scholarly journals Recent changes to Arctic river discharge

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongmei Feng ◽  
Colin J. Gleason ◽  
Peirong Lin ◽  
Xiao Yang ◽  
Ming Pan ◽  
...  

AbstractArctic rivers drain ~15% of the global land surface and significantly influence local communities and economies, freshwater and marine ecosystems, and global climate. However, trusted and public knowledge of pan-Arctic rivers is inadequate, especially for small rivers and across Eurasia, inhibiting understanding of the Arctic response to climate change. Here, we calculate daily streamflow in 486,493 pan-Arctic river reaches from 1984-2018 by assimilating 9.18 million river discharge estimates made from 155,710 satellite images into hydrologic model simulations. We reveal larger and more heterogenous total water export (3-17% greater) and water export acceleration (factor of 1.2-3.3 larger) than previously reported, with substantial differences across basins, ecoregions, stream orders, human regulation, and permafrost regimes. We also find significant changes in the spring freshet and summer stream intermittency. Ultimately, our results represent an updated, publicly available, and more accurate daily understanding of Arctic rivers uniquely enabled by recent advances in hydrologic modeling and remote sensing.

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 1483-1492 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Thorne

Abstract. Like many high latitude areas, the mountainous region of subarctic Canada has experienced recent warming and is an area of large inter-annual temperature variations, most notably during the winter. Quantifying how climate tendencies affect streamflow, especially in the spring melt season, is critical not only to regional water resource management, but to understanding the influence of freshwater on the Arctic sea-ice cover and global climate system. The impact of projected atmospheric warming on the discharge of the Liard River is unclear. Here, uncertainty in climate projections associated with GCM structure (2 °C prescribed warming) and magnitude of increases in global mean air temperature (1 to 6 °C) on the river discharge are assessed using a well-tested, semi-distributed hydrological model. Analyses have shown that the hydrological impacts are highly dependant on the GCM scenario. Uncertainties between the GCM scenarios are driven by the inconsistencies in projected spatial variability and magnitude of precipitation, rather than warming temperatures. Despite these uncertainties, the entire scenario simulations project that the subarctic nival regime will be preserved in the future, but the magnitude of change in river discharge is highly uncertain. Generally, spring freshet will arrive earlier, autumn to spring discharge will increase whereas summer flow will decrease, leading to an overall increase in annual discharge.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing-Bin Lu

Abstract Time-series observations of global lower stratospheric temperature (GLST), global land surface air temperature (LSAT), global mean surface temperature (GMST), sea ice extent (SIE) and snow cover extent (SCE), together with observations reported in Paper I, combined with theoretical calculations of GLSTs and GMSTs, have provided strong evidence that ozone depletion and global climate changes are dominantly caused by human-made halogen-containing ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) and greenhouse gases (GHGs) respectively. Both GLST and SCE have become constant since the mid-1990s and GMST/LSAT has reached a peak since the mid-2000s, while regional continued warmings at the Arctic coasts (particularly Russia and Alaska) in winter and spring and at some areas of Antarctica are observed and can be well explained by a sea-ice-loss warming amplification mechanism. The calculated GMSTs by the parameter-free warming theory of halogenated GHGs show an excellent agreement with the observed GMSTs after the natural El Niño southern oscillation (ENSO) and volcanic effects are removed. These results provide a convincing mechanism of global climate change and will make profound changes in our understanding of atmospheric processes. This study also emphasizes the critical importance of continued international efforts in phasing out all anthropogenic halogenated ODSs and GHGs.


Ecology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dale H. Vitt

Peatland ecosystems are characterized by a substantial accumulation of organic matter in soil (peat), resulting from long-term excess of net primary production at the surface compared to decomposition throughout the peat column. Globally, peatlands cover 3–4 percent of the earth’s land surface, yet they store 25–30 percent of the world’s soil carbon (about 455 Pg of C) and 9–16 percent of the world’s soil nitrogen (8–15 Pg of N) in peat. These large stores of C and N are especially vulnerable to global climate change. Although peatlands occur from the tropics to the Arctic, it is in the boreal region where peatlands are most abundant. The presence of a well-developed ground layer of mosses along with either abundant shrubs or sedges makes the population and community ecology of these ecosystems interesting and challenging. The high water table, presence of anoxia, and isolation from all nutrient inputs—except the atmosphere in some peatlands (bogs)—present unique opportunities to study the hydrology and biogeochemistry.


