scholarly journals Regulation of the Cell Cycle by Focal Adhesion Kinase

1998 ◽  
Vol 143 (7) ◽  
pp. 1997-2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-He Zhao ◽  
Heinz Reiske ◽  
Jun-Lin Guan
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Brdu Incorporation ◽  
Dominant Negative Mutant ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Erk Activation ◽  
Cycle Regulation

In this report, we have analyzed the potential role and mechanisms of integrin signaling through FAK in cell cycle regulation by using tetracycline-regulated expression of exogenous FAK and mutants. We have found that overexpression of wild-type FAK accelerated G1 to S phase transition. Conversely, overexpression of a dominant-negative FAK mutant ΔC14 inhibited cell cycle progression at G1 phase and this inhibition required the Y397 in ΔC14. Biochemical analyses indicated that FAK mutant ΔC14 was mislocalized and functioned as a dominant-negative mutant by competing with endogenous FAK in focal contacts for binding signaling molecules such as Src and Fyn, resulting in a decreases of Erk activation in cell adhesion. Consistent with this, we also observed inhibition of BrdU incorporation and Erk activation by FAK Y397F mutant and FRNK, but not FRNKΔC14, in transient transfection assays using primary human foreskin fibroblasts. Finally, we also found that ΔC14 blocked cyclin D1 upregulation and induced p21 expression, while wild-type FAK increased cyclin D1 expression and decreased p21 expression. Taken together, these results have identified FAK and its associated signaling pathways as a mediator of the cell cycle regulation by integrins.

Pyk2 and FAK differentially regulate progression of the cell cycle

2000 ◽  
Vol 113 (17) ◽  
pp. 3063-3072 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Zhao ◽  
C. Zheng ◽  
J. Guan
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Expression System ◽  
Chimeric Protein ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Erk Activation ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Cycle Regulation

We have previously identified FAK and its associated signaling pathways as a mediator of cell cycle progression by integrins. In this report, we have analyzed the potential role and mechanism of Pyk2, a tyrosine kinase closely related to FAK, in cell cycle regulation by using tetracycline-regulated expression system as well as chimeric molecules. We have found that induction of Pyk2 inhibited G(1) to S phase transition whereas comparable induction of FAK expression accelerated it. Furthermore, expression of a chimeric protein containing Pyk2 N-terminal and kinase domain and FAK C-terminal domain (PFhy1) increased cell cycle progression as FAK. Conversely, the complementary chimeric molecule containing FAK N-terminal and kinase domain and Pyk2 C-terminal domain (FPhy2) inhibited cell cycle progression to an even greater extent than Pyk2. Biochemical analyses indicated that Pyk2 and FPhy2 stimulated JNK activation whereas FAK or PFhy1 had little effect on it, suggesting that differential activation of JNK by Pyk2 may contribute to its inhibition of cell cycle progression. In addition, Pyk2 and FPhy2 to a greater extent also inhibited Erk activation in cell adhesion whereas FAK and PFhy1 stimulated it, suggesting a role for Erk activation in mediating differential regulation of cell cycle by Pyk2 and FAK. A role for Erk and JNK pathways in mediating the cell cycle regulation by FAK and Pyk2 was also confirmed by using chemical inhibitors for these pathways. Finally, we showed that while FAK and PFhy1 were present in focal contacts, Pyk2 and FPhy2 were localized in the cytoplasm. Interestingly, both Pyk2 and FPhy2 (to a greater extent) were tyrosine phosphorylated and associated with Src and Fyn. This suggested that they may inhibit Erk activation in an analogous manner as the mislocalized FAK mutant (Δ)C14 described previously by competing with endogenous FAK for binding signaling molecules such as Src and Fyn. This model is further supported by an inhibition of endogenous FAK association with active Src by Pyk2 and FPhy2 and a partial rescue by FAK of Pyk2-mediated cell cycle inhibition.

scholarly journals Expression of dominant-negative mutant DP-1 blocks cell cycle progression in G1.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 3698-3706 ◽  
Author(s):  
C L Wu ◽  
M Classon ◽  
N Dyson ◽  
E Harlow
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Functional Domains ◽  
Dominant Negative Mutant ◽  
G1 Arrest ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Cycle Progression

