scholarly journals The XXL Survey

2018 ◽  
Vol 620 ◽  
pp. A18 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. H. A. Logan ◽  
B. J. Maughan ◽  
M. N. Bremer ◽  
P. Giles ◽  
M. Birkinshaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Angular Resolution ◽  
False Positive Rate ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Point Sources ◽  
Selection Function ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Cluster Emission ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Function Modelling

Context. The XMM-XXL survey has used observations from the XMM-Newton observatory to detect clusters of galaxies over a wide range in mass and redshift. The moderate PSF (FWHM ~ 6″ on-axis) of XMM-Newton means that point sources within or projected onto a cluster may not be separated from the cluster emission, leading to enhanced luminosities and affecting the selection function of the cluster survey. Aims. We present the results of short Chandra observations of 21 galaxy clusters and cluster candidates at redshifts z > 1 detected in the XMM-XXL survey in X-rays or selected in the optical and infra-red. Methods. With the superior angular resolution of Chandra, we investigate whether there are any point sources within the cluster region that were not detected by the XMM-XXL analysis pipeline, and whether any point sources were misclassified as distant clusters. Results. Of the 14 X-ray selected clusters, 9 are free from significant point source contamination, either having no previously unresolved sources detected by Chandra or with less than about 10% of the reported XXL cluster flux being resolved into point sources. Of the other five sources, one is significantly contaminated by previously unresolved AGN, and four appear to be AGN misclassified as clusters. All but one of these cases are in the subset of less secure X-ray selected cluster detections and the false positive rate is consistent with that expected from the XXL selection function modelling. We also considered a further seven optically selected cluster candidates associated with faint XXL sources that were not classed as clusters. Of these, three were shown to be AGN by Chandra, one is a cluster whose XXL survey flux was highly contaminated by unresolved AGN, while three appear to be uncontaminated clusters. By decontaminating and vetting these distant clusters, we provide a pure sample of clusters at redshift z > 1 for deeper follow-up observations, and demonstrate the utility of using Chandra snapshots to test for AGN in surveys with high sensitivity but poor angular resolution.

Near Edge X-Ray Absorption Fine Structure (NEXAFS) Microscopy: Chemical Analysis at Sub Visible Spatial Resolution

1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (S2) ◽  
pp. 851-852
Author(s):  
H. Ade
Keyword(s):  
Fine Structure ◽  
Compositional Analysis ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Linear Dichroism ◽  
X Rays ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Absorption Fine ◽  
Nexafs Spectroscopy ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
X Ray Absorption

Infrared, Raman, and fluorescence/luminescence microspectroscopy/microscopy in many instances seek to provide high sensitivity compositional and functional information that goes beyond mere elemental composition. This goal is shared by NEXAFS microscopy, in which Near Edge X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (NEXAFS) spectroscopy is employed to provide chemical sensitivity and can be relatively easily adopted in a scanning transmission x-ray microscope (STXM). In addition to compositional information, NEXAFS microscopy can exploit the dependence of x-ray absorption resonances on the bond orientation relative to the linearly polarized x rays (linear dichroism microscopy). For compositional analysis, NEXAFS microscopy is analogous to Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (EELS) in an electron microscope. However, when utilizing near edge spectral features, NEXAFS microscopy requires a considerable lower dose than EELS microscopy which makes it very suitable to studying radiation sensitive materials such as polymers. NEXAFS has shown to have excellent sensitivity to a wide range of moieties in polymers, including sensitivity to substitution isomerism.

An x-ray microprobe based upon a close-coupled focal-spot / glass capillary arrangement

1992 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 1758-1759
Author(s):  
D. A. Carpenter ◽  
M. A. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Fluorescence Analysis ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Specimen Preparation ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Glass Capillary ◽  
Close Coupling ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Point To Point ◽  
Beam Damage

The development of intense sources of x rays has led to renewed interest in the use of microbeams of x rays in x-ray fluorescence analysis. Sparks pointed out that the use of x rays as a probe offered the advantages of high sensitivity, low detection limits, low beam damage, and large penetration depths with minimal specimen preparation or perturbation. In addition, the option of air operation provided special advantages for examination of hydrated systems or for nondestructive microanalysis of large specimens.The disadvantages of synchrotron sources prompted the development of laboratory-based instrumentation with various schemes to maximize the beam flux while maintaining small point-to-point resolution. Nichols and Ryon developed a microprobe using a rotating anode source and a modified microdiffractometer. Cross and Wherry showed that by close-coupling the x-ray source, specimen, and detector, good intensities could be obtained for beam sizes between 30 and 100μm. More importantly, both groups combined specimen scanning with modern imaging techniques for rapid element mapping.

