Side-placing urea and other nitrogen fertilizers for spring barley

1964 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. V. Widdowson ◽  
A. Penny ◽  
R. J. B. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Ammonium Sulphate ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Sodium Nitrate ◽  
Laboratory Experiments ◽  
Spring Barley ◽  
Calcium Nitrate ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizers

1. Laboratory experiments compared alternative ways of placing urea for wheat. Urea greatly increased the pH in the seed-row; placed in contact with seeds, it killed many plants, but did not when placed 1 in. to the side of the seed.2. A combine-drill was modified so that, by simple adjustments, fertilizers could be placed in contact with the seed, or at 1 in. to the side of the seed, or broadcast over the seed-bed.3. Fifteen experiments with spring barley and one with spring wheat, made from 1960–62, compared yields from urea with yields from ammonium sulphate; calcium nitrate and sodium nitrate were tested in seven and in six experiments, respectively.

Experiments measuring effects of ammonium and nitrate fertilizers, with and without sodium and potassium, on spring barley

1967 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-207
Author(s):  
F. V. Widdowson ◽  
A. Penny ◽  
R. J. B. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Sodium Chloride ◽  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Ammonium Sulphate ◽  
Sodium Nitrate ◽  
Spring Barley ◽  
Calcium Nitrate ◽  
Potassium Nitrate ◽  
Grain Yields ◽  
Light Soil ◽  
Sodium And Potassium

1. Thirteen experiments were made with spring barley from 1963 to 1965 on soils overlying chalk. They compared yields at ear emergence and of ripe grain from ammonium sulphate and from calcium nitrate, from sodium nitrate or sodium chloride or both, and from potassium nitrate or potassium chloride. Two rates of seedbed N were tested, though they were different each year, and in 1964 and 1965 N top-dressings were also applied. The amounts of N, K, Na and Mg in the green barley, and of N in the grain, were measured.greatly increased grain yields in all but one experiment, where the barley followed sugar beet. Calcium nitrate gave larger grain yields than ammonium sulphate in three-quarters of the comparisons, but gave much smaller yields than ammonium sulphate on one light soil in 1964 when much rain fell after the fertilizers had been applied. Grain yields from calcium, potassium and sodium nitrates were nearly the same.3. Na slightly increased grain yields in three and K in two experiments, but combine-drilled P or PK fertilizers increased them in every experiment.

Field experiments comparing ammonium sulphate, ammonium nitrate, calcium nitrate and urea combine-drilled with spring barley

1963 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 381-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Devine ◽  
M. R. J. Holmes
Keyword(s):  
Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Ammonium Sulphate ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Spring Barley ◽  
Calcium Nitrate ◽  
Nitrogen Sources ◽  
Early Growth ◽  
Plant Population ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizers ◽  
Grain Yields

1. Twenty-one experiments were carried out in various parts of England and Scotland in 1959–61 comparing two or more of the nitrogen sources ammonium sulphate, ammonium nitrate, calcium nitrate and urea, combine-drilled in compound fertilizers for spring barley.2. Ammonium sulphate and ammonium nitrate combine-drilled at rates from 35 to 105 lb./acre of nitrogen checked early growth slightly in some of the experiments, with no important difference between the two sources, which also gave similar grain yields.3. Calcium nitrate and urea combine-drilled at 45 lb./acre of nitrogen had no large effect on early growth, while at 70 and 90 lb./acre both fertilizers seriously delayed brairding and reduced the plant population in many of the experiments, especially in eastern England. They gave lower yields than ammonium sulphate and ammonium nitrate in many of the experiments in which early growth was affected, and gave lower mean yields at all rates of application.4. In eleven of the experiments, broadcast applications of two or more of the four nitrogen fertilizers were compared. All sources gave similar mean yields.5. There was a slightly smaller yield from combine drilling than from broadcasting ammonium sulphate and ammonium nitrate, and a markedly smaller yield from calcium nitrate and urea.