Unregulated expression of the transcription factor E2F promotes the G1-to-S phase transition in cultured mammalian cells. However, there has been no direct evidence for an E2F requirement in this process. To demonstrate that E2F is obligatory for cell cycle progression, we attempted to inactivate E2F by overexpressing dominant-negative forms of one of its heterodimeric partners, DP-1. We dissected the functional domains of DP-1 and separated the region that facilitate heterodimer DNA binding from the E2F dimerization domain. Various DP-1 mutants were introduced into cells via transfection, and the cell cycle profile of the transfected cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. Expression of wild-type DP-1 or DP-1 mutants that bind to both DNA and E2F drove cells into S phase. In contrast, DP-1 mutants that retained E2F binding but lost DNA binding arrested cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. The DP-1 mutants that were unable to bind DNA resulted in transcriptionally inactive E2F complexes, suggesting that the G1 arrest is caused by formation of defective E2F heterodimers. Furthermore, the G1 arrest instigated by these DP-1 mutants could be rescued by coexpression of wild-type E2F or DP protein. These experiments define functional domains of DP and demonstrate a requirement for active E2F complexes in cell cycle progression.

scholarly journals HBP1 Repression of the p47phox Gene: Cell Cycle Regulation via the NADPH Oxidase

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 3011-3024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen P. Berasi ◽  
Mei Xiu ◽  
Amy S. Yee ◽  
K. Eric Paulson
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Nadph Oxidase ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Cellular Growth ◽  
Superoxide Production ◽  
Regulatory Subunit ◽  
Dominant Negative Mutant ◽  
Ros Generation ◽  
Cycle Regulation

ABSTRACT Several studies have linked the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by the NADPH oxidase to cellular growth control. In many cases, activation of the NADPH oxidase and subsequent ROS generation is required for growth factor signaling and mitogenesis in nonimmune cells. In this study, we demonstrate that the transcriptional repressor HBP1 (HMG box-containing protein 1) regulates the gene for the p47phox regulatory subunit of the NADPH oxidase. HBP1 represses growth regulatory genes (e.g., N-Myc, c-Myc, and cyclin D1) and is an inhibitor of G1 progression. The promoter of the p47phox gene contains six tandem high-affinity HBP1 DNA-binding elements at positions −1243 to −1318 bp from the transcriptional start site which were required for repression. Furthermore, HBP1 repressed the expression of the endogenous p47phox gene through sequence-specific binding. With HBP1 expression and the subsequent reduction in p47phox gene expression, intracellular superoxide production was correspondingly reduced. Using both the wild type and a dominant-negative mutant of HBP1, we demonstrated that the repression of superoxide production through the NADPH oxidase contributed to the observed cell cycle inhibition by HBP1. Together, these results indicate that HBP1 may contribute to the regulation of NADPH oxidase-dependent superoxide production through transcriptional repression of the p47phox gene. This study defines a transcriptional mechanism for regulating intracellular ROS levels and has implications in cell cycle regulation.

scholarly journals Cell cycle regulation in Aspergillus by two protein kinases

1996 ◽  
Vol 317 (3) ◽  
pp. 633-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen A. OSMANI ◽  
Xiang S. YE
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Protein Kinases ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Cyclin B ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases ◽  
Cycle Regulation ◽  
Mitotic Regulation

Great progress has recently been made in our understanding of the regulation of the eukaryotic cell cycle, and the central role of cyclin-dependent kinases is now clear. In Aspergillus nidulans it has been established that a second class of cell-cycle-regulated protein kinases, typified by NIMA (encoded by the nimA gene), is also required for cell cycle progression into mitosis. Indeed, both p34cdc2/cyclin B and NIMA have to be correctly activated before mitosis can be initiated in this species, and p34cdc2/cyclin B plays a role in the mitosis-specific activation of NIMA. In addition, both kinases have to be proteolytically destroyed before mitosis can be completed. NIMA-related kinases may also regulate the cell cycle in other eukaryotes, as expression of NIMA can promote mitotic events in yeast, frog or human cells. Moreover, dominant-negative versions of NIMA can adversely affect the progression of human cells into mitosis, as they do in A. nidulans. The ability of NIMA to influence mitotic regulation in human and frog cells strongly suggests the existence of a NIMA pathway of mitotic regulation in higher eukaryotes. A growing number of NIMA-related kinases have been isolated from organisms ranging from fungi to humans, and some of these kinases are also cell-cycle-regulated. How NIMA-related kinases and cyclin-dependent kinases act in concert to promote cell cycle transitions is just beginning to be understood. This understanding is the key to a full knowledge of cell cycle regulation.

scholarly journals Direct Repression of Cyclin D1 by SIP1 Attenuates Cell Cycle Progression in Cells Undergoing an Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 4615-4624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Mejlvang ◽  
Marina Kriajevska ◽  
Cindy Vandewalle ◽  
Tatyana Chernova ◽  
A. Emre Sayan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Dominant Negative Mutant ◽  
A431 Cells ◽  
Mesenchymal Transition

