scholarly journals A comprehensive manually-curated Compendium of Bovine Transcription Factors

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcela M de Souza ◽  
Juan M Vaquerizas ◽  
Adhemar Zerlotini ◽  
Ludwig Geistlinger ◽  
Benjamín Hernández-Rodríguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Proteins ◽  
Regulatory Mechanisms ◽  
Domain Family ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Control Gene Expression ◽  
Specific Manner

ABSTRACTTranscription factors (TFs) are pivotal regulatory proteins that control gene expression in a context-dependent and tissue-specific manner. In contrast to human, where comprehensive curated TF collections exist, bovine TFs are only rudimentary recorded and characterized. In this article, we present a manually-curated compendium of 865 sequence-specific DNA-binding bovines TFs, which we analyzed for domain family distribution, evolutionary conservation, and tissue-specific expression. In addition, we provide a list of putative transcription cofactors derived from known interactions with the identified TFs. Since there is a general lack of knowledge concerning the regulation of gene expression in cattle, the curated list of TF should provide a basis for an improved comprehension of regulatory mechanisms that are specific to the species.

scholarly journals HOX paralogs selectively convert binding of ubiquitous transcription factors into tissue-specific patterns of enhancer activation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laure Bridoux ◽  
Peyman Zarrineh ◽  
Joshua Mallen ◽  
Mike Phuycharoen ◽  
Victor Latorre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Specific Binding ◽  
Body Parts ◽  
Similar Sequence ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Sequence Recognition ◽  
Control Gene Expression

SummaryGene expression programs determine cell fate in embryonic development and their dysregulation results in disease. Transcription factors (TFs) control gene expression by binding to enhancers, but how TFs select and activate their target enhancers is still unclear. HOX TFs share conserved homeodomains with highly similar sequence recognition properties, yet they impart the identity of different animal body parts. To understand how HOX TFs control their specific transcriptional programs in vivo, we compared HOXA2 and HOXA3 binding profiles in the mouse embryo. HOXA2 and HOXA3 directly cooperate with TALE TFs and selectively target different subsets of a broad TALE chromatin platform. Binding of HOX and tissue-specific TFs convert low affinity TALE binding into high confidence, tissue-specific binding events, which bear the mark of active enhancers. We propose that HOX paralogs, alone and in combination with tissue-specific TFs, generate tissue-specific transcriptional outputs by modulating the activity of TALE TFs at selected enhancers.

scholarly journals HOX paralogs selectively convert binding of ubiquitous transcription factors into tissue-specific patterns of enhancer activation

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. e1009162
Author(s):  
Laure Bridoux ◽  
Peyman Zarrineh ◽  
Joshua Mallen ◽  
Mike Phuycharoen ◽  
Victor Latorre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Specific Binding ◽  
Body Parts ◽  
Similar Sequence ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Sequence Recognition ◽  
Control Gene Expression

Gene expression programs determine cell fate in embryonic development and their dysregulation results in disease. Transcription factors (TFs) control gene expression by binding to enhancers, but how TFs select and activate their target enhancers is still unclear. HOX TFs share conserved homeodomains with highly similar sequence recognition properties, yet they impart the identity of different animal body parts. To understand how HOX TFs control their specific transcriptional programs in vivo, we compared HOXA2 and HOXA3 binding profiles in the mouse embryo. HOXA2 and HOXA3 directly cooperate with TALE TFs and selectively target different subsets of a broad TALE chromatin platform. Binding of HOX and tissue-specific TFs convert low affinity TALE binding into high confidence, tissue-specific binding events, which bear the mark of active enhancers. We propose that HOX paralogs, alone and in combination with tissue-specific TFs, generate tissue-specific transcriptional outputs by modulating the activity of TALE TFs at selected enhancers.

scholarly journals Turning on Myogenin in Muscle: A Paradigm for Understanding Mechanisms of Tissue-Specific Gene Expression

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herve Faralli ◽  
F. Jeffrey Dilworth
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Developmental Regulation ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Spatial Regulation ◽  
Dna Elements ◽  
Temporal And Spatial ◽  
Expression Program

Expression of themyogenin(Myog) gene is restricted to skeletal muscle cells where the transcriptional activator turns on a gene expression program that permits the transition from proliferating myoblasts to differentiating myotubes. The strict temporal and spatial regulation onMyogexpression in the embryo makes it an ideal gene to study the developmental regulation of tissue-specific expression. Over the last 20 years, our knowledge of the regulation ofMyogexpression has evolved from the identification of the minimal promoter elements necessary for the gene to be transcribed in muscle, to a mechanistic understanding of how the proteins that bind these DNA elements work together to establish transcriptional competence. Here we present our current understanding of the developmental regulation of gene expression gained from studies of theMyoggene.

scholarly journals Transcription Factors as the “Blitzkrieg” of Plant Defense: A Pragmatic View of Nitric Oxide’s Role in Gene Regulation