The value of calcium nitrate for spring-sown cereals

1959 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. V. Widdowson ◽  
A. Penny ◽  
R. J. B. Williams ◽  
G. W. Cooke
Keyword(s):  
Ammonium Sulphate ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Root Zone ◽  
Spring Barley ◽  
Maximum Yield ◽  
Calcium Nitrate ◽  
Early Growth ◽  
Sowing Time ◽  
Nitrogen Contents

1. Seven experiments on spring barley and five on spring wheat carried out in 1955–7 compared dressings of ammonium sulphate and calcium nitrate applied to the seedbeds at 0·3 and 0·6 cwt. N/acre. The fertilizers were tested both when broadcast and when drilled with the seed.2. Consistently higher yields of barley were produced by drilling than by broadcasting ammonium sulphate. Drilling calcium nitrate at 0·3 cwt. N/acre was superior to broadcasting for barley but when applied with the seed at 0·6 cwt. N/acre this fertilizer retarded germination and early growth and gave smaller yields than were obtained by broadcasting. Broadcast dressings of both fertilizers gave higher yields of wheat than combine-drilled dressings. There is a considerable risk of fertilizer ‘scorch’ when compound fertilizers containing all their nitrogen in nitrate form are combine-drilled at rates sufficient for maximum yield. This risk may be discounted when adequate rain follows drilling but the check to germination may be sufficient to reduce yields in dry springs, on light soils, and on badly prepared seedbeds. Fertilizers containing all their nitrogen in ammonium form appear to be quite safe at the rates of dressing tested in this work.3. Calcium nitrate and ammonium sulphate gave similar yields and nitrogen contents of both crops when the fertilizers were broadcast on the seedbed. Nitrates applied at sowing-time to cereals grown in the drier parts of the country do not appear to be leached out of the root-zone before they can be taken up by crops.

scholarly journals Nitrogen fertilizers for spring barley and wheat

1958 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 312-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. V. Widdowson ◽  
G. W. Cooke
Keyword(s):  
Nitrogen Content ◽  
Ammonium Sulphate ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Grain Quality ◽  
Spring Barley ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizers ◽  
Seed Yields ◽  
Nitrogen Percentage

1. Ten experiments on spring barley (mainly Proctor) and four on spring wheat (mainly Atle) in 1954–6 compared 0·25 and 0·5 cwt. N/acre (as ammonium sulphate) when drilled with the seed, with dressings broadcast before sowing. Tests were also made of ‘Nitro-Chalk’ dressings given in mid-May. In heavier split applications seedbed dressings were supplemented by top-dressings of 0·5 cwt. N/acre.2. Barley gave much larger average responses than wheat. For barley combine-drilling 0·25 or 0·5 cwt. N/acre gave consistently larger yields than broadcasting the same nitrogen dressing on the seedbed; for wheat combine-drilling gave slightly higher yields at the high rate of dressing only.3. For both crops 0·5 cwt./acre of N drilled with the seed was almost sufficient for maximum yields, but where only 0·25 cwt. N was applied at sowing a mid-May top-dressing of 0·5 cwt. N/acre gave higher yields.4. At most centres May top-dressings of ‘Nitro-Chalk’ gave lower yields than equivalent ammonium sulphate drilled with the seed. Yields were often reduced by lodging on plots which received seedbed dressings plus top-dressing or the heavier rates of top-dressing alone; these treatments also reduced the quality of the grain. Combine-drilled or broadcast seedbed dressings did not cause serious lodging or reduce grain quality.5. 0·25 or 0·5 cwt. N/acre broadcast on the seedbed or combine-drilled had little effect on the percentage of nitrogen in the grain; equivalent topdressings in mid-May consistently increased nitrogen content. Seedbed dressings plus top-dressings supplying heavier total quantities of nitrogen continued to increase nitrogen percentage in grain without giving any increase in yield.

scholarly journals Nitrate, ammonium and urea nitrogen as fertilizers for wheat and rye in a field experiment

1978 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 346-360
Author(s):  
Antti Jaakkola
Keyword(s):  
Field Experiment ◽  
Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Ammonium Sulphate ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Soil Acidity ◽  
Calcium Nitrate ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizers ◽  
Winter Rye ◽  
Calcium Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Yield Level

In a five-year field experiment on a well-limed sandy soil five nitrogen fertilizers were compared. They were urea, ammonium sulphate, calcium nitrate, calcium ammonium nitrate and a mixture of ammonium sulphate and calcium nitrate. The crops in successive years were spring wheat, winter rye, winter wheat, spring wheat and winter rye. The average yield level was not different because of different fertilizers, but in individual years some differences were found. Average contents of nitrogen and calcium in grain and straw, however, showed a slight superiority of calcium nitrate to ammonium sulphate. Other fertilizers did not deviate significantly from either of these. Placement vs. broadcasting, application time and rate of fertilizer nitrogen were also investigated. These factors did not affect the differences between fertilizers. The soil-acidifying effect of the fertilizers decreased in the order: ammonium sulphate, urea, mixture of AS and CN, calcium ammonium nitrate. Calcium nitrate had no effect on soil acidity.

