scholarly journals From environmental fluctuations and energy availability to evolutionary change and speciation

1992 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 230-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Parsons
Keyword(s):  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Evolutionary Change ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Energy Availability ◽  
Tropical Rain Forests ◽  
Relict Species ◽  
Generalist Species ◽  
Fluctuating Environments ◽  
Environmental Fluctuations

Evolutionary patterns can be considered in terms of two interacting continuums (a) the magnitude of environmental fluctuations of physical variables especially climatic, and (b) the availability of metabolic energy beyond basic needs for maintenance and survival (Parsons, 1991) so giving four extreme combinations:(1) widely fluctuating environments, low metabolic energy availability. This situation is a feature of species borders where the energetic costs of environmental perturbations restrict normal physiological processes so that ecological range expansions are precluded. Provided extinctions do not occur, species would alter their ranges to track longer term climatic changes as described in the historical and fossil records.(2) widely fluctuating environments, high metabolic energy availability. This combination favors opportunists and colonists. Furthermore, following a relaxation of stress intensity after a mass extinction there could be a burst of speciation in such generalist species.(3) stable environments, low metabolic energy availabilty. This combination represents deep sea and cave environments where low metabolic rate is an adaptation to accomodate stresses such as anoxia and low resource availability. Consequently the capacity for evolutionary change is low in these habitats which tend to contain relict species.(4) stable environments, high metabolic energy availability. On energetic grounds speciation is theoretically possible, but high vulnerability to any stressful perturbation would be restrictive in practice since some stress is the norm in natural populations.The potential for evolutionary change and speciation is low in these four extremes, however in intermediate habitats the potential is higher as implied in (2) when stress intensity is relaxed. The intermediate habitats would be characterized by moderately fluctuating environments where the metabolic cost of stress would not preclude adaptive change. Furthermore, the stress levels in such habitats should lead to sufficient underlying genetic variability to be permissive of adaptive responses to environmental change (Parsons, 1991). This paradigm may apply to speciation in tropical rain forests. A fossil analogy would be marine invertebrates in frequently disturbed onshore habitats.

scholarly journals Reduced Achilles Tendon Stiffness Disrupts Calf Muscle Neuromechanics in Elderly Gait

Gerontology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Rebecca L. Krupenevich ◽  
Owen N. Beck ◽  
Gregory S. Sawicki ◽  
Jason R. Franz
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Calf Muscle ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Joint Work ◽  
Tendon Stiffness ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Ankle Muscle ◽  
Metabolic Energy Expenditure

Older adults walk slower and with a higher metabolic energy expenditure than younger adults. In this review, we explore the hypothesis that age-related declines in Achilles tendon stiffness increase the metabolic cost of walking due to less economical calf muscle contractions and increased proximal joint work. This viewpoint may motivate interventions to restore ankle muscle-tendon stiffness, improve walking mechanics, and reduce metabolic cost in older adults.

scholarly journals Reducing the metabolic energy of walking and running using an unpowered hip exoskeleton

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiancheng Zhou ◽  
Caihua Xiong ◽  
Juanjuan Zhang ◽  
Di Hu ◽  
Wenbin Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Consumption ◽  
Design Method ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Spring Stiffness ◽  
Spatiotemporal Parameters ◽  
The Common ◽  
Hip Flexion ◽  
Optimal Stiffness ◽  
Insight Into

Abstract Background Walking and running are the most common means of locomotion in human daily life. People have made advances in developing separate exoskeletons to reduce the metabolic rate of walking or running. However, the combined requirements of overcoming the fundamental biomechanical differences between the two gaits and minimizing the metabolic penalty of the exoskeleton mass make it challenging to develop an exoskeleton that can reduce the metabolic energy during both gaits. Here we show that the metabolic energy of both walking and running can be reduced by regulating the metabolic energy of hip flexion during the common energy consumption period of the two gaits using an unpowered hip exoskeleton. Methods We analyzed the metabolic rates, muscle activities and spatiotemporal parameters of 9 healthy subjects (mean ± s.t.d; 24.9 ± 3.7 years, 66.9 ± 8.7 kg, 1.76 ± 0.05 m) walking on a treadmill at a speed of 1.5 m s−1 and running at a speed of 2.5 m s−1 with different spring stiffnesses. After obtaining the optimal spring stiffness, we recruited the participants to walk and run with the assistance from a spring with optimal stiffness at different speeds to demonstrate the generality of the proposed approach. Results We found that the common optimal exoskeleton spring stiffness for walking and running was 83 Nm Rad−1, corresponding to 7.2% ± 1.2% (mean ± s.e.m, paired t-test p < 0.01) and 6.8% ± 1.0% (p < 0.01) metabolic reductions compared to walking and running without exoskeleton. The metabolic energy within the tested speed range can be reduced with the assistance except for low-speed walking (1.0 m s−1). Participants showed different changes in muscle activities with the assistance of the proposed exoskeleton. Conclusions This paper first demonstrates that the metabolic cost of walking and running can be reduced using an unpowered hip exoskeleton to regulate the metabolic energy of hip flexion. The design method based on analyzing the common energy consumption characteristics between gaits may inspire future exoskeletons that assist multiple gaits. The results of different changes in muscle activities provide new insight into human response to the same assistive principle for different gaits (walking and running).

