scholarly journals Risk Factors for Mortality and Progression to Severe COVID-19 Disease in the Southeast United States (US): A Report from the SEUS Study Group

Author(s):  
Athena L. V. Hobbs ◽  
Nicholas Turner ◽  
Imad Omer ◽  
Morgan K. Walker ◽  
Ronald M. Beaulieu ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Identify risk factors that could increase progression to severe disease and mortality in hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 patients in the Southeast US. Design, Setting, and Participants Multicenter, retrospective cohort including 502 adults hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 between March 1, 2020 and May 8, 2020 within one of 15 participating hospitals in 5 health systems across 5 states in the Southeast US. Methods The study objectives were to identify risk factors that could increase progression to hospital mortality and severe disease (defined as a composite of intensive care unit admission or requirement of mechanical ventilation) in hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 patients in the Southeast US. Results A total of 502 patients were included, and the majority (476/502, 95%) had clinically evaluable outcomes. Hospital mortality was 16% (76/476), while 35% (177/502) required ICU admission, and 18% (91/502) required mechanical ventilation. By both univariate and adjusted multivariate analysis, hospital mortality was independently associated with age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.03 for each decade increase, 95% CI 1.56-2.69), male sex (aOR 2.44, 95% CI: 1.34-4.59), and cardiovascular disease (aOR 2.16, 95% CI: 1.15-4.09). As with mortality, risk of severe disease was independently associated with age (aOR 1.17 for each decade increase, 95% CI: 1.00-1.37), male sex (aOR 2.34, 95% CI 1.54-3.60), and cardiovascular disease (aOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.09-2.85). Conclusions In an adjusted multivariate analysis, advanced age, male sex, and cardiovascular disease increased risk of severe disease and mortality in patients with COVID-19 in the Southeast US. In-hospital mortality risk doubled with each subsequent decade of life.

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Elliott ◽  
Barbara Bodinier ◽  
Matthew Whitaker ◽  
Cyrille Delpierre ◽  
Roel Vermeulen ◽  
...  

AbstractMost studies of severe/fatal COVID-19 risk have used routine/hospitalisation data without detailed pre-morbid characterisation. Using the community-based UK Biobank cohort, we investigate risk factors for COVID-19 mortality in comparison with non-COVID-19 mortality. We investigated demographic, social (education, income, housing, employment), lifestyle (smoking, drinking, body mass index), biological (lipids, cystatin C, vitamin D), medical (comorbidities, medications) and environmental (air pollution) data from UK Biobank (N = 473,550) in relation to 459 COVID-19 and 2626 non-COVID-19 deaths to 21 September 2020. We used univariate, multivariable and penalised regression models. Age (OR = 2.76 [2.18–3.49] per S.D. [8.1 years], p = 2.6 × 10–17), male sex (OR = 1.47 [1.26–1.73], p = 1.3 × 10–6) and Black versus White ethnicity (OR = 1.21 [1.12–1.29], p = 3.0 × 10–7) were independently associated with and jointly explanatory of (area under receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC = 0.79) increased risk of COVID-19 mortality. In multivariable regression, alongside demographic covariates, being a healthcare worker, current smoker, having cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, autoimmune disease, and oral steroid use at enrolment were independently associated with COVID-19 mortality. Penalised regression models selected income, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, cystatin C, and oral steroid use as jointly contributing to COVID-19 mortality risk; Black ethnicity, hypertension and oral steroid use contributed to COVID-19 but not non-COVID-19 mortality. Age, male sex and Black ethnicity, as well as comorbidities and oral steroid use at enrolment were associated with increased risk of COVID-19 death. Our results suggest that previously reported associations of COVID-19 mortality with body mass index, low vitamin D, air pollutants, renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors may be explained by the aforementioned factors.


