scholarly journals Genome Maintenance Mechanisms at the Chromatin Level

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (19) ◽  
pp. 10384
Author(s):  
Hirotomo Takatsuka ◽  
Atsushi Shibata ◽  
Masaaki Umeda
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Easy Access ◽  
Order Structure ◽  
Chromatin Modifications ◽  
Level Control ◽  
Regulatory Systems

Genome integrity is constantly threatened by internal and external stressors, in both animals and plants. As plants are sessile, a variety of environment stressors can damage their DNA. In the nucleus, DNA twines around histone proteins to form the higher-order structure “chromatin”. Unraveling how chromatin transforms on sensing genotoxic stress is, thus, key to understanding plant strategies to cope with fluctuating environments. In recent years, accumulating evidence in plant research has suggested that chromatin plays a crucial role in protecting DNA from genotoxic stress in three ways: (1) changes in chromatin modifications around damaged sites enhance DNA repair by providing a scaffold and/or easy access to DNA repair machinery; (2) DNA damage triggers genome-wide alterations in chromatin modifications, globally modulating gene expression required for DNA damage response, such as stem cell death, cell-cycle arrest, and an early onset of endoreplication; and (3) condensed chromatin functions as a physical barrier against genotoxic stressors to protect DNA. In this review, we highlight the chromatin-level control of genome stability and compare the regulatory systems in plants and animals to find out unique mechanisms maintaining genome integrity under genotoxic stress.

scholarly journals N6-Methyladenosine, DNA Repair, and Genome Stability

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Qu ◽  
Pawlos S. Tsegay ◽  
Yuan Liu
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Cell Renewal ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Cellular Sensitivity

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification in mRNAs and non-coding RNAs is a newly identified epitranscriptomic mark. It provides a fine-tuning of gene expression to serve as a cellular response to endogenous and exogenous stimuli. m6A is involved in regulating genes in multiple cellular pathways and functions, including circadian rhythm, cell renewal, differentiation, neurogenesis, immunity, among others. Disruption of m6A regulation is associated with cancer, obesity, and immune diseases. Recent studies have shown that m6A can be induced by oxidative stress and DNA damage to regulate DNA repair. Also, deficiency of the m6A eraser, fat mass obesity-associated protein (FTO) can increase cellular sensitivity to genotoxicants. These findings shed light on the novel roles of m6A in modulating DNA repair and genome integrity and stability through responding to DNA damage. In this mini-review, we discuss recent progress in the understanding of a unique role of m6As in mRNAs, lncRNAs, and microRNAs in DNA damage response and regulation of DNA repair and genome integrity and instability.

scholarly journals Emerging roles of RNA modifications in genome integrity

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seo Yun Lee ◽  
Jae Jin Kim ◽  
Kyle M Miller
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Human Diseases ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Rna Modification ◽  
Rna Modifications ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break

Abstract Post-translational modifications of proteins are well-established participants in DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, which function in the maintenance of genome integrity. Emerging evidence is starting to reveal the involvement of modifications on RNA in the DDR. RNA modifications are known regulators of gene expression but how and if they participate in DNA repair and genome maintenance has been poorly understood. Here, we review several studies that have now established RNA modifications as key components of DNA damage responses. RNA modifying enzymes and the binding proteins that recognize these modifications localize to and participate in the repair of UV-induced and DNA double-strand break lesions. RNA modifications have a profound effect on DNA–RNA hybrids (R-loops) at DNA damage sites, a structure known to be involved in DNA repair and genome stability. Given the importance of the DDR in suppressing mutations and human diseases such as neurodegeneration, immunodeficiencies, cancer and aging, RNA modification pathways may be involved in human diseases not solely through their roles in gene expression but also by their ability to impact DNA repair and genome stability.

scholarly journals Bromodomain proteins: protectors against endogenous DNA damage and facilitators of genome integrity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seo Yun Lee ◽  
Jae Jin Kim ◽  
Kyle M. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Stress Responses ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Cancer Development ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Major Contributor ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Bromodomain Proteins

AbstractEndogenous DNA damage is a major contributor to mutations, which are drivers of cancer development. Bromodomain (BRD) proteins are well-established participants in chromatin-based DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, which maintain genome integrity from cell-intrinsic and extrinsic DNA-damaging sources. BRD proteins are most well-studied as regulators of transcription, but emerging evidence has revealed their importance in other DNA-templated processes, including DNA repair and replication. How BRD proteins mechanistically protect cells from endogenous DNA damage through their participation in these pathways remains an active area of investigation. Here, we review several recent studies establishing BRD proteins as key influencers of endogenous DNA damage, including DNA–RNA hybrid (R-loops) formation during transcription and participation in replication stress responses. As endogenous DNA damage is known to contribute to several human diseases, including neurodegeneration, immunodeficiencies, cancer, and aging, the ability of BRD proteins to suppress DNA damage and mutations is likely to provide new insights into the involvement of BRD proteins in these diseases. Although many studies have focused on BRD proteins in transcription, evidence indicates that BRD proteins have emergent functions in DNA repair and genome stability and are participants in the etiology and treatment of diseases involving endogenous DNA damage.

