scholarly journals 2334. Risk Factors of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Bloodstream Infections in Children’s Hospitals in Japan

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S693-S694
Author(s):  
Yuta Aizawa ◽  
Takayo Shoji ◽  
Kenta Ito ◽  
Masashi Kasai ◽  
Hiroki Sakurai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Children's Hospitals ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Children’S Hospitals

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative Bacterial Bloodstream Infections in Children’s Hospitals in Japan, 2010–2017

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 653-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuta Aizawa ◽  
Takayo Shoji ◽  
Kenta Ito ◽  
Masashi Kasai ◽  
Hiroki Sakurai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Children's Hospitals ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Children’S Hospitals

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Bloodstream Infections due to Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative Non-fermenting Bacteria in a Burn Unit

2008 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. S39-S40
Author(s):  
Süheyla Senger ◽  
Funda Timurkaynak ◽  
Hande Arslan ◽  
Turhan Togan ◽  
Özgür Başaran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Burn Unit ◽  
Fermenting Bacteria

Clinical Experience with Aminoglycosides in Dialysis-Dependent Patients: Risk Factors for Mortality and Reassessment of Current Dosing Practices

2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 1338-1345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett H Heintz ◽  
George R Thompson ◽  
William E Dager
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Average Duration ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Empiric Therapy ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Aminoglycoside Therapy ◽  
Increased Risk

Background:: A resurgence of aminoglycoside use has followed the recent increase of multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens and is often needed even in the treatment of dialysis-dependent patients; however, studies evaluating the treatment of gram-negative infections with aminoglycosides, including the optimal dose, in the setting of dialysis are limited. Objective: To evaluate the current patterns of aminoglycoside use, including microbiologic and clinical indications, and identify risk factors associated with mortality in dialysis-dependent patients receiving aminoglycosides. Methods: Utilization, clinical, and microbiologic data were collected retrospectively over a 2-year period (July 2008-June 2010) for adults with a diagnosis of renal failure requiring dialysis and aminoglycoside therapy. Binary logistic and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for alt-cause 30-day mortality. Results: Ninety-five consecutive aminoglycoside courses in 88 patients met inclusion criteria for evaluation. A wide variety of clinical and microbiologic indications were documented. The average duration of aminoglycoside therapy was 5.2 days (range 1-42), the average duration of antimicrobial therapy was 13.5 days (1-60), and the all-cause 30-day mortality rate was 36.5%. Factors associated with all-cause 30-day mortality were gram-negative rod (GNR) bacteremia (OR 28.6; p = 0.035), advanced age (OR 8.5; p = 0.030), recent admission (OR 33.4; p = 0.038). and inadequate empiric therapy (OR 14.9; p = 0.024). Intravenous catheter removal was protective of all-cause 30-day mortality (OR 0.01; p = 0.005). A first pre-dialysis plasma concentration relative to the minimum inhibitory concentration (Cp:MIC) <6 mg/L (gentamicin/tobramycin) was associated with an increased risk of mortality (p = 0.026) upon subgroup analysis of dialysis-dependent patients with GNR bloodstream infections. Conclusions: Outcomes among dialysis-dependent patients who received aminoglycosides were below expectations. Various risk factors for mortality were identified, including retention of the catheter, inadequate empiric therapy, and a Cp:MIC <6 mg/L. Improved approaches to dosing of aminoglycosides in dialysis-dependent patients, including more aggressive dosing practices, should be urgently explored in attempts to maximize favorable patient outcomes.

scholarly journals Outcomes and Risk Factors in Prosthetic Joint Infections by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative Bacteria: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 340
Author(s):  
Raquel Bandeira da Silva ◽  
Mauro José Salles
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Revision Arthroplasty ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Postoperative Hematoma ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections

Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens, are gaining importance in the aetiology of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). This retrospective observational study identified independent risk factors (RFs) associated with MDR-GNB PJI and their influence on treatment outcomes. We assessed MDR bacteria causing hip and knee PJIs diagnosed at a Brazilian tertiary hospital from January 2014 to July 2018. RFs associated with MDR-GNB PJI were estimated by bivariate and multivariate analyses using prevalence ratios (PRs) with significance at p < 0.05. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to evaluate treatment outcomes. Overall, 98 PJI patients were analysed, including 56 with MDR-GNB and 42 with other bacteria. Independent RFs associated with MDR-GNB PJI were revision arthroplasty (p = 0.002), postoperative hematoma (p < 0.001), previous orthopaedic infection (p = 0.002) and early infection (p = 0.001). Extensively drug-resistant GNB (p = 0.044) and comorbidities (p = 0.044) were independently associated with MDR-GNB PJI treatment failure. In sum, MDR-GNB PJI was independently associated with previous orthopaedic surgery, postoperative local complications and pre-existing infections and was possibly related to selective pressure on bacterial skin colonisation by antibiotics prescribed for early PJI. Infections due to MDR-GNB and comorbidities were associated with higher treatment failure rates.

