scholarly journals 2279. Study of Prescribing patterns and Effectiveness of Ceftolozane–tazobactam (C/T): Real-world Analysis (SPECTRA): a multi-national, multicenter observational study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S780-S781
Author(s):  
Alex Soriano ◽  
Laura Puzniak ◽  
David Paterson ◽  
Florian Thalhalmmer ◽  
Stefan Kluge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Real World ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
National Study ◽  
Multicenter Observational Study ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Source Of Infection ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Abstract Background C/T has demonstrated efficacy in randomized clinical trials to treat cIAI and cUTI and recently completed a study in ventilator-associated bacterial and ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the real-world clinical use and outcomes of C/T in a multi-national study. Methods SPECTRA is a multi-national, multicenter, retrospective, inpatient, observational study of patients treated with C/T in Australia, Austria, Germany, Italy, Spain and United Kingdom. Patients admitted with greater than 48 hours of C/T treatment were included. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment management patterns, microbiological findings and outcomes were analyzed. Results There were 155 patients from 20 participating hospitals in 6 countries. The average age was 58.0 years (±17.8) and most were male 114 (74%). The majority 130 (84%) had at least one comorbidity, with the most common being renal impairment 87 (56%), immunocompromised 62 (40%), and diabetes 52 (34%). The majority, 94 (61%), had previous hospitalizations ≥ 6 months prior to receiving C/T, of which 29 (31%) had an ICU stay and surgeries 64 (42%). Most patients 126 (82%) received antibacterials within 30 days of receiving C/T, 61 (40%) received carbapenems and 47 (31%) received aminoglycoside. The average duration of C/T was 15 (SD12) days. The source of infection was cUTI for 31 (20%), cIAI for 19 (12%) and respiratory for 43 (28%) of C/T treated patients. Most 107 (70%) had an ID consult with an average of 7 (SD 11.3) consults. The top pathogen was Pseudomonas 124 (81%) followed by E. coli 22 (14%), with 56 (37%) having a polymicrobial infection. Over half of the patients were in the ICU 84 (55%), 58 (38%) underwent at least 1 surgery, with 65 (48%) being related to the infection, 60 (39%) had sepsis and 21 (14%) had septic shock. All-cause in hospital mortality was 16%. 30-day all-cause readmission was 12% and 6% were infection related. Conclusion Despite the complexity of the patients in this real-world analysis, most C/T patients had beneficial outcomes that are similar to results of controlled clinical trials. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

A multicenter observational study of cs-131 seeds embedded in a collagen carrier tile in intracranial brain neoplasms: Trial in progress.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2073-TPS2073
Author(s):  
K. Stuart Lee ◽  
Matthew Peach ◽  
Clark C Chen ◽  
Kathryn Dusenbery ◽  
Clara Ferreira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Real World ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Multicenter Observational Study ◽  
Patient Reported

TPS2073 Background: Brachytherapy is an efficacious means for radiation delivery in the treatment of a spectrum of central nervous system tumors. Traditional brachytherapy methods have been limited by uneven dose distribution, complicated workflow, extended procedural times, the cost of dedicated equipment, and frequent adverse events. To address these issues, a permanently implanted device with Cs-131 radiation seeds embedded in a bioresorbable collagen carrier tile (GammaTile [GT], GT Medical Technologies, Tempe, AZ USA) was developed. Described as surgically targeted radiation therapy (STaRT) to distinguish it from external beam radiation therapy, the device is FDA-cleared for use in newly diagnosed malignant intracranial neoplasms and recurrent intracranial tumors, and has demonstrated excellent safety and local control outcomes in early commercial use. Methods: The overarching primary objectives of this multicenter, prospective, observational (phase IV) registry study are to evaluate “real-world” clinical outcomes and patient reported outcomes that measure the safety and efficacy of STaRT using the GT device. The registry is planned for 600 prospectively enrolled subjects at up to 50 enrolling sites. All adult patients undergoing surgical resection of brain tumors of any pathology with intra-operative GT placement are eligible for enrollment, upon consent. Information on patient demographics, tumor pathology, overall survival, adverse events related to radiation or surgery, and quality of life (FACT-Br and LASA) will be collected. Serial MRIs will be collected, and timing of surgical bed recurrence and/or distant recurrence will be collected. Data will be collected at 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-, 18-, and 24-months, then every 6 months through 5 years. Results will be used to benchmark clinical outcomes of GT therapy, allow for comparisons to other existing treatments, and facilitate the design of future clinical trials. Enrollment opened on November 15, 2020, and seven subjects have been enrolled to date at three centers. This study will be the first observational study of resection plus STaRT, delivered by Cs-131 sources in permanently implanted bioresorbable collagen tile carriers, and will allow for evaluation of this treatment approach in a real world setting, as well as provide an information platform for cross-comparison of results obtained from ongoing GT clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT04427384.