Efficiency of utilization of nitrogen fertilizers on representative soils from southern New South Wales

1976 ◽  
Vol 16 (83) ◽  
pp. 875 ◽  
Author(s):  
GJ Osborne ◽  
RR Storrier
Keyword(s):  
Ammonium Sulphate ◽  
Sodium Nitrate ◽  
New South ◽  
New South Wales ◽  
Phosphorus Uptake ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizers ◽  
Soil Reaction ◽  
Nitrogen And Phosphorus ◽  
South Wales ◽  
Nitrogen And Phosphorus Uptake

The effects were examined in a glasshouse study of three forms of nitrogen fertilizer (urea, ammonium sulphate and sodium nitrate) on the yield, and nitrogen and phosphorus uptake of ryegrass (Lolium perenne) in six representative farming soils from the southern slopes and plains of New South Wales. The results indicated an average recovery of 82 per cent of applied nitrogen across the three forms of fertilizer and the six soils. Ammonium sulphate led to decreases in soil reaction of the order of 0.8-1.5 pH units and lower recoveries; sodium nitrate increased pH. Ammonium sulphate as a source of nitrogen is considered undesirable as it gave lower dry matter yields and nitrogen recovery values compared with the other fertilizer forms. In addition, because of its effect on soil reaction, it could lead to the loss of nutrients by leaching or fixation processes.

Effects of nitrogen fertilizers on total nitrogen, soluble nitrogen and soluble carbohydrate contents of grass

1962 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 387-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Z. Nowakowski
Keyword(s):  
Ammonium Sulphate ◽  
Total Nitrogen ◽  
Sodium Nitrate ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizers ◽  
Soluble Carbohydrates ◽  
Soluble Carbohydrate ◽  
Soluble Nitrogen ◽  
Protein Nitrogen ◽  
Total N ◽  
Nitrate N

Italian rye-grass given ammonium sulphate or sodium nitrate at 56 or 112 lb. N/acre was analysed for total nitrogen, soluble nitrogen (non-protein-nitrogen) and soluble carbohydrates.Ten days after applying fertilizer the differences in total-N between the grass receiving 56 and grass receiving 112 lb. N/acre were very small. Total-N in grass decreased with growth, but the effect of the rate of nitrogen on total-N increased. At first the grass given sodium nitrate contained more soluble nitrogen than grass given ammonium sulphate, the difference being greater at 56 lb. N/acre; soluble nitrogen decreased with increasing growth. Ten days after applying fertilizer, the nitrate-N content of grass was very high (ranging from 0·1 to 0·9% in the D.M.) and it gradually decreased. At both levels of nitrogen application, grass given sodium nitrate contained much more nitrate-N than grass given ammonium sulphate. Forty days after applying nitrogen the nitrate-N contents of grass which received 56 and 112 1b. N/acre as ammonium sulphate were 0·039 and 0·222% of the dry matter, respectively; the grass supplied with sodium nitrate gave values of 0·082 and 0·438%.Total soluble carbohydrates in the grass were small early in growth and gradually increased. Nitrogen dressings had little effect on the content of soluble sugars (glucose + fructose + sucrose) but greatly decreased the fructosan. The pattern of changes in the total soluble carbohydrate content followed that in fructosan content. Early in growth, the total soluble carbohydrate/crude protein ratio was very small in grass from all treatments except the ‘control’. This ratio increased with growth and at the last sampling was 2·13 in grass receiving no nitrogen, and in grass supplied with 56 and 112 lb. N/acre as ammonium sulphate it was 1·44 and 0·72 respectively; the corresponding figures for grass receiving sodium nitrate were 1·13 and 0·66. The total soluble carbohydrate carbon/soluble nitrogen ratio in grass with no nitrogen was 18 at the first sampling and it increased gradually, reaching 70 at the last sampling. This ratio was considerably less with all nitrogen treatments than with ‘control’. The values obtained with 112 lb. N/acre were less than those obtained with 561b./acre, irrespective of the form of nitrogen used.The relationship between the soluble carbohydrate carbon content and the soluble nitrogen in grass is illustrated graphically and discussed.

