scholarly journals Age-dependency in mortality of Finnish family caregivers: a nationwide register-based study

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
T M Mikkola ◽  
H Kautiainen ◽  
M Mänty ◽  
M B von Bonsdorff ◽  
T Kröger ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Mortality appears to be lower in family caregivers than in the general population. However, there is lack of knowledge whether the difference in mortality between family caregivers and the general population is dependent on age. The purpose of this study was to analyze all-cause mortality in relation to age in family caregivers and to study their cause-specific mortality using data from multiple Finnish national registers. Methods The data included all individuals, who received family caregiver's allowance in Finland in 2012 (n = 42 256, mean age 67 years, 71% women) and a control population matched for age, sex, and municipality of residence (n = 83 618). Information on dates and causes of death between 2012 and 2017 were obtained from the Finnish Causes of Death Register. Flexible parametric survival modeling and competing risk regression adjusted for socioeconomic status were used. Results The total follow-up time was 717 877 person-years. Family caregivers had lower all-cause mortality than the controls over the follow-up (8.1% vs. 11.6%) both among women (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.61-0.68) and men (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.70-0.77). Younger adult caregivers had equal or only slightly lower mortality than their controls, but after age 60, the difference increased markedly resulting in over 10% lower mortality in favor of the caregivers in the oldest age groups. Caregivers had lower mortality for all the causes of death studied, namely cardiovascular, cancer, neurological, external, respiratory, gastrointestinal and dementia than the controls. Of these, the lowest was the risk for dementia (subhazard ratio=0.29, 95%CI: 0.25-0.34). Conclusions Older family caregivers have lower mortality than the age-matched controls from the general population while younger caregivers have similar mortality to their peers. This age-dependent advantage in mortality is likely to reflect selection of healthier individuals into the family caregiver role. Key messages The difference in mortality between family caregivers and the age-matched general population varies considerably with age. Advantage in mortality observed in family caregiver studies is likely to reflect the selection of healthier individuals into the caregiver role, which underestimates the adverse effects of caregiving.

Author(s):  
Tuija M. Mikkola ◽  
Hannu Kautiainen ◽  
Minna Mänty ◽  
Mikaela B. von Bonsdorff ◽  
Teppo Kröger ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Evidence on family caregivers' health is conflicting. Aim To investigate all-cause and cause-specific mortality in Finnish family caregivers providing high-intensity care and to assess whether age modifies the association between family caregiver status and mortality using data from multiple national registers. Methods The data include all individuals, who received family caregiver's allowance in Finland in 2012 (n = 42,256, mean age 67 years, 71% women) and a control population matched for age, sex, and municipality of residence (n = 83,618). Information on dates and causes of death between 2012 and 2017 were obtained from the Finnish Causes of Death Register. Results Family caregivers had lower all-cause mortality than the controls over the follow-up (8.1 vs. 11.6%) both among women (socioeconomic status adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.64, 95% CI 0.61–0.68) and men (adjusted HR: 0.73, 95% CI 0.70–0.77). When modelling all-cause mortality as a function of age, younger caregivers had only slightly lower or equal mortality to their controls, but older caregivers had markedly lower mortality than their controls, up to more than 10% lower. Caregivers had a lower mortality rate for all the causes of death studied, namely cardiovascular, cancer, neurological, external, respiratory, gastrointestinal and dementia. The lowest risk was for dementia (subhazard ratio = 0.29, 95% CI 0.25–0.34). Conclusions Older family caregivers had lower mortality than the age-matched general population while mortality did not differ according to caregiver status in young adulthood. This age-dependent advantage in mortality is likely to reflect the selection of healthier individuals into the family caregiver role.


Lupus ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 881-885 ◽  
Author(s):  
G E Norby ◽  
G Mjøen ◽  
R Bjørneklett ◽  
B E Vikse ◽  
H Holdaas ◽  
...  

Objective To evaluate long-term mortality and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in a cohort of Norwegian patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis (LN). Methods Renal biopsies were obtained from 178 patients with LN from 1988 until 2007. Mortality rate and death causes were provided by Statistics Norway and ESRD data were provided by the Norwegian Renal Registry. Risk factors for all-cause mortality were evaluated by Cox regression. Standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was compared to observed deaths in a matched general population sample. Results Mean age was 37.6 (±14.4) years, and median time of follow-up was 8.5 years (0–26.2). Thirty-six patients (20.2%) died during follow-up. The SMR for all-cause mortality was 5.6 (Confidence interval [CI] 3.7–7.5). In an adjusted multivariate analysis proliferative glomerulonephritis (LN class IV) was independently associated with all-cause mortality; hazard ratio (HR) 2.6 (Confidence interval [CI] 1.2–5.7 p = 0.017). Main causes of death were infections (47.2%) and cardiovascular events 8 (22.2%). Thirty-six patients (20.2%) reached ESRD. Conclusions Biopsy-proven LN is associated with increased mortality compared to the general population. LN class IV is associated with all-cause mortality. Infections and cardiovascular events were the most common causes of death. Patients with LN have a high incidence of ESRD.