2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. 1183-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neika Vendetti ◽  
Theoklis Zaoutis ◽  
Susan E. Coffin ◽  
Julia Shaklee Sammons

OBJECTIVEThe incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has increased and has been associated with poor outcomes among hospitalized children, including increased risk of death. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for all-cause in-hospital mortality among children with CDI.METHODSA multicenter cohort of children with CDI, aged 1–18 years, was established among children hospitalized at 41 freestanding children’s hospitals between January 1, 2006 and August 31, 2011. Children with CDI were identified using a validated case-finding tool (ICD-9-CM code for CDI plus C. difficile test charge). Only the first CDI-related hospitalization during the study period was used. Risk factors for all-cause in-hospital mortality within 30 days of C. difficile test were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model.RESULTSWe identified 7,318 children with CDI during the study period. The median age of this cohort was 6 years [interquartile range (IQR): 2–13]; the mortality rate was 1.5% (n=109); and the median number of days between C. difficile testing and death was 12 (IQR, 7–20). Independent risk factors for death included older age [adjusted odds ratio (OR, 95% confidence interval), 2.29 (1.40–3.77)], underlying malignancy [3.57 (2.36–5.40)], cardiovascular disease [2.06 (1.28–3.30)], hematologic/immunologic condition [1.89 (1.05–3.39)], gastric acid suppression [2.70 (1.43–5.08)], and presence of >1 severity of illness marker [3.88 (2.44–6.19)].CONCLUSIONPatients with select chronic conditions and more severe disease are at increased risk of death. Identifying risk factors for in-hospital mortality can help detect subpopulations of children that may benefit from targeted CDI prevention and treatment strategies.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36(10):1183–1189


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karlijn van Halem ◽  
Robin Bruyndonckx ◽  
Jeroen van der Hilst ◽  
Janneke Cox ◽  
Paulien Driesen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Belgium was among the first countries in Europe with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. Since the first diagnosis on February 3rd, the epidemic has quickly evolved, with Belgium at the crossroads of Europe, being one of the hardest hit countries. Although risk factors for severe disease in COVID-19 patients have been described in Chinese and United States (US) cohorts, good quality studies reporting on clinical characteristics, risk factors and outcome of European COVID-19 patients are still scarce. Methods This study describes the clinical characteristics, complications and outcomes of 319 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, admitted to a tertiary care center at the start of the pandemic in Belgium, and aims to identify the main risk factors for in-hospital mortality in a European context using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results Most patients were male (60%), the median age was 74 (IQR 61–83) and 20% of patients were admitted to the intensive care unit, of whom 63% needed invasive mechanical ventilation. The overall case fatality rate was 25%. The best predictors of in-hospital mortality in multivariate analysis were older age, and renal insufficiency, higher lactate dehydrogenase and thrombocytopenia. Patients admitted early in the epidemic had a higher mortality compared to patients admitted later in the epidemic. In univariate analysis, patients with obesity did have an overall increased risk of death, while overweight on the other hand showed a trend towards lower mortality. Conclusions Most patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during the first weeks of the epidemic in Belgium were admitted with severe disease and the overall case fatality rate was high. The identified risk factors for mortality are not easily amenable at short term, underscoring the lasting need of effective therapeutic and preventative measures.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Gang Ren ◽  
Xingyi Guo ◽  
Kevin Blighe ◽  
Fang Zhu ◽  
Janet Martin ◽  
...  