Recent Developments In Monochromatic Microprobe X-Ray Fluorescence (MMXRF)

1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (S2) ◽  
pp. 378-379
Author(s):  
Z. W. Chen ◽  
D. B. Wittry
Keyword(s):  
Materials Science ◽  
High Vacuum ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Fluorescence Excitation ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Quantitative Microanalysis ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Fifth Order

A monochromatic x-ray microprobe based on a laboratory source has recently been developed in our laboratory and used for fluorescence excitation. This technique provides high sensitivity (ppm to ppb), nondestructive, quantitative microanalysis with minimum sample preparation and does not require a high vacuum specimen chamber. It is expected that this technique (MMXRF) will have important applications in materials science, geological sciences and biological science.Three-dimensional focusing of x-rays can be obtained by using diffraction from doubly curved crystals. In our MMXRF setup, a small x-ray source was produced by the bombardment of a selected target with a focused electron beam and a toroidal mica diffractor with Johann pointfocusing geometry was used to focus characteristic x-rays from the source. In the previous work ∼ 108 photons/s were obtained in a Cu Kα probe of 75 μm × 43 μm in the specimen plane using the fifth order reflection of the (002) planes of mica.

A multi-length-scale USAXS/SAXS facility: 10–50 keV small-angle X-ray scattering instrument

2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 1508-1512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byron Freelon ◽  
Kamlesh Suthar ◽  
Jan Ilavsky
Keyword(s):  
Small Angle ◽  
Soft Matter ◽  
High Energy ◽  
X Rays ◽  
X Ray ◽  
X Ray Scattering ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
And Performance ◽  
New Facility ◽  
Ray Scattering

Coupling small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and ultra-small-angle X-ray scattering (USAXS) provides a powerful system of techniques for determining the structural organization of nanostructured materials that exhibit a wide range of characteristic length scales. A new facility that combines high-energy (HE) SAXS and USAXS has been developed at the Advanced Photon Source (APS). The application of X-rays across a range of energies, from 10 to 50 keV, offers opportunities to probe structural behavior at the nano- and microscale. An X-ray setup that can characterize both soft matter or hard matter and high-Zsamples in the solid or solution forms is described. Recent upgrades to the Sector 15ID beamline allow an extension of the X-ray energy range and improved beam intensity. The function and performance of the dedicated USAXS/HE-SAXS ChemMatCARS-APS facility is described.

scholarly journals Stellar Winds in Massive X-ray Binaries

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (S329) ◽  
pp. 355-358
Author(s):  
Peter Kretschmar ◽  
Silvia Martínez-Núñez ◽  
Enrico Bozzo ◽  
Lidia M. Oskinova ◽  
Joachim Puls ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Compact Object ◽  
High Mass ◽  
Stellar Winds ◽  
X Rays ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Current State ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Strong Winds ◽  
The One ◽  
X Ray Binaries

AbstractStrong winds from massive stars are a topic of interest to a wide range of astrophysical fields. In High-Mass X-ray Binaries the presence of an accreting compact object on the one side allows to infer wind parameters from studies of the varying properties of the emitted X-rays; but on the other side the accretor’s gravity and ionizing radiation can strongly influence the wind flow. Based on a collaborative effort of astronomers both from the stellar wind and the X-ray community, this presentation attempts to review our current state of knowledge and indicate avenues for future progress.

scholarly journals The sensitivity of atomic analysis by X-rays

1932 ◽  
Vol 135 (828) ◽  
pp. 637-656 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Atomic Number ◽  
Target Material ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Major Constituent ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Depth Of Penetration ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Constituent Element ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Atomic Analysis