Author(s):  
K. Yorozu ◽  
Y. Tachikawa

Abstract. There is much research assessing the impact of climate change on the hydrologic cycle. However, it has often focused on a specific hydrologic process, without considering the interaction among hydrologic processes. In this study, a distributed hydrologic model considering the interaction between flow routing and land surface processes was developed, and its effect on river discharge estimation was investigated. The model enables consideration of flow routing, irrigation withdrawal from rivers at paddy fields, crop growth depending on water and energy status, and evapotranspiration based on meteorological, soil water and vegetation status. To examine the effects of hydrologic process interaction on river discharge estimation, a developed model was applied to the Chao Phraya river basin using near surface meteorological data collected by the Japanese Meteorological Research Institute's Atmospheric General Circulation Model (MRI-AGCM3.2S) with TL959 spatial resolution as forcing data. Also, a flow routing model, which was part of the developed model, was applied independently, using surface and subsurface runoff data from the same GCM. In the results, the developed model tended to estimate a smaller river discharge than was estimated by the river routing model, because of the irrigation effect. In contrast, the annual maximum daily discharge calculated by the developed model was 24% greater than that by the flow routing model. It is assumed that surface runoff in the developed model was greater than that in the flow routing model because the soil water content was maintained at a high level through irrigation withdrawal. As for drought discharge, which is defined as the 355th largest daily discharge, the developed model gave a discharge 2.7-fold greater than the flow routing model. It seems that subsurface runoff in the developed model was greater than that in the flow routing model. The results of this study suggest that considering hydrologic interaction in a numerical model could affect both flood and drought estimation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 334-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Materia ◽  
Paul A. Dirmeyer ◽  
Zhichang Guo ◽  
Andrea Alessandri ◽  
Antonio Navarra

Abstract The discharge of freshwater into oceans represents a fundamental process in the global climate system, and this flux is taken into account in simulations with general circulation models (GCMs). Moreover, the availability of realistic river routing schemes is a powerful instrument to assess the validity of land surface components, which have been recognized to be crucial for the global climate simulation. In this study, surface and subsurface runoff generated by the 13 land surface schemes (LSSs) participating in the Second Global Soil Wetness Project (GSWP-2) are used as input fields for the Hydrology Discharge (HD) routing model to simulate discharge for 30 of the world’s largest rivers. The simplest land surface models do not provide a good representation of runoff, and routed river flows using these inputs are affected by many biases. On the other hand, HD shows the best simulations when forced by two of the more sophisticated schemes. The multimodel ensemble GSWP-2 generates the best phasing of the annual cycle as well as a good representation of absolute values, although the ensemble mean tends to smooth the peaks. Finally, the intermodel comparison shows the limits and deficiencies of a velocity-constant routing model such as HD, particularly in the phase of mean annual discharge. The second part of the study assesses the sensitivity of river discharge to the variation of external meteorological forcing. The Center for Ocean–Land–Atmosphere Studies version of the SSiB model is constrained with different meteorological fields and the resulting runoff is used as input for HD. River flow is most sensitive to precipitation variability, but changes in radiative forcing affect discharge as well, presumably because of the interaction with evaporation. Also, this analysis provides an estimate of the sensitivity of river discharge to precipitation variations. A few areas (e.g., central and eastern Asia, the Mediterranean, and much of the United States) show a magnified response of river discharge to a given percentage change in precipitation. Hence, an amplified effect of droughts as indicated by the consensus of climate change predictions may occur in places such as the Mediterranean. Conversely, increasing summer precipitation foreseen in places like southern and eastern Asia may amplify floods in these poor and heavily populated regions. Globally, a 1% fluctuation in precipitation forcing results in an average 2.3% change in discharge. These results can be used for the definition and assessment of new strategies for land use and water management in the near future.


Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roxanne Ahmed ◽  
Terry Prowse ◽  
Yonas Dibike ◽  
Barrie Bonsal ◽  
Hayley O’Neil

Runoff from Arctic rivers constitutes a major freshwater influx to the Arctic Ocean. In these nival-dominated river systems, the majority of annual discharge is released during the spring snowmelt period. The circulation regime of the salinity-stratified Arctic Ocean is connected to global earth–ocean dynamics through thermohaline circulation; hence, variability in freshwater input from the Arctic flowing rivers has important implications for the global climate system. Daily discharge data from each of the four largest Arctic-draining river watersheds (Mackenzie, Ob, Lena and Yenisei; herein referred to as MOLY) are analyzed to identify historic changes in the magnitude and timing of freshwater input to the Arctic Ocean with emphasis on the spring freshet. Results show that the total freshwater influx to the Arctic Ocean increased by 89 km3/decade, amounting to a 14% increase during the 30-year period from 1980 to 2009. A distinct shift towards earlier melt timing is also indicated by proportional increases in fall, winter and spring discharges (by 2.5%, 1.3% and 2.5% respectively) followed by a decrease (by 5.8%) in summer discharge as a percentage of the mean annual flow. This seasonal increase in discharge and earlier pulse onset dates indicates a general shift towards a flatter, broad-based hydrograph with earlier peak discharges. The study also reveals that the increasing trend in freshwater discharge to the Arctic Ocean is not solely due to increased spring freshet discharge, but is a combination of increases in all seasons except that of the summer.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanna Winkelbauer ◽  
Michael Mayer ◽  
Vanessa Seitner ◽  
Ervin Zsoter ◽  
Hao Zuo ◽  
...  

