scholarly journals A reductive analysis of a compartmental model for COVID-19: data assimilation and forecasting for the United Kingdom

Author(s):  
G. Ananthakrishna ◽  
Jagadish Kumar

We introduce a deterministic model that partitions the total population into the susceptible, infected, quarantined, and those traced after exposure, the recovered and the deceased. We hypothesize ‘accessible population for transmission of the disease’ to be a small fraction of the total population, for instance when interventions are in force. This hypothesis, together with the structure of the set of coupled nonlinear ordinary differential equations for the populations, allows us to decouple the equations into just two equations. This further reduces to a logistic type of equation for the total infected population. The equation can be solved analytically and therefore allows for a clear interpretation of the growth and inhibiting factors in terms of the parameters in the full model. The validity of the ‘accessible population’ hypothesis and the efficacy of the reduced logistic model is demonstrated by the ease of fitting the United Kingdom data for the cumulative infected and daily new infected cases. The model can also be used to forecast further progression of the disease. In an effort to find optimized parameter values compatible with the United Kingdom coronavirus data, we first determine the relative importance of the various transition rates participating in the original model. Using this we show that the original model equations provide a very good fit with the United Kingdom data for the cumulative number of infections and the daily new cases. The fact that the model calculated daily new cases exhibits a turning point, suggests the beginning of a slow-down in the spread of infections. However, since the rate of slowing down beyond the turning point is small, the cumulative number of infections is likely to saturate to about 3.52 × 105 around late July, provided the lock-down conditions continue to prevail. Noting that the fit obtained from the reduced logistic equation is comparable to that with the full model equations, the underlying causes for the limited forecasting ability of the reduced logistic equation are elucidated. The model and the procedure adopted here are expected to be useful in fitting the data for other countries and in forecasting the progression of the disease.

Journalism ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 915-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eddy Borges-Rey

This article outlines a general epistemological framework of data journalism in the devolved nations of the United Kingdom. By using an original model based on three conceptual lenses – materiality, performativity and reflexivity – this study examines the development of this form of journalism, the challenges it faces and its particularities in the context of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. This research, therefore, offers unique insights from semi-structured interviews with data journalists and data editors based at, or working as freelancers for, the mainstream news organisations of these regions. The results suggest that data journalism in these devolved nations displays a distinctive character just as much as it reinforces the norms and rituals of the legacy organisations that pioneered this practice. While various models of data exploitation are tested, regional data journalists creatively circumvent generalised organisational struggles to lay the groundwork for their trade and professional community.


2018 ◽  
pp. 39-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Józef M. Fiszer

There is no doubt that Brexit is an unprecedented event in the history of European integration and the European Union (EU). It will certainly be a turning point not only in the history of the EU but also in Germany and France. It will affect their place and role in the new international order that is currently being shaped. Today, however, it is very difficult to present an accurate diagnosis, and even more difficult to predict the future of the EU, Europe and the whole world after Brexit. Currently, the opinions of researchers and experts on this subject are divided. Many fear that Brexit will be the beginning of the end of the EU and that it will lead to so-called diversified integration and then to its disintegration. Others believe that Brexit, nolens volens, may accelerate the EU’s modernisation process. This will require the adoption of a new revision treaty. This treaty will be developed under the dictation of Germany and France, which are the most influential countries in the EU.The purpose of this article is to answer a few questions, particularly what role  Germany and France can and will play in the EU after Brexit. Will these countries  again become the driving force in the process of European integration and the EU’s modernisation, or will they remain passive and contribute to the break-up of the EU? Moreover, the author intends to show the opportunities and threats for the EU  without the United Kingdom, which counterbalanced the influence of Germany and France in Europe.


1996 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 373-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Mrode ◽  
G. J. T. Swanson ◽  
M. S. Winters

AbstractCountries, which import a significant amount of semen, embryos and animals, are faced with the problem of how properly to evaluate the animals in the national evaluation system when information on the foreign parents is generally missing. Additional problems arise when the foreign parents obtain an evaluation, usually on the basis of progeny, in the country of import with the result that there are two published evaluations for the animals in question. This paper presents a post-iterative method of incorporating foreign information into home country evaluations. The foreign information is initially converted to the same scale and base as in the home country using procedures recommended by the International Bull Evaluation Service. The method consists essentially of calculating a combined evaluation for animals with home and foreign information as a weighted average of yield deviations, parent averages and progeny contributions from the foreign and home countries. The combined evaluations are used to adjust the evaluations of progeny on the basis of formulae derived from the usual mixed model equations. The same principles were used to combine reliabilities from the respective home and foreign reliabilities. The results from the application of the method to the United Kingdom (UK) Holstein Friesian population are presented. There was re-ranking of both bulls and cows, especially foreign bulls with few UK daughters.