The effect of ammonium sulphate treated with a nitrification inhibitor, and calcium nitrate, on growth and N-uptake of spring wheat, ryegrass and kale

1970 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. D. Spratt ◽  
J. K. R. Gasser
Keyword(s):  
Ammonium Sulphate ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Dry Matter ◽  
N Uptake ◽  
Nitrification Inhibitor ◽  
Calcium Nitrate ◽  
Fertilizer N ◽  
Wheat Grain

SUMMARYWheat, ryegrass and kale were grown with ammonium sulphate (treated with a nitrification inhibitor) or calcium nitrate supplying 50 and 100 lb N/acre, and without fertilizer-N. Plants were sampled at various stages, dry weights measured, percentage N determined and N uptakes calculated.Initially wheat and ryegrass grew better and took up more N with ammonium fertilizer than with nitrate. Final yields of dry matter did not differ between forms. Kale produced more dry matter with calcium nitrate than with ammonium sulphate. All crops produced more dry matter with fertilizer-N than without. Fertilized crops contained greatest weights of N 109 days after sowing, when wheat and ryegrass had more with ammonium than with nitrate and kale had less. The 50 lb N/acre as calcium nitrate produced the most wheat grain/lb of fertilizer-N.During the period when growth and N uptake were fastest, wheat grew faster with ammonium than with nitrate, ryegrass grew similarly with both forms, and kale faster with nitrate; wheat and ryegrass took up N faster from ammonium sulphate and kale from calcium nitrate.Mature wheat recovered 58% of the fertilizer-N from calcium nitrate and 43% from ammonium sulphate. After 21 weeks of growth, kale recovered more N from calcium nitrate (50%) than from ammonium sulphate (24%), whereas grass recovered about 40% from each.

Comparison of the efficiencies of several nitrogen fertilizers applied to pasture in autumn and winter

1968 ◽  
Vol 8 (32) ◽  
pp. 301 ◽  
Author(s):  
JR Simpson
Keyword(s):  
Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Ammonium Sulphate ◽  
Sodium Nitrate ◽  
Soil Surface ◽  
Growing Season ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizers ◽  
Calcium Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Time Of Application ◽  
Autumn And Winter ◽  
Made In

A comparison was made of the responses to, and nitrogen recoveries from, ammonium sulphate, sodium nitrate, and urea when broadcast on a ryegrass sward in a favourable growing season. A second comparison was made, in a drier season on the same sward, between ammonium sulphate, sodium nitrate, urea, calcium ammonium nitrate, and ammonium nitrate. In both comparisons urea was an inefficient source of nitrogen, but its efficiency depended on the time of application. Differences in the rainfall shortly after application probably caused this variation in efficiency, by affecting the amounts of ammonia lost to the atmosphere. With sources other than urea, variation in the length of time during which the fertilizer remained at the soil surface, awaiting effective rainfall and plant uptake, had little effect on the final recovery of nitrogen. Ammonium sulphate, calcium ammonium nitrate, and ammonium nitrate showed similar efficiencies during the relatively dry season in which they were compared. Sodium nitrate was the most efficient source in both seasons.

STUDIES ON THE BIONOMICS AND CONTROL OF THE BURSATE NEMATODES OF HORSES AND SHEEP: IV. ON THE LETHAL EFFECTS OF SOME NITROGENOUS FERTILIZERS ON THE FREE-LIVING STAGES OF SCLEROSTOMES

1937 ◽  
Vol 15d (7) ◽  
pp. 127-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. W. Parnell
Keyword(s):  
Strong Solution ◽  
Ammonium Sulphate ◽  
Sodium Nitrate ◽  
Calcium Nitrate ◽  
Potassium Nitrate ◽  
Diammonium Phosphate ◽  
Free Living ◽  
Lethal Effects ◽  
Medium Strength ◽  
And Control

The effect of ten of the commoner nitrogenous fertilizers on the free-living stages of Sclerostomes, is discussed. Urea is the most lethal. Under the conditions of the experiments, which are otherwise ideal for the survival of the larvae, one part of urea to 125 parts of fresh horse feces is necessary to sterilize them. The proportions of the others tested are: Calurea, 1:80; powdered cyanamide, 1:50, with granular cyanamide slightly lower; potassium nitrate, sodium nitrate and Calnitro, 1:20; calcium nitrate and diammonium phosphate (dry or in medium strength solution) 1:17; Nitro-chalk, about 1:16 (but should not be used in strong solution); ammonium sulphate, 1:14.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document