scholarly journals An analysis of students’ mathematical reasoning ability in statistic problem solving based on structure of the observed learning outcome taxonomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 1320 ◽  
pp. 012055
Author(s):  
R Lestary ◽  
Subanji ◽  
R Rahardi
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Learning Outcome ◽  
Reasoning Ability

scholarly journals Perbandingan keefektifan pendekatan problem solving dan problem posing dalam pembelajaran matematika pada siswa SMP

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 136
Author(s):  
Harinda Nurril Falach
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Junior High ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Mathematical Understanding ◽  
T Test ◽  
Problem Posing ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Quasi Experiment

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan: 1) keefektifan pendekatan problem solving terhadap kemampuan pemahaman dan penalaran matematis; 2) keefektifan pendekatan problem posing terhadap kemampuan pemahaman dan penalaran matematis; 3) perbandingan keefektifan antara pendekatan pembelajaran problem solving dan problem posing terhadap kemampuan pemahaman dan penalaran matematis siswa SMP pada pembelajaran bangun ruang sisi datar. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu (quasi experiment). Data dianalisis menggunakan one sample t test, uji MANOVA rumus T2 Hotteling, dan uji t kriteria Bonferroni. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: 1) pendekatan problem solving  efektif terhadap kemampuan pemahaman dan penalaran matematis; 2) pendekatan problem posing efektif terhadap kemampuan pemahaman dan penalaran matematis; 3) pendekatan problem solving lebih efektif dibandingkan problem solving terhadap kemampuan pemahaman matematis tetapi pendekatan problem solving tidak lebih efektif dibandingkatn problem posingterhadap kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa SMP pada pembelajaran bangun ruang sisi datar.Kata kunci: pendekatan problem solving, pendekatan problem posing, kemampuan pemahaman matematis, dan kemampuan penalaran matematis. The effectiveness comparison of problem solving and problem posing approaches in mathematics learning towards junior high school students AbstractThe aim of this study is to describe: 1) the effectiveness of problem solving approach on mathematical understanding and reasoning ability; 2) the effectiveness of problem posing approach on mathematical understanding and reasoning ability; 3) the comparison effectiveness of polyhedral learning using problem solving approach and problem posing approach on mathematical understanding and reasoning ability of State Junior High School. This study was a quasi experiment. The data were analyzed using one-sample t test, MANOVA test with T2 Hotteling's formula, and t-test with Bonferroni criterion. The results of the study show that: 1) the problem solving approach has an effect on mathematical understanding and reasoning ability; 2) the problem posing approach has an effect on mathematical understanding and reasoning ability; and 3) the problem solving approach is more effective than the problem posing approach on mathematical understanding ability, but the problem solving approach is not more effective in polyhedral learning than the problem posing approach on mathematical reasoning ability of State Junior High.Keywords: problem solving approach, problem posing approach, mathematical understanding ability, and mathematical reasoning ability

scholarly journals Perbandingan Keefektifan Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry dan Problem Solving Ditinjau dari Prestasi Belajar Peluang, Kemampuan Penalaran, dan Sikap Siswa terhadap Matematika

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 189
Author(s):  
Sardin Sardin
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Attitudes Toward Mathematics ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Approach ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Learning Problem ◽  
Students Attitudes

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pembelajaran guided inquiry dan problem solving, serta perbedaan kedua pembelajaran tersebut yang ditinjau dari prestasi belajar peluang, kemampuan penalaran siswa, dan sikap siswa terhadap  matematika. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian quasi eksperimen dengan desain pretest-postest nonequivalent comparison-group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 2 Baubau yang dikelompokan sebanyak 10 kelas. Sampel dalam penelitian ini sebanyak dua kelas yang dipilih secara acak. Untuk mengetahui keefektifan pembelajaran digunakan uji one sample t-test; untuk mengetahui perbedaan keefektifan menggunakan uji MANOVA (multivariate tests); untuk mengetahui pembelajaran mana yang lebih efektif menggunakan uji independent sample t-test. Adapun  hasil penelitian ini adalah: (1) pendekatan pembelajaran guided inquiry dan pembelajaran problem solving masing-masing efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan penalaran siswa, dan sikap siswa terhadap matematika, (2) pendekatan pembelajaran guided inquiry sama efektifnya dengan pembelajaran problem solving ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan sikap siswa terhadap matematika, dan (3) pendekatan pembelajaran guided inquiry lebih efektif dari pada pembelajaran problem solving ditinjau dari kemampuan penalaran siswa.Kata Kunci: pembelajaran guided inquiry, pembelajaran problem solving,  prestasi belajar, penalaran matematika, dan sikap siswa terhadap matematika Comparison of Effectiveness Between Guided Inquiry Learning Approach and Problem Solving on Learning Achievement Probability, Reasoning Ability and Attitude Toward Mathematics AbstractThis study aimed to describe the effectiveness of guided inquiry learning and problem solving, as well as those learning a second difference is in terms of achievement of learning opportunities, reasoning ability of students, and students' attitudes toward mathematics. This research is a quasi-experimental design with pretest-posttest nonequivalent comparison-group design. The population in this study were all students of Class XI SMAN 2 Baubau to be grouped as much as 10 classes. The sample in this study were two randomly selected classes. To determine the effectiveness of study used a test of one sample t-test; to determine differences in the effectiveness of using test MANOVA (multivariate tests); to know which one is more effective learning using independent sample t-test test. The results of this study are: (1) guided inquiry approach to learning and teaching problem solving each effective in terms of achievement of learning, reasoning ability of students, and students' attitudes toward mathematics, (2) guided inquiry learning approach is as effective as the learning problem solving in terms of achievement learning and students 'attitudes toward mathematics, and 3) guided inquiry learning approach is more effective than learning problem solving in terms of students' mathematical reasoning abilities.Keywords: guided inquiry learning, problem solving learning, academic achievement, mathematical reasoning, and students' attitudes toward mathematics