Author(s):  
Natalie Glaser ◽  
Michael Persson ◽  
Anders Franco‐Cereceda ◽  
Ulrik Sartipy

Background Prior studies showed that life expectancy in patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) was lower than in the general population. Explanations for this shorter life expectancy are unknown. The aim of this nationwide, observational cohort study was to investigate the cause‐specific death following surgical AVR. Methods and Results We included 33 018 patients who underwent primary surgical AVR in Sweden between 1997 and 2018, with or without coronary artery bypass grafting. The SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web‐System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence‐Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) register and other national health‐data registers were used to obtain and characterize the study cohort and to identify causes of death, categorized as cardiovascular mortality, cancer mortality, or other causes of death. The relative risks for cause‐specific mortality in patients who underwent AVR compared with the general population are presented as standardized mortality ratios. During a mean follow‐up period of 7.3 years (maximum 22.0 years), 14 237 (43%) patients died. The cumulative incidence of death from cardiovascular, cancer‐related, or other causes was 23.5%, 8.3%, and 11.6%, respectively, at 10 years, and 42.8%, 12.8%, and 23.8%, respectively, at 20 years. Standardized mortality ratios for cardiovascular, cancer‐related, and other causes of death were 1.79 (95% CI, 1.75–1.83), 1.00 (95% CI, 0.97–1.04), and 1.08 (95% CI, 1.05–1.12), respectively. Conclusions We found that life expectancy following AVR was lower than in the general population. Lower survival after AVR was explained by an increased relative risk of cardiovascular death. Future studies should focus on the role of earlier surgery in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis and on optimizing treatment and follow‐up after AVR. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02276950.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masayuki Teramoto ◽  
Isao Muraki ◽  
Kokoro Shirai ◽  
Akiko Tamakoshi ◽  
Hiroyasu Iso

Background: Both green tea and coffee consumption have been associated with lower risks of mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all causes in general population, but little is known about those impact on persons with history of CVD. We examined the association of those consumption with these mortalities among persons with and without history of stroke or myocardial infarction in general population. Methods: The study subjects were 60,664 participants (896 stroke and 1751 myocardial infarction survivors and 58,017 persons with no history of stroke or myocardial infarction), aged 40-79 years at the baseline (1988-1990), who completed a lifestyle and medical history questionnaire including self-administered food frequency under the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study for Evaluation of Cancer Risk (JACC Study). Results: During the median follow-up of 18.5 years, a total of 12,745 (7,458 men and 5,287 women) deaths including 3,737 CVD deaths were documented. Green tea and coffee consumption were inversely associated with CVD and all-cause mortality among myocardial infarction survivors as well as persons without history of stroke or myocardial infarction. After adjustment for known cardiovascular risk factors, the lower risks of mortality from CVD and all-causes associated with frequent green tea consumption (5-6 and ≥7 cups/day) or coffee consumption (≥2 cups/day) remained statistical. Conclusions: Both green tea and coffee consumption were inversely associated with risks of CVD and all-cause mortality among myocardial infarction survivors and persons without history of stroke or myocardial infarction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chitra Punjabi ◽  
Vivian Tien ◽  
Lina Meng ◽  
Stan Deresinski ◽  
Marisa Holubar