Purpose: To examine the risk factors for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation and mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study including 432 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who were admitted to three medical centers in Hubei province from January 1st to April 10th 2020. Primary outcomes included ICU admission, mechanical ventilation and death occurring while hospitalized or within 30 days. Results: Of the 432 confirmed patients, 9.5% were admitted to the ICU, 27.3% required mechanical ventilation, and 33.1% died. Total leukocyte count was higher in survivors compared with those who died (8.9 vs 4.8 x 109/l), but lymphocyte counts were lower (0.6 vs 1.0 x 109/l). D-dimer was significantly higher in patients who died compared to survivors (6.0ug/l vs 1.0ug/l, p<0.0001. This was also seen when comparing mechanically versus non-mechanically-ventilated patients. Other significant differences were seen in AST, ALT, LDH, total bilirubin and creating kinase. The following were associated with increased odds of death: age > 65 years (adjusted hazard ratio (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.02-4.05), severe disease at baseline (5.02, 2.05-12.29), current smoker (1.67, 1.37-2.02), temperature >39o C at baseline (2.68, 1.88-4.23), more than one comorbidity (2.12, 1.62-3.09), bilateral patchy shadowing on chest CT or X-ray (3.74, 1.78-9.62) and organ failure (6.47, 1.97-26.23). The following interventions were associated with higher CFR: glucocorticoids (1.60, 1.04-2.30), ICU admission (4.92, 1.37-17.64) and mechanical ventilation (2.35, 1.14-4.82). Conclusion: Demographics, including age over 65 years, current smoker, diabetes, hypertension, and cerebrovascular disease, were associated with increased risk of mortality. Mortality was also associated with glucocorticoid use, mechanical ventilation and ICU admission. Take-Home Message: COVID-19 patients with risk factors were more likely to be admitted into ICU and more likely to require mechanical ventilation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyue Cai ◽  
Guiming Wu ◽  
Jie Zhang ◽  
Lichuan Yang

Background and Objective: Since December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread rapidly around the world. Studies found that the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in COVID-19 patients was more than double the incidence of AKI in non-COVID-19 patients. Some findings confirmed that AKI is a strong independent risk factor for mortality in patients with COVID-19 and is associated with a three-fold increase in the odds of in-hospital mortality. However, little information is available about AKI in COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to analyse the risk factors for AKI in adult patients with COVID-19.Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data from 1 December 2019 to 30 January 2021. We extracted data from eligible studies to compare the effects of age, sex, chronic diseases and potential risk factors for AKI on the prognosis of adult patients with COVID-19.Results: In total, 38 studies with 42,779 patients were included in this analysis. The meta-analysis showed that male sex (OR = 1.37), older age (MD = 5.63), smoking (OR = 1.23), obesity (OR = 1.12), hypertension (OR=1.85), diabetes (OR=1.71), pneumopathy (OR = 1.36), cardiovascular disease (OR = 1.98), cancer (OR = 1.26), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (OR = 4.56), mechanical ventilation (OR = 8.61) and the use of vasopressors (OR = 8.33) were significant risk factors for AKI (P &lt; 0.05).Conclusions: AKI is a common and serious complication of COVID-19. Overall, male sex, age, smoking, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, pneumopathy, cardiovascular disease, cancer, CKD, mechanical ventilation and the use of vasopressors were independent risk factors for AKI in adult patients with COVID-19. Clinicians need to be aware of these risk factors to reduce the incidence of AKI.System Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier [CRD42021282233].


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anurag Mehta ◽  
Sumitabh Singh ◽  
Anum Saeed ◽  
Dhruv Mahtta ◽  
Vera A. Bittner ◽  
...  