Abstract. This study analyses river discharge into the Arctic Ocean using state-of-the-art reanalyses such as the fifth-generation European Reanalysis (ERA5) and the reanalysis component from the Global Flood Awareness System (GloFAS). GloFAS, in it’s operational version 2.1, combines the land surface model Hydrology Tiled ECMWF Scheme for Surface Exchanges over Land, HTESSEL) from ECMWF’s ERA5 with a hydrological and channel routing model (LISFLOOD). Further we analyse GloFAS most recent version 3.1, which is not coupled to HTESSEL but uses the full configuration of LISFLOOD. Seasonal cycles, as well as annual runoff trends are analysed for the major Arctic watersheds – Yenisei, Ob, Lena and Mackenzie – where reanalysis-based runoff can be compared to available observed river discharge records. Further we calculate river discharge over the whole Pan-Arctic region and, by combination with atmospheric inputs, storage changes from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and oceanic volume transports from ocean reanalyses, try to close the non-steric water volume budget. Finally we provide best estimates for every budget equation term using a variational adjustment scheme. Seasonal river discharge peaks are underestimated in ERA5 and GloFAS v2.1 by up to 50 %, caused by pronounced declining trends due to spurious signals in ERA5s data assimilation system. The new GloFAS v3.1 product exhibits distinct improvements and performs best in terms of seasonality and long term means, however opposing to gauge observations it also features declining trends. Calculating runoff indirectly through the divergence of moisture flux is the only reanalyses based estimate that is able to reproduce the river discharge increases measured by gauge observations (Pan-Arctic increase of 2 % per decade). In addition we look into Greenlandic discharge, which makes out about 10 % of of the total Pan-Arctic discharge and features strong increases mainly due to glacial melting. The variational adjustment brought reliable estimates of the volume budget terms on an annual scale, requiring only moderate adjustments of less than 1 % for each individual term. Approximately 6584 ± 84 km3 freshwater leave the Arctic Ocean per year through it’s boundaries. About two thirds of this are recovered through runoff from the surrounding land areas to the Arctic Ocean (4379 ± 25 km3 per year) and about one third is supplied by the atmosphere. On a seasonal scale however the variational approach demonstrated that there are systematical errors present in the data-sets, that are not considered in their uncertainty estimation. Hence the budget residuals of some month were too large to be eliminated within the a priori spreads of the individual terms.


2018 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 805-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. H. Bromwich ◽  
A. B. Wilson ◽  
L. Bai ◽  
Z. Liu ◽  
M. Barlage ◽  
...  

AbstractThe Arctic is a vital component of the global climate, and its rapid environmental evolution is an important element of climate change around the world. To detect and diagnose the changes occurring to the coupled Arctic climate system, a state-of-the-art synthesis for assessment and monitoring is imperative. This paper presents the Arctic System Reanalysis, version 2 (ASRv2), a multiagency, university-led retrospective analysis (reanalysis) of the greater Arctic region using blends of the polar-optimized version of the Weather Research and Forecasting (Polar WRF) Model and WRF three-dimensional variational data assimilated observations for a comprehensive integration of the regional climate of the Arctic for 2000–12. New features in ASRv2 compared to version 1 (ASRv1) include 1) higher-resolution depiction in space (15-km horizontal resolution), 2) updated model physics including subgrid-scale cloud fraction interaction with radiation, and 3) a dual outer-loop routine for more accurate data assimilation. ASRv2 surface and pressure-level products are available at 3-hourly and monthly mean time scales at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). Analysis of ASRv2 reveals superior reproduction of near-surface and tropospheric variables. Broadscale analysis of forecast precipitation and site-specific comparisons of downward radiative fluxes demonstrate significant improvement over ASRv1. The high-resolution topography and land surface, including weekly updated vegetation and realistic sea ice fraction, sea ice thickness, and snow-cover depth on sea ice, resolve finescale processes such as topographically forced winds. Thus, ASRv2 permits a reconstruction of the rapid change in the Arctic since the beginning of the twenty-first century–complementing global reanalyses. ASRv2 products will be useful for environmental models, verification of regional processes, or siting of future observation networks.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Newman ◽  
Yifan Cheng ◽  
Keith Musselman ◽  
Anthony Craig ◽  
Sean Swenson ◽  
...  

