these repair systems. We also show that there is no increase in the transformation rate in a UV-DNA experiment when repair and recombination proficient cells are transformed with nonhomologous plasmid DNA, although the results in a DNA-UV experiment are essentially unchanged by using plasmid DNA. We have used din operon fusions as a sensitive means of assaying for the expression of genes under the control of the SOS-like regulon in both competent and noncompetent cell subpopulations as a consequence of competence development and our subsequent experimental treatments. Results indicate that the SOS-like system is induced in both competent and noncompetent subpopulations in our treatments and so should not be a major factor in the differential response in transformation rate observed in UV-DNA and DNA-UV treatments. These results provide further support to the hypothesis that the evolutionary function of competence is to bring DNA into the cell for use as template in the repair of DNA damage.

scholarly journals Sodium butyrate stimulates DNA repair in UV-irradiated normal and xeroderma pigmentosum human fibroblasts.

1982 ◽  
Vol 257 (22) ◽  
pp. 13441-13447
Author(s):  
M J Smerdon ◽  
S Y Lan ◽  
R E Calza ◽  
R Reeves
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Sodium Butyrate ◽  
Xeroderma Pigmentosum ◽  
Human Fibroblasts

scholarly journals Exploring the multiple roles of guardian of the genome: P53

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wasim Feroz ◽  
Arwah Mohammad Ali Sheikh
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Crucial Role ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Specific Response ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Tumour Suppression

Abstract Background Cells have evolved balanced mechanisms to protect themselves by initiating a specific response to a variety of stress. The TP53 gene, encoding P53 protein, is one of the many widely studied genes in human cells owing to its multifaceted functions and complex dynamics. The tumour-suppressing activity of P53 plays a principal role in the cellular response to stress. The majority of the human cancer cells exhibit the inactivation of the P53 pathway. In this review, we discuss the recent advancements in P53 research with particular focus on the role of P53 in DNA damage responses, apoptosis, autophagy, and cellular metabolism. We also discussed important P53-reactivation strategies that can play a crucial role in cancer therapy and the role of P53 in various diseases. Main body We used electronic databases like PubMed and Google Scholar for literature search. In response to a variety of cellular stress such as genotoxic stress, ischemic stress, oncogenic expression, P53 acts as a sensor, and suppresses tumour development by promoting cell death or permanent inhibition of cell proliferation. It controls several genes that play a role in the arrest of the cell cycle, cellular senescence, DNA repair system, and apoptosis. P53 plays a crucial role in supporting DNA repair by arresting the cell cycle to purchase time for the repair system to restore genome stability. Apoptosis is essential for maintaining tissue homeostasis and tumour suppression. P53 can induce apoptosis in a genetically unstable cell by interacting with many pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic factors. Furthermore, P53 can activate autophagy, which also plays a role in tumour suppression. P53 also regulates many metabolic pathways of glucose, lipid, and amino acid metabolism. Thus under mild metabolic stress, P53 contributes to the cell’s ability to adapt to and survive the stress. Conclusion These multiple levels of regulation enable P53 to perform diversified roles in many cell responses. Understanding the complete function of P53 is still a work in progress because of the inherent complexity involved in between P53 and its target proteins. Further research is required to unravel the mystery of this Guardian of the genome “TP53”.

scholarly journals DNA damage shifts circadian clock time via Hausp-dependent Cry1 stabilization

eLife ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie J Papp ◽  
Anne-Laure Huber ◽  
Sabine D Jordan ◽  
Anna Kriebs ◽  
Madelena Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Circadian Clock ◽  
Transcriptional Response ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Genomic Integrity ◽  
Clock Time ◽  
Dna Repair Enzymes ◽  
Repair Enzymes ◽  
Specific Protease

The circadian transcriptional repressors cryptochrome 1 (Cry1) and 2 (Cry2) evolved from photolyases, bacterial light-activated DNA repair enzymes. In this study, we report that while they have lost DNA repair activity, Cry1/2 adapted to protect genomic integrity by responding to DNA damage through posttranslational modification and coordinating the downstream transcriptional response. We demonstrate that genotoxic stress stimulates Cry1 phosphorylation and its deubiquitination by Herpes virus associated ubiquitin-specific protease (Hausp, a.k.a Usp7), stabilizing Cry1 and shifting circadian clock time. DNA damage also increases Cry2 interaction with Fbxl3, destabilizing Cry2. Thus, genotoxic stress increases the Cry1/Cry2 ratio, suggesting distinct functions for Cry1 and Cry2 following DNA damage. Indeed, the transcriptional response to genotoxic stress is enhanced in Cry1−/− and blunted in Cry2−/− cells. Furthermore, Cry2−/− cells accumulate damaged DNA. These results suggest that Cry1 and Cry2, which evolved from DNA repair enzymes, protect genomic integrity via coordinated transcriptional regulation.