In a previous paper it was shown that 0·0007 per cent, of 29 Cu and 0·0003 per cent, of 26 Fe could be detected in 30 Zn by atomic analysis by X-ray spectroscopy. This sensitivity is greater than that which was claimed by Noddack, Tacke, and Berg, who set the limit at about 0·1 per cent, for non-metals, and by Hevesy, who stated it to be about 0·01 per cent, for an element present in an alloy. It was later suggested by Hevesy that the high value of the sensitivity which we found might result from the fact that some of the alloys we had used were composed of elements of almost equal atomic number, and that the sensitivity would be smaller for a constituent of low atomic number mixed with a major constituent of high atomic number. To elucidate these disagreements we have made further observations of the sensitivity with elements of different atomic number and have investigated the conditions which can influence the sensitivity. The Factors Determining Sensitivity . The detection of one element in a mixture of elements depends upon the identification of its K or L lines in the general spectrum emitted by the mixture under examination. The intensity with which these lines are excited in the target (“excited intensity”) is proportional to the number of atoms of the constituent element excited, i. e ., to its concentration and to the volume of the target in which the cathode ray energy is absorbed. The depth of penetration of the cathode rays is determined by the density of the target material and by their velocity ( i. e ., by the voltage applied to the X-ray tube). Schonland has shown that the range of homogeneous cathode rays in different elements, expressed as a mass per unit area, is approximately constant and is independent of the atomic number of the absorbing element. When their velocity is increased, the cathode rays will penetrate to a greater depth, and therefore a greater number of atoms of all constituents will be ionised. This will increase the “excited intensity” of the lines due to the particular constituent sought equally with those lines of the other elements present. The intensity of a line further depends upon the difference between the voltage applied to the X-ray tube and that necessary to excite the series. For these reasons, a high applied voltage is required for a high sensitivity.

Parameters Affecting X-Ray Microfluorescence (XRMF) Analysis

1986 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monte C. Nichols ◽  
Dale R. Boehme ◽  
Richard W. Ryon ◽  
David Wherry ◽  
Brian Cross ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Techniques ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Sample Surface ◽  
Chemical Information ◽  
X Rays ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Minimal Sample ◽  
Small X ◽  
Fluorescent Radiation ◽  
Channel Analyzer

AbstractX-ray Microfluorescence (XRMF) analysis uses a finely collimated beam of X-rays to excite fluorescent radiation in a sample (Nichols & Ryon 1986). Characteristic fluorescent radiation emanating from the small interaction volume element is acquired using an energy dispersive detector placed in close proximity to the sample. The signal from the detector is processed using a computer-based multi-channel analyzer.XRMF imaging is accomplished by translating the sample through the small X-ray beam in a step or continuous raster mode. As the sample is translated, a pixel by pixel X-ray intensity image is formed for each chemical element in the sample. The resulting digitized image information for each element is stored for subsequent processing and/or display. The images, in the form of elemental maps representing identical areas, may be displayed and color coded by element and/or intensity and then overlayed for spatial correlation.The present study of parameters affecting the performance of an X-ray microfluorescence system has shown how such systems use X-ray beams with effective spot sizes less than 100 micrometers to bridge the gap in analytical capabilities between predominately surface micro analytical techniques such as SEM/EDX and bulk analytical methods such as standard XRF analysis. The combination of XRMF spectroscopy with digital imaging allows chemical information to be obtained and mapped from surface layers as well as from layers or structures beneath the sample surface. Simultaneously, it provides valuable high resolution chemical information in a readily interpreted visual form which displays the homogeneity within a given layer or structure. XRMF systems retain the advantages of minimal sample preparation, non-destructive analysis and high sensitivity inherent to XRF methods.

scholarly journals A comparison of the radiosensitisation ability of 22 different element metal oxide nanoparticles using clinical megavoltage X-rays

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Guerreiro ◽  
Nicholas Chatterton ◽  
Eleanor M. Crabb ◽  
Jon P. Golding
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Metal Oxide ◽  
Hydroxyl Radical ◽  
Singlet Oxygen ◽  
Hydroxyl Radicals ◽  
Metal Oxide Nanoparticles ◽  
Oxide Nanoparticles ◽  
X Rays ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Wide Range