Background: South Asians are at a significantly increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease (CVD), are diagnosed at relatively younger ages, and exhibit more severe disease phenotypes as compared with other ethnic groups. The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying T2D and CVD risk in South Asians are multifactorial and intricately related. Method: Narrative review of the pathophysiology of excess risk of T2D and CVD in South Asians. Result: T2D and CVD have shared risk factors that encompass biological factors [early life influences, impaired glucose metabolism, and adverse body composition] as well as behavioral and environmental risk factors (diet, sedentary behavior, tobacco use, and social determinants of health). Genetics and epigenetics also play a role in explaining the increased risk of T2D and CVD among South Asians. Additionally, South Asians harbor several lipid abnormalities including high concentration of small-dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles, elevated triglycerides, low highdensity lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels, dysfunctional HDL particles, and elevated lipoprotein(a) that predispose them to CVD. Conclusion: In this comprehensive review, we have discussed risk factors that provide insights into the pathophysiology of excess risk of T2D and CVD in South Asians.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5002-5002
Author(s):  
Radhika Gangaraju ◽  
Insu Koh ◽  
Marguerite R. Irvin ◽  
Leslie A. Lange ◽  
Damon E. Houghton ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION: African-Americans (blacks) have higher risk of stroke and coronary heart disease (CHD) - collectively referred to here as cardiovascular disease (CVD), than Caucasian-Americans (whites). Though partly explained by traditional cardiovascular risk factors, half of the excess risk in blacks is not explained by known risk factors. Recent data suggest increased risk of CVD and mortality in individuals with clonal hematopoiesis, which often presents as cytopenia. Using peripheral blood cytopenia as a marker of clonal hematopoiesis, we examined the association between cytopenia and risk of CVD and mortality in blacks and whites. METHODS: The REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort study enrolled 30,239 US black and white adults between 2003 and 2007 (41% black). Socio-demographics and medical history were obtained by telephone interview, and laboratory studies (including complete blood count [CBC]) and physical exam from an in-home visit at baseline. Participants or their proxies were contacted every 6 months to ascertain CVD events, hospitalizations or deaths, and medical records were reviewed to confirm these events. Cytopenia was defined using thresholds in Table 1 as presence of 2 or more of the following: i) hemoglobin in age-, sex-, and race-specific lowest 5th percentile; ii) white cell count in race-specific lowest 5th percentile; iii) platelet count in lowest 5th percentile, and iv) macrocytosis (MCV >98fL). Participants with pre-baseline history of stroke (for analyses including stroke or CVD mortality) or CHD (for analyses including CHD or CVD mortality) and those with missing CBC were excluded. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) of incident CVD and mortality associated with cytopenia. Models adjusted for socio-demographics (Model 1), Framingham stroke or CHD risk factors (Model 2), and estimated glomerular filtration rate and C-reactive protein (Model 3) were used. Differences in the association of cytopenia with outcomes by race were tested using cross-product interaction terms, using a p of <0.1 for interaction. RESULTS: The study included 19,544 participants who were followed for a median of ~9 years. There were 798 (4.3% of those at risk) incident stroke cases and 727 (4.3%) incident CHD cases; 1033 (5.3%) died of CVD, and 3933 (20.1%) died of all-causes. Cytopenia was present in 378 (1.9%) participants, ranging from 0.9% to 3.5% in blacks, 1.4 to 3.9% in whites, 1.6 to 3.9% in men, and 0.9 to 1.8% in women, with increasing prevalence by age. There was no association between cytopenia and stroke or CHD risk in any model. However, cytopenia was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR=1.73, 95%CI: 1.34-2.22), and CVD mortality (HR=1.56, 95% CI: 1.11-2.19) in the extended risk factor Model 3 and also in CVD risk factor adjusted model (Model 2), with little evidence of confounding (Table 2). While the race by cytopenia interaction term was not significant in any model for incident CHD or mortality, the interaction for cytopenia by race for stroke was statistically significant (p-interaction=0.08) in Model 2. The HR of stroke for cytopenia in blacks was 0.86 (95%CI: 0.46-1.61), and for whites was 1.96 (95%CI: 1.0-3.82). CONCLUSION: In this large biracial cohort, cytopenia was associated with increased all-cause and CVD mortality. Cytopenia was a race-specific risk factor for stroke affecting white Americans but not black Americans. With growing knowledge on the role of clonal hematopoiesis in CVD risk and mortality, further work is needed to determine if our phenotype of cytopenia is accurate in classifying clonal hematopoiesis and for determining the mortality risk. Given these findings, assessing clonal hematopoiesis and outcomes related to clonal hematopoiesis in diverse populations is critical to understanding the interactions between somatic mutations in hematopoietic cells and CVD/mortality risk. Disclosures Safford: Amgen: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Igor Nicolas Novitzky-Basso ◽  
Ivan Pasic ◽  
Zeyad Al-Shaibani ◽  
Wilson Lam ◽  
Arjun Law ◽  
...  