scholarly journals The Role of Posttranslational Modifications in DNA Repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Miaomiao Bai ◽  
Dongdong Ti ◽  
Qian Mei ◽  
Jiejie Liu ◽  
Xin Yan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Posttranslational Modifications ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Protein Localization ◽  
Complex Structure ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Regulate Protein

The human body is a complex structure of cells, which are exposed to many types of stress. Cells must utilize various mechanisms to protect their DNA from damage caused by metabolic and external sources to maintain genomic integrity and homeostasis and to prevent the development of cancer. DNA damage inevitably occurs regardless of physiological or abnormal conditions. In response to DNA damage, signaling pathways are activated to repair the damaged DNA or to induce cell apoptosis. During the process, posttranslational modifications (PTMs) can be used to modulate enzymatic activities and regulate protein stability, protein localization, and protein-protein interactions. Thus, PTMs in DNA repair should be studied. In this review, we will focus on the current understanding of the phosphorylation, poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation, ubiquitination, SUMOylation, acetylation, and methylation of six typical PTMs and summarize PTMs of the key proteins in DNA repair, providing important insight into the role of PTMs in the maintenance of genome stability and contributing to reveal new and selective therapeutic approaches to target cancers.

scholarly journals DNA damage shifts circadian clock time via Hausp-dependent Cry1 stabilization

eLife ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie J Papp ◽  
Anne-Laure Huber ◽  
Sabine D Jordan ◽  
Anna Kriebs ◽  
Madelena Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Circadian Clock ◽  
Transcriptional Response ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Genomic Integrity ◽  
Clock Time ◽  
Dna Repair Enzymes ◽  
Repair Enzymes ◽  
Specific Protease

The circadian transcriptional repressors cryptochrome 1 (Cry1) and 2 (Cry2) evolved from photolyases, bacterial light-activated DNA repair enzymes. In this study, we report that while they have lost DNA repair activity, Cry1/2 adapted to protect genomic integrity by responding to DNA damage through posttranslational modification and coordinating the downstream transcriptional response. We demonstrate that genotoxic stress stimulates Cry1 phosphorylation and its deubiquitination by Herpes virus associated ubiquitin-specific protease (Hausp, a.k.a Usp7), stabilizing Cry1 and shifting circadian clock time. DNA damage also increases Cry2 interaction with Fbxl3, destabilizing Cry2. Thus, genotoxic stress increases the Cry1/Cry2 ratio, suggesting distinct functions for Cry1 and Cry2 following DNA damage. Indeed, the transcriptional response to genotoxic stress is enhanced in Cry1−/− and blunted in Cry2−/− cells. Furthermore, Cry2−/− cells accumulate damaged DNA. These results suggest that Cry1 and Cry2, which evolved from DNA repair enzymes, protect genomic integrity via coordinated transcriptional regulation.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor sensitivity of DNA repair deficient tumors

Immunotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 1205-1213
Author(s):  
Pauline Rochefort ◽  
Françoise Desseigne ◽  
Valérie Bonadona ◽  
Sophie Dussart ◽  
Clélia Coutzac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Repair Deficiency ◽  
Dna Repair Deficiency

Faithful DNA replication is necessary to maintain genome stability and implicates a complex network with several pathways depending on DNA damage type: homologous repair, nonhomologous end joining, base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair and mismatch repair. Alteration in components of DNA repair machinery led to DNA damage accumulation and potentially carcinogenesis. Preclinical data suggest sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors in tumors with DNA repair deficiency. Here, we review clinical studies that explored the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor in patient harboring tumor with DNA repair deficiency.

scholarly journals Obesity, DNA Damage, and Development of Obesity-Related Diseases

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Włodarczyk ◽  
Grażyna Nowicka
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Dietary Habits ◽  
Cell Metabolism ◽  
Cancer Cell Proliferation ◽  
Dna Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Risk Assessment And Prevention ◽  
And Migration

Obesity has been recognized to increase the risk of such diseases as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and cancer. It indicates that obesity can impact genome stability. Oxidative stress and inflammation, commonly occurring in obesity, can induce DNA damage and inhibit DNA repair mechanisms. Accumulation of DNA damage can lead to an enhanced mutation rate and can alter gene expression resulting in disturbances in cell metabolism. Obesity-associated DNA damage can promote cancer growth by favoring cancer cell proliferation and migration, and resistance to apoptosis. Estimation of the DNA damage and/or disturbances in DNA repair could be potentially useful in the risk assessment and prevention of obesity-associated metabolic disorders as well as cancers. DNA damage in people with obesity appears to be reversible and both weight loss and improvement of dietary habits and diet composition can affect genome stability.