scholarly journals Perceptions of Community Hematologists/Oncologists on Barriers to Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2198-2198
Author(s):  
Ajeet Gajra ◽  
Richard Sweat ◽  
Yolaine Jeune-Smith ◽  
Jonathan K. Kish ◽  
Bruce A Feinberg
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Annual Meeting ◽  
Real World ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
The United States ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Car T

Introduction The ASH Annual Meeting is a venue for presentation of outcomes data from key clinical trials in hematologic malignancies and novel drug classes used to treat them. The approval of two CAR-T therapies, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tis-cel), in the treatment of large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), including diffuse LBCL (DLBCL), has ushered in a new class of drugs, i.e. cellular therapy. At ASH 2018, Nastoupil et al. presented data from a retrospective analysis of the characteristics and outcomes of patients with relapsed/refractory LBCL, including DLBCL, treated with commercially available axi-cel CAR-T therapy at academic centers in the United States (Nastoupil LJ, et al. Blood. 2018;132[Suppl 1]:91). The authors found that early outcomes of real-world patients receiving axi-cel therapy were comparable to those observed in the clinical trial population, despite >40% of these patients failing to meet the clinical trial eligibility criteria. At a live meeting in February 2019, we sought the perceptions of community hematologists and oncologists (H/O) regarding their use of, referrals for and barriers to CAR-T therapy as well their perception of the value of the real-world evidence (RWE) presented. Methods A live meeting in February 2019 convened H/O with geographic representation from across the United States. The participants were shown data from selected oral and/or poster presentations from the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting and responded to questions regarding their perceptions of the data and its potential impact on current practice. Participants submitted their demographic responses via a web-based survey prior to the meeting and data impression responses via an audience response system at the live meeting. Results Among the 59 H/O who participated in this live market research program on February 22-23, 2019, 61% identified their primary specialty as hematology/oncology and 34% medical oncology. Only 27% of H/O had attended the 60th ASH Annual Meeting in December 2018. The participants were mostly community-based physicians, 50% in private community and 45% in community practices owned by a hospital or academic center. One-third have been in practice for over 20 years, one-third for 11-20 years and one-third for 10 or fewer years. This group sees an average of 20+ patients per day and reported B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma as one of the three most common hematologic malignancy they managed. 28% of H/O indicated that they have referred one patient and 24% have referred 2-5 patients for CAR-T therapy since the first approval on August 30, 2017. Of those H/O who had referred patients for CAR-T therapy, 45% indicated that none of their patients had yet received the infusion. The top two barriers to prescribing/recommending CAR-T therapy, as reported by the H/O, were the cumbersome logistics of administering therapy and following patients (52%), and the cost of the therapy (46%). Other concerns included high toxicity (24%) and lack of long-term survival data (19%), but not lack of knowledge of CAR-T therapy (2%). Furthermore, 87% of H/O agreed with the assertion that due to the limitations of randomized clinical trials, RWE is necessary to inform clinical practice. After review of the information presented on the real-world use of axi-cel, 73% of H/O indicated that this information is likely to cause them to recommend CAR-T therapy for more of their patients with DLBCL. Conclusions There is significant interest in adopting and using CAR-T therapies in LBCL amongst community H/O. This group does not perceive itself as lacking in knowledge regarding CAR-T therapy. The significant barriers of logistics and cost are potential deterrents to appropriate use. These results can inform stakeholders (manufacturers, payers, hospitals and practices) regarding the need to improve processes and develop payment models to address cost in order to facilitate access of these agents to the appropriate patients. RWE is viewed favorably by the vast majority of community H/O to inform clinical practice, due to the limitations of randomized clinical trials. Disclosures Gajra: Cardinal Health: Employment. Sweat:Cardinal Health: Employment. Jeune-Smith:Cardinal Health: Employment. Kish:Cardinal Health: Employment. Feinberg:Cardinal Health: Employment.