scholarly journals 832. Assessment of Risk Factors Associated with Wide-resistance Gram-negative Bacteria Infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S457-S457
Author(s):  
Henry Pablo Lopes Campos e Reis ◽  
Ana Beatriz Ferreira Rodrigues ◽  
Julio César Castro Silva ◽  
Lia Pinheiro de Lima ◽  
Talita Lima Quinaher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Multiresistant Pathogens ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Contact Isolation ◽  
Bladder Catheter

Abstract Background Enterobacteria and multidrug-resistant non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli present a challenge in the management of invasive infections, leading to mortality rates due to their limited therapeutic arsenal. The objective of this work was to analyze risk factors that may be associated with these infections, for a better situational mapping and assertive decision-making in a university hospital in Brazil. Methods The study was conducted between January and September 2019, with 167 patients in contact isolation at a university hospital in Brazil. Potential outcome-related variables for wide-resistance Gram-negative bacteria (BGN) infections were evaluated. Risk factors were identified from univariate statistical analysis using Fisher’s test. Results 51 (30.5%) out of 167 patients in contact isolation evolved with wide-resistance BGN infection. Risk factors in univariate analysis were age, hospital unit and previous use of invasive devices. Patients aged up to 59 years were more likely to progress to infection than those aged over 60 years (p 0.0274, OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.5). Those admitted to the oncohematology (p &lt; 0.001, OR 32.5, Cl 9.1-116.3) and intensive care unit (p &lt; 0.001, OR 28.0, Cl 3.5-225.9) units were more likely to develop this type of infection. The least likely were those admitted to a kidney transplant unit (p 0.0034, OR 15.33, Cl 1.8-131.0). Prior use of mechanical ventilation (p 0.0058, OR 12.2, Cl 2.0-76.1) and delayed bladder catheter (p 0.0266, OR 5.0, Cl 1.2-20.1) in patients with respiratory and urinary tract infection, respectively, were also reported as risk factors related to these infections. The gender of the patients was not significant for the study. Conclusion This study determined that variables such as age, hospitalization unit, use of mechanical ventilation and delayed bladder catheter could be considered important risk factors in triggering the infectious process by wide-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Thus, the analysis of these factors becomes a great foundation to prevent the development of multiresistant pathogens through prevention strategies, prophylaxis management and more targeted empirical therapies. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Impact of empirical antibiotic regimens on mortality in neutropenic patients with bloodstream infection presenting with septic shock

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Chumbita ◽  
Pedro Puerta-Alcalde ◽  
Carlota Gudiol ◽  
Nicole Garcia-Pouton ◽  
Júlia Laporte-Amargós ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Neutropenic Patients ◽  
Prospective Cohorts ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
The Impact

Objectives: We analyzed risk factors for mortality in febrile neutropenic patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) presenting with septic shock and assessed the impact of empirical antibiotic regimens. Methods: Multicenter retrospective study (2010-2019) of two prospective cohorts comparing BSI episodes in patients with or without septic shock. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for mortality in episodes with septic shock. Results: Of 1563 patients with BSI, 257 (16%) presented with septic shock. Those patients with septic shock had higher mortality than those without septic shock (55% vs 15%, p<0.001). Gram-negative bacilli caused 81% of episodes with septic shock; gram-positive cocci, 22%; and Candida species 5%. Inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment (IEAT) was administered in 17.5% of septic shock episodes. Empirical β-lactam combined with other active antibiotics was associated with the lowest mortality observed. When amikacin was the only active antibiotic, mortality was 90%. Addition of empirical specific gram-positive coverage had no impact on mortality. Mortality was higher when IEAT was administered (76% vs 51%, p=0.002). Age >70 years (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.7), IEAT for Candida spp. or gram-negative bacilli (OR 3.8, 1.3-11.1), acute kidney injury (OR 2.6, 1.4-4.9) and amikacin as the only active antibiotic (OR 15.2, 1.7-134.5) were independent risk factors for mortality, while combination of β-lactam and amikacin was protective (OR 0.32, 0.18-0.57). Conclusions: Septic shock in febrile neutropenic patients with BSI is associated with extremely high mortality, especially when IEAT is administered. Combination therapy including an active β-lactam and amikacin results in the best outcomes.

