Oxford Textbook of Advanced Critical Care Echocardiography

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Transthoracic Echocardiography ◽  
Clinical Problem ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Clinical Use ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
Critical Care Echocardiography ◽  
Reference Guide ◽  
Specific Assessment

This book is a physiological and evidence-based reference guide to the principles and techniques of advanced echocardiography. Both transoesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography are addressed, where appropriate. The foundations of advanced echocardiography are outlined in Part 1, preceding specific assessment methods of critical care echo which are demonstrated and discussed in Part 2. In reality, most critically ill patients do not suffer only one clinical problem, so Part 3 integrates techniques learned in Part 2 to answer both common and unexpected critical care questions. The future use of echocardiography in critical care is explored in Part 4. Important reference values for clinical use can be accessed easily in the appendices. An appendix includes videos, cases, and multiple-choice questions that can be used to reinforce understanding.

Heart–lung interactions

2020 ◽  
pp. 73-80
Author(s):  
Gulrukh Zaidi ◽  
Paul H. Mayo
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Stroke Volume ◽  
Cardiac Function ◽  
Transthoracic Echocardiography ◽  
Intrathoracic Pressure ◽  
Practical Method ◽  
Pressure Variation ◽  
Respiratory Cycle ◽  
Critical Care Echocardiography ◽  
Pulsed Wave Doppler

Echocardiography is the most clinically practical method of visualizing cardiac structures and directly observing changes of cardiac function during the respiratory cycle. This chapter will review heart–lung interactions and will focus on the effects of intrathoracic pressure variation on cardiac function that can be measured with advanced critical care echocardiography. These measurements are derived from observing respirophasic variation of stroke volume (SV) and help the intensivist to guide management of haemodynamic failure. The heart–lung interactions that occur with changes in intrathoracic pressure variation have utility in identification of preload sensitivity and adverse patient ventilator interaction. Measurement of the systolic velocity envelope with pulsed-wave Doppler is a requisite skill in order to identify SV variation, as is the recognition that the measurements may be difficult with transthoracic echocardiography.

Transesophageal Echocardiography

2019 ◽  
pp. 816-826
Author(s):  
Ryan C. Craner ◽  
Farouk Mookadam ◽  
Harish Ramakrishna
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
North America ◽  
Transesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Transthoracic Echocardiography ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Specialized Training ◽  
Critical Care Echocardiography ◽  
Tertiary Care Centers

The use of ultrasound has revolutionized care in the intensive care unit (ICU). The use of critical care echocardiography, including transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), has become commonplace in ICUs worldwide. In North America, however, intensivists rarely perform transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) unless they have anesthesiology training or have received specialized training to be competent in TEE. In many centers, neurology critical care is provided within the general ICU, and many tertiary-care centers have a dedicated ICU for specialized cases that require advanced and intensive neurologic care.

Evidence-based practice: fever-related interventions

1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 481-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Henker
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
American Association ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Critically Ill Patient ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Common Phenomenon ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Research Studies

Fever is a common phenomenon in critically ill patients. Ideally, all decisions about treatment of fever would be based on results of well-developed research studies. Instead, some research questions related to treatment of fever have been studied more extensively than others. This article is an evaluation of the usefulness of the research studies related to treatment of fever in the critically ill. Two questions are addressed: when is treatment of fever most beneficial to a critically ill patient, and how is fever most effectively treated in the critically ill? Evidence related to the treatment of fever is evaluated by using the recommendation levels of the research-based practice protocols of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

scholarly journals Prospective assessment of a score for assessing basic critical-care transthoracic echocardiography skills in ventilated critically ill patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathieu Jozwiak ◽  
Xavier Monnet ◽  
Raphaël Cinotti ◽  
Fréderic Bontemps ◽  
Jean Reignier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Transthoracic Echocardiography ◽  
Prospective Assessment

Evidence-based Assessment

2010 ◽  
pp. 76-98
Author(s):  
John Hunsley ◽  
Eric J. Mash
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
The Past ◽  
Specific Assessment ◽  
The Many ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Made In

Evidence-based assessment relies on research and theory to inform the selection of constructs to be assessed for a specific assessment purpose, the methods and measures to be used in the assessment, and the manner in which the assessment process unfolds. An evidence-based approach to clinical assessment necessitates the recognition that, even when evidence-based instruments are used, the assessment process is a decision-making task in which hypotheses must be iteratively formulated and tested. In this chapter, we review (a) the progress that has been made in developing an evidence-based approach to clinical assessment in the past decade and (b) the many challenges that lie ahead if clinical assessment is to be truly evidence-based.

scholarly journals Report of the first AKI Round Table meeting: an initiative of the ESICM AKI Section

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ostermann ◽  
A. Schneider ◽  
T. Rimmele ◽  
I. Bobek ◽  
M. van Dam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Knowledge Gaps ◽  
Blood Pressure Targets