Author(s):  
Natasha Rustemeyer ◽  
Mark Howells

There is increasing evidence that rising temperatures and heatwaves in the United Kingdom are associated with an increase in heat-related mortality. This study aims to retrospectively quantify the impact of heatwaves on mortality during the 2019 summer period using daily death occurrences. Second, it compares excess mortality during the 2019 heatwaves to excess mortality during the 2018 and 2017 heatwave periods. Lastly, it compares the excess mortality in the 2017-2019 heatwaves to the estimated excess deaths for the same period in the Public Health England (PHE) Heatwave mortality monitoring Reports. The cumulative number of excess deaths during the summer 2019 heatwaves were minimal and were substantially lower than during the summer 2018 heatwaves (1,700 deaths) and summer 2017 heatwaves (1,489 deaths). All findings were at variance with the PHE Heatwave mortality monitoring reports which estimated cumulative excess deaths to be 892, 863 and 778 during the summer period of 2019, 2018 and 2017 respectively using provisional death registrations. Issues have been identified in the use of provisional death registrations for mortality monitoring and the reduced reliability of the ONS daily death occurrence database before 2019. These findings may identify more reliable ways to monitor heat mortality during heatwaves in the future.


Author(s):  
Frédéric Neyrat

“This evening, the city of Copenhagen is a crime scene, with those responsible fleeing for the airport.” It was in this manner that John Sauven, the executive director of Greenpeace for the United Kingdom, expressed himself following the Copenhagen summit on climate change.1 A crime? What sort of crime? What exactly happened during this summit? More than likely, no kind of event that would be capable of immediately changing the history of the world. But nevertheless, there was a noticeable turning point in relation to how societies were discussing the management of climate change; there was a revelatory moment in regard to what we have taken to calling the ...


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (s1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marwan Al-Raeei ◽  
Moustafa Sayem El-Daher ◽  
Oliya Solieva

Abstract Objectives: Compartmental models are helpful tools to simulate and predict the spread of infectious diseases. In this work we use the SEIR model to discuss the spreading of COVID-19 pandemic for countries with the most confirmed cases up to the end of 2020, i.e. the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, Brazil, and India. The simulation considers the susceptible, exposed, infective, and the recovered cases of the disease. Method: We employ the order Runge–Kutta method to solve the SIER model equations-for modelling and forecasting the spread of the new coronavirus disease. The parameters used in this work are based on the confirmed cases from the real data available for the countries reporting most cases up to December 29, 2020. Results: We extracted the coefficients of the exposed, infected, recovered and mortality rate of the SEIR model by fitting the collected real data of the new coronavirus disease up to December 29, 2020 in the countries with the most cases. We predict the dates of the peak of the infection and the basic reproduction number for the countries studied here. We foresee COVID-19 peaks in January-February 2021 in Brazil and the United Kingdom, and in February-March 2021 in France, Russia, and India, and in March-April 2021 in the United States. Also, we find that the average value of the SARS-CoV-2 basic reproduction number is 2.1460. Conclusion: We find that the predicted peak infection of COVID-19 will happen in the first half of 2021 in the six considered countries. The basic SARS-CoV-19 reproduction number values range within 1.0158–3.6642 without vaccination.


Author(s):  
Timo Van Havere

In recent years archivists and historians have been pondering the importance of '1800' inthe history of archives and historiography: did the turn of that century mark the start of'modern' archival organisation, focused on historical research? Even though the accessibilityof Belgian archives was unsurpassed in nineteenth-century Europe, the archival historyof that country has been neglected thus far. By looking at the National Archives inBrussels and the city archives of Ghent, new light can be shed on the Belgian archivallandscape around 1800. As it turns out, 1814 was an important turning point. The politicalchange ftom the French Empire to the United Kingdom of the Netherlands was used bysome historians to secure an appointment as archivist. At the same time, the new nationalgovernment actively remodelled archives into historiographical institutions.


Significance Trump first snubbed the EU on April 30 with a mere postponement of possible tariffs and then humiliated the E3 (Germany, France and the United Kingdom) on May 8 with his decision to withdraw from the Iranian nuclear deal. This sends a highly symbolic message from the US president to his European allies: buckle or face penalties. Impacts Trump’s decisions reinforce a growing realisation in the EU that he will interpret their search for compromise as weakness. The EU faces a difficult road ahead with multiple pressures increasing, both within and outside the bloc. The growing divide between the EU and the United States will please Russia.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Alvarez