Treatment-related toxicities in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17041-e17041
Author(s):  
M. Ulcickas Yood ◽  
P. Feng Wang ◽  
S. Hensley Alford ◽  
S. Oliveria ◽  
K. Wells ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Health System ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Medical Record ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Real World ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials

e17041 Background: Although treatment effects and toxicities have been reported from randomized clinical trials of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), little information is available from real-world clinical practice where heterogeneous treatment patterns and patient populations may lead to different estimates than those observed in clinical trials. Methods: Using a population-based tumor registry at a large, Midwestern integrated health system, we identified all cases of stage III or IV SCCHN diagnosed 2000–2006. The incidence/severity of acute and late toxicities associated with SCCHN treatment was obtained from detailed medical record review of health system encounters, including physician notes. Grading of toxicities (using CTCAE3 criteria), distinction between acute and late toxicity, and analyses by treatment are ongoing. The incidence and severity of toxicities will be presented by treatment regimen, tumor location and tumor stage. We presented here an interim analysis. Results: Among the target population of 194 patients that will ultimately be included in this study, 137 medical record reviews have been completed to date. The percentages of patients with toxicities, including 95% confidence intervals are presented in the table , below. Conclusions: Toxicity in patients with advanced SCCHN is common. Data from clinical practice quantifying the incidence are lacking, these data from an observational real-world study provide important baseline information on the incidence of toxicities in patients with advanced SCCHN and also call for safer effective treatment for SCCHN. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Survival among metastatic colorectal patients in clinical trials compared to the real world.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 673-673
Author(s):  
Ziwei Wang ◽  
Lindsay Hwang ◽  
James Don Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Real World ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
The Real ◽  
Clinical Trial Results

673 Background: Randomized clinical trials play a central role in clinical research though only a small fraction of patients partake in clinical studies. Questions thus arise regarding the generalizability of clinical trial results to the remainder of the population. This study evaluated whether patient survival from randomized clinical trials in metastatic colorectal cancer reflects real world outcomes. Methods: A Pubmed search was used to identify randomized phase III clinical trials of first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer published between 2005 and 2010. We excluded secondary or pooled analyses, second-line treatments, non-metastatic patients, non-English language, and non-randomized studies. Thirty-one clinical trials met these criteria, comprised of 79 distinct clinical trial arms. Overall survival among clinical trial patients was compared to metastatic colorectal cancer patients within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Within SEER, we restricted the analysis time-period and age of patients to match the enrollment period and age of patients within each individual clinical trial. Results: The clinical trials enrolled a total of 16,614 patients. Among all clinical trial arms the median survival ranged from 6.7-62 months, 1-year survival ranged from 30-97%, and 2-year survival ranged from 6-88%. Compared to SEER, the median survival was higher in 95% of the individual clinical trial arms by an average of 5.4 months (p<0.0001). The 1-year survival was higher in 94% of the clinical trial arms by an average of 16.7% (p<0.0001). The 2-year survival was higher in 71% of the clinical trial arms by an average of 7.2% (p<0.0001). Conclusions: This study found substantially improved survival among clinical trial participants compared to patients in the SEER database suggesting that survival estimates from clinical trials may not generalize to the “real world.” Potential patient factors such as differences in underlying comorbidity, performance status, disease burden, as well as variation in treatment could not be addressed in this study, though these factors likely explain some of the observed survival differences.