scholarly journals NEW INSIGHT ON EPIDEMIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF BACTERIAL BLOODSTREAM INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH HEMATOLOGICAL MALIGNACIES

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e2015044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Lo Menzo ◽  
Giulia La Martire ◽  
Giancarlo Ceccarelli ◽  
Mario Venditti
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Empirical Treatment ◽  
Rational Approach ◽  
Attributable Mortality ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Adequate Treatment ◽  
Gram Negative

Bloodstream infections (BSI) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in onco-hematologic patients. The Gram-negative etiology was the main responsible of the febrile neutropenia in the sixties and its impact declined due to the use of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis; this situation was followed by the gradual emergence of Gram-positive bacteria also following of the increased use of intravascular devices and the introduction of new chemotherapeutic strategies. In the last decade the Gram-negative etiology is raising again because of the emergence of resistant strains that make questionable the usefulness of currentstrategies for prophylaxis and empirical treatment. Gram-negative BSI attributable mortality is relevant and the appropriate empirical treatment significantly improves the prognosis; on the other hand the delayed adequate treatment of Gram-positive BSI does not seem to have an high impact on survival. The clinician has to be aware of the epidemiology of his institution and of colonizations of his patients in order to choose the most appropriate empiric therapy. Ina setting of high endemicity of multidrug-resistant infections, even the choice of a targeted therapy can be a challenge, often requiring strategies based on off-label prescriptions and low grade evidences.In this review we summarize the current evidences for the best targeted therapies for difficult to treat bacteria BSIs and future perspectives in this topic. We also provide a flow chart for a rational approach to the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia in a multidrug resistant high prevalence setting.

Gram-negative bloodstream infections and sepsis: risk factors, screening tools and surveillance

2019 ◽  
Vol 132 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-15
Author(s):  
Eleanor Mitchell ◽  
Mark S Pearce ◽  
Anthony Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Topic Area ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Sepsis Risk ◽  
Comorbidity Scores ◽  
Associated Risk Factors ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Abstract Introduction and background Incidence of gram-negative bloodstream infections (GNBSIs) and sepsis are rising in the UK. Healthcare-associated risk factors have been identified that increase the risk of infection and associated mortality. Current research is focused on identifying high-risk patients and improving the methods used for surveillance. Sources of data Comprehensive literature search of the topic area using PubMed (Medline). Government, professional and societal publications were also reviewed. Areas of agreement A range of healthcare-associated risk factors independently associate with the risk of GNBSIs and sepsis. Areas of controversy There are calls to move away from using simple comorbidity scores to predict the risk of sepsis-associated mortality, instead more advanced multimorbidity models should be considered. Growing points and areas for developing research Advanced risk models should be created and evaluated for their ability to predict sepsis-associated mortality. Investigations into the accuracy of NEWS2 to predict sepsis-associated mortality are required.

scholarly journals Risk factors and outcomes for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli bacteremia

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swati Patolia ◽  
Getahun Abate ◽  
Nirav Patel ◽  
Setu Patolia ◽  
Sharon Frey
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Urinary Catheter ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Source Of Infection

Background: The incidence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms is increasing along with mortality. Identifying risk factors for the development of MDR Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bacteremia could greatly impact patient care and management. Methods: Data from the electronic health record of patients with GNB over 13-month period were collected at a single university medical center. Baseline demographic data, risk factor, microbiological data, recurrence of bacteremia, and mortality were recorded. Results: A total of 177 patients were included in the analysis. MDR GNB occurred in 46 patients (26%). The mortality rate in the MDR group was 34.8% compared to 13.7% in non-MDR group ( p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus [DM; odds ratio (OR): 2.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1–4.88], previous antibiotic use (OR: 2.93, 95% CI: 1.25–6.87), and urinary catheter as a source of infection (OR 5.96, 95% CI: 1.78–19.94) were significant risk factors for the development of MDR GNB. In addition, end-stage liver disease (OR: 3.64, 95% CI: 1.07–12.3), solid organ malignancy (OR: 3.64, 95% CI: 1.25–10.56), intra-abdominal source of infection (OR: 3.66, 95% CI: 1.14–11.73), inappropriate empiric antibiotics (OR 7.59, 95% CI: 1.68–34.34) and urinary catheter as a source of infection (OR 5.68, 95% CI: 1.37–23.5) were significant factors for mortality in patients with MDR GNB. Conclusion: Our study provides important information about the risk factors for the development of MDR GNB bacteremia and helps prognosticate patient with MDR GNB.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document