Background Secondary malignancies (SM) are a recognized complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT). It is unclear whether specific immunosuppressive therapies (IST) may contribute to this risk. We have reported that Azathioprine (AZP) is a relevant option as a steroid-sparing agent in chronic graft versus host disease (cGvHD) treatment (Uhm et al BMT 2018) by evaluating its failure-free survival and overall survival. AZP is known to increase the risk of SM in patients with inflammatory bowel disease or autoimmune disease. Also, cGvHD in of itself increases the risk of SM. However, SM risk was not extensively investigated in patients treated with AZP for cGvHD. Thus, we performed a retrospective chart review to evaluate IST and analyze for correlations with SM risk and whether treatment with distinct IST, including AZP, may be associated with added risk for SM development. Patients and methods A total of 502 patients who received HCT from Jan 2000 to Dec 2012 and had a diagnosis of cGvHD according to NIH criteria after HCT, treated from April 2000 to Mar 2013, at Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Canada, were enrolled in the retrospective study. Patients and disease characteristics are as follows: median age of 48 years; male 289 (57.6%), classical 217 (43.6%), overlap syndrome 281 (56.4%). Of note, 394 patients (78.6%) had a previous history of acute GvHD. Subtype, severity and organ involvement of cGvHD were assessed at initial presentation of cGvHD. The most common treatment used for cGvHD was systemic corticosteroid (82.7%) followed by AZP (40.8%), cyclosporine (CSA) (40.1%) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (26.5%). The incidence of SM was calculated from HCT to the first day of confirmed diagnosis of SM using cumulative incidence method considering competing events such as relapse or death. Risk factors for SM development were compared using Gray model. Survival after diagnosis of SM was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared using log-rank test. For multivariate analysis, Fine-Gray regression model and Cox proportional hazard model were used to analyze the effects of variables on SM risk and survival (OS), respectively. Results With a median follow-up duration of 12.3 years, 101 patients were diagnosed with SM with a median onset of 5.7 years (range 0.3-18.3 years). The most common types of SM were basal cell skin cancer (n=29), followed by squamous cell skin cancer (n=22) and head & neck cancer (n=17). The overall incidence of SM was 19.5% (95% CI, 15.9-23.4%) at 12 years. We evaluated multiple risk factors for the risk of SM, and the following variables were not statistically significant: the use of fludarabine, total body irradiation, stem cell source, donor type, previous acute GvHD, use of T-cell depletion, subtype and severity of cGvHD, organ involvement of mouth, eye, liver, gut, lung, musculoskeletal system at initial presentation. In addition, we evaluated the use of systemic IST including corticosteroid, CSA, tacrolimus, MMF and ECP but with no effect on SM risk. Of interest, the use of AZP was found to increase the risk of SM: The cumulative incidence of SM was 22.7% (16.9-29.1%) at 12 years in the AZP group, whereas it was 16.9% (12.5-21.9%) in those treated without AZP (p=0.023) (Fig A). Exposure duration of AZP showed good correlation with increased risk of SM: patients treated with AZP for 5.85 years or longer showed 46% higher risk of SM development than those not (HR 1.46 [1.11-1.91], p=0.007). Multivariate analysis confirmed the following factors as risk factor for SM: exposure to AZP (HR 1.65, p=0.012), age at transplant &gt;60 years (HR 2.40, p=0.007), male sex (HR 1.56, p=0.039) and skin involvement at cGvHD presentation (HR 1.59, p=0.018) (Fig B). A refined SM risk score was developed, giving a point each for age over 60 years, male sex, skin involvement at cGvHD presentation, and exposure to AZP. The summed scores were grouped 0-1 (n=244), low risk of 13.3%; 2 (n=174), intermediate risk of 19.9% (HR 1.614); above 2 (n=80), high risk for SM, 38.1% at 12 years (HR 3.502; p&lt;0.001) (Fig C). Median survival duration was 3.9 years after SM diagnosis, while 5 year survival rate was 43.6% (33.8-52.9%) (Fig D). The use of AZP does not appear to affect survival after diagnosis of SM. Conclusions The present study suggests that the use of AZP correlates with the risk of SM after adjustment of other confounding covariates such as skin involvement of GVHD, patient age or sex. Figure 1 Disclosures Lipton: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Mattsson:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; ITB: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Mallinkrodt: Honoraria; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Azathioprine is being used to treat chronic gvhd


