The Cultural Defence
This chapter considers how arguments based on cultural traditions and customary law influence the reasoning of judges in various jurisdictions through the use of cultural defences. A survey of cases reveals that judges consistently refuse to allow the introduction of evidence concerning litigants’ cultural backgrounds in legal proceedings. As explained here, the prescriptive version of cultural relativism calls attention to the context in which individuals act under cultural imperatives. It is the underlying theory that justifies culturally specific notions of reasonableness in criminal law and civil litigation. Although the defence is sometimes understood as limited to criminal cases, the chapter demonstrates how cultural factors also figure in cases involving exemptions and calculating damages in civil litigation. The chapter identifies several types of culture conflict, considers a theoretical framework for analysing cultural defences, and discusses practical difficulties associated with the implementation of the cultural defence policy. Anthropologists are often asked to serve as expert witnesses in these cases. How their involvement in the justice system may affect their professional reputations is also assessed. The final section offers suggestions as to likely new areas where cultural defences will be raised, such as military tribunals and educational systems. While proponents of the strategy contend that the courtroom door should be open to cultural argumentation, this does not mean the cultural factors should necessarily influence the disposition of the cases, particularly if the customs central to the dispute involve irreparable harm.