AbstractWe use an exponential growth model to analyze the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea, Italy, Spain, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the USA and the New-York state. This model uses the number of officially reported patients tested positive and deaths to estimate an infected hindcast of the cumulative number of patients who later tested positive or who later die. For each region, an epidemic timeline is established, obtaining a precise knowledge of the chronology of the main epidemiological events during the full course of the first wave. It includes, in particular, the time that the virus has been in free circulation before the impact of the social distancing measures were observable. The results of the study suggest that among the analyzed regions, only South Korea and Germany possessed, at the beginning of the epidemic, a testing capacity that allowed to correctly follow the evolution of the epidemic. Anticipation in taking measures in these two countries caused the virus to spend less time in free circulation than in the rest of the regions. The analysis of the growth rates in the different regions suggests that the exponential growth rate of the cumulative number of infected, when the virus is in free circulation, is around 0.250737. In addition, we also study the ability of the model to properly forecast the epidemic spread at the beginning of the epidemic outbreak when very little data and information about the coronavirus were available. In the case of France, we obtain a reasonable estimate of the peak of the new cases of patients tested positive 9 days in advance and only 7 days after the implementation of a strict lockdown.


Author(s):  
Zhihua Liu ◽  
Pierre Magal ◽  
Glenn Webb

1SummaryBackgroundThe novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is currently causing concern in the medical, epidemiological and mathematical communities as the virus is rapidly spreading around the world. Internationally, there are more than 1 200 000 cases detected and confirmed in the world on April 6. The asymptomatic and mild symptomatic cases are just going to be really crucial for us to understand what is driving this epidemic to transmit rapidly. Combining a mathematical model of severe (SARS-CoV-transmission with data from China, South Korea, Italy, France, Germany and United Kingdom, we provide the epidemic predictions of the number of reported and unreported cases for the SARS-CoV-2 epidemics and evaluate the effectiveness of control measures for each country.MethodsWe combined a mathematical model with data on cumulative confirmed cases from China, South Korea, Italy, France, Germany and United Kingdom to provide the epidemic predictions and evaluate the effectiveness of control measures. We divide infectious individuals into asymptomatic and symptomatic infectious individuals. The symptomatic infectious phase is also divided into reported (severe symptoms) and unreported (mild symptoms) cases. In fact, there exists a period for the cumulative number of reported cases to grow (approximately) exponentially in the early phase of virus transmission which is around the implementation of the national prevention and control measures. We firstly combine the date of the implementation of the measures with the daily and cumulative data of the reported confirmed cases to find the most consistent period for the cumulative number of reported cases to grow − approximately exponentially with the formula χ1 exp(χ2t) χ3, thus we can determine the parameters χ1, χ2, χ3 in this formula and then determine the parameters and initial conditions for our model by using this formula and the plausible biological parameters for SARS-CoV-2 based on current evidence.We then provide the epidemic predictions, evaluate the effectiveness of control measures by simulations of our model.FindingsBased on the simulations using multiple groups of parameters (d1, d2, N), here [d1, d2] is the consistent period for the cumulative number of reported cases to grow approximately exponentially with the formula χ1 exp(χ2t) χ3 and N is the date at which public intervention measures became effective, we found that the ranges of the turning point, the final size of reported and unreported cases are respectively Feb.6 − 7, 67 000 − 69 000 and 45 000 − 46 000 for China, Feb.29−Mar.1, 9 000 − 9 400and 2 250 − 2 350 for South Korea, Mar.24 − 26, 156 000 − 177 000, and 234 000 − 265 000 for Italy, Mar.30−Apr.9, 104 000 − 212 000, and 177 000 − 318 000 for France, Mar.30−Apr.20, 141 000 − 912 000, and 197 000 − 1 369 000 for Germany, Apr.1−May12, 140 000 − 473 000, and 210 000 − 709 000 for UnitedKingdom. Our prediction relies on the cumulative data of the reported confirmed cases. As more data become available, the ranges become smaller and smaller, that means the prediction becomes better and better. It is evident that our estimates and simulations have shown good correspondence with the distribution of the cumulative data available of the reported confirmed cases for each country and in particularly, the curves plotted by using different parameter groups (d1, d2, N) for reported and unreported cases tend to be consistent in China and South Korea (see (e) in Figures 2-3). For Italy, France, Germany and United Kingdom, the prediction can be updated to higher accuracy with on-going day by day reported case data (see Figures 4-7).InterpretationWe used the plausible biological parameters f, ν, η for SARS-CoV-2 based on current evidence which might be refined as more comprehensive data become available. Our prediction also relies on the cumulative data of the reported confirmed cases. Using multiple groups of parameters (d1, d2, N), we have attempted to make the best possible prediction using the available data. We found that with more cumulative data available, the curves plotted by using different parameter groups (d1, d2, N) for reported and unreported cases will be closer and closer, and finally tend to be consistent. This shows that when we have no enough cumulative data available, we need to use all possible parameter groups to predict the range of turning point, the final size of reported and unreported cases. When we have enough cumulative data, for example, when we get the data after the turning point, we only need to use any one of these parameter groups to get a prediction with high accuracy.FundingNSFC (Grant No. 11871007), NSFC and CNRS (Grant No. 11811530272) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document