scholarly journals Using a simple rope-pulley system that mechanically couples the arms, legs, and treadmill reduces the metabolic cost of walking

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisey Vega ◽  
Christopher J. Arellano
Keyword(s):  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Metabolic Effects ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Walking Ability ◽  
Arm Swing ◽  
Pulley System ◽  
Young Subjects ◽  
Walking Recovery ◽  
Set Up

Abstract Background Emphasizing the active use of the arms and coordinating them with the stepping motion of the legs may promote walking recovery in patients with impaired lower limb function. Yet, most approaches use seated devices to allow coupled arm and leg movements. To provide an option during treadmill walking, we designed a rope-pulley system that physically links the arms and legs. This arm-leg pulley system was grounded to the floor and made of commercially available slotted square tubing, solid strut channels, and low-friction pulleys that allowed us to use a rope to connect the subject’s wrist to the ipsilateral foot. This set-up was based on our idea that during walking the arm could generate an assistive force during arm swing retraction and, therefore, aid in leg swing. Methods To test this idea, we compared the mechanical, muscular, and metabolic effects between normal walking and walking with the arm-leg pulley system. We measured rope and ground reaction forces, electromyographic signals of key arm and leg muscles, and rates of metabolic energy consumption while healthy, young subjects walked at 1.25 m/s on a dual-belt instrumented treadmill (n = 8). Results With our arm-leg pulley system, we found that an assistive force could be generated, reaching peak values of 7% body weight on average. Contrary to our expectation, the force mainly coincided with the propulsive phase of walking and not leg swing. Our findings suggest that subjects actively used their arms to harness the energy from the moving treadmill belt, which helped to propel the whole body via the arm-leg rope linkage. This effectively decreased the muscular and mechanical demands placed on the legs, reducing the propulsive impulse by 43% (p < 0.001), which led to a 17% net reduction in the metabolic power required for walking (p = 0.001). Conclusions These findings provide the biomechanical and energetic basis for how we might reimagine the use of the arms in gait rehabilitation, opening the opportunity to explore if such a method could help patients regain their walking ability. Trial registration: Study registered on 09/29/2018 in ClinicalTrials.gov (ID—NCT03689647).

scholarly journals Walking in simulated reduced gravity: mechanical energy fluctuations and exchange

1999 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 383-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy M. Griffin ◽  
Neil A. Tolani ◽  
Rodger Kram
Keyword(s):  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Potential Energy ◽  
Gravitational Potential ◽  
Inverted Pendulum ◽  
Mechanical Energy ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Gravitational Potential Energy ◽  
Reduced Gravity

Walking humans conserve mechanical and, presumably, metabolic energy with an inverted pendulum-like exchange of gravitational potential energy and horizontal kinetic energy. Walking in simulated reduced gravity involves a relatively high metabolic cost, suggesting that the inverted-pendulum mechanism is disrupted because of a mismatch of potential and kinetic energy. We tested this hypothesis by measuring the fluctuations and exchange of mechanical energy of the center of mass at different combinations of velocity and simulated reduced gravity. Subjects walked with smaller fluctuations in horizontal velocity in lower gravity, such that the ratio of horizontal kinetic to gravitational potential energy fluctuations remained constant over a fourfold change in gravity. The amount of exchange, or percent recovery, at 1.00 m/s was not significantly different at 1.00, 0.75, and 0.50 G (average 64.4%), although it decreased to 48% at 0.25 G. As a result, the amount of work performed on the center of mass does not explain the relatively high metabolic cost of walking in simulated reduced gravity.

scholarly journals Gait-symmetry-based human-in-the-loop optimization for unilateral transtibial amputees with robotic prostheses

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanggan Feng ◽  
Chengqiang Mao ◽  
Qining Wang
Keyword(s):  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Optimization Method ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Joint Degeneration ◽  
Joint Injury ◽  
Loop Optimization ◽  
Gait Symmetry ◽  
Human In The Loop ◽  
Risk Of Injury ◽  
Transtibial Amputees