scholarly journals WIP1 Promotes Homologous Recombination and Modulates Sensitivity to PARP Inhibitors

Cells ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamila Burdova ◽  
Radka Storchova ◽  
Matous Palek ◽  
Libor Macurek
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Lesion ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
G2 Cells

Genotoxic stress triggers a combined action of DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Protein phosphatase 2C delta (referred to as WIP1) is involved in timely inactivation of DNA damage response by suppressing function of p53 and other targets at chromatin. Here we show that WIP1 promotes DNA repair through homologous recombination. Loss or inhibition of WIP1 delayed disappearance of the ionizing radiation-induced 53BP1 foci in S/G2 cells and promoted cell death. We identify breast cancer associated protein 1 (BRCA1) as interactor and substrate of WIP1 and demonstrate that WIP1 activity is needed for correct dynamics of BRCA1 recruitment to chromatin flanking the DNA lesion. In addition, WIP1 dephosphorylates 53BP1 at Threonine 543 that was previously implicated in mediating interaction with RIF1. Finally, we report that inhibition of WIP1 allowed accumulation of DNA damage in S/G2 cells and increased sensitivity of cancer cells to a poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib. We propose that inhibition of WIP1 may increase sensitivity of BRCA1-proficient cancer cells to olaparib.

Mutations in CREBBP and EP300 genes affect DNA repair of oxidative damage in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome cells

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-266
Author(s):  
Ilaria Dutto ◽  
Claudia Scalera ◽  
Micol Tillhon ◽  
Giulio Ticli ◽  
Gianluca Passaniti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Oxidative Dna Damage ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Nuclear Antigen ◽  
Autosomal Dominant Disorder ◽  
Cell Extracts ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome (RSTS) is an autosomal-dominant disorder characterized by intellectual disability, skeletal abnormalities, growth deficiency and an increased risk of tumors. RSTS is predominantly caused by mutations in CREBBP or EP300 genes encoding for CBP and p300 proteins, two lysine acetyl-transferases (KAT) playing a key role in transcription, cell proliferation and DNA repair. However, the efficiency of these processes in RSTS cells is still largely unknown. Here, we have investigated whether pathways involved in the maintenance of genome stability are affected in lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) obtained from RSTS patients with mutations in CREBBP or in EP300 genes. We report that RSTS LCLs with mutations affecting CBP or p300 protein levels or KAT activity, are more sensitive to oxidative DNA damage and exhibit defective base excision repair (BER). We have found reduced OGG1 DNA glycosylase activity in RSTS compared to control cell extracts, and concomitant lower OGG1 acetylation levels, thereby impairing the initiation of the BER process. In addition, we report reduced acetylation of other BER factors, such as DNA polymerase β and Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA), together with acetylation of histone H3. We also show that complementation of CBP or p300 partially reversed RSTS cell sensitivity to DNA damage. These results disclose a mechanism of defective DNA repair as a source of genome instability in RSTS cells.

scholarly journals Dynamic Compartmentalization of Base Excision Repair Proteins in Response to Nuclear and Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 794-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyra M. Griffiths ◽  
Dan Swartzlander ◽  
Kellen L. Meadows ◽  
Keith D. Wilkinson ◽  
Anita H. Corbett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Oxidative Dna Damage ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Intracellular Localization ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress ◽  
Base Excision

ABSTRACT DNAs harbored in both nuclei and mitochondria of eukaryotic cells are subject to continuous oxidative damage resulting from normal metabolic activities or environmental insults. Oxidative DNA damage is primarily reversed by the base excision repair (BER) pathway, initiated by N-glycosylase apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) lyase proteins. To execute an appropriate repair response, BER components must be distributed to accommodate levels of genotoxic stress that may vary considerably between nuclei and mitochondria, depending on the growth state and stress environment of the cell. Numerous examples exist where cells respond to signals, resulting in relocalization of proteins involved in key biological transactions. To address whether such dynamic localization contributes to efficient organelle-specific DNA repair, we determined the intracellular localization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae N-glycosylase/AP lyases, Ntg1 and Ntg2, in response to nuclear and mitochondrial oxidative stress. Fluorescence microscopy revealed that Ntg1 is differentially localized to nuclei and mitochondria, likely in response to the oxidative DNA damage status of the organelle. Sumoylation is associated with targeting of Ntg1 to nuclei containing oxidative DNA damage. These studies demonstrate that trafficking of DNA repair proteins to organelles containing high levels of oxidative DNA damage may be a central point for regulating BER in response to oxidative stress.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document