Zinc finger transcription factors of the Snail/Slug and ZEB-1/SIP1 families control epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development in cancer. Here, we studied SIP1-regulated mesenchymal conversion of epidermoid A431 cells. We found that concomitant with inducing invasive phenotype, SIP1 inhibited expression of cyclin D1 and induced hypophosphorylation of the Rb tumor suppressor protein. Repression of cyclin D1 was caused by direct binding of SIP1 to three sequence elements in the cyclin D1 gene promoter. By expressing exogenous cyclin D1 in A431/SIP1 cells and using RNA interference, we demonstrated that the repression of cyclin D1 gene by SIP1 was necessary and sufficient for Rb hypophosphorylation and accumulation of cells in G1 phase. A431 cells expressing SIP1 along with exogenous cyclin D1 were highly invasive, indicating that SIP1-regulated invasion is independent of attenuation of G1/S progression. However, in another epithelial-mesenchymal transition model, gradual mesenchymal conversion of A431 cells induced by a dominant negative mutant of E-cadherin produced no effect on the cell cycle. We suggest that impaired G1/S phase progression is a general feature of cells that have undergone EMT induced by transcription factors of the Snail/Slug and ZEB-1/SIP1 families.

scholarly journals Phosphorylation of RCC1 on Serine 11 Facilitates G1/S Transition in HPV E7-Expressing Cells

Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 995
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Hou ◽  
Lijun Qiao ◽  
Ruijuan Liu ◽  
Xuechao Han ◽  
Weifang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Mtor Pathway ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Post Translational Modifications ◽  
Hpv E7 ◽  
Cycle Regulation

Persistent infection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) plays a causal role in cervical cancer. Regulator of chromosome condensation 1 (RCC1) is a critical cell cycle regulator, which undergoes a few post-translational modifications including phosphorylation. Here, we showed that serine 11 (S11) of RCC1 was phosphorylated in HPV E7-expressing cells. However, S11 phosphorylation was not up-regulated by CDK1 in E7-expressing cells; instead, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway promoted S11 phosphorylation. Knockdown of AKT or inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway down-regulated phosphorylation of RCC1 S11. Furthermore, S11 phosphorylation occurred throughout the cell cycle, and reached its peak during the mitosis phase. Our previous data proved that RCC1 was necessary for the G1/S cell cycle progression, and in the present study we showed that the RCC1 mutant, in which S11 was mutated to alanine (S11A) to mimic non-phosphorylation status, lost the ability to facilitate G1/S transition in E7-expressing cells. Moreover, RCC1 S11 was phosphorylated by the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in HPV-positive cervical cancer SiHa and HeLa cells. We conclude that S11 of RCC1 is phosphorylated by the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and phosphorylation of RCC1 S11 facilitates the abrogation of G1 checkpoint in HPV E7-expressing cells. In short, our study explores a new role of RCC1 S11 phosphorylation in cell cycle regulation.

Abstract W P198: Sphingomyelin Synthases Regulate Neuronal Cell Proliferation and Cell Cycle Progression

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Umadevi V Wesley ◽  
Daniel Tremmel ◽  
Robert Dempsey
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Neuronal Cell ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cerebral Artery Occlusion

Introduction: The molecular mechanisms of cerebral ischemia damage and protection are not completely understood, but a number of reports implicate the contribution of lipid metabolism and cell-cycle regulating proteins in stroke out come. We have previously shown that tricyclodecan-9-yl-xanthogenate (D609) resulted in increased ceramide levels after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) in spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR). We hypothesized that D609 induced cell cycle arrest probably by inhibiting sphingomyelin synthase (SMS). In this study, we examined the direct effects of SMS on cell cycle progression and proliferation of neuroblast cells. Methods: Ischemia was induced by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) and reperfusion. Expression levels were measured by western blot analysis, RT-PCR, and Immunofluorescence staining. SMS1 and 2 expressions were silenced by stable transfection with SMS1/2-targeted shRNA. Cell cycle analysis was performed using Flow cytometry. Data were analyzed using MODFIT cell cycle analysis program. Cell proliferation rate was measured by MTT assay. Results: We have identified that the expression of SMS1is significantly up-regulated in the ischemic hemisphere following MCAO. Neuro-2a cells transfected with SMS specific ShRNA acquired more neuronal like phenotype and exhibited decreased proliferation rate. Also, silencing of both SMS1 and 2 induced cell-cycle arrest as shown by significantly increased percentage of cells in G0/G1 and decreased proportion of cells in S-phase as compared to control cells. This was accompanied by up-regulation of cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitors p21 and decreased levels of phophorylated AKT levels. Furthermore, loss of SMS inhibited the migratory potential of Neuro 2a cells. Summary: Up-regulation of SMS under ischemic/reperfusion conditions suggests that this enzyme potentially contributes to cell cycle regulation and may contribute to maintaining neuronal cell population. Further studies may open up a new direction for identifying the molecular mechanisms of cell cycle regulation and protection following ischemic stroke

scholarly journals Babam2 Regulates Cell Cycle Progression and Pluripotency in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells as Revealed by Induced DNA Damage