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Leiter ◽  
K L Greenberg ◽  
M Donchin ◽  
O Keidar ◽  
S Siemiatycki ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Women from low socio-economic, culturally insular populations are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). The ultra-Orthodox Jewish (UOJ) community in Israel is a difficult to access, rapidly growing low socio-economic, insular minority with numerous obstacles to health. The current study investigates CVD-related risk factors (RF) in a sample of OUJ women, comparing sample characteristics with the general population. Addressing the questions, 'Are UOJ women at increased risk for CVD?', 'Which RFs should be addressed beyond the general population's?', this study can inform public health initiatives (PHI) for this and similar populations. Methods Self-administered questionnaires completed by a cluster randomized sample of 239 women from a UOJ community included demographics, fruit, vegetables, and sweetened drink consumption, secondhand smoke exposure, physical activity (PA) engagement, and BMI. Population statistics utilized for comparison of demographic and cardiovascular risk factors were obtained from government-sponsored national surveys. Results Compared with the general population, UOJ women were less likely to consume 5 fruits and vegetables a day (12.7% vs. 24.3%, p&lt;.001) and more likely to consume &gt; 5 cups of sweetened beverages a day (18.6% vs. 12.6%, p=.019). UOJ women also reported less secondhand smoke exposure (7.2% vs. 51.4%, p&lt;.001) and higher rates of PA recommendation adherence (60.1% vs. 25.6%, p&lt;.0001) than the general population. Obesity was higher in UOJ women (24.3% vs. 16.1%, p&lt;.0001). Conclusions This study suggests that PHIs in this population target healthy weight maintenance, nutrition, and PA. As a consequence of this study, the first CVD prevention intervention has been implemented in this population, targeting the identified RFs. Utilizing a mixed methods and community-based participatory approach, this innovative 3-year intervention reached over 2,000 individuals. Key messages This study identified nutrition risk behaviors and high levels of obesity in a difficult to access, minority population. This study informed the planning and implementation of a community-based PHI.


2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 030006052110251
Author(s):  
Minqiang Huang ◽  
Ming Han ◽  
Wei Han ◽  
Lei Kuang

Objective We aimed to compare the efficacy and risks of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) versus histamine-2 receptor blocker (H2B) use for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in critically ill patients with sepsis and risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we used the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III Clinical Database to identify critically ill adult patients with sepsis who had at least one risk factor for GIB and received either an H2B or PPI for ≥48 hours. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to balance baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Results After 1:1 PSM, 1056 patients were included in the H2B and PPI groups. The PPI group had higher in-hospital mortality (23.8% vs. 17.5%), GIB (8.9% vs. 1.6%), and pneumonia (49.6% vs. 41.6%) rates than the H2B group. After adjusting for risk factors of GIB and pneumonia, PPI use was associated with a 1.28-times increased risk of in-hospital mortality, 5.89-times increased risk of GIB, and 1.32-times increased risk of pneumonia. Conclusions Among critically ill adult patients with sepsis at risk for GIB, SUP with PPIs was associated with higher in-hospital mortality and higher risk of GIB and pneumonia than H2Bs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document