<p>The Arctic has warmed during the recent observational record and is projected to keep warming through the end of the 21<sup>st</sup> century in nearly every future emissions scenario and global climate model. This will drive continued thawing of permafrost-rich soils, alter the partitioning of rain versus snow events, and greatly affectthe water cycle and land-surface processes across the Arctic. However, previous analyses of these impacts using dynamical models have relied on global climate model output or relatively coarse regional climate model simulations. In the coarse simulations, projections of changes to the water cycle and land-surface processes in areas of complex orography and high land-surface heterogeneity, which are characteristic of many regions in the Arctic, may thus be limited. </p><p>Here, we discuss recent work examining high-resolution regional climate simulations over Alaska and NW Canada. Completed and upcoming simulations have been and will be run at a 4 km grid spacing, which is sufficient to resolve orography across this region’s mountain ranges. The initial simulation results are very encouraging and show the regional climate model yields a realistic representation of the seasonal and spatial evolution of precipitation, temperature, and snowpack compared to previous studies across Alaska and other Arctic regions. A paired future climate simulation uses the Pseudo-Global Warming (PGW) approach, where the end of century ensemble mean monthly climate perturbations (CMIP5 RCP8.5) are used to incorporate the thermodynamic effects of future warming into the present-day climate as represented by ERA-Interim reanalysis data. Changes in major components of the hydroclimate (e.g. precipitation, temperature, snowfall, snowpack) are projected to sometimes be significant in this future scenario. For example, the seasonal snow cover in some regions is projected to mostly disappear. However, there are also projected increases in snowpack in historically very cold areas (e.g. high elevations) that are able to stay cold enough in the future to support snowfall and snowpack.</p><p>Finally, we will present a new effort to couple an advanced land-surface model, the Community Terrestrial Systems Model (CTSM), within the Regional Arctic Systems Model (RASM) in an effort to better represent complex land-surface and subsurface (e.g. permafrost, streamflow availability timing and temperatures) processes for climate change impact studies. CTSM is a complex physically based land-surface model that is able to represent multiple snow layers, a complex canopy, and multiple soil layers including organic matter and frozen soils, which enables us to explicitly represent spatial variability in the regional hydroclimate and land states (e.g. permafrost) at relatively high spatial resolutions relative to other simulations (4 km land and atmosphere grids).  Successful coupling of CTSM within RASM has been completed and we will discuss some preliminary land-atmosphere coupled test results.</p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Materia ◽  
Daniele Peano ◽  
Marianna Benassi ◽  
Tomas Lovato ◽  
Silvio Gualdi ◽  
...  

<p>Large-scale river routing schemes are essential to close the hydrological cycle in fully coupled<span> </span>Earth System Models (ESMs). The availability of a realistic water flow is a powerful instrument to evaluate modeled land surface, a crucial component of the global climate whos<span>e </span>properties are often simplified by heavy parameterization, due to lack of process knowledge and<span> </span>validation data.<span> </span>We built up a new concept of river routing model, named HYDROS (HYdro-Dynamic ROuting Scheme), that replaces the present scheme embedded in the CMCC-CM2 global coupled model.<span> </span>The new scheme aims at overcoming one of the current major limitations,<span> </span>that is the use of time-independent flow velocities parameterized as a function of topography.<span> </span>Through the imposition of hydraulic equations, HYDROS defines a time-varying flow velocity<span> </span>associated with the amount of lateral runoff generated by the ESM's land component and the flow through the<span> </span>river system.<span> Compared to the scheme currently in place,</span> HYDROS show improvements in the simulation of mean annual discharge phase, especially for the Arctic rivers and<span> </span>the Amazon. In <span>the Mississippi case</span>,<span> </span><span>an extreme</span> flood episode <span>is</span> better caught by the new representation, indicating that the improved flow velocity better catches the discharge peaks after extreme rainfalls. The new routing model<span> </span>is not able to improve the volumes of simulated river discharge, <span>whose</span> magnitude depends on<span> </span>the ability of the ESM land surface scheme to generate correct surface and sub-surface runoff. Once implemented in coupled mode, HYDROS will guarantee a plausible amount and timing of freshwater discharge into the global ocean, unveiling possible unresolved feedback mechanisms occurring in proximity of river mouths<span>.</span></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document