AbstractGait asymmetry due to the loss of unilateral limb increases the risk of injury or progressive joint degeneration. The development of wearable robotic devices paves a way to improve gait symmetry of unilateral amputees. Moreover, the state-of-the-art studies on human-in-the-loop optimization strategies through decreasing the metabolic cost as the optimization task, have met several challenges, e.g. too long period of optimization and the optimization feasibility for unilateral amputees who have the deficit of gait symmetry. Here, in this paper, we proposed gait-symmetry-based human-in-the-loop optimization method to decrease the risk of injury or progressive joint degeneration for unilateral transtibial amputees. The experimental results (N = 3 unilateral transtibial subjects) demonstrate that only average 9.0±4.1min of convergence was taken. Compared to gait symmetry while wearing prosthetics, after optimization, the gait symmetry indicator value of the subjects wearing the robotic prostheses was improved by 21.0% and meanwhile the net metabolic energy consumption value was reduced by 9.2%. Also, this paper explores the rationality of gait indicators and what kind of gait indicators are the optimization target. These results suggest that gait-symmetry-based human-in-the-loop strategy could pave a practical way to improve gait symmetry by accompanying the reduction of metabolic cost, and thus to decrease the risk of joint injury for the unilateral amputees.

scholarly journals Elastic energy savings and active energy cost in a simple model of running

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. e1009608
Author(s):  
Ryan T. Schroeder ◽  
Arthur D. Kuo
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Energy ◽  
Energy Cost ◽  
Energy Savings ◽  
Mechanical Energy ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
The Body ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Energetic Cost ◽  
Mass Model ◽  
Human Running

The energetic economy of running benefits from tendon and other tissues that store and return elastic energy, thus saving muscles from costly mechanical work. The classic “Spring-mass” computational model successfully explains the forces, displacements and mechanical power of running, as the outcome of dynamical interactions between the body center of mass and a purely elastic spring for the leg. However, the Spring-mass model does not include active muscles and cannot explain the metabolic energy cost of running, whether on level ground or on a slope. Here we add explicit actuation and dissipation to the Spring-mass model, and show how they explain substantial active (and thus costly) work during human running, and much of the associated energetic cost. Dissipation is modeled as modest energy losses (5% of total mechanical energy for running at 3 m s-1) from hysteresis and foot-ground collisions, that must be restored by active work each step. Even with substantial elastic energy return (59% of positive work, comparable to empirical observations), the active work could account for most of the metabolic cost of human running (about 68%, assuming human-like muscle efficiency). We also introduce a previously unappreciated energetic cost for rapid production of force, that helps explain the relatively smooth ground reaction forces of running, and why muscles might also actively perform negative work. With both work and rapid force costs, the model reproduces the energetics of human running at a range of speeds on level ground and on slopes. Although elastic return is key to energy savings, there are still losses that require restorative muscle work, which can cost substantial energy during running.

scholarly journals Muscle Metabolic Energy Costs While Modifying Propulsive Force Generation During Walking

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard E. Pimentel ◽  
Noah L. Pieper ◽  
William H. Clark ◽  
Jason R. Franz
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Energy Costs ◽  
Joint Power ◽  
Lower Limb Muscles ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Musculoskeletal Models ◽  
Metabolic Costs ◽  
Related Increase

AbstractWe pose that an age-related increase in the metabolic cost of walking arises in part from a redistribution of joint power where muscles spanning the hip compensate for insufficient ankle push-off and smaller peak propulsive forces (FP). Young adults elicit a similar redistribution when walking with smaller FP via biofeedback. We used targeted FP biofeedback and musculoskeletal models to estimate the metabolic costs of operating lower limb muscles in young adults walking across a range of FP. Our simulations support the theory of distal-to-proximal redistribution of joint power as a determinant of increased metabolic cost in older adults during walking.

scholarly journals Contributions of metabolic and temporal costs to human gait selection

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (143) ◽  
pp. 20180197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik M. Summerside ◽  
Rodger Kram ◽  
Alaa A. Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Movement Time ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Human Gait ◽  
Cost Of Transport ◽  
Relative Value ◽  
Weighted Combination

Humans naturally select several parameters within a gait that correspond with minimizing metabolic cost. Much less is understood about the role of metabolic cost in selecting between gaits. Here, we asked participants to decide between walking or running out and back to different gait specific markers. The distance of the walking marker was adjusted after each decision to identify relative distances where individuals switched gait preferences. We found that neither minimizing solely metabolic energy nor minimizing solely movement time could predict how the group decided between gaits. Of our twenty participants, six behaved in a way that tended towards minimizing metabolic energy, while eight favoured strategies that tended more towards minimizing movement time. The remaining six participants could not be explained by minimizing a single cost. We provide evidence that humans consider not just a single movement cost, but instead a weighted combination of these conflicting costs with their relative contributions varying across participants. Individuals who placed a higher relative value on time ran faster than individuals who placed a higher relative value on metabolic energy. Sensitivity to temporal costs also explained variability in an individual's preferred velocity as a function of increasing running distance. Interestingly, these differences in velocity both within and across participants were absent in walking, possibly due to a steeper metabolic cost of transport curve. We conclude that metabolic cost plays an essential, but not exclusive role in gait decisions.