Abstract Background Using published data, we sought to compare outcomes in patients transitioned to either oral fluoroquinolones (FQs) or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) vs ß-lactams (BLs) after an initial intravenous (IV) course for gram-negative rod (GNR) bacteremia. Methods We conducted a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE and published IDWeek abstracts. We included studies that reported all-cause mortality and/or infection recurrence in patients transitioned to oral FQ/TMP-SMX and BLs. Results Eight retrospective studies met inclusion criteria with data for 2289 patients, of whom 65% were transitioned to oral FQs, 7.7% to TMP-SMX, and 27.2% to BLs. Follow-up periods ranged from 21 to 90 days. All-cause mortality was not significantly different between patients transitioned to either FQ/TMP-SMX or BLs (odds ratio [OR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69–1.87). Overall recurrence of infection, either bacteremia or the primary site, occurred more frequently in patients transitioned to oral BLs vs FQs (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.17–3.61). Analysis limited to recurrent bacteremia was similarly suggestive, although limited by small numbers (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 0.93–4.99). However, based on known pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, prescribed ß-lactam dosing regimens were frequently suboptimal. Conclusions In the step-down IV to oral treatment of GNR bacteremia, we found insufficient data regarding outcomes after oral TMP-SMX; however, selection of an FQ over commonly utilized ß-lactam regimens may reduce chances of infection recurrence. Although this may be a class effect, it may simply be the result of inadequate dosing of ß-lactams. Additional investigations are warranted to determine outcomes with TMP-SMX and optimized oral ß-lactam dosing regimens.


2020 ◽  
pp. jech-2019-213602
Author(s):  
Leo Niskanen ◽  
Timo Partonen ◽  
Anssi Auvinen ◽  
Jari Haukka

BackgroundPatients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a markedly higher overall mortality from coronary heart disease (CHD), as well as many other causes of death like cancer. Since diabetes is a multisystem disease, this fact together with the increased lifespan among individuals with diabetes may also lead to the emergence of other diabetes-related complications and ultimately to diversification of the causes of death.MethodsThe study population of this observational historic cohort study consisted of subjects with DM, who had purchased for at least one insulin prescription and/or one oral antidiabetic between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2010 (N=199 354), and a reference population matched by age, sex and hospital district (N=199 354). Follow-up was continued until December 31, 2017. All-cause and cause-specific mortality (cancer, CHD and stroke) was analysed with Poisson and Cox’s regression. Associations between baseline medications and mortality were analysed using LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) models.ResultsThe mortality rates were significantly elevated among the patients with DM. However, the relative risk of all-cause mortality between the DM and reference populations tended to converge during the follow-up. The lowering trend was most apparent in CHD mortality. The difference between DM and reference populations in stroke mortality vanished with a later entrance to the follow-up period. There were a few differences between DM and no-DM groups with respect to how baseline medications were associated with mortality.ConclusionsThe gap between the mortality of patients with diabetes compared to subjects who are non-diabetic diminished markedly during the 21-year period. This was driven primarily by the reduced CHD mortality.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Aro ◽  
A Holkeri ◽  
A Eranti ◽  
T Kerola ◽  
M J Junttila ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a major cause of premature mortality worldwide, so there has been an ongoing pursuit for tools for SCD risk stratification. Coronary artery disease is the major cause for SCD in adults, but the level of risk associated with multiple cardiovascular risk factors is not well established. Purpose To create a clinical risk score for estimating SCD risk in the general population. Methods Using data from a Finnish general population cohort of 7200 adults (mean age 51y, 46% male) with a mean follow-up of 24±11 years, we assessed the incremental SCD risk associated with the presence of several cardiovascular risk factors. SCD events were adjudicated based on death certificates according to the established criteria (autopsy was performed on 48% of SCD cases). Hazard ratios (HR) for SCD and all-cause mortality were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Of the multiple parameters analysed, male sex, increasing age, diabetes, hypertension, smoking and previously diagnosed cardiac disease were independently associated with SCD in a multivariable model. Based on the magnitude of risk, a SCD risk score was created (2 points: age >70y; 1 point: male sex, age 60–70y, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, cardiac disease). Results 75.2% of the study subjects had 0–2 risk points, 12.8% 3 risk points, and 12.0% >3 risk points. During the follow-up, 400 SCDs occurred. Increasing risk score was associated with a progressively greater risk for SCD (Figure). Compared with subjects without risk factors, those with a risk score of 3 had a HR of 21.2 (95% CI 12.7–35.4, p<0.001) and those with a risk score of >3 had a HR of 52.6 (95% CI 31.3–88.3, p<0.001) for SCD. Clinical risk score predicted significantly also all-cause mortality (HR 31.5 with risk score >3 [95% CI 27.6–35.9, p<0.001]). Risk of SCD according to the risk score Conclusions Accumulation of multiple cardiovascular risk factors is associated with a markedly elevated risk for SCD in the general population. This highlights the need for SCD prevention efforts with lifestyle interventions and medical therapy in the high-risk subjects. Studies on focused SCD risk stratification may be warranted in the subjects at highest risk.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 226-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Beard ◽  
M. Chen ◽  
N. D. Arvold ◽  
P. L. Nguyen ◽  
A. K. Ng ◽  
...  