scholarly journals Genome Maintenance Mechanisms at the Chromatin Level

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (19) ◽  
pp. 10384
Author(s):  
Hirotomo Takatsuka ◽  
Atsushi Shibata ◽  
Masaaki Umeda
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Easy Access ◽  
Order Structure ◽  
Chromatin Modifications ◽  
Level Control ◽  
Regulatory Systems

Genome integrity is constantly threatened by internal and external stressors, in both animals and plants. As plants are sessile, a variety of environment stressors can damage their DNA. In the nucleus, DNA twines around histone proteins to form the higher-order structure “chromatin”. Unraveling how chromatin transforms on sensing genotoxic stress is, thus, key to understanding plant strategies to cope with fluctuating environments. In recent years, accumulating evidence in plant research has suggested that chromatin plays a crucial role in protecting DNA from genotoxic stress in three ways: (1) changes in chromatin modifications around damaged sites enhance DNA repair by providing a scaffold and/or easy access to DNA repair machinery; (2) DNA damage triggers genome-wide alterations in chromatin modifications, globally modulating gene expression required for DNA damage response, such as stem cell death, cell-cycle arrest, and an early onset of endoreplication; and (3) condensed chromatin functions as a physical barrier against genotoxic stressors to protect DNA. In this review, we highlight the chromatin-level control of genome stability and compare the regulatory systems in plants and animals to find out unique mechanisms maintaining genome integrity under genotoxic stress.

scholarly journals WIP1 Promotes Homologous Recombination and Modulates Sensitivity to PARP Inhibitors

Cells ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamila Burdova ◽  
Radka Storchova ◽  
Matous Palek ◽  
Libor Macurek
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Lesion ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
G2 Cells

Genotoxic stress triggers a combined action of DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Protein phosphatase 2C delta (referred to as WIP1) is involved in timely inactivation of DNA damage response by suppressing function of p53 and other targets at chromatin. Here we show that WIP1 promotes DNA repair through homologous recombination. Loss or inhibition of WIP1 delayed disappearance of the ionizing radiation-induced 53BP1 foci in S/G2 cells and promoted cell death. We identify breast cancer associated protein 1 (BRCA1) as interactor and substrate of WIP1 and demonstrate that WIP1 activity is needed for correct dynamics of BRCA1 recruitment to chromatin flanking the DNA lesion. In addition, WIP1 dephosphorylates 53BP1 at Threonine 543 that was previously implicated in mediating interaction with RIF1. Finally, we report that inhibition of WIP1 allowed accumulation of DNA damage in S/G2 cells and increased sensitivity of cancer cells to a poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib. We propose that inhibition of WIP1 may increase sensitivity of BRCA1-proficient cancer cells to olaparib.

scholarly journals DNA-Histone Cross-Links: Formation and Repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manideep C. Pachva ◽  
Alexei F. Kisselev ◽  
Bakhyt T. Matkarimov ◽  
Murat Saparbaev ◽  
Regina Groisman
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Electrostatic Interactions ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Tumor Resistance ◽  
Cross Link ◽  
Covalent Bonds ◽  
Nucleosome Core ◽  
Cross Links ◽  
Tight Association

The nucleosome is a stretch of DNA wrapped around a histone octamer. Electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonds between histones and DNA are vital for the stable organization of nucleosome core particles, and for the folding of chromatin into more compact structures, which regulate gene expression via controlled access to DNA. As a drawback of tight association, under genotoxic stress, DNA can accidentally cross-link to histone in a covalent manner, generating a highly toxic DNA-histone cross-link (DHC). DHC is a bulky lesion that can impede DNA transcription, replication, and repair, often with lethal consequences. The chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin, as well as ionizing and ultraviolet irradiations and endogenously occurring reactive aldehydes, generate DHCs by forming either stable or transient covalent bonds between DNA and side-chain amino groups of histone lysine residues. The mechanisms of DHC repair start to unravel, and certain common principles of DNA-protein cross-link (DPC) repair mechanisms that participate in the removal of cross-linked histones from DNA have been described. In general, DPC is removed via a two-step repair mechanism. First, cross-linked proteins are degraded by specific DPC proteases or by the proteasome, relieving steric hindrance. Second, the remaining DNA-peptide cross-links are eliminated in various DNA repair pathways. Delineating the molecular mechanisms of DHC repair would help target specific DNA repair proteins for therapeutic intervention to combat tumor resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Expression of genes involved in DNA repair and telomere maintenance in the yeast Hansenula polymorpha DL1 under heat stress

2015 ◽  
Vol 462 (1) ◽  
pp. 185-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Beletsky ◽  
A. N. Malyavko ◽  
M. V. Sukhanova ◽  
E. S. Mardanova ◽  
M. E. Zvereva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Heat Stress ◽  
Hansenula Polymorpha ◽  
Telomere Maintenance ◽  
Expression Of Genes
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document