Abstract Background A wide range of nanoparticles (NPs), composed of different elements and their compounds, are being developed by several groups as possible radiosensitisers, with some already in clinical trials. However, no systematic experimental survey of the clinical X-ray radiosensitising potential of different element nanoparticles has been made. Here, we directly compare the irradiation-induced (10 Gy of 6-MV X-ray photon) production of hydroxyl radicals, superoxide anion radicals and singlet oxygen in aqueous solutions of the following metal oxide nanoparticles: Al2O3, SiO2, Sc2O3, TiO2, V2O5, Cr2O3, MnO2, Fe3O4, CoO, NiO, CuO, ZnO, ZrO2, MoO3, Nd2O3, Sm2O3, Eu2O3, Gd2O3, Tb4O7, Dy2O3, Er2O3 and HfO2. We also examine DNA damage due to these NPs in unirradiated and irradiated conditions. Results Without any X-rays, several NPs produced more radicals than water alone. Thus, V2O5 NPs produced around 5-times more hydroxyl radicals and superoxide radicals. MnO2 NPs produced around 10-times more superoxide anions and Tb4O7 produced around 3-times more singlet oxygen. Lanthanides produce fewer hydroxyl radicals than water. Following irradiation, V2O5 NPs produced nearly 10-times more hydroxyl radicals than water. Changes in radical concentrations were determined by subtracting unirradiated values from irradiated values. These were then compared with irradiation-induced changes in water only. Irradiation-specific increases in hydroxyl radical were seen with most NPs, but these were only significantly above the values of water for V2O5, while the Lanthanides showed irradiation-specific decreases in hydroxyl radical, compared to water. Only TiO2 showed a trend of irradiation-specific increase in superoxides, while V2O5, MnO2, CoO, CuO, MoO3 and Tb4O7 all demonstrated significant irradiation-specific decreases in superoxide, compared to water. No irradiation-specific increases in singlet oxygen were seen, but V2O5, NiO, CuO, MoO3 and the lanthanides demonstrated irradiation-specific decreases in singlet oxygen, compared to water. MoO3 and CuO produced DNA damage in the absence of radiation, while the highest irradiation-specific DNA damage was observed with CuO. In contrast, MnO2, Fe3O4 and CoO were slightly protective against irradiation-induced DNA damage. Conclusions Beyond identifying promising metal oxide NP radiosensitisers and radioprotectors, our broad comparisons reveal unexpected differences that suggest the surface chemistry of NP radiosensitisers is an important criterion for their success.

Applications of a Laboratory X-ray Micropsobe to Materials Analysis

1988 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 115-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Carpenter ◽  
M. A. Taylor ◽  
C. E. Holcombe
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
High Spatial Resolution ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Specimen Preparation ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Glass Capillary ◽  
Materials Analysis ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Small Glass

A laboratory-based X-ray microprobe, composed of a high-brilliance microfocus X-ray tube, coupled with a small glass capillary, has been developed for materials applications. Because of total external reflectance of X rays from the smooth inside bore of the glass capillary, the microprobe has a high sensitivity as well as a high spatial resolution. The use of X rays to excite elemental fluorescence offers the advantages of good peak-to-background, the ability to operate in air, and minimal specimen preparation. In addition, the development of laboratory-based instrumentation has been of Interest recently because of greater accessibility when compared with synchrotron X-ray microprobes.

scholarly journals X-ray emission from Planetary Nebulae

1997 ◽  
Vol 180 ◽  
pp. 214-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail M. Conway ◽  
You-Hua Chu
Keyword(s):  
Planetary Nebulae ◽  
Point Sources ◽  
Stellar Winds ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Will Emit ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Extended Sources ◽  
Central Stars

X-ray emission from planetary nebulae (PNe) may originate from two sources: central stars which are 100,000–200,000 K will emit soft X-rays, and shocked fast stellar winds reaching 106–107 K will emit harder X-rays. The former are point sources, while the shocked winds are expected to be extended sources emitting continuously out to the inner wall of the visible nebular shell (Weaver et al. 1977; Wrigge & Wendker 1996).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document