226 Background: To better understand the impact of RT on mortality, we analyzed long-term survival and patterns of excess mortality in men with stage I seminoma. Methods: 9,045 men with stage I seminoma were identified in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database. Time to testicular-cancer mortality (TCM), death from second malignancy (SM), cardiovascular mortality (CVM) or suicide (SUIC) and all-cause mortality (ACM) were calculated. Survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Gender- and age-adjusted standardized mortality ratios (SMR) were calculated using U.S. population data. Cox and Fine and Gray multivariable analysis were used to evaluate the effect of RT on mortality outcomes. Results: 7,025 men (78%) received RT. After a median follow-up of 11.7 years, 869 men (9.6%) had died: sixty-five from TCM, 279 from SM, 169 from CVM and 37 from SUIC. 10-year rates of ACM and TCM were 4.24% and 0.52% among men who received RT and 7.14% and 1.22% among men who did not. Compared to the adjusted general population, men with seminoma had increased risk of ACM (SMR 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.28), SM (SMR 1.78; 95% CI 1.58-2.00) and SUIC (SMR 1.40; 95% CI 1.02-1.94) and decreased risk of CVM (SMR 0.73; 95% CI 0.62-0.84). Rates of ACM, SM and SUIC (SMR, all p < 0.05) were increased whether RT was used or not. Men who received RT were less likely to die (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 0.76; 95% CI 0.65-0.89; p < 0.001) and had a lower risk of TCM (AHR 0.39; 95% CI 0.24-0.65; p < 0.001). There was no difference in CVM between men who did and did not receive RT (AHR 0.89; 95% CI 0.60-1.15; p = 0.230) and a numerical increase in SM in men who received RT as compared to others (AHR 1.25; 95% CI 0.90-1.72; p=0.180). Conclusions: Compared to the general population, men with a history of stage I seminoma had increased risks of all-cause mortality, death from second malignancies, and suicide. Our data suggest that 15 years after diagnosis, men who did receive RT may be more likely to die from a second malignancy than men who did not. Although not receiving RT was associated with higher testicular-cancer mortality, the results may reflect decreased access to care or follow-up as active surveillance protocols were not common during the study era. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2020 ◽  
pp. 107484072097718
Author(s):  
Dena Schulman-Green ◽  
Shelli L. Feder ◽  
J. Nicholas Dionne-Odom ◽  
Janene Batten ◽  
Victoria Jane En Long ◽  
...  

Family caregivers play an integral role in supporting patient self-management, yet how they perform this role is unclear. We conducted a qualitative metasynthesis of family caregivers’ processes to support patient self-management of chronic, life-limiting illness and factors affecting their support. Methods included a systematic literature search, quality appraisal of articles, data abstraction, and data synthesis to produce novel themes. Thirty articles met inclusion criteria, representing 935 international family caregivers aged 18 to 89 years caring for patients with various health conditions. Three themes characterized family caregivers’ processes to support patient self-management: “Focusing on the Patient’s Illness Needs,” “Activating Resources to Support Oneself as the Family Caregiver,” and “Supporting a Patient Living with a Chronic, Life-Limiting Illness.” Factors affecting family caregivers’ support included Personal Characteristics, Health Status, Resources, Environmental Characteristics, and the Health Care System. The family caregiver role in supporting patient self-management is multidimensional, encompassing three processes of care and influenced by multiple factors.


1965 ◽  
Vol 59 (10) ◽  
pp. 333-338
Author(s):  
Eugene Rogot

A follow-up study of 11,732 persons first registered as legally blind in Massachusetts during the twenty-year period, 1940-1959, was conducted in order to determine survivorship patterns and causes of death among the blind. This paper reports findings for 5,976 blind persons who were sixty-five years of age or older at the time of registration. Life-expectancy values calculated for single years of age from sixty-five to ninety showed that blind males had lower values than the general population over most of this age range; differences in life-expectancy were roughly two years for ages sixty-five to seventy-two, about one year for ages seventy-three to seventy-nine, and essentially no difference for ages eighty to ninety. The pattern for females was very similar to that for males. The largest differences according to major causes of blindness were for diabetes with blind males age sixty-five and over having an observed life-expectancy almost four years less than expected, and blind females age sixty-five and over having a life-expectancy 4.8 years less than expected. For blind males as well as for blind females age sixty-five and over, excess mortality due to diabetes was particularly noted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document