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 522
Author(s):  
Noreen Falak ◽  
Qari Muhammad Imran ◽  
Adil Hussain ◽  
Byung-Wook Yun
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Plant Defense ◽  
Systemic Acquired Resistance ◽  
Defense Mechanism ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Biological Processes ◽  
Genetic Components ◽  
Transcriptional Changes

Plants are in continuous conflict with the environmental constraints and their sessile nature demands a fine-tuned, well-designed defense mechanism that can cope with a multitude of biotic and abiotic assaults. Therefore, plants have developed innate immunity, R-gene-mediated resistance, and systemic acquired resistance to ensure their survival. Transcription factors (TFs) are among the most important genetic components for the regulation of gene expression and several other biological processes. They bind to specific sequences in the DNA called transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) that are present in the regulatory regions of genes. Depending on the environmental conditions, TFs can either enhance or suppress transcriptional processes. In the last couple of decades, nitric oxide (NO) emerged as a crucial molecule for signaling and regulating biological processes. Here, we have overviewed the plant defense system, the role of TFs in mediating the defense response, and that how NO can manipulate transcriptional changes including direct post-translational modifications of TFs. We also propose that NO might regulate gene expression by regulating the recruitment of RNA polymerase during transcription.

scholarly journals Interplay between cofactors and transcription factors in hematopoiesis and hematological malignancies

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zi Wang ◽  
Pan Wang ◽  
Yanan Li ◽  
Hongling Peng ◽  
Yu Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Hematologic Disorders ◽  
Cell Lineages ◽  
Stage Of Development ◽  
Transcription Complexes ◽  
Insight Into

AbstractHematopoiesis requires finely tuned regulation of gene expression at each stage of development. The regulation of gene transcription involves not only individual transcription factors (TFs) but also transcription complexes (TCs) composed of transcription factor(s) and multisubunit cofactors. In their normal compositions, TCs orchestrate lineage-specific patterns of gene expression and ensure the production of the correct proportions of individual cell lineages during hematopoiesis. The integration of posttranslational and conformational modifications in the chromatin landscape, nucleosomes, histones and interacting components via the cofactor–TF interplay is critical to optimal TF activity. Mutations or translocations of cofactor genes are expected to alter cofactor–TF interactions, which may be causative for the pathogenesis of various hematologic disorders. Blocking TF oncogenic activity in hematologic disorders through targeting cofactors in aberrant complexes has been an exciting therapeutic strategy. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge regarding the models and functions of cofactor–TF interplay in physiological hematopoiesis and highlight their implications in the etiology of hematological malignancies. This review presents a deep insight into the physiological and pathological implications of transcription machinery in the blood system.

scholarly journals Methylation of the Cyclin A1 Promoter Correlates with Gene Silencing in Somatic Cell Lines, while Tissue-Specific Expression of Cyclin A1 Is Methylation Independent

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 3316-3329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carsten Müller ◽  
Carol Readhead ◽  
Sven Diederichs ◽  
Gregory Idos ◽  
Rong Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Cpg Island ◽  
Trichostatin A ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cyclin A1 ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Tissue Specific Expression

ABSTRACT Gene expression in mammalian organisms is regulated at multiple levels, including DNA accessibility for transcription factors and chromatin structure. Methylation of CpG dinucleotides is thought to be involved in imprinting and in the pathogenesis of cancer. However, the relevance of methylation for directing tissue-specific gene expression is highly controversial. The cyclin A1 gene is expressed in very few tissues, with high levels restricted to spermatogenesis and leukemic blasts. Here, we show that methylation of the CpG island of the human cyclin A1 promoter was correlated with nonexpression in cell lines, and the methyl-CpG binding protein MeCP2 suppressed transcription from the methylated cyclin A1 promoter. Repression could be relieved by trichostatin A. Silencing of a cyclin A1 promoter-enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) transgene in stable transfected MG63 osteosarcoma cells was also closely associated with de novo promoter methylation. Cyclin A1 could be strongly induced in nonexpressing cell lines by trichostatin A but not by 5-aza-cytidine. The cyclin A1 promoter-EGFP construct directed tissue-specific expression in male germ cells of transgenic mice. Expression in the testes of these mice was independent of promoter methylation, and even strong promoter methylation did not suppress promoter activity. MeCP2 expression was notably absent in EGFP-expressing cells. Transcription from the transgenic cyclin A1 promoter was repressed in most organs outside the testis, even when the promoter was not methylated. These data show the association of methylation with silencing of the cyclin A1 gene in cancer cell lines. However, appropriate tissue-specific repression of the cyclin A1 promoter occurs independently of CpG methylation.