THE ENERGETIC COSTS OF CALLING IN THE BUSHCRICKET REQUENA VERTICALIS (ORTHOPTERA: TETTIGONIIDAE: LISTROSCELIDINAE)

1993 ◽  
Vol 178 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. J. Bailey ◽  
P. C. Withers ◽  
M. Endersby ◽  
K. Gaull
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass ◽  
Sound Pressure ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Acoustic Power ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Energetic Cost ◽  
Metabolic Efficiency ◽  
Metabolic Costs ◽  
Sound Pressure Levels ◽  
The Relationship

1. The metabolic costs of calling for male Requena verticalis Walker (Tettigoniidae: Listroscelidinae) were measured by direct recordings of oxygen consumption. The acoustic power output was measured by sound pressure levels around the calling bushcricket. 2. The average metabolic cost of calling was 0.143 ml g-1 h-1 but depended on calling rate. The net metabolic cost of calling per unit call, the syllable, was calculated to be 4.34×10-6+/−8.3×10-7 ml O2 syllable-1 g-1 body mass (s.e.) from the slope of the relationship between total V(dot)O2 and rate of syllable production. The resting V(dot)O2, calculated as the intercept of the relationship, was 0.248 ml O2 g-1 body mass h-1. 3. The energetic cost of calling for R. verticalis (average mass 0.37 g) was estimated at 31.85×10-6 J syllable-1. 4. Sound pressure levels were measured around calling insects. The surface area of a sphere of uniform sound pressure level [83 dB SPL root mean square (RMS) acoustic power] obtained by these measurements was used to calculate acoustic power. This was 0.20 mW. 5. The metabolic efficiency of calling, based on total metabolic energy utilisation, was 6.4 %. However, we propose that the mechanical efficiency for acoustic transmission is closer to 57 %, since only about 10 % of muscle metabolic energy is apparently available for sound production. 6. R. verticalis emits chirps formed of several syllables within which are discrete sound pulses. Wing stroke rates, when the insect is calling at its maximal rate, were approximately 583 min-1. This is slow compared to the rates observed in conehead tettigoniids, the only other group of bushcrickets where metabolic costs have been measured. The thoracic temperatures of males that had been calling for 5 min were not significantly different from those of non-calling males. 7. For R. verticalis, calling with relatively slow syllable rates may reduce the total cost of calling, and this may be a compensatory mechanism for their other high energetic cost of mating (a large spermatophylax).

scholarly journals Multi-objective control in human walking: insight gained through simultaneous degradation of energetic and motor regulation systems

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (158) ◽  
pp. 20190227
Author(s):  
Kirsty A. McDonald ◽  
Joseph P. Cusumano ◽  
Peter Peeling ◽  
Jonas Rubenson
Keyword(s):  
Energy Minimization ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Energetic Cost ◽  
Leg Length ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Speed Regulation ◽  
Speed Error ◽  
Objective Control ◽  
Error Regulation

Minimization of metabolic energy is considered a fundamental principle of human locomotion, as demonstrated by an alignment between the preferred walking speed (PWS) and the speed incurring the lowest metabolic cost of transport. We aimed to (i) simultaneously disrupt metabolic cost and an alternate acute task requirement, namely speed error regulation, and (ii) assess whether the PWS could be explained on the basis of either optimality criterion in this new performance and energetic landscape. Healthy adults ( N = 21) walked on an instrumented treadmill under normal conditions and, while negotiating a continuous gait perturbation, imposed leg-length asymmetry. Oxygen consumption, motion capture data and ground reaction forces were continuously recorded for each condition at speeds ranging from 0.6 to 1.8 m s −1 , including the PWS. Both metabolic and speed regulation measures were disrupted by the perturbation ( p < 0.05). Perturbed PWS selection did not exhibit energetic prioritization (although we find some indication of energy minimization after motor adaptation). Similarly, PWS selection did not support prioritization of speed error regulation, which was found to be independent of speed in both conditions. It appears that, during acute exposure to a mechanical gait perturbation of imposed leg-length asymmetry, humans minimize neither energetic cost nor speed regulation errors. Despite the abundance of evidence pointing to energy minimization during normal, steady-state gait, this may not extend acutely to perturbed gait. Understanding how the nervous system acutely controls gait perturbations requires further research that embraces multi-objective control paradigms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document