Abstract Purpose Critical Care Nephrology is an emerging sub-specialty of Critical Care. Despite increasing awareness about the serious impact of acute kidney injury (AKI) and renal replacement therapy (RRT), important knowledge gaps persist. This report represents a summary of a 1-day meeting of the AKI section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) identifying priorities for future AKI research. Methods International Members of the AKI section of the ESICM were selected and allocated to one of three subgroups: “AKI diagnosis and evaluation”, “Medical management of AKI” and “Renal Replacement Therapy for AKI.” Using a modified Delphi methodology, each group identified knowledge gaps and developed potential proposals for future collaborative research. Results The following key research projects were developed: Systematic reviews: (a) epidemiology of AKI with stratification by patient cohorts and diagnostic criteria; (b) role of higher blood pressure targets in patients with hypertension admitted to the Intensive Care Unit, and (c) specific clearance characteristics of different modalities of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Observational studies: (a) epidemiology of critically ill patients according to AKI duration, and (b) current clinical practice of CRRT. Intervention studies:( a) Comparison of different blood pressure targets in critically ill patients with hypertension, and (b) comparison of clearance of solutes with various molecular weights between different CRRT modalities. Conclusion Consensus was reached on a future research agenda for the AKI section of the ESICM.

scholarly journals Nursing Interventions to Prevent Delirium in Critically Ill Patients in the Intensive Care Unit during the COVID19 Pandemic—Narrative Overview

Healthcare ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 578
Author(s):  
Dorota Ozga ◽  
Sabina Krupa ◽  
Paweł Witt ◽  
Wioletta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Personalised Medicine ◽  
Nursing Interventions ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Current State ◽  
Scientific Disciplines ◽  
Reliable Methods

It has become a standard measure in recent years to utilise evidence-based practice, which is associated with a greater need to implement and use advanced, reliable methods of summarising the achievements of various scientific disciplines, including such highly specialised approaches as personalised medicine. The aim of this paper was to discuss the current state of knowledge related to improvements in “nursing” involving management of delirium in intensive care units during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. This narrative review summarises the current knowledge concerning the challenges associated with assessment of delirium in patients with COVID-19 by ICU nurses, and the role and tasks in the personalised approach to patients with COVID-19.

scholarly journals Improving nurses’ readiness for evidence-based practice in critical care units: results of an information literacy training program

BMC Nursing ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamileh Farokhzadian ◽  
Somayeh Jouparinejad ◽  
Farhad Fatehi ◽  
Fatemeh Falahati-Marvast
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Training Program ◽  
Information Literacy ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Literacy Skills ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Critical Care Units ◽  
Literacy Training ◽  
Information Literacy Skills

Abstract Background One of the most important prerequisites for nurses’ readiness to implement Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is to improve their information literacy skills. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a training program on nurses’ information literacy skills for EBP in critical care units. Methods In this interventional study, 60 nurses working in critical care units of hospitals affiliated to Kerman University of Medical Sciences were randomly assigned into the intervention or control groups. The intervention group was provided with information literacy training in three eight-hour sessions over 3 weeks. Data were collected using demographic and information literacy skills for EBP questionnaires before and 1 month after the intervention. Results At baseline, the intervention and control groups were similar in terms of demographic characteristics and information literacy skills for EBP. The training program significantly improved all dimensions of information literacy skills of the nurses in the intervention group, including the use of different information resources (3.43 ± 0.48, p < 0.001), information searching skills and the use of different search features (3.85 ± 0.67, p < 0.001), knowledge about search operators (3.74 ± 0.14, p < 0.001), and selection of more appropriate search statement (x2 = 50.63, p = 0.001) compared with the control group. Conclusions Nurses can learn EBP skills and apply research findings in their nursing practice in order to provide high-quality, safe nursing care in clinical settings. Practical workshops and regular training courses are effective interventional strategies to equip nurses with information literacy skills so that they can apply these skills to their future nursing practice.

scholarly journals Feasibility of cardiac output measurements in critically ill patients by medical students

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Geert Koster ◽  
Thomas Kaufmann ◽  
Bart Hiemstra ◽  
Renske Wiersema ◽  
Madelon E. Vos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Output ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Percentage Error ◽  
Poor Agreement ◽  
Cardiac Output Measurements

Abstract Background Critical care ultrasonography (CCUS) is increasingly applied also in the intensive care unit (ICU) and performed by non-experts, including even medical students. There is limited data on the training efforts necessary for novices to attain images of sufficient quality. There is no data on medical students performing CCUS for the measurement of cardiac output (CO), a hemodynamic variable of importance for daily critical care. Objective The aim of this study was to explore the agreement of cardiac output measurements as well as the quality of images obtained by medical students in critically ill patients compared to the measurements obtained by experts in these images. Methods In a prospective observational cohort study, all acutely admitted adults with an expected ICU stay over 24 h were included. CCUS was performed by students within 24 h of admission. CCUS included the images required to measure the CO, i.e., the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter and the velocity time integral (VTI) in the LVOT. Echocardiography experts were involved in the evaluation of the quality of images obtained and the quality of the CO measurements. Results There was an opportunity for a CCUS attempt in 1155 of the 1212 eligible patients (95%) and in 1075 of the 1212 patients (89%) CCUS examination was performed by medical students. In 871 out of 1075 patients (81%) medical students measured CO. Experts measured CO in 783 patients (73%). In 760 patients (71%) CO was measured by both which allowed for comparison; bias of CO was 0.0 L min−1 with limits of agreement of − 2.6 L min−1 to 2.7 L min−1. The percentage error was 50%, reflecting poor agreement of the CO measurement by students compared with the experts CO measurement. Conclusions Medical students seem capable of obtaining sufficient quality CCUS images for CO measurement in the majority of critically ill patients. Measurements of CO by medical students, however, had poor agreement with expert measurements. Experts remain indispensable for reliable CO measurements. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; registration number NCT02912624

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document