Human globin gene promoter sequences are sufficient for specific expression of a hybrid gene transfected into tissue culture cells

1987 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 398-402
Author(s):  
T Rutherford ◽  
A W Nienhuis
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Globin Gene ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Globin Genes ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Promoter Sequences ◽  
Erythroleukemia Cells ◽  
Murine Erythroleukemia

The contribution of the human globin gene promoters to tissue-specific transcription was studied by using globin promoters to transcribe the neo (G418 resistance) gene. After transfection into different cell types, neo gene expression was assayed by scoring colony formation in the presence of G418. In K562 human erythroleukemia cells, which express fetal and embryonic globin genes but not the adult beta-globin gene, the neo gene was expressed strongly from a fetal gamma- or embryonic zeta-globin gene promoter but only weakly from the beta promoter. In murine erythroleukemia cells which express the endogenous mouse beta genes, the neo gene was strongly expressed from both beta and gamma promoters. In two nonerythroid cell lines, human HeLa cells and mouse 3T3 fibroblasts, the globin gene promoters did not allow neo gene expression. Globin-neo genes were integrated in the erythroleukemia cell genomes mostly as a single copy per cell and were transcribed from the appropriate globin gene cap site. We conclude that globin gene promoter sequences extending from -373 to +48 base pairs (bp) (relative to the cap site) for the beta gene, -385 to +34 bp for the gamma gene, and -555 to +38 bp for the zeta gene are sufficient for tissue-specific and perhaps developmentally specific transcription.

Calcitonin/calcitonin gene-related peptide transcription unit: tissue-specific expression involves selective use of alternative polyadenylation sites

1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (10) ◽  
pp. 2151-2160
Author(s):  
S G Amara ◽  
R M Evans ◽  
M G Rosenfeld
Keyword(s):  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Alternative Polyadenylation ◽  
Calcitonin Gene Related Peptide ◽  
Transcription Unit ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Related Peptide ◽  
Calcitonin Gene ◽  
Polyadenylation Sites ◽  
Specific Regulation

Different 3' coding exons in the rat calcitonin gene are used to generate distinct mRNAs encoding either the hormone calcitonin in thyroidal C-cells or a new neuropeptide referred to as calcitonin gene-related peptide in neuronal tissue, indicating the RNA processing regulation is one strategy used in tissue-specific regulation of gene expression in the brain. Although the two mRNAs use the same transcriptional initiation site and have identical 5' terminal sequences, their 3' termini are distinct. The polyadenylation sites for calcitonin and calcitonin gene-related peptide mRNAs are located at the end of the exons 4 and 6, respectively. Termination of transcription after the calcitonin exon does not dictate the production of calcitonin mRNA, because transcription proceeds through both calcitonin and calcitonin gene-related peptide exons irrespective of which mRNA is ultimately produced. In isolated nuclei, both polyadenylation sites appear to be utilized; however, the proximal (calcitonin) site is preferentially used in nuclei from tissues producing calcitonin mRNA. These data suggest that the mechanism dictating production of each mRNA involves the selective use of alternative polyadenylation sites.

scholarly journals Minireview: Transcriptional Regulation in Development of Bone

Endocrinology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 146 (3) ◽  
pp. 1012-1017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Kobayashi ◽  
Henry Kronenberg
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcriptional Regulation ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Bone Cells ◽  
Genetic Manipulation ◽  
Bone Development ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Bone Cell ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Multiple Differentiation

Regulation of gene expression by transcription factors is one of the major mechanisms for controlling cellular functions. Recent advances in genetic manipulation of model animals has allowed the study of the roles of various genes and their products in physiological settings and has demonstrated the importance of specific transcription factors in bone development. Three lineages of bone cells, chondrocytes, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts, develop and differentiate according to their distinct developmental programs. These cells go through multiple differentiation stages, which are often regulated by specific transcription factors. In this minireview, we will discuss selected transcription factors that have been demonstrated to critically affect bone cell development. Further study of these molecules will lead to deeper understanding in mechanisms that govern development of bone.

scholarly journals Genetic influences on cell type specific gene expression and splicing during neurogenesis elucidate regulatory mechanisms of brain traits

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nil Aygün ◽  
Angela L. Elwell ◽  
Dan Liang ◽  
Michael J. Lafferty ◽  
Kerry E. Cheek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Regulatory Mechanisms ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Risk Variants ◽  
Allele Specific ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Regulatory Effects

SummaryInterpretation of the function of non-coding risk loci for neuropsychiatric disorders and brain-relevant traits via gene expression and alternative splicing is mainly performed in bulk post-mortem adult tissue. However, genetic risk loci are enriched in regulatory elements of cells present during neocortical differentiation, and regulatory effects of risk variants may be masked by heterogeneity in bulk tissue. Here, we map e/sQTLs and allele specific expression in primary human neural progenitors (n=85) and their sorted neuronal progeny (n=74). Using colocalization and TWAS, we uncover cell-type specific regulatory mechanisms underlying risk for these traits.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document