Biomedicines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 397
Author(s):  
Cheuk Yiu Tenny Chung ◽  
Paulisally Hau Yi Lo ◽  
Kenneth Ka Ho Lee
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Stem Cells ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Gamma Irradiation ◽  
Cellular Senescence ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Regulation

BRISC and BRCA1-A complex member 2 (Babam2) plays an essential role in promoting cell cycle progression and preventing cellular senescence. Babam2-deficient fibroblasts show proliferation defect and premature senescence compared with their wild-type (WT) counterpart. Pluripotent mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) are known to have unlimited cell proliferation and self-renewal capability without entering cellular senescence. Therefore, studying the role of Babam2 in ESCs would enable us to understand the mechanism of Babam2 in cellular aging, cell cycle regulation, and pluripotency in ESCs. For this study, we generated Babam2 knockout (Babam2−/−) mESCs to investigate the function of Babam2 in mESCs. We demonstrated that the loss of Babam2 in mESCs leads to abnormal G1 phase retention in response to DNA damage induced by gamma irradiation or doxorubicin treatments. Key cell cycle regulators, CDC25A and CDK2, were found to be degraded in Babam2−/− mESCs following gamma irradiation. In addition, Babam2−/− mESCs expressed p53 strongly and significantly longer than in control mESCs, where p53 inhibited Nanog expression and G1/S cell cycle progression. The combined effects significantly reduced developmental pluripotency in Babam2−/− mESCs. In summary, Babam2 maintains cell cycle regulation and pluripotency in mESCs in response to induced DNA damage.

scholarly journals A Dominant-Negative PPARγMutant Promotes Cell Cycle Progression and Cell Growth in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells

PPAR Research ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joey Z. Liu ◽  
Christopher J. Lyon ◽  
Willa A. Hsueh ◽  
Ronald E. Law
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Smooth Muscle ◽  
Smooth Muscle Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Muscle Cells ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Positive Regulators

PPARγligands have been shown to have antiproliferative effects on many cell types. We herein report that a synthetic dominant-negative (DN) PPARγmutant functions like a growth factor to promote cell cycle progression and cell proliferation in human coronary artery smooth muscle cells (CASMCs). In quiescent CASMCs, adenovirus-expressed DN-PPARγpromoted G1→S cell cycle progression, enhanced BrdU incorporation, and increased cell proliferation. DN-PPARγexpression also markedly enhanced positive regulators of the cell cycle, increasing Rb and CDC2 phosphorylation and the expression of cyclin A, B1, D1, and MCM7. Conversely, overexpression of wild-type (WT) or constitutively-active (CA) PPARγinhibited cell cycle progression and the activity and expression of positive regulators of the cell cycle. DN-PPARγexpression, however, did not up-regulate positive cell cycle regulators in PPARγ-deficient cells, strongly suggesting that DN-PPARγeffects on cell cycle result from blocking the function of endogenous wild-type PPARγ. DN-PPARγexpression enhanced phosphorylation of ERK MAPKs. Furthermore, the ERK specific-inhibitor PD98059 blocked DN-PPARγ-induced phosphorylation of Rb and expression of cyclin A and MCM7. Our data thus suggest that DN-PPARγpromotes cell cycle progression and cell growth in CASMCs by modulating fundamental cell cycle regulatory proteins and MAPK mitogenic signaling pathways in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs).

The direct and indirect effects of corticosterone and primary adipose tissue on MCF7 breast cancer cell cycle progression

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaniv Shpilberg ◽  
Michael K. Connor ◽  
Michael C. Riddell
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Adipose Tissue ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Indirect Effects ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Direct And Indirect Effects ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Regulation

AbstractBreast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Glucocorticoids (GCs) have the potential to directly affect breast cancer or indirectly via changes to the tumor growth microenvironment a breast cancer is exposed to. The role of GCs in breast cancer progression by direct and indirect means are not fully understood.To study the direct and indirect effects of GCs on breast cancer cell cycle regulation.MCF7 breast cancer cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of corticosterone (CORT) to investigate the direct effects. In addition, MCF7 cells were cultured in conditioned media (CM) from primary adipose tissue excised from CORT-supplemented lean and obese male rats.CORT alone resulted in dose-dependent increases in p27 and hypophosphorylated retinoblastoma protein (Rb) which was accompanied by a reduction in the number of cells in S-phase. CM prepared from adipose tissue overrode these direct CORT effects, suggesting that the tumor growth microenvironment created in the CM dominates MCF7 cell cycle regulation.The direct inhibitory effects of CORT on cancer cell cycle progression are largely limited by the hormone’s effects on adipose tissue biology.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document