Ipilimumab in real-world clinical practice: efficacy and safety data from a multicenter observational study

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Russi ◽  
Vera Damuzzo ◽  
Marco Chiumente ◽  
Jacopo Pigozzo ◽  
Marco Cesca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Real World ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Multicenter Observational Study

scholarly journals Hydroxyzine Use and Mortality in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Multicenter Observational Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (24) ◽  
pp. 5891
Author(s):  
Marina Sánchez-Rico ◽  
Frédéric Limosin ◽  
Raphaël Vernet ◽  
Nathanaël Beeker ◽  
Antoine Neuraz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Acid Sphingomyelinase ◽  
Potential Usefulness ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Post Exposure Prophylaxis ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Multicenter Observational Study ◽  
Exposure Prophylaxis

(1) Background: Based on its antiviral activity, anti-inflammatory properties, and functional inhibition effects on the acid sphingomyelinase/ceramide system (FIASMA), we sought to examine the potential usefulness of the H1 antihistamine hydroxyzine in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. (2) Methods: In a multicenter observational study, we included 15,103 adults hospitalized for COVID-19, of which 164 (1.1%) received hydroxyzine within the first 48 h of hospitalization, administered orally at a median daily dose of 25.0 mg (SD = 29.5). We compared mortality rates between patients who received hydroxyzine at hospital admission and those who did not, using a multivariable logistic regression model adjusting for patients’ characteristics, medical conditions, and use of other medications. (3) Results: This analysis showed a significant association between hydroxyzine use and reduced mortality (AOR, 0.51; 95%CI, 0.29–0.88, p = 0.016). This association was similar in multiple sensitivity analyses. (4) Conclusions: In this retrospective observational multicenter study, the use of the FIASMA hydroxyzine was associated with reduced mortality in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials of hydroxyzine for COVID-19 are needed to confirm these results, as are studies to examine the potential usefulness of this medication for outpatients and as post-exposure prophylaxis for individuals at high risk for severe COVID-19.

scholarly journals The real-world outcomes of multiple myeloma patients treated with daratumumab

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. e0258487
Author(s):  
Agoston Gyula Szabo ◽  
Tobias Wirenfeldt Klausen ◽  
Mette Bøegh Levring ◽  
Birgitte Preiss ◽  
Carsten Helleberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Real World ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Median Number ◽  
The Real ◽  
Treatment Timing ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Standard Risk

Most patients cannot be included in randomized clinical trials. We report real-world outcomes of all Danish patients with multiple myeloma (MM) treated with daratumumab-based regimens until 1 January 2019. Methods Information of 635 patients treated with daratumumab was collected retrospectively and included lines of therapy (LOT), hematologic responses according to the International Myeloma Working Group recommendations, time to next treatment (TNT) and the cause of discontinuation of treatment. Baseline characteristics were acquired from the validated Danish Multiple Myeloma Registry (DMMR). Results Daratumumab was administrated as monotherapy (Da-mono) in 27.7%, in combination with immunomodulatory drugs (Da-IMiD) in 57.3%, in combination with proteasome inhibitors (Da-PI) in 11.2% and in other combinations (Da-other) in 3.8% of patients. The median number of lines of therapy given before daratumumab was 5 for Da-mono, 3 for Da-IMiD, 4 for Da-PI, and 2 for Da-other. In Da-mono, overall response rate (ORR) was 44.9% and median time to next treatment (mTNT) was 4.9 months. In Da-IMiD, ORR was 80.5%, and mTNT was 16.1 months. In Da-PI, OOR was 60.6% and mTNT was 5.3 months. In patients treated with Da-other, OOR was 54,2% and mTNT was 5.6 months. The use of daratumumab in early LOT was associated with longer TNT (p<0.0001). Patients with amplification 1q had outcome comparable to standard risk patients, while patients with t(4;14), t(14;16) or del17p had worse outcome (p = 0.0001). Multivariate analysis indicated that timing of treatment (timing of daratumumab in the sequence of all LOT that the patients received throughout the course of their disease) was the most important factor for outcome (p<0.0001). Conclusion The real-world outcomes of multiple myeloma patients treated with daratumumab are worse than the results of clinical trials. Outcomes achieved with daratumumab were best when daratumumab was used in combination with IMIDs and in early LOT. Patients with high-risk CA had worse outcomes, but patients with amp1q had similar outcomes to standard-risk patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document