scholarly journals KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH ALJABAR BERDASARKAN GAYA KOGNITIF FIELD INDEPENDENT

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-73
Author(s):  
Tanti Erviana
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Related Information ◽  
Independent Field ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Main Instrument

This research aims to describe the level of mathematical reasoning ability of students with field-independent cognitive styles in solving algebra problems. The research method used is a qualitative descriptive approach, using qualitative data then described to produce a clear and detailed picture of students' mathematical reasoning with independent field cognitive style in solving algebra problems. The subjects of the research were Class VIII students’ of SMP Negeri 47 Surabaya. The main Instrument in this study is the researchers themselves. Instrument supporters in this research is divided into 2 kinds of Tests, namely the task of problem solving algebra, and guidelines for the interview. Data collection Techniques in the study carried out using two techniques, namely written tests and interviews. The process of data analysis in this study refers to qualitative data analysis process, namely the reduction of data, presenting the data, and draw conclusions. the results of this research indicate that (1) able to conduct an investigation of the problems faced thoroughly, (2) able to plan problem solving by connecting various related information, (3) able to use the strategy chosen correctly and correctly, and (4) able to re-examine, evaluate, and draw valid conclusions based on the solution of the problem obtained. In addition, the results of this study indicate that the level of mathematical reasoning ability of students is in the category sufficient to meet the mathematical reasoning indicators of field-independent cognitive style.

Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Dengan Pendekatan Saintifik Pada Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Kelas VIII B SMP Negeri 1 Padamara

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
Dyah Ayu Nur Khoeriyah ◽  
Ahmad Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Action Planning ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Flat Side ◽  
Class Viii

This study aims to improve students' mathematical reasoning abilities in learning mathematics through Problem Solving with Scientific approaches. The subjects in this study were all students of class VIII B, Padamara 1 st junior high school, totaling 33 students. This research was conducted in 3 cycles, each cycle consisting of 2 meetings. Each cycle in this study includes action planning, action implementation, observation and reflection. To measure the ability of mathematical reasoning is evaluated using the mathematical reasoning ability test. Based on the results of the study, the mathematical reasoning ability of the first cycle obtained an average value of 40.9, the second cycle obtained an average value of 60.15, and the third cycle obtained an average value of 63.3. The conclusion obtained from this study is that learning with Problem Solving with the Scientific approach can improve the mathematical reasoning ability of students of class VIII B Padamara 1 N Middle School, especially the subject of Building a Flat Side Room.

scholarly journals Improving Students’ Scientific Reasoning and Problem-Solving Skills by The 5E Learning Model

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sri Mulyani Endang Susilowati ◽  
Khaerul Anam
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Scientific Reasoning ◽  
Learning Outcome ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Problem Solving Skills ◽  
Regression Test ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Biology Learning ◽  
The Relationship

<p>Biology learning in MA (Madrasah Aliyah) Khas Kempek was still dominated by teacher with low students’ involvement. This study would analyze the effectiveness of the 5E (Engagement, Exploration, Explanation, Elaboration, Evaluation) learning model in improving scientific knowledge and problems solving. It also explained the relationship between students’ scientific reasoning with their problem-solving abilities. This was a pre-experimental research with one group pre-test post-test. Sixty students of MA Khas Kempek from XI MIA 3 and XI MIA 4 involved in this study. The learning outcome of the students was collected by the test of reasoning and problem-solving. The results showed that the rises of students’ scientific reasoning ability were 69.77% for XI MIA 3 and 66.27% for XI MIA 4, in the medium category. The problem-solving skills were 63.40% for XI MIA 3, 61.67% for XI MIA 4, and classified in the moderate category. The simple regression test found a linear correlation between students’ scientific reasoning and problem-solving ability. This study affirms that reasoning ability is needed in problem-solving. It is found that application of 5E learning model was effective to improve scientific reasoning and problem-solving ability of students.</p>

scholarly journals KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL PADA MATERI RELASI DAN FUNGSI KELAS VIII SMP

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-61
Author(s):  
Veronica Veronica Siskanti
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
High Ability ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Generalization Problem ◽  
Reasoning Skills ◽  
Low Ability

The aims of this study is to describe students' mathematical reasoning skills in solving problems on relationship materials and functions. Research method is used descriptive qualitative. The research subjects consisted of six students of grade VIII SMP Negeri 51 Palembang with two students with high ability, two medium students and two students with low ability. Data collection is carried out by providing 5 points about tests, interviews, and documentation. This study, using 5 indicators of reasoning, namely analysis, synthesis, generalization, problem solving is not routine, and justification / proof. The results showed that students who have high ability are mostly able to fulfill all aspects of mathematical reasoning ability. As for students who have moderate ability is able to meet two to three aspects of the students' mathematical reasoning ability only. Then for students who have low ability is only able to meet one to two aspects of the student's mathematical reasoning ability. 

The Influence of Problem-Solving Learning Model and Student Learning Motivation on Mathematical Reasoning Ability

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-44
Author(s):  
Ismail Djakaria
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Tukey Test ◽  
Level 2 ◽  
Quasi Experiment

This study aims to determine whether the mathematical reasoning ability of students who are taught by the problem-solving learning model is effective in terms of the learning motivation of class VII students of SMP Negeri 4 Gorontalo. This type of research is Quasi Experiment with Treatment by level 2 x 2 design using two-way analysis test and Tukey test. The results showed that the mathematical reasoning ability of students who had intrinsic learning motivation in problem-solving learning was 84.13 and the mathematical reasoning ability of students who had intrinsic learning motivation in conventional learning was 67.21. This can also be proven through a test with a significant level of 5% and df = 127 indicating t > t(1,127)(0.05). Obtained t = 4.232 for a = 0.05 obtained t(1,127)(0.05) = 2.80 Thus, the reasoning abilities of students who have intrinsic learning motivation are taught by problem-solving learning more effectively than the reasoning abilities of students who have intrinsic learning motivation are taught by conventional learning.

scholarly journals Improving students’ mathematical reasoning and self-efficacy through Missouri mathematics project and problem-solving

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aprisal Aprisal ◽  
Agus Maman Abadi
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
School Students ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Comparison Of Effectiveness ◽  
And Control

[English]: This article aims to elucidate the effectiveness of Missouri mathematics project-problem solving learning (MMP-PS) toward mathematical reasoning ability and self-efficacy. We conducted quasi experiment research which involve 132 lower secondary school students (age 14-15 years old) as population. Of the population, 25 students respectively in two classes were selected randomly as experiment class and control class. The experiment class was taught using MMP-PS and a control class was taught using MMP (Missouri mathematics project learning). To examine the effectiveness of MMP-PS and MMP toward mathematics reasoning ability and self-efficacy, data were analyzed using one sample t-test. The difference of students’ mathematical reasoning and self-efficacy before and after the treatment was analyzed using Manova. The comparison of effectiveness of MMP-PS and MMP were analyzed through t-Benferroni test.   This article shows that MMP-PS is effective on mathematical reasoning ability and self-efficacy. Meanwhile, MMP is effective on mathematical reasoning ability. The MMP-PS was better than MMP on students’ self-efficacy. Thus, MMP-PS could be utilized in mathematics learning to support students’ mathematical reasoning ability and self-efficacy. Keywords: Missouri mathematics project, Problem solving, Mathematical reasoning, self-efficacy [Bahasa]: Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pembelajaran missouri mathematics projectdengan pendekatan problem solving(MMP-PS) terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematika dan self-efficacy. Penelitian kuasi eksperimen dilaksanakan dengan melibatkan 132 siswa SMP (kisaran umur 14-15 tahun) sebagai populasi. Dipilih secara acak dua kelas yang terdiri dari masing-masing 25 siswa sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol. Kelas eksperimen diajar dengan menggunakan pembelajaran Missouri mathematics projectdengan pendekatan problem solvingdan kelas kontrol diajar dengan pembelajaran missouri mathematics project(MMP). Data penelitian dianalisis melalui uji satu sampel untuk mengukur keefektifan MMP-PS dan MMP terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematika dan self-efficacy. Perbedaan kemampuan penalaran matematika dan self-efficacysiswa sebelum dan sesudah pembelajaran dianalisis menggunakan uji Manova. Perbandingan keunggulan antara MMP-PS dan MMP menggunakan uji t-Benferroni. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa MMP-PS efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan penalaran matematika danself-efficacy. Sementara itu, pembelajaran MMP efektif ditinjau kemampuan penalaran matematika. Pembelajaran MMP-PS lebih unggul dari pembelajaran MMP ditinjau dari self-efficacysiswa. Jadi, MMP-PS bisa digunakan dalam pembelajaran matematika untuk mendukung kemampuan penalaran matematika dan self-efficacy. Kata kunci: Missouri mathematics project, Penalaran matematika, Self-efficacy, Pemecahan masalah NB: PDF version of this article will be available in maximum two weeks after this publication

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document